Re: [Paraview] [Xdmf] xdmf2 and paraview troubles
Is there a particular reason why you are using hdf5 1.8? Things would
probably go smoother if you used 1.6.X.
-berk
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 5:01 AM, Alin M Elena
alinm.el...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Berk,
Here is the answer that I got from John on the xdmf list.
This is after some header problems were solved plus the hdf5 1.8 version
problem solved too,
Now the problem seem to be related with some casting of uint64. Anyhow it
looks like me related with the problem that Mike Jackson fixed last summer in
June.
I will not have time to follow John's advice until next week.
regards,
Alin
--
__
If the Universities will not study useless subjects, who will?
G. F. FitzGerald, Nature, 45/46, 392 (1892)
__
Mr Alin M ELENA
Irish Centre for High-End Computing -- www.ichec.ie
The Design Tower, Trinity Technology Enterprise Campus
Grand Canal Quay, Dublin 2, Ireland
Tel: +353 (0) 1 5241608 ext 29
Fax: +353 (0) 1 7645845
http://alin.elenaworld.net
alin.el...@ichec.ie
alinm.el...@gmail.com
__
-- Forwarded message --
From: John Biddiscombe biddi...@cscs.ch
To: alin.el...@ichec.ie
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:37:45 +0100
Subject: Re: [Xdmf] xdmf2 and paraview troubles
Alin
[ 46%] Building CXX object
Utilities/Xdmf2/libsrc/CMakeFiles/Xdmf.dir/XdmfH5Driver.o
/home/alin/ParaView3/Utilities/Xdmf2/libsrc/XdmfH5Driver.cxx(165): error: a
value of type haddr_t={uint64_t={unsigned long}} (*)(H5FD_t *) cannot be
used to initialize an entity of type herr_t={int} (*)(H5FD_t *,
H5FD_mem_t={H5FD_mem_t}, hid_t={int}, haddr_t={uint64_t={unsigned long}},
hsize_t={unsigned long long})
H5FD_dsm_get_eoa, /*get_eoa */
^
Look carefully and you can see a 64bit int is being cast to a standard int
(or vice versa). Have a play with Enable SIZE_T and 64 bit compilation
options. This error clearly should not occur, but since you're using an intel
compiler, some combination might not have been discoverd. (possibly even a
CMake issue causing types not to be detected properly, but unlikely)
See if you can find what settings make the error go away and post the results
back. Perhaps it'll help provide a fix for the future.
NB. I'm guessing, so if I am barking up the wrong tree. Apologies.
JB
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
Re: [Paraview] [Xdmf] xdmf2 and paraview troubles
Hi Berk,
Personally I do not use the xdmf and I am interested only in the molecular
plots.
The 1.8 version is the one that came default on my opensuse 11.1 box.
In the face of the issues may be a good idea to bundle, as an option, a
version that is known to work with paraview.
I try to compile paraview with all plugins as we intend here at ICHEC to offer
it to the users as a complement/replacement of their visualization tools.
regards,
Alin
--
__
If the Universities will not study useless subjects, who will?
G. F. FitzGerald, Nature, 45/46, 392 (1892)
__
Mr Alin M ELENA
Irish Centre for High-End Computing -- www.ichec.ie
The Design Tower, Trinity Technology Enterprise Campus
Grand Canal Quay, Dublin 2, Ireland
Tel: +353 (0) 1 5241608 ext 29
Fax: +353 (0) 1 7645845
http://alin.elenaworld.net
alin.el...@ichec.ie
alinm.el...@gmail.com
__
On Wednesday 25 March 2009 10:40:25 you wrote:
Is there a particular reason why you are using hdf5 1.8? Things would
probably go smoother if you used 1.6.X.
-berk
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 5:01 AM, Alin M Elena
alinm.el...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Berk,
Here is the answer that I got from John on the xdmf list.
This is after some header problems were solved plus the hdf5 1.8 version
problem solved too,
Now the problem seem to be related with some casting of uint64. Anyhow it
looks like me related with the problem that Mike Jackson fixed last
summer in June.
I will not have time to follow John's advice until next week.
regards,
Alin
--
__
If the Universities will not study useless subjects, who will?
G. F. FitzGerald, Nature, 45/46, 392 (1892)
__
Mr Alin M ELENA
Irish Centre for High-End Computing -- www.ichec.ie
The Design Tower, Trinity Technology Enterprise Campus
Grand Canal Quay, Dublin 2, Ireland
Tel: +353 (0) 1 5241608 ext 29
Fax: +353 (0) 1 7645845
http://alin.elenaworld.net
alin.el...@ichec.ie
alinm.el...@gmail.com
__
-- Forwarded message --
From: John Biddiscombe biddi...@cscs.ch
To: alin.el...@ichec.ie
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:37:45 +0100
Subject: Re: [Xdmf] xdmf2 and paraview troubles
Alin
[ 46%] Building CXX object
Utilities/Xdmf2/libsrc/CMakeFiles/Xdmf.dir/XdmfH5Driver.o
/home/alin/ParaView3/Utilities/Xdmf2/libsrc/XdmfH5Driver.cxx(165):
error: a value of type haddr_t={uint64_t={unsigned long}} (*)(H5FD_t
*) cannot be used to initialize an entity of type herr_t={int}
(*)(H5FD_t *, H5FD_mem_t={H5FD_mem_t}, hid_t={int},
haddr_t={uint64_t={unsigned long}}, hsize_t={unsigned long long})
H5FD_dsm_get_eoa,
/*get_eoa */
^
Look carefully and you can see a 64bit int is being cast to a standard
int (or vice versa). Have a play with Enable SIZE_T and 64 bit
compilation options. This error clearly should not occur, but since
you're using an intel compiler, some combination might not have been
discoverd. (possibly even a CMake issue causing types not to be detected
properly, but unlikely)
See if you can find what settings make the error go away and post the
results back. Perhaps it'll help provide a fix for the future.
NB. I'm guessing, so if I am barking up the wrong tree. Apologies.
JB
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
Re: [Paraview] Transform surface independently from axes and boxes
Hopefully, I understand this correctly now. Just go to the Display tab. If you scroll lower, you'll see a transformation section. Apply the scale there. The scale will be applied to both the geometry as well as the annotation, while the annotation will keep on showing original data values. Utkarsh 2009/3/25 blende32 blend...@gmx.net: Hi, the problem still exists. It seems not possible to scale only for display an let the annotation (Show cube axes) on unscaled values (the original values), which are not transformed. If I use the transform filter I manipulate the real data an then of course the annotation uses also the transformed values. I only will swage the surface for the display and screenshots, but the axes annotations should show the real values. Is this not possible? I use no geometry. The data are temperatures in Z, height in y and time in X. Karl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ From: jerome.ve...@gmail.com To: blend...@gmx.net Date: 08:31:33, 03.24.2009 Subject: Re: [Paraview] Transform surface independently from axes and boxes ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Hi, I don't know if this possible. Maybe with the calculator : what about if you give as point data the original point coordinate, and then apply the transform ? PointData should not be modified. This is a brief idea : I even don't know how to set the axes to plot the point data instead of the geometry... Good luck ! Jerome 2009/3/24 blende32 blend...@gmx.net Thank you for the explanation, but maybe I described the problem not exactly. I did not want to plot the surface of the transformed data apart from the outline and the axes of the original data. I will to get a nonproportional plot. The bounds of the data are X(0...3000) Y(0...250) Z(20...31) and this should be plotted in a cube with the same length of each edge with axes labeled of the original data. With the Transform filter I did many trials but without success. Karl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ From: utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com To: blend...@gmx.net Date: 14:08:16, 03.23.2009 Subject: Re: [Paraview] Transform surface independently from axes and boxes ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Apply the Transform filter to your data to transform it. However, also turn on the visibility of your original data source i.e input to the transform filter, switch the representation type to outline and then show cube axes etc. on that original data. Utkarsh On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Karl Muster blend...@gmx.net wrote: Hello, I'm new in using paraview for visualisation and I need some help for scaling or transforming surfaceplots independently from axes and boxes. The data about X, Y and Z are from different dimensions, thats why I have to transform or scale it, but the axes should show the real values and should not also be scaled. Thank you for help. -- Aufgepasst: Sind Ihre Daten beim Online-Banking auch optimal geschützt? Jetzt absichern: https://homebanking.gmx.net/?mc=m...@footer.hb ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
Re: [Paraview] Transform surface independently from axes and boxes
This is the problem, when I use the transformation section on the Display tab the scale will be applied to both, the geometry and the annotation (with Show cube axes) but I see on the Information tab the original values on the Bounds section. And this values should be used for the annotation not the transformed values, which are used for display. If I want the scale for both I can use the transform filter and manipulate the data directly but that is not what I want. Karl Original-Nachricht Datum: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 07:25:31 -0400 Von: Utkarsh Ayachit utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com An: blende32 blend...@gmx.net CC: jerome.ve...@gmail.com, paraview@paraview.org Betreff: Re: [Paraview] Transform surface independently from axes and boxes Hopefully, I understand this correctly now. Just go to the Display tab. If you scroll lower, you'll see a transformation section. Apply the scale there. The scale will be applied to both the geometry as well as the annotation, while the annotation will keep on showing original data values. Utkarsh 2009/3/25 blende32 blend...@gmx.net: Hi, the problem still exists. It seems not possible to scale only for display an let the annotation (Show cube axes) on unscaled values (the original values), which are not transformed. If I use the transform filter I manipulate the real data an then of course the annotation uses also the transformed values. I only will swage the surface for the display and screenshots, but the axes annotations should show the real values. Is this not possible? I use no geometry. The data are temperatures in Z, height in y and time in X. Karl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ From: jerome.ve...@gmail.com To: blend...@gmx.net Date: 08:31:33, 03.24.2009 Subject: Re: [Paraview] Transform surface independently from axes and boxes ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Hi, I don't know if this possible. Maybe with the calculator : what about if you give as point data the original point coordinate, and then apply the transform ? PointData should not be modified. This is a brief idea : I even don't know how to set the axes to plot the point data instead of the geometry... Good luck ! Jerome 2009/3/24 blende32 blend...@gmx.net Thank you for the explanation, but maybe I described the problem not exactly. I did not want to plot the surface of the transformed data apart from the outline and the axes of the original data. I will to get a nonproportional plot. The bounds of the data are X(0...3000) Y(0...250) Z(20...31) and this should be plotted in a cube with the same length of each edge with axes labeled of the original data. With the Transform filter I did many trials but without success. Karl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ From: utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com To: blend...@gmx.net Date: 14:08:16, 03.23.2009 Subject: Re: [Paraview] Transform surface independently from axes and boxes ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Apply the Transform filter to your data to transform it. However, also turn on the visibility of your original data source i.e input to the transform filter, switch the representation type to outline and then show cube axes etc. on that original data. Utkarsh On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Karl Muster blend...@gmx.net wrote: Hello, I'm new in using paraview for visualisation and I need some help for scaling or transforming surfaceplots independently from axes and boxes. The data about X, Y and Z are from different dimensions, thats why I have to transform or scale it, but the axes should show the real values and should not also be scaled. Thank you for help. -- Aufgepasst: Sind Ihre Daten beim Online-Banking auch optimal geschützt? Jetzt absichern: https://homebanking.gmx.net/?mc=m...@footer.hb ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep
Re: [Paraview] [Xdmf] xdmf2 and paraview troubles
Alin Paraview is bundled with a version of hdf5 that is known to work. But you turned it off, by setting PARAVIEW_USE_SYSTEM_HDF5:BOOL=ON turn this back off. JB Hi Berk, Personally I do not use the xdmf and I am interested only in the molecular plots. The 1.8 version is the one that came default on my opensuse 11.1 box. In the face of the issues may be a good idea to bundle, as an option, a version that is known to work with paraview. I try to compile paraview with all plugins as we intend here at ICHEC to offer it to the users as a complement/replacement of their visualization tools. regards, Alin -- John Biddiscombe,email:biddisco @ cscs.ch http://www.cscs.ch/ CSCS, Swiss National Supercomputing Centre | Tel: +41 (91) 610.82.07 Via Cantonale, 6928 Manno, Switzerland | Fax: +41 (91) 610.82.82 ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
[Paraview] Creating Append Attributes filter using python
Hi all, Could anyone advise me how to create an Append Attributes filter using pvpython? Paraview documentation refers to Group Parts filter which, I believe, is obsolete in version 3.4.0. My purpose is to merge multiple scalar/vector data sets sharing the same geometry. The data sets are loaded using PVDReader. Thanks, tpk ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
Re: [Paraview] Transform surface independently from axes and boxes
There seems to be a bug, if the transform was applied from the display tab, the cube-axes should still have been showing the original data bounds. Please feel free to add a bug report at www.paraview.org/Bug Thanks, Utkarsh On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 7:58 AM, Karl Muster blend...@gmx.net wrote: This is the problem, when I use the transformation section on the Display tab the scale will be applied to both, the geometry and the annotation (with Show cube axes) but I see on the Information tab the original values on the Bounds section. And this values should be used for the annotation not the transformed values, which are used for display. If I want the scale for both I can use the transform filter and manipulate the data directly but that is not what I want. Karl Original-Nachricht Datum: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 07:25:31 -0400 Von: Utkarsh Ayachit utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com An: blende32 blend...@gmx.net CC: jerome.ve...@gmail.com, paraview@paraview.org Betreff: Re: [Paraview] Transform surface independently from axes and boxes Hopefully, I understand this correctly now. Just go to the Display tab. If you scroll lower, you'll see a transformation section. Apply the scale there. The scale will be applied to both the geometry as well as the annotation, while the annotation will keep on showing original data values. Utkarsh 2009/3/25 blende32 blend...@gmx.net: Hi, the problem still exists. It seems not possible to scale only for display an let the annotation (Show cube axes) on unscaled values (the original values), which are not transformed. If I use the transform filter I manipulate the real data an then of course the annotation uses also the transformed values. I only will swage the surface for the display and screenshots, but the axes annotations should show the real values. Is this not possible? I use no geometry. The data are temperatures in Z, height in y and time in X. Karl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ From: jerome.ve...@gmail.com To: blend...@gmx.net Date: 08:31:33, 03.24.2009 Subject: Re: [Paraview] Transform surface independently from axes and boxes ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Hi, I don't know if this possible. Maybe with the calculator : what about if you give as point data the original point coordinate, and then apply the transform ? PointData should not be modified. This is a brief idea : I even don't know how to set the axes to plot the point data instead of the geometry... Good luck ! Jerome 2009/3/24 blende32 blend...@gmx.net Thank you for the explanation, but maybe I described the problem not exactly. I did not want to plot the surface of the transformed data apart from the outline and the axes of the original data. I will to get a nonproportional plot. The bounds of the data are X(0...3000) Y(0...250) Z(20...31) and this should be plotted in a cube with the same length of each edge with axes labeled of the original data. With the Transform filter I did many trials but without success. Karl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ From: utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com To: blend...@gmx.net Date: 14:08:16, 03.23.2009 Subject: Re: [Paraview] Transform surface independently from axes and boxes ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Apply the Transform filter to your data to transform it. However, also turn on the visibility of your original data source i.e input to the transform filter, switch the representation type to outline and then show cube axes etc. on that original data. Utkarsh On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Karl Muster blend...@gmx.net wrote: Hello, I'm new in using paraview for visualisation and I need some help for scaling or transforming surfaceplots independently from axes and boxes. The data about X, Y and Z are from different dimensions, thats why I have to transform or scale it, but the axes should show the real values and should not also be scaled. Thank you for help. -- Aufgepasst: Sind Ihre Daten beim Online-Banking auch optimal geschützt? Jetzt absichern: https://homebanking.gmx.net/?mc=m...@footer.hb ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Follow
Re: [Paraview] using netcdf in paraview
Burlen You can have an arbitrary number of meshes in the nedCDF file - but only one is exported (by default). Part of the work I was doing recently was to add SIL support to the reader so that the GUI panel would display it all, and allow the user to select multiple meshes for export. The reader by default generates multiblock - but only the first block (biggest rather, decided by size) is actually exported. Once I've finished with it, each selected variable would be exported as a separate grid. The core code should handle 1-5 dimensions (considering a vector field stored as a separate dimension, which between you and me is annoying). The reader got messy because I was trying to support different conventions, so it's very hard to follow what's doing what. the ability to support associated variables for dimensions and stuff really messed it up, and different conventions use different systems for the grid variables etc. Some data use time as a separate dimension, other multiple files etc etc JB Hi Guys, By the way I just tried to load her data using the new VisIt database bridge and it worked! Does the CSCS plugin you guys have been talking about support multiple meshes in the same file? Just curious, cause I had to write a custom panel in PV to get that stuff working. Burlen John Biddiscombe wrote: Martha (+put back on paraview list for reference and google) My Bad. One of the changes I made to the netCDF code was to handle series of files (one file per process, or one per timestep) using another class in vtkCSCSCommon Best thing is check out all of it from here... https://svn.cscs.ch/vtkContrib/trunk/vtkCSCS/ and use the cmakelists in the root pv3-plugins folder. you need CSCSCommomn and netCDF enabled. Fix the netCDF reader and send me the patches please :) JB Katie, I was able to check out vtkNetCDF from the SVN server; I had tried before using the web site's instructions, but it wouldn't work, I suppose because of our firewall; however the https in the URL that Mr. Biddiscome gave us did make a difference. However, when I attempted to build ParaView 3.4 with that vtkNetCDF module, I got an error once again, this time when for vtkNetCDFReader.cxx; what is missing is FileSeriesFinder.h. I cannot find that include file anywhere, in ParaView3.4, ParaView3.3, etc, so I don't know if it was inadvertently left out of the vtkNetCDF distribution or what. Martha -Original Message- From: Carbonari, Katie (IS) Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 5:15 PM To: Tonkin, Martha E (IS) Subject: FW: [Paraview] using netcdf in paraview -Original Message- From: John Biddiscombe [mailto:biddi...@cscs.ch] Sent: Tue 3/24/2009 5:09 PM To: Berk Geveci Cc: Carbonari, Katie (IS); paraview@paraview.org Subject: Re: [Paraview] using netcdf in paraview Katie Just looking again at the error messages makes me realize thet you're using a very old vtkCSCSnetCDF the version in here https://svn.cscs.ch/vtkContrib/trunk/vtkCSCS/vtkNetCDF/ is much more recent and will at least compile without errors. It ewas intended for meteo data (ocean/atmosphere) and so you should get something out of it but the changes I made a few months back will have broken the core load of data depending on which convention you are using. My intention was to create subclasses for each supported convention, rather than try to support all of them with aton of options - which is what the current reader does. If you're familiar with vtk code, you'll son work out how to fix it. I'll take a look at again it in a few weeks. JB Hmmm. It sounds like there is version mismatch between ParaView and the plugin. We deprecated those classes not long ago. Are you using cvs ParaView? -berk 2009/3/23 Carbonari, Katie (IS) katie.carbon...@ngc.com mailto:katie.carbon...@ngc.com : Hi there. I'm trying to read netcdf data into paraview, but am having lots of issues. I was following these directions (from here: http://www.cscs.ch/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=96Itemid=1 32): Please build ParaView using the CMake advanced option PARAVIEW_EXTRA_EXTERNAL_MODULES set to CSCSNetCDF rerun configure and set PARAVIEW_USE_CSCSNetCDF to ON, then rerun configure and enter the name of the directory where the source has been extracted. Build paraview and the netCDF reader should be embedded. Building as a vtk module is supported, documentation will be provided as soon as possible. (Some changes have recently been made which may break the existing build, these will be fixed shortly). But when we make Paraview, it's not finding a bunch of files (vtkMultiGroupDataInformation.h, vtkMultiGroupDataSet.h, vtkMultiGroupSetAlgorithm.h). Any advice on how to make this work? Or maybe a better way to read in netcdf files? Thanks,
