RE: Office 365 launched
Microsoft does not have a data centre in Aus yet so it's hosted in Singapore with fail-over to either US or Ireland. Telstra is just an agent they don't have any technical involvement in the system. From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Turner Sent: Wednesday, 29 June 2011 3:38 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Office 365 launched Telstra covers AU, so I would guess that it is in Aust. Regards Paul Turner Practice Lead - SharePoint SMS Management Technology M 0412 748 168 paul.tur...@smsmt.commailto:paul.tur...@smsmt.com www.smsmt.comhttp://www.smsmt.com/ About SMS: Innovation House, Technology Park, Mawson Lakes Boulevard, Mawson Lakes SA 5095 SMS Management Technology (SMS) [ASX:SMX] is Australia's largest publicly listed Management Services company. We solve complex problems and transform business through Consulting, Technology and Systems Integration P please consider the environment before printing this email From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Chris Tomich [chris.tom...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, 29 June 2011 3:31 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: Re: Office 365 launched Does anyone know if the Aus version is hosted in Australia and the US version is hosted in the US? Just for latency reasons I can imagine some places would just pay the $2 more per month. On 29 June 2011 13:50, Trevor Johnson code...@gmail.commailto:code...@gmail.com wrote: If you go to the US site it's only $6.00... http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/office365/online-software.aspx#fbid=07xY537b0lX Cheers TJ On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Paul Turner ptur...@smsmt.commailto:ptur...@smsmt.com wrote: http://www.microsoft.com/en-au/office365/buy-small-business.aspx?WT.z_O365_ca=Buy_online-software_en-us Regards Paul Turner Practice Lead - SharePoint SMS Management Technology M 0412 748 168 paul.tur...@smsmt.commailto:paul.tur...@smsmt.com www.smsmt.comhttp://www.smsmt.com About SMS: Innovation House, Technology Park, Mawson Lakes Boulevard, Mawson Lakes SA 5095 SMS Management Technology (SMS) [ASX:SMX] is Australia's largest publicly listed Management Services company. We solve complex problems and transform business through Consulting, Technology and Systems Integration P please consider the environment before printing this email NOTICE - This communication is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking any action in reliance on, this communication by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication please delete and destroy all copies and telephone SMS Management Technology on 1300 842 767 immediately. Any views expressed in this Communication are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of SMS Management Technology. Except as required by law, SMS Management Technology does not represent, warrant and/or guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that the communication is free from errors, virus, interception or interference. ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.commailto:ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.commailto:ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss NOTICE - This communication is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking any action in reliance on, this communication by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication please delete and destroy all copies and telephone SMS Management Technology on 1300 842 767 immediately. Any views expressed in this Communication are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of SMS Management Technology. Except as required by law, SMS Management Technology does not represent, warrant and/or guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that the communication is free from errors, virus, interception or interference. SAGE is the first and only Australian company certified to the global benchmark standards of the Control Systems Integration Association. To see how this benefits you, simply visit www.controlsys.org Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the
RE: Office 365 launched
I've heard from a few sources including Microsoft that they have the three data centres, not sure about HK. From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Chris Grist Sent: Wednesday, 29 June 2011 4:47 PM To: 'ozMOSS' Subject: RE: Office 365 launched Isn't the failover in HK ? or is this only for BPOS From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Jason Taylor Sent: Wednesday, 29 June 2011 3:46 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Office 365 launched Microsoft does not have a data centre in Aus yet so it's hosted in Singapore with fail-over to either US or Ireland. Telstra is just an agent they don't have any technical involvement in the system. From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Turner Sent: Wednesday, 29 June 2011 3:38 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Office 365 launched Telstra covers AU, so I would guess that it is in Aust. Regards Paul Turner Practice Lead - SharePoint SMS Management Technology M 0412 748 168 paul.tur...@smsmt.commailto:paul.tur...@smsmt.com www.smsmt.comhttp://www.smsmt.com/ About SMS: Innovation House, Technology Park, Mawson Lakes Boulevard, Mawson Lakes SA 5095 SMS Management Technology (SMS) [ASX:SMX] is Australia's largest publicly listed Management Services company. We solve complex problems and transform business through Consulting, Technology and Systems Integration P please consider the environment before printing this email From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Chris Tomich [chris.tom...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, 29 June 2011 3:31 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: Re: Office 365 launched Does anyone know if the Aus version is hosted in Australia and the US version is hosted in the US? Just for latency reasons I can imagine some places would just pay the $2 more per month. On 29 June 2011 13:50, Trevor Johnson code...@gmail.commailto:code...@gmail.com wrote: If you go to the US site it's only $6.00... http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/office365/online-software.aspx#fbid=07xY537b0lX Cheers TJ On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Paul Turner ptur...@smsmt.commailto:ptur...@smsmt.com wrote: http://www.microsoft.com/en-au/office365/buy-small-business.aspx?WT.z_O365_ca=Buy_online-software_en-us Regards Paul Turner Practice Lead - SharePoint SMS Management Technology M 0412 748 168 paul.tur...@smsmt.commailto:paul.tur...@smsmt.com www.smsmt.comhttp://www.smsmt.com About SMS: Innovation House, Technology Park, Mawson Lakes Boulevard, Mawson Lakes SA 5095 SMS Management Technology (SMS) [ASX:SMX] is Australia's largest publicly listed Management Services company. We solve complex problems and transform business through Consulting, Technology and Systems Integration P please consider the environment before printing this email NOTICE - This communication is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking any action in reliance on, this communication by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication please delete and destroy all copies and telephone SMS Management Technology on 1300 842 767 immediately. Any views expressed in this Communication are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of SMS Management Technology. Except as required by law, SMS Management Technology does not represent, warrant and/or guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that the communication is free from errors, virus, interception or interference. ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.commailto:ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.commailto:ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss NOTICE - This communication is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking any action in reliance on, this communication by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication please delete and destroy all copies and telephone SMS Management Technology on 1300 842 767 immediately. Any views expressed in this Communication are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of SMS Management Technology. Except as required by law, SMS Management Technology does
RE: moving dbs
Not a DNS alias, a SQL Server alias. You configure this using the program: cliconfg.exe. Just copy this into the Windows Run box then Alias tab to configure using a TCP connection. From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Chris Grist Sent: Wednesday, 1 June 2011 1:43 PM To: 'ozMOSS' Subject: RE: moving dbs So this would just be a DNS Alias? From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Jason Taylor Sent: Wednesday, 1 June 2011 12:30 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: moving dbs A while ago we had this situation of moving to another server. We ended up using a more simple approach and just created a SQL Server database alias using the old server as the alia name and the new server as the server name. Since then we install SharePoint using a database alias so we never have to deal with this again. From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Chris Grist Sent: Wednesday, 1 June 2011 12:15 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: moving dbs Hi All, Has anyone been through this process: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc512725.aspx How long did it take you and any thing to be aware of? Chris Grist MCITP, MCTS, VCP Senior Technical Consultant [cid:image001.gif@01CC2062.61C44BC0] Ground Level 175 Fullarton Rd Dulwich SA 5065 t: (08) 8304 f: (08) 8364 2910 m: 0432 898 500 NOTE: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and may contain information intended only for the addressee(s). If you have received this communication in error, you must not copy or distribute any part of it or otherwise disclose its contents to anyone - please notify Loftus IT immediately. Loftus IT does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the information provided herein. No representation is made that email and any files transmitted with it are virus-free - virus scanning is the responsibility of the recipient and is recommended. SAGE is the first and only Australian company certified to the global benchmark standards of the Control Systems Integration Association. To see how this benefits you, simply visit www.controlsys.orghttp://www.controlsys.org Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may be confidential or contain legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any perusal, use, distribution, copying, modification or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately advise us by return e-mail and delete the document without making a copy. No warranty is made that any attachments are free from viruses. It is the recipient's responsibility to establish its own protection against viruses and other damage. SAGE is the first and only Australian company certified to the global benchmark standards of the Control Systems Integration Association. To see how this benefits you, simply visit www.controlsys.org Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may be confidential or contain legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any perusal, use, distribution, copying, modification or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately advise us by return e-mail and delete the document without making a copy. No warranty is made that any attachments are free from viruses. It is the recipient's responsibility to establish its own protection against viruses and other damage. inline: image001.gif___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: SharePoint 2010 books
I use safaribooksonline.com. You pay a monthly subscription and get access to a good selection of SharePoint titles as long as you don't mind reading on the screen. From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Nigel Hertz Sent: Friday, 13 May 2011 11:10 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: SharePoint 2010 books I use Wrox' SharePoint 2010 Administrationhttp://www.wrox.com/WileyCDA/WroxTitle/Professional-SharePoint-2010-Administration.productCd-047051.html and SharePoint 2010 Developmenthttp://www.wrox.com/WileyCDA/WroxTitle/Professional-SharePoint-2010-Development.productCd-0470529423.html - mainly because when I bought them, none others had been published :) From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of etmi...@akapost.com Sent: Friday, 13 May 2011 11:15 AM To: 'ozMOSS' Subject: SharePoint 2010 books Hi All, Does anyone have a good reference for SharePoint 2010 books both for dev admin (prefer each book for each dev admin)? Have a good weekend, Many thanks, Etmilis Stockland Notice: If this communication has been sent to you by mistake, please delete and notify us. If it has been sent to you by mistake, legal privilege is not waived or lost and you are not entitled to use it in any way. Stockland and its subsidiaries reserve the right to monitor e-mail communication through its networks. SAGE is the first and only Australian company certified to the global benchmark standards of the Control Systems Integration Association. To see how this benefits you, simply visit www.controlsys.org Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may be confidential or contain legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any perusal, use, distribution, copying, modification or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately advise us by return e-mail and delete the document without making a copy. No warranty is made that any attachments are free from viruses. It is the recipient's responsibility to establish its own protection against viruses and other damage. ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: suggestions on custom implementation
Since you are using 2010 you can just open the site in SharePoint designer and insert a XsltListViewWebPart onto the page and point the datasource back to the list in the other site. That will give you full functionality to sort filter etc and you can map url parameters to filter values. Regards, Jason From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Noone Sent: Friday, 8 April 2011 8:08 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: suggestions on custom implementation Couldn't you simply modify the list view by adding a CEWP with a history back URL? Otherwise your options might include - a DVWP with hard-coded workflow URL which appends the item ID; or a reusable RadGrid with same; or a SharePoint DataGrid within a custom web part... Regards, Paul -- Online Developer/SharePoint Administrator, ICT Infrastructure Team CEO Sydney From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Maxine Harwood Sent: Thursday, 7 April 2011 5:35 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: suggestions on custom implementation Would like to hear how you might implement this. SharePoint Server 2010 Standard! Problem: === Parent site has a custom library Subsites (and child sites of these sites) need to have a 'view' of the library based on some criteria. View should have same functionality as a standard view would have (ability to sort or filter as well as edit or view the properties, start workflows etc.). its fine to add a link in the navigation to a page passing parameters. Caveat: the view should appear within the subsite - not as a link to the parent site. I would prefer to use parameters to obtain a reusable page/part - as there is likely to be many changes over the next few months. Possible implementations: === I have investigated options to solve this issue, but each seem to have its own issues and I can't find the perfect fit. Using a link to a view doesn't meet the requirements, as the preferred solution should not take them out of the subsite (for navigation etc.). I've looked at using an aspx page in the _layouts directory to show the view, but am having difficulty getting the full functionality of OOTB views. I figure there must be an easier way (and cheaper than upgrading to enterprise!). I have briefly looked into creating a custom web part - but not sure if it will give me anything extra, or even a Silverlight web part... I have played with the content editor web part and have used this in the past - but it's not perfect either. SAGE is the first and only Australian company certified to the global benchmark standards of the Control Systems Integration Association. To see how this benefits you, simply visit www.controlsys.org Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may be confidential or contain legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any perusal, use, distribution, copying, modification or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately advise us by return e-mail and delete the document without making a copy. No warranty is made that any attachments are free from viruses. It is the recipient's responsibility to establish its own protection against viruses and other damage. ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: Discussion lists broken after installing SharePoint 2010 February Cumulative Update
Good suggestion Maxine. I gave it a try but didn't help. Files had not been changed from a clean install, I even copied them across for good measure. -Original Message- From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Maxine Harwood Sent: Friday, 1 April 2011 11:24 AM To: 'ozMOSS' Subject: RE: Discussion lists broken after installing SharePoint 2010 February Cumulative Update Looks to me like an issue reading the xml schema for the discussion list, perhaps there was a change during the update?? Maybe do a file compare of your discussion schema (:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\Web Server Extensions\12\TEMPLATE\FEATURES\DiscussionsList\Discuss\schema.xml) against the one attached (from SharePoint 2010 standard clean install) and see if there are any differences? -Original Message- From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Jason Taylor Sent: Friday, 1 April 2011 8:59 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Discussion lists broken after installing SharePoint 2010 February Cumulative Update The discussion list is straight OOTB, no customisation at all and just has the plain name of Discussions. The most interesting thing is that discussion lists created after the update work fine, just not those created before the update. There are alerts on most the lists but I tried removing them which didn't help. -Original Message- From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Brown Sent: Friday, 1 April 2011 9:20 AM To: 'ozMOSS' Subject: RE: Discussion lists broken after installing SharePoint 2010 February Cumulative Update http://blogs.technet.com/b/stefan_gossner/archive/2011/03/04/delayed-februar y-2011-cu-for-sharepoint-2010-is-now-available.aspx Going by that I'd say you'd have the re-released, but you may want to double check, hmm wonder if the versions are different between the release and re-release??? Anyone know?? Other than that, the error code looks to be a range of things, from having double - in a folder name in a library connected to outlook (i.e. --) to about email related problems Are there alerts on the lists with issues? Are there any lists with issues without alerts? I suspect this is not the issue, but worth a shot. The other general issue seems to be a missing assembly or assembly reference, is this a 100% OOTB page? Custom web part? Anything? -DB -Original Message- From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Jason Taylor Sent: Friday, 1 April 2011 8:52 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Discussion lists broken after installing SharePoint 2010 February Cumulative Update Hi Daniel, I'm not completely sure which version I have. I originally downloaded them on the 7th March. Cheers, Jason -Original Message- From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Brown Sent: Friday, 1 April 2011 8:47 AM To: 'ozMOSS' Subject: RE: Discussion lists broken after installing SharePoint 2010 February Cumulative Update Hi Jason, Are you using the pulled or re-release CU? MS pulled the original release and deployed it by (approx.) 2 weeks. Cheers, DB -Original Message- From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Jason Taylor Sent: Friday, 1 April 2011 8:20 AM To: 'ozMOSS (ozmoss@ozmoss.com)' Subject: Discussion lists broken after installing SharePoint 2010 February Cumulative Update Hi Everyone, Going crazy with an issue we're experiencing after applying the SharePoint 2010 February Cumulative Update. * We have a number of identical SharePoint site collections (500+) that are all created using exactly the same method from a site template. In the site collection is a Discussion list. After installing the Feb 2011 CU the discussions lists have stopped working. You can browse to the list and actually see the default view with items in the list, however when trying to click on anything (items, add new, list settings, view settings, list permissions) an exception is raised. All sites created after the CU installation work fine. Nothing else has been changed other than installing the CU. This is the error that is shown when trying to view an item: Cannot complete this action. Please try again.nativehr0x80004005/nativehrnativestack/nativestack Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code. Exception Details: System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException: Cannot complete this action. Please try again.nativehr0x80004005/nativehrnativestack/nativestack Source Error: An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception
Discussion lists broken after installing SharePoint 2010 February Cumulative Update
System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException: Cannot complete this action. Please try again. at Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequestInternalClass.GetViewsSchemaXml(String bstrUrl, String bstrListName, Boolean bFullBlown, Boolean bNeedInitAllViews, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter p2DWriter, Int32 plDefaultViewIndex, Int32 plMobileDefaultViewIndex) at Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequest.GetViewsSchemaXml(String bstrUrl, String bstrListName, Boolean bFullBlown, Boolean bNeedInitAllViews, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter p2DWriter, Int32 plDefaultViewIndex, Int32 plMobileDefaultViewIndex) 1d3b4e99-441a-4b46-a679-06d8c7cf3624 03/31/2011 07:23:28.52 w3wp.exe (0x1B34) 0x12CC SharePoint Foundation Template Cache fo1vMonitorable Leaked record detected with address 0992F6C8, name (unknown), and thread local refcount 1. To see AddRef/Release callstacks for this leak, run stsadm -o setproperty -pn refcountcallstacktrackingenabled -pv true. 1d3b4e99-441a-4b46-a679-06d8c7cf3624 03/31/2011 07:23:28.52 w3wp.exe (0x1B34) 0x12CC SharePoint Foundation Monitoring b4lyMedium Leaving Monitored Scope (Request (GET:http://projects:80/p/32100/Lists/Discussions/AllItems.aspx?RootFolder=%2Fp%2F32100%2FLists%2FDiscussions%2Ftest%20discussionFolderCTID=0x01200200F2EA00AAD8A8534EB1A1EF2FE29DF80EView=%7BD16C01EA-57A4-4F6E-9957-40CEBCD6900E%7DTopicsView=http%3A%2F%2Fprojects%2Fp%2F32100%2FLists%2FDiscussions%2FAllItems%2Easpx)). Execution Time=36.2451093644583 1d3b4e99-441a-4b46-a679-06d8c7cf3624 Appreciate any advice you have. Regards, Jason Taylor SAGE is the first and only Australian company certified to the global benchmark standards of the Control Systems Integration Association. To see how this benefits you, simply visit www.controlsys.org Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may be confidential or contain legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any perusal, use, distribution, copying, modification or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately advise us by return e-mail and delete the document without making a copy. No warranty is made that any attachments are free from viruses. It is the recipient's responsibility to establish its own protection against viruses and other damage. attachment: winmail.dat___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: Discussion lists broken after installing SharePoint 2010 February Cumulative Update
Hi Daniel, I'm not completely sure which version I have. I originally downloaded them on the 7th March. Cheers, Jason -Original Message- From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Brown Sent: Friday, 1 April 2011 8:47 AM To: 'ozMOSS' Subject: RE: Discussion lists broken after installing SharePoint 2010 February Cumulative Update Hi Jason, Are you using the pulled or re-release CU? MS pulled the original release and deployed it by (approx.) 2 weeks. Cheers, DB -Original Message- From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Jason Taylor Sent: Friday, 1 April 2011 8:20 AM To: 'ozMOSS (ozmoss@ozmoss.com)' Subject: Discussion lists broken after installing SharePoint 2010 February Cumulative Update Hi Everyone, Going crazy with an issue we're experiencing after applying the SharePoint 2010 February Cumulative Update. * We have a number of identical SharePoint site collections (500+) that are all created using exactly the same method from a site template. In the site collection is a Discussion list. After installing the Feb 2011 CU the discussions lists have stopped working. You can browse to the list and actually see the default view with items in the list, however when trying to click on anything (items, add new, list settings, view settings, list permissions) an exception is raised. All sites created after the CU installation work fine. Nothing else has been changed other than installing the CU. This is the error that is shown when trying to view an item: Cannot complete this action. Please try again.nativehr0x80004005/nativehrnativestack/nativestack Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code. Exception Details: System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException: Cannot complete this action. Please try again.nativehr0x80004005/nativehrnativestack/nativestack Source Error: An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace below. Stack Trace: [COMException (0x80004005): Cannot complete this action. Please try again.nativehr0x80004005/nativehrnativestack/nativestack] Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequestInternalClass.GetViewsSchemaXml(String bstrUrl, String bstrListName, Boolean bFullBlown, Boolean bNeedInitAllViews, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter p2DWriter, Int32 plDefaultViewIndex, Int32 plMobileDefaultViewIndex) +0 Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequest.GetViewsSchemaXml(String bstrUrl, String bstrListName, Boolean bFullBlown, Boolean bNeedInitAllViews, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter p2DWriter, Int32 plDefaultViewIndex, Int32 plMobileDefaultViewIndex) +187 [SPException: Cannot complete this action. Please try again.] Microsoft.SharePoint.SPGlobal.HandleComException(COMException comEx) +27428978 Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequest.GetViewsSchemaXml(String bstrUrl, String bstrListName, Boolean bFullBlown, Boolean bNeedInitAllViews, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter p2DWriter, Int32 plDefaultViewIndex, Int32 plMobileDefaultViewIndex) +27813923 Microsoft.SharePoint.SPViewCollection.EnsureViewSchema(Boolean fullBlownSchema, Boolean bNeedInitallViews) +283 Microsoft.SharePoint.SPList.get_Views() +58 Microsoft.SharePoint.SPViewContext.RedirectIfNecessary() +265 Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages.DataFormWebPart.CreateChildControls() +563 Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages.BaseXsltListWebPart.CreateChildControls() +2189 Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages.WebPartMobileAdapter.CreateChildControls() +72 System.Web.UI.Control.EnsureChildControls() +132 System.Web.UI.Control.PreRenderRecursiveInternal() +61 System.Web.UI.Control.PreRenderRecursiveInternal() +224 System.Web.UI.Control.PreRenderRecursiveInternal() +224 System.Web.UI.Control.PreRenderRecursiveInternal() +224 System.Web.UI.Control.PreRenderRecursiveInternal() +224 System.Web.UI.Control.PreRenderRecursiveInternal() +224 System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) +3394 Below is an example message from the event log regarding this error: 03/31/2011 07:23:28.51 w3wp.exe (0x1B34) 0x12CC SharePoint Foundation SPRequest 90imHigh Failed to cache schema for 4-00BFEA716A4943FAB535D15C05500108-1.0.0.0--1-1033-108-4-3 while caching list data1d3b4e99-441a-4b46-a679-06d8c7cf3624 03/31/2011 07:23:28.51 w3wp.exe (0x1B34) 0x12CC SharePoint Foundation GeneraltkpkHigh VtemplateManager::loadUncustomizedFormSchema failed with error code 0x80004005.1d3b4e99-441a-4b46-a679-06d8c7cf3624 03/31/2011 07:23:28.51 w3wp.exe (0x1B34) 0x12CC SharePoint
RE: Discussion lists broken after installing SharePoint 2010 February Cumulative Update
Thank you Chris, it looks like I do have the wrong update. My version is: 14.0.5136.5001. I will try and apply the latest CU tonight and see if that fixes it. Why do they make this so hard. What ever happened to: Check for Updates - Newer version found, do you want to install - Yes. Cheers, Jason -Original Message- From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Chris Grist Sent: Friday, 1 April 2011 8:54 AM To: 'ozMOSS' Subject: RE: Discussion lists broken after installing SharePoint 2010 February Cumulative Update This is the one I got on the 22nd of March: KB Article Number(s): 2464408, 2479795, 2494097, 2496287 Language: All (Global) Platform: x64 Location: (http://hotfixv4.microsoft.com/Microsoft%20SharePoint%20Server%202010/sp1/ officeserver2010kb2479795fullfilex64glb/14..5136.5002/free/429443_intl _x64_zip.exe) Password: wRaCVa2xvE -Original Message- From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Jason Taylor Sent: Friday, 1 April 2011 8:52 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Discussion lists broken after installing SharePoint 2010 February Cumulative Update Hi Daniel, I'm not completely sure which version I have. I originally downloaded them on the 7th March. Cheers, Jason -Original Message- From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Brown Sent: Friday, 1 April 2011 8:47 AM To: 'ozMOSS' Subject: RE: Discussion lists broken after installing SharePoint 2010 February Cumulative Update Hi Jason, Are you using the pulled or re-release CU? MS pulled the original release and deployed it by (approx.) 2 weeks. Cheers, DB -Original Message- From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Jason Taylor Sent: Friday, 1 April 2011 8:20 AM To: 'ozMOSS (ozmoss@ozmoss.com)' Subject: Discussion lists broken after installing SharePoint 2010 February Cumulative Update Hi Everyone, Going crazy with an issue we're experiencing after applying the SharePoint 2010 February Cumulative Update. * We have a number of identical SharePoint site collections (500+) that are all created using exactly the same method from a site template. In the site collection is a Discussion list. After installing the Feb 2011 CU the discussions lists have stopped working. You can browse to the list and actually see the default view with items in the list, however when trying to click on anything (items, add new, list settings, view settings, list permissions) an exception is raised. All sites created after the CU installation work fine. Nothing else has been changed other than installing the CU. This is the error that is shown when trying to view an item: Cannot complete this action. Please try again.nativehr0x80004005/nativehrnativestack/nativestack Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code. Exception Details: System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException: Cannot complete this action. Please try again.nativehr0x80004005/nativehrnativestack/nativestack Source Error: An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace below. Stack Trace: [COMException (0x80004005): Cannot complete this action. Please try again.nativehr0x80004005/nativehrnativestack/nativestack] Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequestInternalClass.GetViewsSchemaXml(Stri ng bstrUrl, String bstrListName, Boolean bFullBlown, Boolean bNeedInitAllViews, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter p2DWriter, Int32 plDefaultViewIndex, Int32 plMobileDefaultViewIndex) +0 Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequest.GetViewsSchemaXml(String bstrUrl, String bstrListName, Boolean bFullBlown, Boolean bNeedInitAllViews, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter p2DWriter, Int32 plDefaultViewIndex, Int32 plMobileDefaultViewIndex) +187 [SPException: Cannot complete this action. Please try again.] Microsoft.SharePoint.SPGlobal.HandleComException(COMException comEx) +27428978 Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequest.GetViewsSchemaXml(String bstrUrl, String bstrListName, Boolean bFullBlown, Boolean bNeedInitAllViews, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter p2DWriter, Int32 plDefaultViewIndex, Int32 plMobileDefaultViewIndex) +27813923 Microsoft.SharePoint.SPViewCollection.EnsureViewSchema(Boolean fullBlownSchema, Boolean bNeedInitallViews) +283 Microsoft.SharePoint.SPList.get_Views() +58 Microsoft.SharePoint.SPViewContext.RedirectIfNecessary() +265 Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages.DataFormWebPart.CreateChildControls() +563 Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages.BaseXsltListWebPart.CreateChildControls( ) +2189 Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages.WebPartMobileAdapter.CreateChildControls () +72 System.Web.UI.Control.EnsureChildControls() +132
RE: Discussion lists broken after installing SharePoint 2010 February Cumulative Update
The discussion list is straight OOTB, no customisation at all and just has the plain name of Discussions. The most interesting thing is that discussion lists created after the update work fine, just not those created before the update. There are alerts on most the lists but I tried removing them which didn't help. -Original Message- From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Brown Sent: Friday, 1 April 2011 9:20 AM To: 'ozMOSS' Subject: RE: Discussion lists broken after installing SharePoint 2010 February Cumulative Update http://blogs.technet.com/b/stefan_gossner/archive/2011/03/04/delayed-februar y-2011-cu-for-sharepoint-2010-is-now-available.aspx Going by that I'd say you'd have the re-released, but you may want to double check, hmm wonder if the versions are different between the release and re-release??? Anyone know?? Other than that, the error code looks to be a range of things, from having double - in a folder name in a library connected to outlook (i.e. --) to about email related problems Are there alerts on the lists with issues? Are there any lists with issues without alerts? I suspect this is not the issue, but worth a shot. The other general issue seems to be a missing assembly or assembly reference, is this a 100% OOTB page? Custom web part? Anything? -DB -Original Message- From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Jason Taylor Sent: Friday, 1 April 2011 8:52 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Discussion lists broken after installing SharePoint 2010 February Cumulative Update Hi Daniel, I'm not completely sure which version I have. I originally downloaded them on the 7th March. Cheers, Jason -Original Message- From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Brown Sent: Friday, 1 April 2011 8:47 AM To: 'ozMOSS' Subject: RE: Discussion lists broken after installing SharePoint 2010 February Cumulative Update Hi Jason, Are you using the pulled or re-release CU? MS pulled the original release and deployed it by (approx.) 2 weeks. Cheers, DB -Original Message- From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Jason Taylor Sent: Friday, 1 April 2011 8:20 AM To: 'ozMOSS (ozmoss@ozmoss.com)' Subject: Discussion lists broken after installing SharePoint 2010 February Cumulative Update Hi Everyone, Going crazy with an issue we're experiencing after applying the SharePoint 2010 February Cumulative Update. * We have a number of identical SharePoint site collections (500+) that are all created using exactly the same method from a site template. In the site collection is a Discussion list. After installing the Feb 2011 CU the discussions lists have stopped working. You can browse to the list and actually see the default view with items in the list, however when trying to click on anything (items, add new, list settings, view settings, list permissions) an exception is raised. All sites created after the CU installation work fine. Nothing else has been changed other than installing the CU. This is the error that is shown when trying to view an item: Cannot complete this action. Please try again.nativehr0x80004005/nativehrnativestack/nativestack Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code. Exception Details: System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException: Cannot complete this action. Please try again.nativehr0x80004005/nativehrnativestack/nativestack Source Error: An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace below. Stack Trace: [COMException (0x80004005): Cannot complete this action. Please try again.nativehr0x80004005/nativehrnativestack/nativestack] Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequestInternalClass.GetViewsSchemaXml(String bstrUrl, String bstrListName, Boolean bFullBlown, Boolean bNeedInitAllViews, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter p2DWriter, Int32 plDefaultViewIndex, Int32 plMobileDefaultViewIndex) +0 Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequest.GetViewsSchemaXml(String bstrUrl, String bstrListName, Boolean bFullBlown, Boolean bNeedInitAllViews, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter p2DWriter, Int32 plDefaultViewIndex, Int32 plMobileDefaultViewIndex) +187 [SPException: Cannot complete this action. Please try again.] Microsoft.SharePoint.SPGlobal.HandleComException(COMException comEx) +27428978 Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequest.GetViewsSchemaXml(String bstrUrl, String bstrListName, Boolean bFullBlown, Boolean bNeedInitAllViews, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter p2DWriter, Int32 plDefaultViewIndex, Int32 plMobileDefaultViewIndex) +27813923 Microsoft.SharePoint.SPViewCollection.EnsureViewSchema
RE: User Profile Sync
Hi Chris, I had so much trouble getting this working, but now have reliable sync with AD. After hitting countless errors and reading all the previously mentioned blog posts I started again and reinstalled SharePoint (luckily I used mostly PowerShell). The trick I used to properly get the services to start were this: - Add the SharePoint Farm user to local admin group - Reboot the server and login as SharePoint Farm account (I believe it needs a local profile for this user). - Start the services: o User Profile Service o User Profile Synchronization Service (this service can take a while so be patient and don't try and kill it). Remove the SharePoint Farm from local admin group. If you get an error in the event log ILM Certificate could not be created: Cert step 2 could not be created: C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office Servers\14.0\Tools\MakeCert.exe -pe -sr LocalMachine -ss My -a sha1 -n CN=ForefrontIdentityManager -sky exchange -pe -in ForefrontIdentityManager -ir localmachine -is root then you need to delete the certificates labelled ForefrontIdentityManager from the Trusted Root Certification Authorities - Certificates section. See this blog for details: http://www.cleverworkarounds.com/2010/08/15/more-user-profile-sync-in-sp2010-certificate-provisioning-issues/. Hope this helps. Cheers, Jason Taylor SAGE Automation From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Chris Walsh Sent: Tuesday, 18 January 2011 2:57 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: User Profile Sync Ok, This is an email to find out if anyone has actually managed to fully deploy User Profile Sync into a real SP2010 farm? I've tried numerous of times, with each newer CU, each fails at a different point. I went through the great blogpost that Jeremy Thake linked to me (thanks mate) but didn't help unfortunately. I've got 4 WFE's Clustered DB servers Dedicated search Dedicated Application Server, which hosts most of the service apps. AD Server 2008 R2 with 2003 functional level with about 12,000 AD user objects. It shouldn't be this hard. Cheers, Chris SAGE is the first and only Australian company certified to the global benchmark standards of the Control Systems Integration Association. To see how this benefits you, simply visit www.controlsys.org Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may be confidential or contain legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any perusal, use, distribution, copying, modification or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately advise us by return e-mail and delete the document without making a copy. No warranty is made that any attachments are free from viruses. It is the recipient's responsibility to establish its own protection against viruses and other damage. ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: SPS2010: Assigning a Farm-unique number to list items?
I have used this approach but found it to be unreliable and ended up resorting back to a custom event handler on the list. We store the previous Id value in the property bag of the website but you could just as easily store in the farm property bag to be used by all site collections. From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Turner Sent: Friday, 22 October 2010 8:00 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: SPS2010: Assigning a Farm-unique number to list items? Here is a good link on creating your own provider: http://www.zimmergren.net/archive/2010/04/13/sp-2010-sharepoint-server-2010-creating-your-custom-document-id-provider.aspx Couple of things... it is mainly executed by a timer job rather than real-time and you have the ability to re-seed/replace all previous ID's with new ones too. Regards, Paul Turner MCT, MCPD: Enterprise, MCSD, MCDBA, MCTS, MSF, Microsoft vTSP Consultant M: 0412 748 168 A: 66 Henley Beach Road, Mile End SA 5031 E: paul.tur...@dws.com.aumailto:paul.tur...@dws.com.au W: www.dws.com.auhttp://www.dws.com.au/ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are only for the use of the person to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this email in error and are requested to delete it immediately. Any opinion expressed in this e-mail may not necessarily be that of DWS Pty Ltd. Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Noone Sent: Friday, 22 October 2010 7:47 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: SPS2010: Assigning a Farm-unique number to list items? Whoa. Déjà vu. From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of James Boman Sent: Thursday, 21 October 2010 6:07 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: SPS2010: Assigning a Farm-unique number to list items? Good morning SharePoint gurus! I was brainstorming to find the best way to make a list where list items are allocated a Farm unique number on save. i.e. when an item is saved, one of the column values is CV0001000 , and the next item gets CV0001001 even if it is in another list in another site collection. Options under consideration: * The numbering feature in Information Management Policies seems to only apply to document libraries and not lists - is this true? * List Event Handler, backed up by a webservice to store the numbers in a centralised list somewhere * Custom Field Type with same custom webservice backing. * Hmmm... a better way? Any ideas? Cheers, J. James Boman Solution Architect [cid:image001.jpg@01CB71C1.AECAE370] [cid:image002.jpg@01CB71C1.AECAE370] Telephone: +61 (08) 7200 1100 [cid:image002.jpg@01CB71C1.AECAE370] Mobile: +61 (0) 417 857 298 [cid:image002.jpg@01CB71C1.AECAE370] Web : http://www.i-pmo.com.auhttp://www.i-pmo.com.au/ [cid:image002.jpg@01CB71C1.AECAE370] Skype : [cid:image003.png@01CB71C1.AECAE370]skype:JDBoman?call JDBomanskype:JDBoman?call [cid:image004.png@01CB71C1.AECAE370] SAGE is the first and only Australian company certified to the global benchmark standards of the Control Systems Integration Association. To see how this benefits you, simply visit www.controlsys.org Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may be confidential or contain legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any perusal, use, distribution, copying, modification or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately advise us by return e-mail and delete the document without making a copy. No warranty is made that any attachments are free from viruses. It is the recipient's responsibility to establish its own protection against viruses and other damage. inline: image001.jpginline: image002.jpginline: image003.pnginline: image004.png___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
Default column value not appearing in Word
Hi all, I have set a default value for a choice field in a document library. If I upload a document manually the correct default value is shown in the property dialog. When using the New menu to create a document, Word is opened and the server properties displayed but the choice field is blank instead of showing the default. I'm using SharePoint 2010 and the same behaviour occurs in Word 2007 and Word 2010. Regards, Jason Taylor SAGE is the first and only Australian company certified to the global benchmark standards of the Control Systems Integration Association. To see how this benefits you, simply visit www.controlsys.org Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may be confidential or contain legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any perusal, use, distribution, copying, modification or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately advise us by return e-mail and delete the document without making a copy. No warranty is made that any attachments are free from viruses. It is the recipient's responsibility to establish its own protection against viruses and other damage. attachment: winmail.dat___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: Assigned to email alert in custom list
Thanks for all the ideas. I actually worked out that by adding the Assigned To site column to your list and setting the EnableAssignToEmail property of the list to true, SharePoint will send the email just like a task or issues list. I documented the technique herehttp://jaypoint.com/send-assigned-to-emails-custom-list/. Cheers, Jason From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Nigel Witherdin Sent: Sunday, 27 June 2010 5:58 PM To: OzMoss Subject: RE: Assigned to email alert in custom list Yep, this is possible. An ItemAdded event handler can be added to your list where you implement this logic. From: jason.tay...@gotosage.com To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:08:24 +0930 Subject: Assigned to email alert in custom list Hi, I have a custom list definition and content type (based in Item) for managing project risks. The content type has an assigned to field. I would like the functionality of the task or issue list to email the person when they are assigned to the risk. Anyone know if this is possible without using third party controls or SharePoint Designer? Code solutions are fine. Regards, Jason Taylor SAGE is the first and only Australian company certified to the global benchmark standards of the Control Systems Integration Association. To see how this benefits you, simply visit www.controlsys.orghttp://www.controlsys.org Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may be confidential or contain legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any perusal, use, distribution, copying, modification or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately advise us by return e-mail and delete the document without making a copy. No warranty is made that any attachments are free from viruses. It is the recipient's responsibility to establish its own protection against viruses and other damage. Get a new e-mail account with Hotmail - Free. Sign-up now.http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/19780/direct/01/ SAGE is the first and only Australian company certified to the global benchmark standards of the Control Systems Integration Association. To see how this benefits you, simply visit www.controlsys.org Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may be confidential or contain legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any perusal, use, distribution, copying, modification or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately advise us by return e-mail and delete the document without making a copy. No warranty is made that any attachments are free from viruses. It is the recipient's responsibility to establish its own protection against viruses and other damage. ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
Assigned to email alert in custom list
Hi, I have a custom list definition and content type (based in Item) for managing project risks. The content type has an assigned to field. I would like the functionality of the task or issue list to email the person when they are assigned to the risk. Anyone know if this is possible without using third party controls or SharePoint Designer? Code solutions are fine. Regards, Jason Taylor SAGE is the first and only Australian company certified to the global benchmark standards of the Control Systems Integration Association. To see how this benefits you, simply visit www.controlsys.org Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may be confidential or contain legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any perusal, use, distribution, copying, modification or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately advise us by return e-mail and delete the document without making a copy. No warranty is made that any attachments are free from viruses. It is the recipient's responsibility to establish its own protection against viruses and other damage. ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: Site Usage Summaries Again
Hi Chris, It should work fine with anonymous users, we are just pulling out what SharePoint already logs. Cheers, Jason -Original Message- From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Chris Denniss Sent: Thursday, 8 April 2010 1:11 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Site Usage Summaries Again Thanks Jason Looking into enhancing the OOTB Site Usage Report for page / document hits(just the basic info displayed in a more usable manner) for our Intranet site managers. I'm very interested in your reporting system(as I'm not having much finding simple solutions to manage the already available data) I do have a question though - Our current Intranet is mainly read by anonymous users, will the stats be reported accurately for page / document hits? Of course any other suggestions for making the (subsite)Site Usage Report more accessible / usable for end users welcome... Now off to look at the 3rd party options: Nintex Reporting 2008, Webtrends (any others?) And SP2010! Cheers Jason Taylor jason.tay...@gotosage.com 11/03/2010 8:44 am Hi All, Sorry it's taken so long to reply on this, I ended up writing a blog article (yes I've started a blog) on how we implemented our reporting and packaged up the source code to make it easier for anyone to use. For those interested here is the article: http://jaypoint.com/sharepoint-site-usage-reporting/ Happy to answer any further questions. Cheers, Jason Taylor jaypoint.comhttp://jaypoint.com/ From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Mark Burns Sent: Wednesday, 10 March 2010 11:44 AM To: 'ozMOSS' Subject: RE: Site Usage Summaries Again I have made the decision to abandon MOSS Usage Reporting and go with a solution of parsing logs into a SQL database. The question is, do I parse the IIS logs or the MOSS usage logs. Parsing IIS logs seems easy to do out of the box with LogParser. Parsing MOSS logs with LogParser does not appear to provide useful broken down information. There seems to be a requirement for a purpose written parser to dissect the information. Is this correct? What is the consensus of SharePoint experts out in OzMoss land - use MOSS logs or IIS logs? Cheers, Mark From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Jason Taylor Sent: Friday, 5 March 2010 8:56 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Site Usage Summaries Again Hi Mark, We gave up on the in-built reporting and wrote an application to pull the logs into SQL Server then have an analysis services cube to slice and dice in Excel. Works pretty well and I am happy to share the code if you're interested. Cheers, Jason Taylor SAGE Automation From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Mark Burns Sent: Thursday, 4 March 2010 3:15 PM To: 'ozMOSS' Subject: Site Usage Summaries Again 1) I am trying to reconcile the site usage data that is available from SharePoint Designer reports and the site usage summary data (_layouts/SpUsageWeb.aspx) from MOSS. I can't seem to match the data up? Should they match up? 2) After a hiccup where site usage data wasn't being generated for a week due to CA issues, no data is displayed in MOSS site usage summaries for the period before the hiccup, even though the data used to be reported. 3) SPD shows the historical data not reported in MOSS. Does MOSS get the data from a different location to SPD? I think not, but I don't understand. 4) Does the usage data stored in the Content DB only include 30 day detailed information and then summarised month information? 5) Since the hiccup, the SharePoint usage logs are written to a different file location, i.e. different GUID file name. Can the data from different log file locations be combined into one location? And will it help in getting MOSS to report historical site usage information? 6) Is there a good reference for better understanding the SharePoint Usage logging and reporting model(s). I know the above is a lot to ask, but I can't seem to locate a reference that ties it all together. HELP! Cheers, Mark Mark Burns Business Systems Project Manager Adelaide Airport Ltd p (08) 8308 9252 f (08) 8308 9311 e mbu...@aal.com.aublocked::mailto:mbu...@aal.com.au P Please consider the environment before printing this email CAUTION: This message may contain privileged and confidential information intended only for the above named addressee. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or any part thereof is prohibited. If you have received this message in error please notify Adelaide Airport Limited immediately by return email or call (+61)8 8308 9211. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of Adelaide Airport Limited
RE: Site Usage Summaries Again
Hi All, Sorry it's taken so long to reply on this, I ended up writing a blog article (yes I've started a blog) on how we implemented our reporting and packaged up the source code to make it easier for anyone to use. For those interested here is the article: http://jaypoint.com/sharepoint-site-usage-reporting/ Happy to answer any further questions. Cheers, Jason Taylor jaypoint.comhttp://jaypoint.com/ From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Mark Burns Sent: Wednesday, 10 March 2010 11:44 AM To: 'ozMOSS' Subject: RE: Site Usage Summaries Again I have made the decision to abandon MOSS Usage Reporting and go with a solution of parsing logs into a SQL database. The question is, do I parse the IIS logs or the MOSS usage logs. Parsing IIS logs seems easy to do out of the box with LogParser. Parsing MOSS logs with LogParser does not appear to provide useful broken down information. There seems to be a requirement for a purpose written parser to dissect the information. Is this correct? What is the consensus of SharePoint experts out in OzMoss land - use MOSS logs or IIS logs? Cheers, Mark From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Jason Taylor Sent: Friday, 5 March 2010 8:56 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Site Usage Summaries Again Hi Mark, We gave up on the in-built reporting and wrote an application to pull the logs into SQL Server then have an analysis services cube to slice and dice in Excel. Works pretty well and I am happy to share the code if you're interested. Cheers, Jason Taylor SAGE Automation From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Mark Burns Sent: Thursday, 4 March 2010 3:15 PM To: 'ozMOSS' Subject: Site Usage Summaries Again 1) I am trying to reconcile the site usage data that is available from SharePoint Designer reports and the site usage summary data (_layouts/SpUsageWeb.aspx) from MOSS. I can't seem to match the data up? Should they match up? 2) After a hiccup where site usage data wasn't being generated for a week due to CA issues, no data is displayed in MOSS site usage summaries for the period before the hiccup, even though the data used to be reported. 3) SPD shows the historical data not reported in MOSS. Does MOSS get the data from a different location to SPD? I think not, but I don't understand. 4) Does the usage data stored in the Content DB only include 30 day detailed information and then summarised month information? 5) Since the hiccup, the SharePoint usage logs are written to a different file location, i.e. different GUID file name. Can the data from different log file locations be combined into one location? And will it help in getting MOSS to report historical site usage information? 6) Is there a good reference for better understanding the SharePoint Usage logging and reporting model(s). I know the above is a lot to ask, but I can't seem to locate a reference that ties it all together. HELP! Cheers, Mark Mark Burns Business Systems Project Manager Adelaide Airport Ltd p (08) 8308 9252 f (08) 8308 9311 e mbu...@aal.com.aublocked::mailto:mbu...@aal.com.au P Please consider the environment before printing this email CAUTION: This message may contain privileged and confidential information intended only for the above named addressee. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or any part thereof is prohibited. If you have received this message in error please notify Adelaide Airport Limited immediately by return email or call (+61)8 8308 9211. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of Adelaide Airport Limited. The owner and neither operator of the email system nor the sender of this email accept any responsibility for any viruses that may be contained in this email or its attachments. It is therefore your responsibility to ensure that your systems have adequate protection against virus infection. Adelaide Airport Limited ABN: 78 075 176 653 SAGE is the first and only Australian company certified to the global benchmark standards of the Control Systems Integration Association. To see how this benefits you, simply visit www.controlsys.org Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may be confidential or contain legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any perusal, use, distribution, copying, modification or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately advise us by return e-mail and delete the document without making a copy. No warranty is made that any
RE: Filter web part with URL params
I don't think you can do it OOTB, but there was a sub-classed version of this web part on Codeplex (developed by the Microsoft for their internal use) that included this functionality. I had a quick look but couldn't find the project. Maybe someone else has this code or know where the location on Codeplex? Regards, Jason Taylor From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Noone Sent: Tuesday, 16 February 2010 10:37 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: Filter web part with URL params Hi all, I have a simple article page with a CQWP on it. The articles are divided into a number of categories and I want to re-purpose the page for each of them. I'd like to be able to pass the category filter through as a URL param. Is there some way I can achieve this? My first thought was to try to set the value for a connected filter web part but not sure how to go about it. Regards, Paul Online Developer, ICT CEO Sydney SAGE is the first and only Australian company certified to the global benchmark standards of the Control Systems Integration Association. To see how this benefits you, simply visit www.controlsys.org Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may be confidential or contain legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any perusal, use, distribution, copying, modification or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately advise us by return e-mail and delete the document without making a copy. No warranty is made that any attachments are free from viruses. It is the recipient's responsibility to establish its own protection against viruses and other damage. ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
RE: CQWP in 2010
I can see the point about multiple content databases, but they could have at least allowed a query against another site collection (one at a time). This would save many people having to resort to 3rd party tools or custom development. From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Thake Sent: Thursday, 28 January 2010 6:59 PM To: paul.culm...@sevensigma.com.au; ozMOSS Subject: RE: CQWP in 2010 With the new Developer Dashboard, if you did put a web part on a page that did a cross site collection query...you'd be able to see the timings on the page based on what object model calls were happening. Would be interesting, but Paul is correct...hopping between two site collections means two databases which results in taking the data up into the application server memory and joining the data there. Maybe that's what the 64-bit minimum requirement and min 6GB RAM is for ;-) From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Culmsee Sent: Thursday, 28 January 2010 1:40 PM To: 'ozMOSS' Subject: RE: CQWP in 2010 Thats an architectural limitation of content databases. When you think about it, crossing site collections is actually quite inefficient because its two separate underlying SQL databases. I'd be very interested indeed just to see how expensive SDK based cross site collection queries are at a DB level. Ie slap on the lightning conductor web part, pull some data and to a sql trace. Perhaps the numbers have been crunched somewhere - I've not gone looking. Regards Paul From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Jason Taylor Sent: Thursday, 28 January 2010 1:36 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: CQWP in 2010 Looking at the query scope settings they look exactly the same as 2007, allowing only site collection, sites sub-sites or a list. Unless there is something under the hood it doesn't look like you can. Cheers, Jason Taylor SAGE Automation From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Noone Sent: Thursday, 28 January 2010 10:40 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: CQWP in 2010 Can anyone confirm whether the Content Query Web Part in 2010 has been enhanced to allow cross-site querying? Regards, Paul Online Developer, ICT CEO Sydney Winner of a National Australian Human Resources Institute Award and Australian Engineering Excellence Awards 2008 'Presidents Prize' Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may be confidential or contain legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any perusal, use, distribution, copying, modification or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately advise us by return e-mail and delete the document without making a copy. No warranty is made that any attachments are free from viruses. It is the recipient's responsibility to establish its own protection against viruses and other damage. Winner of a National Australian Human Resources Institute Award and Australian Engineering Excellence Awards 2008 'Presidents Prize' Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may be confidential or contain legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any perusal, use, distribution, copying, modification or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately advise us by return e-mail and delete the document without making a copy. No warranty is made that any attachments are free from viruses. It is the recipient's responsibility to establish its own protection against viruses and other damage. ___ ozmoss mailing list ozmoss@ozmoss.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
