RE: Spell Checker
I recall having this issue very early on in my exposure to SP. Don't think we got to the bottom of it so I'm all ears too. From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Noone Sent: Friday, 14 May 2010 10:33 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: Spell Checker Can anyone tell me why the Spell Checker is unavailable on the Agenda list in workspace sites? And how I might add it? Kind regards, Paul Noone --- Online Developer Information Communication and Technology Catholic Education Office, Sydney p: (02) 9568 8461 f: (02) 9568 8483 e: paul.no...@ceosyd.catholic.edu.au mailto:paul.no...@ceosyd.catholic.edu.au w: http://www.ceosyd.catholic.edu.au/ http://www.ceosyd.catholic.edu.au/ image001.jpg___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
Maximum number of items in a list
Morning all, We have a list that contains a large number of items (60,000 at present, +3,000/month). I'm looking at assessing a) the risk of letting it continue (actual maximum limit?) and b) improving performance as it's become a bit sluggish. I know the maximum supported number of items in any one list/container is 2,000. We really didn't see much of a performance hit until maybe 20-30,000 items. The list itself contains a couple of standard column lookups, a custom field (custom query-based lookup), and some simple workflows fired on create. The performance of the main view users use is sufficient, with a filtered view to display only recent data. However exporting all data to Excel (they use pivot tables and charts) takes ~3m. For anyone who's dealt with large lists, how have you approached this? Has anyone run into any real 'uh oh' surprise dead-end problems with large lists? I'm still researching this, but at the moment considering breaking the list into multiple containers. It'll be a pain for reporting on the information as it'll be disjointed. Users might need to butt the list data together in Excel before reporting.. not ideal. Any pointers? Cheers, Chris ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: Maximum number of items in a list
G'day, yep 2007. Thanks, I'll have a read. J From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Jon Bullen Sent: Monday, 10 May 2010 9:43 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Maximum number of items in a list Hi, SP2007 or 2010? I'll make the wild assumption it is 2007 so this may help guide you: White paper: Working with large lists in Office SharePoint Server 2007 http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc262813.aspx It comes down to limiting the amount of items being returned in the query and how optimised the DB is. Jon Bullen | Senior Consultant | Microsoft Services È +61 4 1048 0197 Canberra, Australia | www.microsoft.com/services http://www.microsoft.com/services MSN IM: jon_bul...@hotmail.com mailto:jon_bul...@hotmail.com From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Chris Milne Sent: Monday, 10 May 2010 9:39 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: Maximum number of items in a list Morning all, We have a list that contains a large number of items (60,000 at present, +3,000/month). I'm looking at assessing a) the risk of letting it continue (actual maximum limit?) and b) improving performance as it's become a bit sluggish. I know the maximum supported number of items in any one list/container is 2,000. We really didn't see much of a performance hit until maybe 20-30,000 items. The list itself contains a couple of standard column lookups, a custom field (custom query-based lookup), and some simple workflows fired on create. The performance of the main view users use is sufficient, with a filtered view to display only recent data. However exporting all data to Excel (they use pivot tables and charts) takes ~3m. For anyone who's dealt with large lists, how have you approached this? Has anyone run into any real 'uh oh' surprise dead-end problems with large lists? I'm still researching this, but at the moment considering breaking the list into multiple containers. It'll be a pain for reporting on the information as it'll be disjointed. Users might need to butt the list data together in Excel before reporting.. not ideal. Any pointers? Cheers, Chris image001.png___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: Maximum number of items in a list
Cheers Paul. Yeah I think if we divide the containers we'll do it by root list rather than sub-folders so it's really clear to the users which section is which (and there's a site basically dedicated to this list so shouldn't be a problem). I envisioned dividing it by item date created but that's a good point.. by dept might be good too. What tool would you use to actually move the items? From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Noone Sent: Monday, 10 May 2010 9:47 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Maximum number of items in a list Unless there's a burning need to have them all in one library why not break them out into several? We're looking at doing the same thing now for similar reasons. Now the only question remaining is how to divide them up - content type, document type or custom criteria - department, team, need etc. I'm even going so far as to suggest dumping folders and creating a new library for each root directory. Oh the pain... From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Jon Bullen Sent: Monday, 10 May 2010 9:43 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Maximum number of items in a list Hi, SP2007 or 2010? I'll make the wild assumption it is 2007 so this may help guide you: White paper: Working with large lists in Office SharePoint Server 2007 http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc262813.aspx It comes down to limiting the amount of items being returned in the query and how optimised the DB is. Jon Bullen | Senior Consultant | Microsoft Services È +61 4 1048 0197 Canberra, Australia | www.microsoft.com/services http://www.microsoft.com/services MSN IM: jon_bul...@hotmail.com mailto:jon_bul...@hotmail.com From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Chris Milne Sent: Monday, 10 May 2010 9:39 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: Maximum number of items in a list Morning all, We have a list that contains a large number of items (60,000 at present, +3,000/month). I'm looking at assessing a) the risk of letting it continue (actual maximum limit?) and b) improving performance as it's become a bit sluggish. I know the maximum supported number of items in any one list/container is 2,000. We really didn't see much of a performance hit until maybe 20-30,000 items. The list itself contains a couple of standard column lookups, a custom field (custom query-based lookup), and some simple workflows fired on create. The performance of the main view users use is sufficient, with a filtered view to display only recent data. However exporting all data to Excel (they use pivot tables and charts) takes ~3m. For anyone who's dealt with large lists, how have you approached this? Has anyone run into any real 'uh oh' surprise dead-end problems with large lists? I'm still researching this, but at the moment considering breaking the list into multiple containers. It'll be a pain for reporting on the information as it'll be disjointed. Users might need to butt the list data together in Excel before reporting.. not ideal. Any pointers? Cheers, Chris image001.png___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: Lookup Column rendering
Hey Daniel, I recall last time I looked at something like this, I found that the default SharePoint rendering for a drop-down with more than 20 items in it is a 'typable-innable' drop-down, and a 'non-typable-innable' drop-down control if it contains less than 20. Or maybe it was the other way around. And maybe it wasn't exactly 20 but close to it J Try inserting over 20 / removing to under 20 items and see if the behaviour changes. In the end we used a custom control to avoid it. HTH, C From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Brown Sent: Wednesday, 21 April 2010 12:23 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: Lookup Column rendering Howdy all, Just a quick one with any luck... I've got a lookup column on a newform.aspx however it allows typing in it, which is messing things up (as you can type anything in it, rather than only what is in the fake drop down list). Is there any way to prohibit free text in this fake DDL and actually make it a real drop down list? Cheers, Daniel ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
Infopath
Hey all, Until this point I've managed to avoid Infopath like a plague because it's never quite clicked with me. I'm now looking at making recommendations for our users and I'm trying to understand the appropriate logical workflow behind saving them to libraries and making good use of them. The scenario is a user from one dept will create and partially complete a form from template and save in the library. Someone else will then come by and complete/update it. By default (if it's configured as a web form) you can submit / save / save as. I only want users 'Submitting' forms back to the library, not on their desktop or anything so I went into 'Open and Save' options and disabled save and save as. Now I only get Submit, Close and Print which is good. I'm then a little puzzled as to why when filling the form out and hitting Submit followed by Close, it prompts me to save it (?). The right choice here is to hit 'no' because it's already submitted it to the library, but the intuitive choice for a user is to hit 'yes'. Ideally I'd like it not to display that prompt at all, because I configured it to display a dialogue on successful submission - Your form has been successfully saved. Anyone know if there's a way to disable this specific save prompt? Another quirk I find here is that by giving users a chance to save it separately here, it allows them to name the file themselves, bypassing the default / correct naming standard configured for form submission. This would introduce the possibility of duplicate forms being recorded if they first hit Submit, then were prompted to save again (everybody loves 'Jan 2 temp.docx', right? ;). Ideally I'd have the form close by itself on successful submission - no need to hit Close. So it seems there is a difference between 'saving' and 'submitting' - what do you guys use? Submit, save, a combination? Advantages either way? Cheers, Chris image001.png___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: Infopath
Perfect, Ali, thanks. I didn't even think to approach it like that! Cheers. From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Usher, Ali Sent: Thursday, 15 April 2010 2:22 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Infopath Hi Chris We don't tend to use the menu bar, we disable it completely and add action buttons to the form to complete these tasks. The menu bar creates too much confusion as you mention, unless users are really used to InfoPath forms. Using a button allows you to complete the entire action with one click. You can make the form submit and close in the one step. Ali Usher | From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Chris Milne Sent: Thursday, 15 April 2010 12:31 To: ozMOSS Subject: Infopath Hey all, Until this point I've managed to avoid Infopath like a plague because it's never quite clicked with me. I'm now looking at making recommendations for our users and I'm trying to understand the appropriate logical workflow behind saving them to libraries and making good use of them. The scenario is a user from one dept will create and partially complete a form from template and save in the library. Someone else will then come by and complete/update it. By default (if it's configured as a web form) you can submit / save / save as. I only want users 'Submitting' forms back to the library, not on their desktop or anything so I went into 'Open and Save' options and disabled save and save as. Now I only get Submit, Close and Print which is good. I'm then a little puzzled as to why when filling the form out and hitting Submit followed by Close, it prompts me to save it (?). The right choice here is to hit 'no' because it's already submitted it to the library, but the intuitive choice for a user is to hit 'yes'. Ideally I'd like it not to display that prompt at all, because I configured it to display a dialogue on successful submission - Your form has been successfully saved. Anyone know if there's a way to disable this specific save prompt? Another quirk I find here is that by giving users a chance to save it separately here, it allows them to name the file themselves, bypassing the default / correct naming standard configured for form submission. This would introduce the possibility of duplicate forms being recorded if they first hit Submit, then were prompted to save again (everybody loves 'Jan 2 temp.docx', right? ;). Ideally I'd have the form close by itself on successful submission - no need to hit Close. So it seems there is a difference between 'saving' and 'submitting' - what do you guys use? Submit, save, a combination? Advantages either way? Cheers, Chris Click here https://www.mailcontrol.com/sr/pieCv32h11HTndxI!oX7Uu4ItyQZZf3fJIeBZej+ dOJa9TgC6cMn6hDPrkd8oxmHnb0zQOikQPINL52V0szYFQ== to report this email as spam. This email (which includes all attachments and linked documents) is intended for and is confidential to the addressee; it may also be subject to legal professional privilege or otherwise protected from disclosure. If the addressee is a government agency in receipt of a Right to Information Act (2009) application in relation to this email, contact must be made with QR Network Pty Ltd ABN 78 132 181 116 in accordance with the third party consultation process provided for in Part 3, Division 3, Section 37 of that legislation. If you are not the addressee, or if you have received this email in error, you must not use, rely upon, disclose or reproduce it (or any part of it) in any way. Please notify the sender of your receipt of it and delete it in its entirety. Neither QR Network Pty Ltd ABN 78 132 181 116 (or any of its related entities) accepts any liability for computer viruses, data corruption, delay, interference, interception, unauthorised access or amendment of this email. The views expressed in this email, unless clearly stated otherwise, are the views of the sender. They do not necessarily represent the view or policy of QR Network Pty Ltd ABN 78 132 181 116 or any of its related entities. image001.png___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: Infopath
Thanks all, great info. From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Sezai Komur Sent: Thursday, 15 April 2010 3:23 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: Re: Infopath Have a read of this: http://claytoncobb.wordpress.com/2009/06/20/auto-generating-filenames-fo r-infopath-forms/ It contains steps on configuring the toolbar, generating a unique filename and implementing a submit button. On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Paul Turner paul.tur...@dws.com.au wrote: Yep, and you can disable the button afterwards too or switch to a view without buttons to stop it being submitted again. Paul T From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Nigel Hertz Sent: Thursday, 15 April 2010 2:30 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Infopath That's the approach we go for as well - menu bar is disabled, and we put buttons with rules etc in to do all actions. From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Usher, Ali Sent: Thursday, 15 April 2010 2:22 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Infopath Hi Chris We don't tend to use the menu bar, we disable it completely and add action buttons to the form to complete these tasks. The menu bar creates too much confusion as you mention, unless users are really used to InfoPath forms. Using a button allows you to complete the entire action with one click. You can make the form submit and close in the one step. Ali Usher | From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Chris Milne Sent: Thursday, 15 April 2010 12:31 To: ozMOSS Subject: Infopath Hey all, Until this point I've managed to avoid Infopath like a plague because it's never quite clicked with me. I'm now looking at making recommendations for our users and I'm trying to understand the appropriate logical workflow behind saving them to libraries and making good use of them. The scenario is a user from one dept will create and partially complete a form from template and save in the library. Someone else will then come by and complete/update it. By default (if it's configured as a web form) you can submit / save / save as. I only want users 'Submitting' forms back to the library, not on their desktop or anything so I went into 'Open and Save' options and disabled save and save as. Now I only get Submit, Close and Print which is good. I'm then a little puzzled as to why when filling the form out and hitting Submit followed by Close, it prompts me to save it (?). The right choice here is to hit 'no' because it's already submitted it to the library, but the intuitive choice for a user is to hit 'yes'. Ideally I'd like it not to display that prompt at all, because I configured it to display a dialogue on successful submission - Your form has been successfully saved. Anyone know if there's a way to disable this specific save prompt? Another quirk I find here is that by giving users a chance to save it separately here, it allows them to name the file themselves, bypassing the default / correct naming standard configured for form submission. This would introduce the possibility of duplicate forms being recorded if they first hit Submit, then were prompted to save again (everybody loves 'Jan 2 temp.docx', right? ;). Ideally I'd have the form close by itself on successful submission - no need to hit Close. So it seems there is a difference between 'saving' and 'submitting' - what do you guys use? Submit, save, a combination? Advantages either way? Cheers, Chris Click here https://www.mailcontrol.com/sr/pieCv32h11HTndxI!oX7Uu4ItyQZZf3fJIeBZej+ dOJa9TgC6cMn6hDPrkd8oxmHnb0zQOikQPINL52V0szYFQ== to report this email as spam. This email (which includes all attachments and linked documents) is intended for and is confidential to the addressee; it may also be subject to legal professional privilege or otherwise protected from disclosure. If the addressee is a government agency in receipt of a Right to Information Act (2009) application in relation to this email, contact must be made with QR Network Pty Ltd ABN 78 132 181 116 in accordance with the third party consultation process provided for in Part 3, Division 3, Section 37 of that legislation. If you are not the addressee, or if you have received this email in error, you must not use, rely upon, disclose or reproduce it (or any part of it) in any way. Please notify the sender of your receipt of it and delete it in its entirety. Neither QR Network Pty Ltd ABN 78 132 181 116 (or any of its related entities) accepts any liability for computer viruses, data corruption, delay, interference, interception, unauthorised access or amendment of this email. The views expressed in this email, unless clearly stated otherwise, are the views of the sender. They do not necessarily represent the view or policy of QR Network Pty Ltd
70-541 course
Hey all, I'm looking at starting study for the 70-541 WSS Application development exam shortly.. anyone done it? Any comments? Difficulty, worthwhile etc? Anyone done/recommend any other SP development courses? Cheers, Chris ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: 70-541 course
Thanks guys J From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Adam Clark Sent: Tuesday, 23 March 2010 2:56 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: 70-541 course Chris, I would like to backup what Sezai is saying, with the release of the new 2010 product stack (and not just SharePoint applications), there is a whole lot of new certifications and information being released that will be the way to go for certifications. If you really feel that your organisation is going to hold a 2007 cert in high regards for the next 18-24 months, then, if I was in your shoes I 'may' consider it, but more than likely I would still lean towards getting the new 2010 certs. Hope this helps. Regards, Adam Clark Principal Solutions Architect Mobile: +61 412 344 037 Email:adam.cl...@sharingminds.com.au mailto:adam.cl...@sharingminds.com.au Web: http://www.sharingminds.com.au http://www.sharingminds.com.au/ Blog: http://adamclark.wordpress.com http://adamclark.wordpress.com/ From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Sezai Komur Sent: Tuesday, 23 March 2010 2:33 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: Re: 70-541 course I would wait for the new 2010 exams to be released and do those instead. http://www.sharepointcomic.com/archive/2010/01/08/sharepoint-2010-certif ication-and-sharepoint-2007-certification.aspx Sezai. On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Chris Milne chris.mi...@dataaspects.com.au wrote: Hey all, I'm looking at starting study for the 70-541 WSS Application development exam shortly.. anyone done it? Any comments? Difficulty, worthwhile etc? Anyone done/recommend any other SP development courses? Cheers, Chris ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss image001.gif___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: Best way to query multiple calendars
If you're on using Outlook 2007 have you considered connecting each of the calendars to Outlook and have them display together in calendar overlay mode? Very simple but potentially effective, if clunky and a PITA J If you have any development knowledge, that's the way I'd tackle this; create web part with configurable attached calendars that it will search. In the web part, CAML query the lists, do your date comparisons there and return the links in the web part. C From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Ken Thompson Sent: Tuesday, 16 February 2010 7:36 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Best way to query multiple calendars Hi Paul, Currently I am not rolling them up, I am using Kwizcom's Calendar Plus mini calendars to display booking calendars for all the department cars in one page. So say for finance, they have their own document centre site for their cars (a sub site of cars) in which each car has a calendar. Then on the entry page for that site are mini calendars for every car, so a user can scroll down the page to find a car that is available that day quickly (without going to each calendar separately). I figured rolling up calendars would work to well for a user being able to just quickly see what car was availablewould I be wrong? I'm finding that having multiple mini calendars on a page can really slow its loading time, especially if a user has an older PC. So the main purpose of creating a query tool, was to more readily display to a user which cars are available on a specified time / date range. That being said; I'm open to alternative solutions that might also solve my problem J Cheers, Ken Thompson IT Support - Systems Administrator HomeGround Services 68 Oxford Street, Collingwood, VIC 3066 Tel: 03 9288 9668 (Ex 668) Mob: 0404 852 325 Fax: 03 9419 1876 www.homeground.org.au http://www.homeground.org.au From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Noone Sent: Tuesday, 16 February 2010 8:11 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Best way to query multiple calendars Hi Ken, Nope. My CAML query builder just imploded from the sheer effort of that. J What are you using to rollup all the calendars into a single view? A Bamboo Solutions wp? Regards, Paul Online Developer, ICT CEO Sydney From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Ken Thompson Sent: Monday, 15 February 2010 3:48 PM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: Best way to query multiple calendars Hi All, I've got a pretty basic booking system setup for company cars, rooms etc. Basically I have a calendar for each item. What I would like to do is have a page where a user can enter a time/date range and hit search and it will return links to every calendar which is NOT booked within that time range. Just wondering what all you guru's recommend I use to achieve this? Cheers, Ken Thompson IT Support - Systems Administrator HomeGround Services 68 Oxford Street, Collingwood, VIC 3066 Tel: 03 9288 9668 (Ex 668) Mob: 0404 852 325 Fax: 03 9419 1876 www.homeground.org.au http://www.homeground.org.au ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: Cannot modify shared webpart
What kind of web part is it? You can modify the web.config file for the web app to get more info out of it by following this post: http://vspug.com/michael/2007/06/28/sharepoint-under-the-hood-see-real-e rror-description-and-callstack-stack-trace/ This will tell you a bit more, however I wouldn't do it on a production box. Can you reproduce the issue in a test environment? C -Original Message- From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of etmi...@akapost.com Sent: Tuesday, 16 February 2010 10:10 AM To: 'ozMOSS' Subject: Cannot modify shared webpart Hi everyone, I am newbie to SharePoint, so please bare with my question :-) We have deploy a webpart used in 2 different sites, but in site B we cannot modify the shared webpart to see the properties, etc. We see the usual error An unexpected error has occurred., trying to open the page using SharePoint Designer, it complains that the master page is invalid. We have reset the master page but still no luck. Any idea? Or can someone point us where/what we should start looking into? Thanks, etmilis ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: Peeping into CAML Query from CQWP
Hoi hoi, This may do the trick for recursion for you; spQueryObject.ViewAttributes = Scope='Recursive'; As for pulling out the CAML, I recall someone mentioning something like that here a while ago but I don't recall the specifics. C -Original Message- From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of etmi...@akapost.com Sent: Tuesday, 16 February 2010 1:49 PM To: 'ozMOSS' Subject: Peeping into CAML Query from CQWP Hi everyone, Is there a way or ways to peep into or get the CAML query from out of the box content query web part? I have been playing with CAML query and I can see some grey hairs growing immediately :-) The reason I ask is, I am maintaining a web part developed by someone and need to modify/overwrite the caml query. I can get what I want using the OOTB CQWP but I want the actual CAML query. I have tried using U2U CAML query builder but still have no luck since the query needs to be RECURSVIE and I don't think U2U supports it yet. Thanks, etmilis ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: Deadlocks [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
Is the event recurring in your logs? How often? From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Nigel Hertz Sent: Wednesday, 10 February 2010 8:56 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Deadlocks [SEC=UNOFFICIAL] We've been recycling the app pool 3-4 times a day for the past week or so L From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Noja, Fadi Sent: Wednesday, 10 February 2010 9:46 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Deadlocks [SEC=UNOFFICIAL] I had that before and I simply recycled the app pool and it stopped appearing. From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Nigel Hertz Sent: Wednesday, 10 February 2010 9:43 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Deadlocks There's nothing in the logs referring to SQL at all, it seems to purely be an IIS issue. It's a 2003 SP2 server, with .Net 3.0 installed. I'm checking windows update now to see what patches etc are available. From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Turner Sent: Wednesday, 10 February 2010 9:37 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Deadlocks What .net framework level do you have... is it 3.5 SP1? If no... consider running Windows Update. Is it a 2003 Server? Regards, Paul Turner Senior Solutions Specialist M: 0412 748 168 P: 08 8238 0912 F: 08 8234 5966 A: 66 Henley Beach Road, Mile End SA 5031 E: paul.tur...@dws.com.au mailto:paul.tur...@dws.com.au W: www.dws.com.au https://webmail.dws.com.au/owa/UrlBlockedError.aspx Error! Filename not specified. ADVANCED BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LTD This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are only for the use of the person to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this email in error and are requested to delete it immediately. Any opinion expressed in this e-mail may not necessarily be that of DWS Pty Ltd. Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Daniel W. Brown [dan...@danielbrown.id.au] Sent: Wednesday, 10 February 2010 9:06 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Deadlocks I haven't seen that particular one, is there any event log entries which correspond to the approx. time which show SQL server deadlocks? From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Nigel Hertz Sent: Wednesday, 10 February 2010 9:01 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: Deadlocks Hi all Has anyone ever seen this in their event logs? If so, any tips on resolving the issue? ISAPI 'C:\WINNT\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\aspnet_isapi.dll' reported itself as unhealthy for the following reason: 'Deadlock detected'. Nigel Nigel Hertz Software Developer | Information Technology Stockland Level 25 | 133 Castlereagh Street | Sydney NSW 2000 T: 02 9035 2617 | F: 02 8988 2617 Stockland Notice: If this communication has been sent to you by mistake, please delete and notify us. If it has been sent to you by mistake, legal privilege is not waived or lost and you are not entitled to use it in any way. Stockland and its subsidiaries reserve the right to monitor e-mail communication through its networks. Stockland Notice: If this communication has been sent to you by mistake, please delete and notify us. If it has been sent to you by mistake, legal privilege is not waived or lost and you are not entitled to use it in any way. Stockland and its subsidiaries reserve the right to monitor e-mail communication through its networks. Stockland Notice: If this communication has been sent to you by mistake, please delete and notify us. If it has been sent to you by mistake, legal privilege is not waived or lost and you are not entitled to use it in any way. Stockland and its subsidiaries reserve the right to monitor e-mail communication through its networks. ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: Source Control for VS Projects
+1 TFS. As a relatively inexperienced developer, TFS (2008) has been pretty easy to jump into to manage SP projects. Work item tracking and linking to source changes is brilliant TFS or other. But my only experience is with TFS and I'm always happy to work with it. C From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Daniel W. Brown Sent: Tuesday, 19 January 2010 10:33 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Source Control for VS Projects Team Foundation Server is nice, but very big and heavy if it's a small dev team. A great alternative which I've had some success with is SVN. From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Power, Karl Sent: Tuesday, 19 January 2010 10:48 PM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: Source Control for VS Projects Hi folks, I was wondering what tools are being used by some of you guys for managing source code? We were looking at deploying SourceSafe but we have come across some pretty scathing reviews. Any information would be greatly appreciated, Rgds, KP Karl Power Glanbia Business Services Glanbia Plc Tel: +353 (0) 56 883 6016 Email: kpo...@glanbia.ie mailto:kpo...@glanbia.ie __ The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. Any views and opinions expressed are those of the individual author/sender and are not necessarily shared or endorsed by Glanbia plc or any associated or related company. This message has been scanned for all known viruses. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Glanbia plc is registered in Ireland as a public limited company. Registered Office: Glanbia House, Kilkenny. Company Number: 129933 == ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: Source Control for VS Projects
Cool Jeremy. Is the presentation focused toward SP 2007/2010 or neither in particular? C From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Thake Sent: Wednesday, 20 January 2010 11:28 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Source Control for VS Projects +1 to TFS. Also remember that TFS 2010 (RTM in April) will have a Basic Edition which is a lot more affordable than the full TFS 2010 suite. I am presenting on TFS + SharePoint Dev at the ALM conference in Sydney in April, they'll be plenty of content on the SharePointDevWiki.com around this soon. I have used SourceSafe, SVN and TFS and I must say that TFS is the easiest in terms of direct integration with Visual Studio and obviously gives you build server etc. You could do this with TeamCity instead though. You may also get licensing for TFS via your Microsoft agreements in some cases. BTW - great article Darren! From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Chris Milne Sent: Wednesday, 20 January 2010 6:11 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Source Control for VS Projects +1 TFS. As a relatively inexperienced developer, TFS (2008) has been pretty easy to jump into to manage SP projects. Work item tracking and linking to source changes is brilliant TFS or other. But my only experience is with TFS and I'm always happy to work with it. C From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Daniel W. Brown Sent: Tuesday, 19 January 2010 10:33 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Source Control for VS Projects Team Foundation Server is nice, but very big and heavy if it's a small dev team. A great alternative which I've had some success with is SVN. From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Power, Karl Sent: Tuesday, 19 January 2010 10:48 PM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: Source Control for VS Projects Hi folks, I was wondering what tools are being used by some of you guys for managing source code? We were looking at deploying SourceSafe but we have come across some pretty scathing reviews. Any information would be greatly appreciated, Rgds, KP Karl Power Glanbia Business Services Glanbia Plc Tel: +353 (0) 56 883 6016 Email: kpo...@glanbia.ie mailto:kpo...@glanbia.ie __ The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. Any views and opinions expressed are those of the individual author/sender and are not necessarily shared or endorsed by Glanbia plc or any associated or related company. This message has been scanned for all known viruses. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Glanbia plc is registered in Ireland as a public limited company. Registered Office: Glanbia House, Kilkenny. Company Number: 129933 == ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: Custom column to show item permissions
Might be time to leap into the world of development, Paul? :P From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Noone Sent: Thursday, 3 December 2009 9:13 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Custom column to show item permissions Cheers Paul. That's what I figured. :\ From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Turner Sent: Thursday, 3 December 2009 9:49 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Custom column to show item permissions Sure... custom dev :-) A custom field would do it but may need to run elevated as most users (readers) shouldn't have access to view permissions. Regards, Paul Turner Senior Solutions Specialist M: 0412 748 168 P: 08 8238 0912 F: 08 8234 5966 A: 66 Henley Beach Road, Mile End SA 5031 E: paul.tur...@dws.com.au mailto:paul.tur...@dws.com.au W: www.dws.com.au https://webmail.dws.com.au/owa/UrlBlockedError.aspx Error! Filename not specified. ADVANCED BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LTD This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are only for the use of the person to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this email in error and are requested to delete it immediately. Any opinion expressed in this e-mail may not necessarily be that of DWS Pty Ltd. Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Noone [paul.no...@ceosyd.catholic.edu.au] Sent: Thursday, 3 December 2009 9:19 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: Custom column to show item permissions Hi all, Can anyone think of a clever way to show a list item's current permissions in a custom column? Regards, Paul Online Developer, ICT CEO Sydney ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: Public Beta of SP2010
That's great to hear. Web apps that use rich UX components have traditionally heard a groan of impatience from me if they're not LL (new term being coined here?). Very keen to see how cruisy it is to use. From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Sezai Komur Sent: Thursday, 19 November 2009 12:15 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: Re: Public Beta of SP2010 Even though the new UX seems complex and fancy, its actually more lean and lightweight than WSS 3.0 / MOSS 2007, it might not seem that way visually though. They've significantly cleaned up the HTML markup used and have implemented performance enhancements with regards to the use of Javascript, which is minified and split up into multiple JS files that are downloaded as needed. You know you're gonna love it mate :) On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Darren Neimke darren.nei...@live.com wrote: Once you go ribbon - you won't want to go back! We'll see :-) I'm certainly not making judgements ahead of time and I'm going into this open-minded, but I've always viewed web and desktop UX's as completely separate things and now we are really starting to see those lines getting significantly blurred. Maybe it's just something that I am going to have to learn to live with? Or maybe Microsoft could have done it another way? Either way, I'm certainly not saying that this (ultra rich UX) is going to cause SP2010 to fail... but a part of me likes web apps that are specifically tailored for a web experience - which tends to be lean and lightweight. The web applications that I've always loved have been that way (think 37 Signals). Kind Regards, Darren Neimke darren.nei...@live.com Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:12:05 +0800 Subject: Re: Public Beta of SP2010 From: sharepointse...@gmail.com To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com The ribbon takes a little getting used to, once you get your hands on it, your first impressions of the ribbon UI will be hmmm. not sure I'm going to like this, what have they done to SharePoint! That being said, after using it for a while you get familiar to the new interface, you can perform tasks easier with fewer clicks, and don't need to be redirected back an forth through endless application pages. Once you go ribbon - you won't want to go back! Sezai. On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 8:28 AM, Darren Neimke darren.nei...@live.com wrote: I'm looking forward to having a play with 2010 because I'll be keen to see whether it is actually nice (or not) to have such a rich UI as a web application. I'm really looking forward to a lot of what they've included in this release - such as the use of AJAX for partial page rendering - but having a Ribbon and all that other richness in a browser... hrm, let's see. Kind Regards, Darren Neimke darren.nei...@live.com From: dan...@danielbrown.id.au To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 10:52:16 +1030 Subject: RE: Public Beta of SP2010 Just to name some, the new UI is awesome. Welcome to the ribbon with live preview of everything. Hover over the buttons, selected text changes fonts, colour, style, etc. Same with pretty much everything like that. Pretty much every page is now a wiki page which allows for mass easier editing of page content, Far fewer UI freshes with the use of AJAX, only what you're working on updates, rather than the entire page. Been playing with it for awhile now and loving it. From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Chris Milne Sent: Thursday, 19 November 2009 10:48 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Public Beta of SP2010 Cool J I haven't had any exposure to it yet. How does everyone feel about it? Any significant changes to the development/deployment story? Any outstanding features we're looking forward to? Cheers, Chris From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Daniel W. Brown Sent: Thursday, 19 November 2009 8:28 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: Public Beta of SP2010 Importance: High SharePoint 2010 has been beta for a little over 4 hours now J You can find out more info download links @ http://blogs.msdn.com/sharepoint/archive/2009/11/18/sharepoint-2010-publ ic-beta-is-now-available-for-download.aspx WHOOOHOO! Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection. Sign up now. http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/177141665/direct/01/ ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection. Sign up now. http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/177141665/direct/01/ ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: Disassembler tool
Let me know if you find a flight simulator in any OOTB web parts. ;) From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Noone Sent: Wednesday, 18 November 2009 2:34 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Disassembler tool I'm guessing that he might have been provided with a third party solution file and would now like to make modifications to it. Or maybe just looking for Easter eggs? J From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Michael Nemtsev Sent: Wednesday, 18 November 2009 2:56 PM To: 'ozMOSS' Subject: RE: Disassembler tool What exactly you want to reverse?! In SharePoint world you usually reverse-engineering the templates to extract artefacts to build features. For this you usually use VSeWSS, SPSource, SharePointSpy. But I really wonder what are you rebuilding with Reflector, because I pretty sure that's wrong approach for your task. Btw, Reflector doesn't show you exact code, because it uses pattern matching to resolve IL and build C# or whatever code is used. To disassemble the IL code you need ILDASM. From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Ajay Sent: Wednesday, 18 November 2009 2:27 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: Disassembler tool Hi Guys,, Bit off-topic for MOSS people but do you know any good tool to generate source code of a dll. I have tried reflector is not working as expected,, maybe I am missing some config... as project generated by Reflector does not compile. Thanks A ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: MOSS 2007 Search Engine Vulnerability
Hey Christian, I've never heard or seen anything to suggest either way, but I'd be surprised if MS wasn't on top of this, it's a common security threat. Would be very interested to know if it was injectable. You could try your own testing? Punch in something like '--drop dbo.tblname'? Not sure of the SP schema, I'm sure MS would slap my wrist if I knew it off-hand as it's not good practise :) C -Original Message- From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of chris_py_...@manulife.com Sent: Monday, 26 October 2009 12:25 PM To: ozMOSS Cc: ozMOSS; ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com Subject: MOSS 2007 Search Engine Vulnerability Hi Guys I was asked to provide information that MOSS 2007 search engine is free from SQL Injection Vulnerability. We tried to search information on google about this but couldn't really find any resources(formal/papers) to back us up to claim that it's safe from SQL injection It's pain in the backside these network people I tell you (no offense to network guys :D, especially Nathan hehehe) Regards Christian = Disclaimer: This message is intended only for the use of the person to whom it is expressly addressed and may contain information that is confidential and legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, reliance on, reference to, review, disclosure or copying of the message and the information it contains for any purpose is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail of the misdelivery and delete all its contents. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of the Company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: SPlist GetItems method
Remarks
The properties of the view that is specified by the viewName parameter
override the properties that are specified in the query object that is
passed through the query parameter. For example, if the query object
includes a Where tag that specifies only items containing a particular
column value, while the view specifies to return all items, all items
will be returned.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms434064.aspx
HTH
-Original Message-
From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On
Behalf Of chris_py_...@manulife.com
Sent: Thursday, 8 October 2009 3:25 PM
To: ozMOSS
Cc: ozMOSS; ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com
Subject: SPlist GetItems method
Hi Guys
I am just wondering why rowlimit for SPQuery will not work when used in
GetItems method together with View ID. For example if I set
query.RowLimit
= 5 and use it in GetItems(query) the row limit will apply and
successfully
return 5 items for me. However when I used it in
GetItems(query,{DEFAULT
VIEW ID}) it would return all items to me no matter what row limit I
set.
Regards,
Christian
=
Disclaimer:
This message is intended only for the use of the person to whom it is
expressly addressed and may contain information that is confidential and
legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are
hereby
notified that any use, reliance on, reference to, review, disclosure or
copying of the message and the information it contains for any purpose
is
prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify
the
sender by reply e-mail of the misdelivery and delete all its contents.
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of the Company shall be understood as
neither given nor endorsed by it.
___
ozmoss mailing list
ozmoss@ozmoss.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
___
ozmoss mailing list
ozmoss@ozmoss.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: Testing, testing, 1, 2, 3
Agree. Any word on what condition I might use to tag these in mail rules? Message header 'to:ozmoss' maybe? -Original Message- From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Bill Williamson Sent: Wednesday, 16 September 2009 9:11 AM To: Nigel Hertz Cc: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: Re: Testing, testing, 1, 2, 3 Reply-to on this new list is set to the original poster. 15 years ago I'd have said that was a good thing, but most people nowadays click reply, not reply all, so perhaps it should be changed to reply-to the list? On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Nigel Hertz nigel.he...@stockland.com.au wrote: Are we live? J Kind regards Nigel Hertz Software Developer | Information Technology Stockland Level 25 | 133 Castlereagh Street | Sydney NSW 2000 T: 02 9035 2617 | F: 02 8988 2617 Stockland Notice: If this communication has been sent to you by mistake, please delete and notify us.  If it has been sent to you by mistake, legal privilege is not waived or lost and you are not entitled to use it in any way. Stockland and its subsidiaries reserve the right to monitor e-mail communication through its networks. ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: Calendar Comparison
Morning, Can you use Outlook 2007? It has calendar comparison/overlay built in. Unless you need to visualise this in the portal itself.. in which case listen to Paul, not me J Using Outlook, each user would need to visit each calendar, drop down Actions - Connect to Outlook, then from Outlook use the merge/overlay options from there. You can pick and choose which calendars easily in there, you just need to have them connected from SP. Cheers, C From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Ken Thompson Sent: Thursday, 27 August 2009 10:03 AM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: RE: Calendar Comparison Haha, yeah I think you have mentioned itstill fishing for a possible way to do it with the stock system. Getting the impression it just aint possible? Ken Thompson IT Support HomeGround Services 68 Oxford Street, Collingwood, VIC 3066 Tel: 03 9419 8855 Ex. 229 Mob: 0425 664 734 Fax: 03 9419 1876 www.homeground.org.au http://www.homeground.org.au From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Noone Sent: Thursday, 27 August 2009 10:01 AM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: RE: Calendar Comparison Hi Ken, Sorry if I've said this before. 'm getting a case of déjà vu here. Bamboo Calendar and List Rollup web parts, when combined, can overlay multiple calendars and also colour code them. Like all their roll-up web parts it requires you to select a master list for the view. It's probably cheaper than developing a custom solution. And, no, I still don't work for them. ;) Regards, Paul Online Developer, ICT CEO Sydney From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Ken Thompson Sent: Thursday, 27 August 2009 9:51 AM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: Calendar Comparison Hi All, I was wondering if there is a way to allow users to compare calendars next to each other / on top of each other? If they could select which calendars that would be great also. Basically, I've created a booking centre which is basically a document centre site, with sub-document centre sites for collingwood cars st Kilda cars etc. Beneath these is a calendar for every car, or room etc. I'm quite happy with the end result, it's very user friendly and works well. There is only one flaw, users cant compare calendars...say they just want to find what cars are available, thus I want to allow them to compare these calendars against each other...or is it possible to do some kind of query that displays any calendar that has no bookings in a time they specify? Cheers, Ken Thompson IT Support HomeGround Services 68 Oxford Street, Collingwood, VIC 3066 Tel: 03 9419 8855 Ex. 229 Mob: 0425 664 734 Fax: 03 9419 1876 www.homeground.org.au http://www.homeground.org.au Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists http://www.codify.com/lists Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists http://www.codify.com/lists Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists http://www.codify.com/lists Support procedure: http://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists
RE: Uploading Files to SharePoint 2007 that contain Special Characters
If you want to avoid manually renaming files, there are tools out there to mass-rename and remove these characters. Couldn't give you an example off the top of my head but I know we used one here. Bear in mind that part of SharePoint's appeal is to remove the need for filenames to contain all relevant information about that file. I.E. you can use the Name/Title column for that and/or create your own custom fields. Doing that at mass-import time might be a little trickier though. Kind regards, Chris Milne -Original Message- From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Bill Williamson Sent: Tuesday, 11 August 2009 4:31 PM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: Re: Uploading Files to SharePoint 2007 that contain Special Characters On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Richard Ingrichard@macquarie.com wrote: I been searching the net and so far run into suggestions that the filenames should just be changed, but our customers require these characters. One of two things must be changed: A. the filenames B. the platform you're using I'd say A would be easier but if it's a requirement then B may be your only option. Support procedure: http://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists Support procedure: http://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists
RE: Site Description appears on all pages
Yeah, I would steer away from modifying any 12 hive files directly, it's not best practice. I'd go with Paul's suggestion of creating/using a custom master edited to your needs. I suppose if you wanted to take it a step further you could truncate the page description so it does display but keeps it short. Kind regards, Chris Milne From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Noone Sent: Thursday, 30 July 2009 10:53 AM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: RE: Site Description appears on all pages Ken, are you referring to WSS site templates only? If you use a custom master you can just remove the placeholder or replace it with the page description. From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of ken zheng Sent: Thursday, 30 July 2009 10:45 AM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: Site Description appears on all pages Hi Guys: Just wonder if anyone has a simple way to remove the site description or replace it with site name? Right now he description appears on every single page. This is incredibly annoying when the description tends to be rather lengthy. The solution I found is to modify files under C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\Web Server Extensions\12\TEMPLATE\1033\STS\DOCTEMP\SMARTPGS Cheers Ken Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists http://www.codify.com/lists Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists http://www.codify.com/lists Support procedure: http://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists
RE: Site Description appears on all pages
I think SP needs all its placeholder's somewhere on the page just to be able to render the page, don't they? I recall if you remove required placeholders, the page won't compile. Is there a certain set of placeholders that are required and some that are optional? PlaceHolderPageDescription I imagine would be optional? Kind regards, Chris Milne From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Brown Sent: Thursday, 30 July 2009 11:40 AM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: RE: Site Description appears on all pages No, as that placeholder is already there. If you want to hide it, just add Visable=false to the html : asp:ContentPlaceHolder id=PlaceHolderPageDescription runat=server Visable=false / From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of ken zheng Sent: Thursday, 30 July 2009 11:07 AM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: RE: Site Description appears on all pages I can see there is a asp:ContentPlaceHolder id=PlaceHolderPageDescription runat=server/ on the masterpage ,so can I replace it with PlaceHolderPageTitle? Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:02:35 +0930 From: lied...@hotmail.com Subject: RE: Site Description appears on all pages To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com I have searched master page but can't find line with ... ProjectProperty Property=Description ... which ContentPlaceHolder is it in? Thanks Ken Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:44:09 +0930 From: daniel.br...@internode.on.net Subject: RE: Site Description appears on all pages To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com The general rule of thumb is to never edit OOTB files, it can came back to bite you in the behind pretty hard, especially with updates and service pack. I would ghost the master page (or use a custom one). If you want to hide it, I'd do something like: SharePoint:ProjectProperty Property=Description runat=server Visable=false/ To answer your other question of how to replace it with the title, the following HTML will do it: SharePoint:ProjectProperty Property=Title runat=server / -DB From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Noone Sent: Thursday, 30 July 2009 10:29 AM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: RE: Site Description appears on all pages For WSS sites you can either unghost the master or delete it as required for each page: tr td class=ms-webpartpagedescription SharePoint:ProjectProperty Property=Description runat=server/ /td /tr From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Noone Sent: Thursday, 30 July 2009 10:53 AM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: RE: Site Description appears on all pages Ken, are you referring to WSS site templates only? If you use a custom master you can just remove the placeholder or replace it with the page description. From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of ken zheng Sent: Thursday, 30 July 2009 10:45 AM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: Site Description appears on all pages Hi Guys: Just wonder if anyone has a simple way to remove the site description or replace it with site name? Right now he description appears on every single page. This is incredibly annoying when the description tends to be rather lengthy. The solution I found is to modify files under C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\Web Server Extensions\12\TEMPLATE\1033\STS\DOCTEMP\SMARTPGS Cheers Ken Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists http://www.codify.com/lists Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists http://www.codify.com/lists Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists http://www.codify.com/lists Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists http://www.codify.com/lists
RE: removing members from meeting sites
We've run into this before too. Interested to hear how people are dealing with this. Kind regards, Chris Milne From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Chris Grist Sent: Thursday, 30 July 2009 1:10 PM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Cc: Edda Panozzo Subject: removing members from meeting sites Hi Guys, We have some meetings with meeting workspaces, when we remove staff from the outlook calendar, the meeting site on sharepoint does not get updated so the old staff member stays in the list, deleting them only deletes from the current occurrence, is there someone to fix this/remove attendees permanently? Chris Grist Technical Officer, ICT Systems Education.au Limited Level 1, 182 Fullarton Road DULWICH SA 5065 p +61 8 83343291 f +61 8 83343211 e cgr...@educationau.edu.au w www.educationau.edu.au http://www.educationau.edu.au/ What does 21st century learning look like and what do educators need to do to be prepared for it. Find out at our next seminar in Sydney on Friday 11 September 2009 - More information visit www.educationau.edu.au IMPORTANT: This e-mail, including any attachments, may contain private or confidential information. If you think you may not be the intended recipient, or if you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete all copies of this e-mail. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not reproduce any part of this e-mail or disclose its contents to any other party. This email represents the views of the individual sender, which do not necessarily reflect those of Education.au except where the sender expressly states otherwise. It is your responsibility to scan this email and any files transmitted with it for viruses or any other defects. education.au limited will not be liable for any loss, damage or consequence caused directly or indirectly by this email. Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists http://www.codify.com/lists Support procedure: http://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists
Pre-generated list order numbers
Afternoon folks, I have a need to create a SP list which, when users create a new list item entry, a new unique 'order' number will be presented to them and displayed on the newform.aspx, before the list item is actually created. So the first thing they see is a unique number (which stays with the item as a key value when they commit it and is from that point forward not changeable), followed by normal editable fields for the list item. Anyone done anything like this before? I'm thinking of creating two lists, one being the aforementioned list (call it list A) and the 2nd being a 'administration' list which essentially contains a variable/value of the last used number. When someone hits new on list A, it increments the value and gives the next number. To do that, I'd need to edit newform.aspx to display the new ID value, then somehow store it with the list item when it gets committed and make it not editable on editform.aspx. Anyone know of any better ways to achieve something like this? Kind regards, Chris Milne Support procedure: http://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists
RE: Pre-generated list order numbers
Thanks guys, I haven't created a custom field yet, look forward to it.. cheers. Kind regards, Chris Milne From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of ken zheng Sent: Thursday, 30 July 2009 3:32 PM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: RE: Pre-generated list order numbers I created a web service to generate the number so it can be used in infopath form as well. Ken Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:39:26 +1000 From: chris.mi...@dataaspects.com.au Subject: Pre-generated list order numbers To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Afternoon folks, I have a need to create a SP list which, when users create a new list item entry, a new unique 'order' number will be presented to them and displayed on the newform.aspx, before the list item is actually created. So the first thing they see is a unique number (which stays with the item as a key value when they commit it and is from that point forward not changeable), followed by normal editable fields for the list item. Anyone done anything like this before? I'm thinking of creating two lists, one being the aforementioned list (call it list A) and the 2nd being a 'administration' list which essentially contains a variable/value of the last used number. When someone hits new on list A, it increments the value and gives the next number. To do that, I'd need to edit newform.aspx to display the new ID value, then somehow store it with the list item when it gets committed and make it not editable on editform.aspx. Anyone know of any better ways to achieve something like this? Kind regards, Chris Milne Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists http://www.codify.com/lists Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists http://www.codify.com/lists Support procedure: http://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists
RE: Web part with dll reference
Ahoy, No change since last post: Web Part Error: A Web Part or Web Form Control on this Page cannot be displayed or imported. The type could not be found or it is not registered as safe. Show Error Details http://dvsdev001/chris/default.aspx Hide Error Details http://dvsdev001/chris/default.aspx [UnsafeControlException: A Web Part or Web Form Control on this Page cannot be displayed or imported. The type could not be found or it is not registered as safe.] at Microsoft.SharePoint.ApplicationRuntime.SafeControls.GetTypeFromGuid(Guid guid) at Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages.SPWebPartManager.CreateWebPartsFromRowSetData(Boolean onlyInitializeClosedWebParts) AFAIK they are both marked as safe. Kind regards, Chris Milne -Original Message- From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of chris_py_...@manulife.com Sent: Tuesday, 28 July 2009 4:27 PM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Cc: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: RE: Web part with dll reference all good mate :) btw back to your problem, does call stack give away what could be wrong with the web part? Chris Milne chris.mi...@data aspects.com.auTo Sent by: ozmoss@ozmoss.com ozmoss@ozmoss.com cc Subject 07/28/2009 02:25 RE: Web part with dll reference PM Please respond to ozmoss@ozmoss.com Hey Chris(tian) :) Nope, the externally-referenced assembly doesn't reference any other external assemblies, it only uses standard System namespace stuff. A tempting approach to install the external one separately, but I think in my case it'd be ideal to deploy them together. The external one is just a library that would never be used as a feature on its own, it would only be used when packaged with something else, a web part/workflow/something. I see where you're coming from though, I'll keep it in mind as an alternative. Cheers. Kind regards, Chris -Original Message- From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of chris_py_...@manulife.com Sent: Tuesday, 28 July 2009 4:03 PM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Cc: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: RE: Web part with dll reference chris, i think he meant your external reference assembly probably reference to another external reference assembly. I wouldnt deploy the external reference assembly with your solution but instead install them separately (if there is installation for it) but as jeremy suggested you can add the safe control entry from your deployment, but that's just me. BTW there are 4 chris' here LOL regards christian Chris Milne chris.mi...@data aspects.com.auTo Sent by: ozmoss@ozmoss.com ozmoss@ozmoss.com cc Subject 07/28/2009 01:56 RE: Web part with dll reference PM Please respond to ozmoss@ozmoss.com Hey Chris, Worth a shot, but no, all references in that project are System.*. Cheers. Kind regards, Chris From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Chris Tomich Sent: Tuesday, 28 July 2009 3:51 PM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: Re: Web part with dll reference Hi Chris, Shot in the dark here but does your externally referenced assembly have references to other assemblies that you aren't deploying? Kind Regards, Chris Tomich On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Chris Milne chris.mi...@dataaspects.com.au wrote: Thanks Jeremy [update: and Sezai]. Yep, sorry, ‘tis VSeWSS 1.3 CTP using WSP. Copy Local is set to true on my reference and it does indeed deploy both my web part and referenced assembly to c:\windows\assembly\. I tried manually adding a SafeControl entry to the web.config for my referenced assembly to no avail, same result
RE: Web part with dll reference [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
I had, however like I mentioned in my earlier post I was unsure about having the assembly name and namespace the same. Have changed these to be different in the external library project and I’ve got a bit further, it’s now giving me a COMException error specific to the external library functionality. Off-topic for here so I’ll take further investigation offline. J Simple in the end, thanks for everyone’s help! Kind regards, Chris Milne -Original Message- From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Specker, Caroline Sent: Tuesday, 28 July 2009 4:36 PM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: RE: Web part with dll reference [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Have you double checked the safe control entry to make sure it matches the dll exactly - in particular the public key token? -Original Message- From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Chris Milne Sent: Tuesday, 28 July 2009 4:25 PM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: RE: Web part with dll reference Hey Chris(tian) :) Nope, the externally-referenced assembly doesn't reference any other external assemblies, it only uses standard System namespace stuff. A tempting approach to install the external one separately, but I think in my case it'd be ideal to deploy them together. The external one is just a library that would never be used as a feature on its own, it would only be used when packaged with something else, a web part/workflow/something. I see where you're coming from though, I'll keep it in mind as an alternative. Cheers. Kind regards, Chris -Original Message- From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of chris_py_...@manulife.com Sent: Tuesday, 28 July 2009 4:03 PM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Cc: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: RE: Web part with dll reference chris, i think he meant your external reference assembly probably reference to another external reference assembly. I wouldnt deploy the external reference assembly with your solution but instead install them separately (if there is installation for it) but as jeremy suggested you can add the safe control entry from your deployment, but that's just me. BTW there are 4 chris' here LOL regards christian Chris Milne chris.mi...@data aspects.com.auTo Sent by: ozmoss@ozmoss.com ozmoss@ozmoss.com cc Subject 07/28/2009 01:56 RE: Web part with dll reference PM Please respond to ozmoss@ozmoss.com Hey Chris, Worth a shot, but no, all references in that project are System.*. Cheers. Kind regards, Chris From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Chris Tomich Sent: Tuesday, 28 July 2009 3:51 PM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: Re: Web part with dll reference Hi Chris, Shot in the dark here but does your externally referenced assembly have references to other assemblies that you aren't deploying? Kind Regards, Chris Tomich On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Chris Milne chris.mi...@dataaspects.com.au wrote: Thanks Jeremy [update: and Sezai]. Yep, sorry, ‘tis VSeWSS 1.3 CTP using WSP. Copy Local is set to true on my reference and it does indeed deploy both my web part and referenced assembly to c:\windows\assembly\. I tried manually adding a SafeControl entry to the web.config for my referenced assembly to no avail, same result. Also found in SP log: http://server/chris/default.aspx - An unexpected error has been encountered in this Web Part. Error: This page has encountered a critical error. Contact your system administrator if this problem persists. which unfortunately is no more exciting than what I’m seeing on the page. Have followed this post to turn on extra debug info, am now seeing this on page: Web Part Error: A Web Part or Web Form Control on this Page cannot be displayed or imported. The type could not be found or it is not registered as safe. Show Error Details Hide Error Details [UnsafeControlException: A Web Part or Web Form Control on this Page cannot be displayed or imported. The type could not be found or it is not registered as safe.] at Microsoft.SharePoint.ApplicationRuntime.SafeControls.GetTypeFromGuid (Guid guid) at Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages.SPWebPartManager.CreateWebPartsFromRow SetData (Boolean onlyInitializeClosedWebParts) So not found or not safe.. hmm. Both assemblies now have SafeControl entries and are in c:\windows\assembly\. In my external library, my assembly name is the same as my default namespace, is this allowed/problematic? Kind regards
Web part with dll reference
Afternoon all, I'm developing a web part in which I would like to reference functionality that exists in one of our other company Visual Studio projects (.net assembly/dll). I'm having trouble doing this and hoping someone can point me in the right direction J I've created a simple VS web part project which works if I deploy it just by itself (not using the library functionality). I then added a reference to my dll, added a 'using' to import the namespace into my code (if I deploy again at this point it still works), but if I add one line of code that uses the external library into CreateChildControls() and deploy, I get a generic 'Error An Unexpected error has occurred' message on a page the webpart exists on. Visual Studio is automatically adding a SafeControl Assembly=.. to my web.config for my web part assembly but not the external library assembly, do I need to add that? Both assemblies are automatically being added to the GAC. Any help is appreciated! Kind regards, Chris Support procedure: http://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists
RE: Web part with dll reference
Thanks Jeremy [update: and Sezai]. Yep, sorry, 'tis VSeWSS 1.3 CTP using WSP. Copy Local is set to true on my reference and it does indeed deploy both my web part and referenced assembly to c:\windows\assembly\. I tried manually adding a SafeControl entry to the web.config for my referenced assembly to no avail, same result. Also found in SP log: http://server/chris/default.aspx - An unexpected error has been encountered in this Web Part. Error: This page has encountered a critical error. Contact your system administrator if this problem persists. .which unfortunately is no more exciting than what I'm seeing on the page. Have followed this http://www.andrewconnell.com/blog/archive/2007/02/01/5935.aspx post to turn on extra debug info, am now seeing this on page: Web Part Error: A Web Part or Web Form Control on this Page cannot be displayed or imported. The type could not be found or it is not registered as safe. Show Error Details http://dvsdev001/chris/default.aspx Hide Error Details http://dvsdev001/chris/default.aspx [UnsafeControlException: A Web Part or Web Form Control on this Page cannot be displayed or imported. The type could not be found or it is not registered as safe.] at Microsoft.SharePoint.ApplicationRuntime.SafeControls.GetTypeFromGuid(Gui d guid) at Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages.SPWebPartManager.CreateWebPartsFromRow SetData(Boolean onlyInitializeClosedWebParts) So not found or not safe.. hmm. Both assemblies now have SafeControl entries and are in c:\windows\assembly\. In my external library, my assembly name is the same as my default namespace, is this allowed/problematic? Kind regards, Chris From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Thake Sent: Tuesday, 28 July 2009 3:01 PM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: RE: Web part with dll reference So are you using the VSeWSS 1.3 CTP when you say Visual Studio projects? I'm assuming you must be using a WSP if its automatically adding the SafeControl entry. The reason you're probably getting this error is because you need to ensure you deploy the external library with the package. To do this, ensure you have Copy Local set to true in the properties. If it's VSeWSS you're using, you can check the manifest.xml file and see whether an Assembly element has been added for it. Also you can check it's deployed by going to c:\windows\assembly and ensuring the dll is in there ;-) Jeremy Thake Readify | Senior Consultant M: +61 400 767 022 | E: jeremy.th...@readify.net mailto:jeremy.th...@readify.net | W: www.readify.net http://www.readify.net/ From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Chris Milne Sent: Tuesday, 28 July 2009 12:41 PM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: Web part with dll reference Afternoon all, I'm developing a web part in which I would like to reference functionality that exists in one of our other company Visual Studio projects (.net assembly/dll). I'm having trouble doing this and hoping someone can point me in the right direction J I've created a simple VS web part project which works if I deploy it just by itself (not using the library functionality). I then added a reference to my dll, added a 'using' to import the namespace into my code (if I deploy again at this point it still works), but if I add one line of code that uses the external library into CreateChildControls() and deploy, I get a generic 'Error An Unexpected error has occurred' message on a page the webpart exists on. Visual Studio is automatically adding a SafeControl Assembly=.. to my web.config for my web part assembly but not the external library assembly, do I need to add that? Both assemblies are automatically being added to the GAC. Any help is appreciated! Kind regards, Chris Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists http://www.codify.com/lists Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists http://www.codify.com/lists Support procedure: http://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists
RE: Trap document View and Download
Thanks Sezai, that standards doc is excellent for someone of my level of skill coming into SharePoint development. Thanks Muhimbi. Kind regards, Chris Milne From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Sezai Komur Sent: Thursday, 9 July 2009 4:15 PM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: Re: Trap document View and Download Allegations aside, Muhimbi do have an excellent free SharePoint Development Standards book available for download from their website: http://www.muhimbi.com/blog/2009/05/muhimbis-sharepoint-development.html It contains some very useful and handy info in one document, especially useful as a guide for those of you who are asked to write development standards documents for your organisation. Sezai. On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Paul Noone paul.no...@ceosyd.catholic.edu.au wrote: And removed any telling comments from the source? Not that anyone could afford to buy it! ;) From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Sezai Komur Sent: Thursday, 9 July 2009 1:26 PM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: Re: Trap document View and Download I came across the same site a month or two ago. I really could have used their PDF generation component in a previous project, we ended up developing our own by utilising another 3rd party NET PDF generation component. I also had the exact same thoughts as Paul with regards to their auditing product back then, a very uncanny resemblance to Ted's, also had the exact same comments from a colleague I showed the site too (to be crystal clear I'm not alleging anything!). They maybe just borrowed the idea, added extra functionality and presented it a little better. On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Paul Noone paul.no...@ceosyd.catholic.edu.au wrote: Did you check out the licensing costs per farm?? Not to mention the solution's uncanny resemblance to Ted's free version... J From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Darren Neimke Sent: Thursday, 9 July 2009 12:17 PM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: RE: Trap document View and Download $700 doesn't seem that expensive does it? Good on him eh? If it saves you 3 or 4 days work and gives you some support it seems like money pretty well spent. Kind Regards, Darren Neimke darren.nei...@live.com Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:44:34 +1000 From: paul.no...@ceosyd.catholic.edu.au Subject: RE: Trap document View and Download To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Looks like he's don just what I intended. Taken Ted's solution and added everything that was missing - including a hefty price tag! J From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Darren Neimke Sent: Wednesday, 8 July 2009 10:55 AM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: RE: Trap document View and Download Here's a link to an interesting product that I found while looking for similar solutions in and around auditing: http://muhimbicom/Products/SharePoint-Audit.aspx http://muhimbi.com/Products/SharePoint-Audit.aspx Kind Regards, Darren Neimke darren.nei...@live.com Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 10:40:01 +1000 From: sharepointconsultant@gmail.com Subject: Re: Trap document View and Download To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Thanks Heaps Paul that is great! On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Paul Noone paul.no...@ceosyd.catholic.edu.au wrote: There's an Item level Auditing solution that does just that. A new version is available from Ted Patisson (the original author) in MSDN magazine. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc794261.aspx Link to original HOWTO and solution: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb397403.aspx It's sorely lacking in functionality and requires some modifications - pagination, flushing, archiving etc. But it's a good base to start from. The OOTB auditing (which is activated in CA and then at the site collection) isn't even a consideration. It's just plain awful. Regards, Paul Online Developer, ICT CEO Sydney From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Sharepoint Consultant Sent: Tuesday, 7 July 2009 10:44 AM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: Trap document View and Download Hi, I need to capture when a docment is viewed or downloaded so I can record 'who' and 'when' into a seperate auditing database. The spitemeventreceiver does not allow me to trap these events. Does anyone have a good solution for this problem? Thanks heaps. Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists http://www.codify.com/lists Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support
RE: Content Deployment - reparenting issue
Hey Paul, Not sure about the error message you're getting or how your dodgy CT might affect this but we just used Gary Lapointe's stsadm extensions (gl-copylist) to relocate a SP list from one site to another site, retaining metadata. All happened in the same site collection. http://stsadm.blogspot.com/2007/09/importexportcopy-lists.html http://stsadm.blogspot.com/2009/02/downloads.html HTH Kind regards, Chris Milne From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Noone Sent: Wednesday, 8 July 2009 1:17 PM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: Content Deployment - reparenting issue Hi all, I've never had a problem with this before but can't seem to get around this error. microsoft.sharepoint.spexception: The file...cannot be imported because its parent web...does not exist. I am trying to simply import a document library from one site to another. I have tried with and without dependencies and various version and security settings to no avail. FWIW, this happens to be the document library with the dodgy content type I can't delete. J Any ideas on how to migrate this content and retain the metadata?? Regards, Paul Online Developer, ICT CEO Sydney Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists http://www.codify.com/lists Support procedure: http://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists
RE: Can't delete old content type [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Morning Paul, If you can't even remove the CT from the doclib, yeah it must be being used in there somewhere. Just a basic suggestion if you haven't tried already... - Is your view displaying all items (not filtering anything out?) - Turned on the CT as a list column? Will let you quickly spot any used instances. FWIW.. HTH Kind regards, Chris Milne From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Noone Sent: Monday, 6 July 2009 9:29 AM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: RE: Can't delete old content type [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Hi Caroline, I'm only trying to delete it from a particular document library at this stage, not at the site collection level. I successfully delete it from another document library but it looks like there must be items I can't see in this one. :\ Anyone got a programmatic quick fix that'll take two params - old and new content type - and update all items matching? J Regards, Paul Online Developer, ICT CEO Sydney From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Specker, Caroline Sent: Monday, 6 July 2009 9:26 AM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: RE: Can't delete old content type [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] You will need to check every list in your site collection to make sure they are not using the content type. From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Noone Sent: Monday, 6 July 2009 9:03 AM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: Can't delete old content type Hi guys, I'm trying to delete an old content type from a doc library but am being told it's in use. I've been right through the library and can't find any items that are using it. Is it possible that even as site collection admin I wouldn't see items that have been uploaded but not yet checked in?? Regards, Paul Online Developer, ICT CEO Sydney Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists http://www.codify.com/lists * The information contained in this e-mail, and any attachments to it, is intended for the use of the addressee and is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, read, forward, copy or retain any of the information. If you received this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify the sender by return e-mail or telephone. The Commonwealth does not warrant that any attachments are free from viruses or any other defects. You assume all liability for any loss, damage or other consequences which may arise from opening or using the attachments. The security of emails transmitted in an unencrypted environment cannot be guaranteed. By forwarding or replying to this email, you acknowledge and accept these risks. * Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists http://www.codify.com/lists Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists http://www.codify.com/lists Support procedure: http://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists
Item scheduling link
Afternoon all, If you have the Office SharePoint Server Publishing feature enabled on your site, and versioning with major and minor versions enabled on a list, you will see the 'Manage Item Scheduling' option in the Document Library's settings. When you follow the link you're presented with the option to enable/disable this on the doclib, but when you hit OK, you're returned to the Site settings page rather than the Document Library's settings page. Wrong link perhaps or anyone know if this by design? No biggie, just an observation. Kind regards, Chris Support procedure: http://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists
RE: createtaskwithcontenttype
Many thanks Brian Jeffery. I was a little unclear on the use of the term 'feature', now it's all coming clear.. so my workflow project is already being pushed out as a feature, I can just add my content type to an existing or new element manifest, referenced from feature.xml. Sounds great.. thanks. Kind regards, Chris From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Brian Farnhill Sent: Tuesday, 19 May 2009 1:12 PM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: RE: createtaskwithcontenttype That's in a feature, so generally in a feature you have your feature.xml file, and one or more elements XML files (if you just have one it is generally called elements.xml) Check out SPDevWiki for info on features and how to make them - http://sharepointdevwiki.com/display/public/Features Brian Farnhill Consultant Technical Consulting Mobile: 0408 289 303 Email:brian.farnh...@uniqueworld.net mailto:brian.farnh...@uniqueworld.net Web: www.uniqueworld.net http://www.uniqueworld.net Blog: blog.brianfarnhill.com http://blog.brianfarnhill.com/ From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Chris Milne [chris.mi...@dataaspects.com.au] Sent: Tuesday, 19 May 2009 1:01 PM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: RE: createtaskwithcontenttype Thanks Brian. Elements file.. is that in a site definition? Do you need to create one to implement that? So far I've just created the workflow project. Kind regards, Chris From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Brian Farnhill Sent: Tuesday, 19 May 2009 11:18 AM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: RE: createtaskwithcontenttype Create a content type that inherits from the workflow task one - we did that via a feature. So something like this in your elements file should so it: ContentType ID=0x01080100[GUID GOES HERE] Name=My Custom Approval Workflow Task Group=My Custom Workflow Content Types Description=A task used in my custom approval workflow Version=0 Hidden=FALSE This creates a CT that inherits from the workflow task one, and from here in that XML I can add fields to it like any other content type deployed via a feature to store my own data. I hope that helps. Brian Farnhill Consultant Technical Consulting Mobile: 0408 289 303 Email:brian.farnh...@uniqueworld.net mailto:brian.farnh...@uniqueworld.net Web: www.uniqueworld.net http://www.uniqueworld.net Blog: blog.brianfarnhill.com http://blog.brianfarnhill.com/ From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Chris Milne [chris.mi...@dataaspects.com.au] Sent: Tuesday, 19 May 2009 10:57 AM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: createtaskwithcontenttype Morning all, I'm creating a SharePoint workflow in VS and am having trouble implementing createtaskwithcontenttype. Here's what I'm getting when I run the workflow: Workflow1. Information: System.Reflection.TargetInvocationException: Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation. --- System.ArgumentException: The content type of a workflow task must be derived from the Workflow Task content type. And here's what I'm doing: In the portal.. - Created a content type on my site, let's call it 'abc', derived from List / Task - Enabled content types on my task list - Added abc as a content type to my task list - Can manually create a task of this CT in this list - In VS... - Plopped down a 'createtaskwithcontenttype' (createTask1) and 'completetask' activity. Left 'ContentTypeId' property of the createtaskwithcontenttype' blank in the properties window - Populated the correlation tokens, task properties and task id's (works fine if i use a 'createtask' instead) - Grabbing the SPContentTypeId of abc in a code activity before the createtaskwithcontenttype - Setting: createTask1.ContentTypeId = abcContentTypeId.ToString() at the start of createTask1_MethodInvoking() Okay, so I've just realised that my CT is derived from List / Task, but it's expecting it to be derived from Workflow Task. I know this is the CT it uses if you instead use a 'createtask' activity, but how can you create a user-defined CT that derives from Workflow Task? Kind regards, Chris Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists http://www.codify.com/lists Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List
SP dev using Win7 boot from VHD
Morning all, Anyone using Windows 7 to boot their SP dev (server 2003/2008) environment from VHD? Curious to know any good/bad experiences if so. Performance in particular. Cheers, Chris Support procedure: http://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists
Multiple workflows per VS project
Hey guys, I'm creating a workflow solution using VSeWSS 1.3. I have 3 sequential workflows to create which I was expecting to add to the same project, deploy as a single assembly in a feature and away I go. However, the VSeWSS Sequential Workflow template comes with a feature.xml and workflow.xml, and the workflow.xml relates to the existing workflow. If I add new workflows to the project, it doesn't create a workflow.xml for each one, so I can create new ones manually, each named the same as the workflows(.xml), but VS doesn't let you rename the original workflow.xml (right-click, no rename/delete). My additional element manifests don't seem to be included in the deploy either, resulting in a file not found error. This kind of suggests that you're supposed to leave it as is, even though you can change the element manifest filename reference in feature.xml. Would I have to create one project per workflow? Then I'd have 3 different features to activate in the portal, when really they're all part of the same solution. Thoughts/Ideas? Kind regards, Chris Support procedure: http://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists
RE: Multiple workflows per VS project
Thanks M, When I mentioned that workflow.xml has no delete/rename, I was talking about Solution View. Actually, my WSP view is completely empty. I thought it was some kind of fault but then I wasn't sure if workflows were packaged that way; so they definitely are? I have no files listed in the WSP view.. I read somewhere you need to do a release build to build the WSP first, which I've done, but no dice, nada. Sorry, not sure what you mean you say pkg folder - this is in the Solution Explorer? Thanks for your help. C From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Matthew Cosier Sent: Wednesday, 6 May 2009 12:46 PM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: Re: Multiple workflows per VS project Sounds like you're trying to edit it within the WSP view. Click the 'Show hidden files' button in VS, then include the pkg folder into your project (this is the one it generates). You should be able to add to/manipulate this, then go into your WSP view and hit the refresh button - play around with it. M On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Chris Milne chris.mi...@dataaspects.com.au wrote: Hey guys, I'm creating a workflow solution using VSeWSS 1.3. I have 3 sequential workflows to create which I was expecting to add to the same project, deploy as a single assembly in a feature and away I go. However, the VSeWSS Sequential Workflow template comes with a feature.xml and workflow.xml, and the workflow.xml relates to the existing workflow. If I add new workflows to the project, it doesn't create a workflow.xml for each one, so I can create new ones manually, each named the same as the workflows(.xml), but VS doesn't let you rename the original workflow.xml (right-click, no rename/delete). My additional element manifests don't seem to be included in the deploy either, resulting in a file not found error. This kind of suggests that you're supposed to leave it as is, even though you can change the element manifest filename reference in feature.xml. Would I have to create one project per workflow? Then I'd have 3 different features to activate in the portal, when really they're all part of the same solution. Thoughts/Ideas? Kind regards, Chris Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists http://www.codify.com/lists Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists http://www.codify.com/lists Support procedure: http://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists
List views across sites
Morning all, I have a doc lib on one site, and I want to display the list of documents with their associated fields on another site in the same site collection. I can partially do this using the Content Query Web Part but this appears to only list the document's name, not its other fields. I was hoping to drop in a standard list view that you would get if you were dropping the web part inside the same site, but that's not available on other sites. Any ideas on how I can display the other fields? Sorry about the n00bie question, our general Internet access is down at the moment so I can't check there first.. Cheers, Chris Support procedure: http://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists
RE: List views across sites
Thanks to both Pauls, will check it out. Kind regards, Chris -Original Message- From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Noone Sent: Friday, 24 April 2009 9:10 AM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: RE: List views across sites Hi Chris, a Data View (SPD) or XML web part with custom XSL style is your best bet. You won't achieve the same level of functionality you get from a straight List View web part but you can at least list all your columns. Regards, Paul Online Developer, ICT CEO Sydney -Original Message- From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Chris Milne Sent: Friday, 24 April 2009 9:03 AM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: List views across sites Morning all, I have a doc lib on one site, and I want to display the list of documents with their associated fields on another site in the same site collection. I can partially do this using the Content Query Web Part but this appears to only list the document's name, not its other fields. I was hoping to drop in a standard list view that you would get if you were dropping the web part inside the same site, but that's not available on other sites. Any ideas on how I can display the other fields? Sorry about the n00bie question, our general Internet access is down at the moment so I can't check there first.. Cheers, Chris Support procedure: http://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists Support procedure: http://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists Support procedure: http://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists
RE: Unknown errors with people and groups
Helpful those 'Unknown Error' messages, aren't they? J Only one site of the multiple sites you mention has this problem? Any differences between the problem site and the others you can think of? How did you migrate the sites? Kind regards, Chris Milne From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Noone Sent: Friday, 17 April 2009 10:25 AM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: Unknown errors with people and groups Hi guys, I've recently migrated some sites to a new collection and everything seems to have worked with the exception of people and group management on one site. Whenever I try to access the Site Permissions (/_layouts/user.aspx) or Group Settings (_layouts/editgrp.aspx) page for this site I receive the Unknown error screen. I receive the same error when trying to apply changes in the Set Up Groups for this Site page (_layouts/permsetup.aspx). Has anyone experienced this or have any idea what's going on? Kind regards, Paul Noone Online Developer, ICT CEO Sydney ph: (02) 9568 8461 fax: (02) 9568 8483 email: paul.no...@ceosyd.catholic.edu.au web: http://www.ceosyd.catholic.edu.au/ Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists http://www.codify.com/lists Support procedure: http://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists
RE: Unknown errors with people and groups
Anything in the 12 hive or Windows event logs? If you can't find anything perhaps hit the page again, get the unknown error and check the logs at that point, then it should be at the top of the page. Kind regards, Chris Milne From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Noone Sent: Friday, 17 April 2009 10:39 AM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: RE: Unknown errors with people and groups Only difference is this one and it's children don't have publishing enabled. Also, these were migrated using the Content Deployment Wizard and I reparented the parent site after import. Maybe it'll be easier to just try again. :\ Regards, Paul Online Developer, ICT CEO Sydney From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Chris Milne Sent: Friday, 17 April 2009 10:35 AM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: RE: Unknown errors with people and groups Helpful those 'Unknown Error' messages, aren't they? J Only one site of the multiple sites you mention has this problem? Any differences between the problem site and the others you can think of? How did you migrate the sites? Kind regards, Chris Milne From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Noone Sent: Friday, 17 April 2009 10:25 AM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: Unknown errors with people and groups Hi guys, I've recently migrated some sites to a new collection and everything seems to have worked with the exception of people and group management on one site. Whenever I try to access the Site Permissions (/_layouts/user.aspx) or Group Settings (_layouts/editgrp.aspx) page for this site I receive the Unknown error screen. I receive the same error when trying to apply changes in the Set Up Groups for this Site page (_layouts/permsetup.aspx). Has anyone experienced this or have any idea what's going on? Kind regards, Paul Noone Online Developer, ICT CEO Sydney ph: (02) 9568 8461 fax: (02) 9568 8483 email: paul.no...@ceosyd.catholic.edu.au web: http://www.ceosyd.catholic.edu.au/ Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists http://www.codify.com/lists Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists http://www.codify.com/lists Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists http://www.codify.com/lists Support procedure: http://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists
RE: Overdue Reminders (OOB Collect Feedback Workflow)
Karl, Has the status of the Task workflows changed to 'complete' after they've hit 'Send Feedback'? They shouldn't get overdue task alerts if this is the case. Kind regards, Chris Milne From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Power, Karl Sent: Friday, 3 April 2009 7:44 PM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: Overdue Reminders (OOB Collect Feedback Workflow) Greetings folks, One of our management team here kicked of an (out of the box) Collect Feedback workflow on a document which assigned tasks to each of the 7 reviewers that the manager specified, in parallel. The tasks were due to be completed by the 27th March. Some of the reviewers completed their tasks before the due date and some didn't. It now seems that all reviewers (even the ones who have reviewed the document and used the send feedback button on the form) are getting email alerts reminding them that their task is overdue. The workflow is still in progress and is set to terminate when all tasks are complete. I'm just wondering if anyone else has come across this scenario? Common sense leads me to assume that only the reviewers who haven't completed their tasks should get overdue reminders, but I've learned not to make assumptions! Any info would be greatly appreciated Karl Power Glanbia Business Services Glanbia Plc Tel: +353 (0) 56 883 6016 Email: kpo...@glanbia.ie mailto:kpo...@glanbia.ie Click here to join MS Live Meeting Session https://www.livemeeting.com/cc/btconferencing3 __ The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. Any views and opinions expressed are those of the individual author/sender and are not necessarily shared or endorsed by Glanbia plc or any associated or related company. This message has been scanned for all known viruses. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Glanbia plc is registered in Ireland as a public limited company. Registered Office: Glanbia House, Kilkenny. Company Number: 129933 == Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists http://www.codify.com/lists Support procedure: http://www.codify.com/lists/support List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: ozmoss-subscr...@ozmoss.com Unsubscribe: ozmoss-unsubscr...@ozmoss.com List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists
RE: Backup Issue
Hi Imran, I don't see any attachments on your last email. Did you attach it? Does the list server filter these? Cheers, Chris From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Imran Syed Sent: Monday, 8 December 2008 13:46 PM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: Backup Issue Hi All, I am facing an issue in the MOSS 2007 backup. When I try to backup MOSS, it fails with the error shown in the attached jpeg file, even though it has got ample free space on the disk. The backup size is 6.3 GB Available space on disk is 80 GB. I feel that it is a bug in the system. Please let me know if anyone has experienced similar issue. Cheers Imran Syed ** This message contains privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you must not disseminate, copy or take any action in reliance on it. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Skilled Group Ltd. The sender cannot guarantee that this email or any attachment to it is free of computer viruses or other conditions which may damage or interfere with data, hardware or software with which it might be used. It is sent on the strict condition that the user carries out and relies on its own procedures for ensuring that its use will not interfere with the recipients systems and the recipient assumes all risk of use and absolves the sender of all responsibility for any consequence of its use. ** List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists http://www.codify.com/lists List address: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozmoss Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists
