Re: Asp.Net Core
Oops spoke too soon. Thanks On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 1:00 PM, DotNet Dude <adotnetd...@gmail.com> wrote: > You must be using the 'empty' template > > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Tom Rutter <therut...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hey folks, >> >> I assume some of you have at least played with asp.net core. Is it just >> me or has Microsoft taken this "let's separate everything and let the dev >> get whatever they as they need it" too far? Even serving static files isn't >> baked in by default. C'mon! The VS web project templates should at least >> have this on by default. >> >> Regards >> Tom the new plumber >> > >
Re: Asp.Net Core
You must be using the 'empty' template On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Tom Rutter <therut...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey folks, > > I assume some of you have at least played with asp.net core. Is it just > me or has Microsoft taken this "let's separate everything and let the dev > get whatever they as they need it" too far? Even serving static files isn't > baked in by default. C'mon! The VS web project templates should at least > have this on by default. > > Regards > Tom the new plumber >
Asp.Net Core
Hey folks, I assume some of you have at least played with asp.net core. Is it just me or has Microsoft taken this "let's separate everything and let the dev get whatever they as they need it" too far? Even serving static files isn't baked in by default. C'mon! The VS web project templates should at least have this on by default. Regards Tom the new plumber
