Re: [Paraview] Feature request - Need more detailed control of generating nodal quantities from element results

2014-10-23 Thread Berk Geveci
Hi Alan,

You are correct (although (1) is somewhat unclear - are we talking about
Exodus files that have different element sets here?).

I would also recommend this document:
http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/images/7/78/VTK-Quadrature-Point-Design-Doc.pdf
which explains the current integration (gauss) point support. It doesn't do
what he wants but it's worth a read.

Best,
-berk

On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Scott, W Alan wasc...@sandia.gov wrote:

 A question from a user.  I believe that answer is correct to the first
 bullet, and the answer is no to the second bullet?


 1 - Averaging a nodal result from surrounding elements is OK as long as
 the node is within a homogenous body.  This process is not correct for
 nodes on the boundary between two different materials.
 2 - Is there a process to extrapolate element integration point quantities
 (stresses, strains) to nodes for elements with non-linear shape functions?


 Thanks,

 Alan
 ___
 Powered by www.kitware.com

 Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
 http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

 Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
 http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

 Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
 http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview


[Paraview] Feature request - Need more detailed control of generating nodal quantities from element results

2014-10-22 Thread Scott, W Alan
A question from a user.  I believe that answer is correct to the first bullet, 
and the answer is no to the second bullet?


1 - Averaging a nodal result from surrounding elements is OK as long as the 
node is within a homogenous body.  This process is not correct for nodes on the 
boundary between two different materials.
2 - Is there a process to extrapolate element integration point quantities 
(stresses, strains) to nodes for elements with non-linear shape functions?


Thanks,

Alan
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview


Re: [Paraview] [Feature request] Expanding PVD File Components

2010-04-28 Thread Favre Jean

From: paraview-boun...@paraview.org [paraview-boun...@paraview.org] On Behalf 
Of Olumide [50...@web.de]
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 2:03 PM
To: paraview@paraview.org
Subject: Re: [Paraview] [Feature request] Expanding PVD File Components

Thanks.

Erm ... what does a *.vts file look like?

(VTM and VTS files are not described in the file formats document.)

-

Please see:

StructuredGrid (.vts) — Serial vtkStructuredGrid (structured).

on page 12 of the file format document www.vtk.org/VTK/img/file-formats.pdf
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview


Re: [Paraview] [Feature request] Expanding PVD File Components

2010-04-27 Thread Aurélien Marsan
it looks like .pvd file, without time.
Such a file can be writen with vtk.vtkMultiBlockDataWriter()

For example :

 ?xml version=1.0?

 VTKFile type=vtkMultiBlockDataSet version=1.0
 byte_order=LittleEndian compressor=vtkZLibDataCompressor

 vtkMultiBlockDataSet

 DataSet index=1 file=bloc1_test.vts/

 DataSet index=2 file=bloc2_test.vts/

 DataSet index=3 file=bloc3_test.vts/

 DataSet index=4 file=bloc4_test.vts/

 DataSet index=5 file=bloc5_test.vts/

 DataSet index=6 file=bloc6_test.vts/

 DataSet index=7 file=bloc7_test.vts/

 DataSet index=8 file=bloc8_test.vts/

 DataSet index=9 file=bloc9_test.vts/

 DataSet index=10 file=bloc10_test.vts/

 DataSet index=11 file=bloc11_test.vts/

 DataSet index=12 file=bloc12_test.vts/

 DataSet index=13 file=bloc13_test.vts/

 DataSet index=14 file=bloc14_test.vts/

 DataSet index=15 file=bloc15_test.vts/

 DataSet index=16 file=bloc16_test.vts/

 DataSet index=17 file=bloc17_test.vts/

 DataSet index=18 file=bloc18_test.vts/

 DataSet index=19 file=bloc19_test.vts/

 DataSet index=20 file=bloc20_test.vts/

 DataSet index=21 file=bloc21_test.vts/

 DataSet index=22 file=bloc22_test.vts/

 DataSet index=23 file=bloc23_test.vts/

 DataSet index=24 file=bloc24_test.vts/

 DataSet index=25 file=bloc25_test.vts/

 /vtkMultiBlockDataSet

 /VTKFile




2010/4/26 Olumide 50...@web.de

 Marsan, what does a VTM file look like?

 In addition to expanding the VTP (and VTM) files. It is possible to add
 more object/primitive detail in the statistics inspector. It may useful to
 expand an object so that point values, poly-face coordinates etc. can be
 read/seen.


 ___
 Powered by www.kitware.com

 Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
 http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

 Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
 http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

 Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
 http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview

___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview


Re: [Paraview] [Feature request] Expanding PVD File Components

2010-04-26 Thread Utkarsh Ayachit
My pvd components, do you mean blocks in a multiblock dataset? That's
one of the feature's we are thinking about for future release. Any
suggestions about the user interface from the community are always
welcome :).

Utkarsh

On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Olumide 50...@web.de wrote:
 Hi -

 Would the developers consider making PVD files expandable (and collapsable)?
 It would be nice to be able to see the contents of a PVD file and possible
 hide/suppress the display of parts of the the PVD file. This would be a
 great way to reduce clutter.

 - Olumide
 ___
 Powered by www.kitware.com

 Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
 http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

 Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
 http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

 Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
 http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview

___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview


Re: [Paraview] [Feature request] Expanding PVD File Components

2010-04-26 Thread Olumide
I don't know what you mean by multiblock dataset, but here's an example 
of how I use PVD files -- to compose multiple files:


?xml version=1.0?
VTKFile type=Collection version=0.1 byte_order=LittleEndian
Collection
DataSet timestep=0 file=Data_Patch_0.vtp/
DataSet timestep=0 file=Data_Patch_1.vtp/
DataSet timestep=0 file=Data_Patch_2.vtp/
/Collection
/VTKFile

It would be nice to be able to expand the PVD file in the pipeline 
browser in order to see its various file components and optionally hide 
some of them. For example, if the view is cluttered, I may wish to 
suppress the display of Data_Patch_1.vtp.


Regards,

- Olumide

___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview


Re: [Paraview] [Feature request] Expanding PVD File Components

2010-04-26 Thread Aurélien Marsan
Good Morning,

MultiBlockDataSet is what you have when you read your pvd file. See the tab
Information in the Object Browser to be sure.
But in your case, all the timesteps are 0 ?  Then maybe you should
better user a .vtm file.

However, I completely agree with you. What you suggest would be a very
convenient tool.
For a MultiBlockDataSet, in the tab Information of the object inspector,
it would be great to have the possibility to hide some of the DataSets, or
better, to completely desactivate some components.
Regards,

A.Marsan
2010/4/26 Olumide 50...@web.de

 I don't know what you mean by multiblock dataset, but here's an example of
 how I use PVD files -- to compose multiple files:

 ?xml version=1.0?
 VTKFile type=Collection version=0.1 byte_order=LittleEndian
Collection
DataSet timestep=0 file=Data_Patch_0.vtp/
DataSet timestep=0 file=Data_Patch_1.vtp/
DataSet timestep=0 file=Data_Patch_2.vtp/
/Collection
 /VTKFile

 It would be nice to be able to expand the PVD file in the pipeline browser
 in order to see its various file components and optionally hide some of
 them. For example, if the view is cluttered, I may wish to suppress the
 display of Data_Patch_1.vtp.

 Regards,


 - Olumide

 ___
 Powered by www.kitware.com

 Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
 http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

 Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
 http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

 Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
 http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview

___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview


Re: [Paraview] [Feature request] Expanding PVD File Components

2010-04-26 Thread Olumide

Marsan, what does a VTM file look like?

In addition to expanding the VTP (and VTM) files. It is possible to add 
more object/primitive detail in the statistics inspector. It may useful 
to expand an object so that point values, poly-face coordinates etc. can 
be read/seen.


___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview


[Paraview] [Feature request] Expanding PVD File Components

2010-04-25 Thread Olumide

Hi -

Would the developers consider making PVD files expandable (and 
collapsable)? It would be nice to be able to see the contents of a PVD 
file and possible hide/suppress the display of parts of the the PVD 
file. This would be a great way to reduce clutter.


- Olumide
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview


[Paraview] Feature request: Direction specification in cylinder source

2009-11-26 Thread Mengda Wu
Hi Paraview developers,

I trying to use cylinder source, but there is no direction
specification as in cone source. It would be great if you can add this
feature.

Thanks,
Mengda
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview


Re: [Paraview] Feature request: Direction specification in cylinder source

2009-11-26 Thread Ricardo Reis

On Wed, 25 Nov 2009, Mengda Wu wrote:


Hi Paraview developers,

   I trying to use cylinder source, but there is no direction
specification as in cone source. It would be great if you can add this
feature.



You can add your vote here for this feature :)

http://paraview.uservoice.com/pages/11350-general/suggestions/309509-orient-cylinder-glyp-direction-using-vector?ref=title

best,


 Ricardo Reis

 'Non Serviam'

 PhD candidate @ Lasef
 Computational Fluid Dynamics, High Performance Computing, Turbulence
 http://www.lasef.ist.utl.pt

 Cultural Instigator @ Rádio Zero
 http://www.radiozero.pt

 Keep them Flying! Ajude a/help Aero Fénix!

 http://www.aeronauta.com/aero.fenix

 http://www.flickr.com/photos/rreis/___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview


Re: [Paraview] Feature request for 2D plotting in ParaView

2009-07-16 Thread Utkarsh Ayachit
 2. Plot more than 1 plots in the same chart.
 (To compare simulation and experimental results, or more than 1 set of
 results)

You can already do that. You can turn on visibility of multiple
sources in the same plot view.

Utkarsh
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview


Re: [Paraview] Feature Request: vtkImageResample

2009-04-21 Thread Jérôme
Hi,

This is an up of this old thread. I have problems with vtkImageResample. I
wrote an XML that exposes this filter to ParaView, and
vtkImageGaussianSource and vtkImageMagnitude too. Please, could you try that
and tell me if you can reproduce this behaviour ?
- Load plugin as XML
- Create a Gaussian Source and Apply with default settings
- Plug an Image Resample proxy to the Gaussian Source output
- Set Spacing to 0.5 0.5 0.5
- Apply.

Then, a normal behaviour would be for ImageResample to produce a volume with
Extent twice more than input, so dimension (256, 256, 256). This is not the
case. Extent is blocked to 0 127 0 127 0 127. With the given spacing, the
bounding box is smaller than the input! You can try with a down-sampling of
the input: set Spacing to 2 2 2 in Image Resample object property panel,
Apply. Extent is twice less than input, Spacing twice more: bounding box is
the same, this behaviour is correct.

It acts like there is a saturation of the output extent according to the
input one. I didn't note that problem within a python script (outside
ParaView) and with an VTK-only dependent executable.

Find attached the XML.

Thanks for your time!
Best regards,

Jerome
WIndows XP SP3, ParaView CVS, VS2008X

2009/1/30 Bryn Lloyd bll...@vision.ee.ethz.ch

 Hi again,

 It seems the vtkImageResample filter (and it's parent vtkImageReslice
 probably too) does not give the output array a name (unless no resampling is
 done).

 This would seem to be a bug. However, I couldn't follow the code in
 vtkImageReslice to see where the name could be set or what the problem is.

 Cheers
 Bryn








 Bryn Lloyd wrote:

 Hi,

 I have tried it in a similar way with no success.


 It works though using following Set-methods:

 //

 void vtkImageResample2::SetOutputSpacing(double v[3])
 {
  this-SetOutputSpacing(v[0],v[1],v[2]);
 }

 //

 void vtkImageResample2::SetOutputSpacing(double v0,double v1,double v2)
 {
  this-SetAxisOutputSpacing(0,v0);
  this-SetAxisOutputSpacing(1,v1);
  this-SetAxisOutputSpacing(2,v2);
 }



 With standard xml description:

  DoubleVectorProperty
 name=OutputSpacing
 command=SetOutputSpacing
 number_of_elements=3
 default_values=0 0 0 
  /DoubleVectorProperty



 I have place the code here:

 http://www.vision.ee.ethz.ch/~blloyd/vtkImageResample2/http://www.vision.ee.ethz.ch/%7Eblloyd/vtkImageResample2/



 This seems to work (extent is changed say for MagnifactionFactos=0.5 0.5
 1.0). But the image data becomes invisible. I think it converts the
 PointData-Arrays to some other form, e.g. image scalars or something, which
 paraview doesn't display.


 --Bryn










 Jérôme wrote:

 Hi,

 I tried to do what you talked about, because I need isotropic volumes
 for a number of algorithms. I think it is the same for you, right?

 I wrote an xml file that you can load in the plugin manager menu,
 according to this wiki page:
   http://paraview.org/Wiki/Plugin_HowTo#Enabling_a_filter_in_VTK

 The problem is that the VTK filter seems not to be paraview-compliant:
 it didn't work, but unfortunately I didn't have time to describe the
 bugs. I joint the xml file, so that you can try and please tell me if
 it works for you -then I may guess it is because of my settings...-.

 In a nutshell, here are my problems for a volume of spacing 0.5x0.5x1
 that I want to be 0.5x0.5x0.5 ie magnification factor = 0.5 on axis z
 (= 2)
 - The filter updates, but the extent does not change in the output
 - When representation of input is 'Slice', the output dimensionality is 2
 !!!

 I hope someone could find the mistake, wherever it comes (my xml,
 paraview, or VTK)

 I also write a Cxx class that inherites from vtkImageResample and
 computes automatically the magnification factor depending on a
 user-chosen reference axis (in my example, x or y). Today, I use an
 independent executable that converts an input mhd file into an
 isotropic volume, and then I open it in paraview. I would be glad if
 this step is part of a paraview pipeline, but my inherited class has
 the same behaviour than vtkImageResample (and I think that when I
 tried with the parent class vtkImageReslice, the same problem
 occured...).

 Jerome

 2009/1/30 Bryn Lloyd bll...@vision.ee.ethz.ch:

 Dear VTK Developers


 I would like to use the vtkResampleImage class in Paraview (plugin). For
 this purpose it would be helpful if in addition to the methods

 SetAxisMagnificationFactor (int axis, double factor)
 SetAxisOutputSpacing (int axis, double spacing)


 which are valid for axis 0,1 and 2, following new functions could be
 added:

 SetAxisMagnificationFactor (double, double, double)
 SetAxisOutputSpacing (double, double, double)


 i.e. taking values for all three axis directions simultaneously.


 Could this be done?


 Thanks in advance!

 Bryn





Re: [Paraview] Feature Request: vtkImageResample

2009-04-21 Thread Bryn Lloyd

Hi Jerome,

I have had the same problem. It seems to be an incompatibility with the 
paraview pipeline.



Standard applications with these filters work fine.

It also affects the vtkImageConstantPad filter.


I sent my attempts to the list in March:

http://www.paraview.org/pipermail/paraview/2009-March/011351.html

bye
Bryn






Jérôme wrote:

Hi,

This is an up of this old thread. I have problems with vtkImageResample. 
I wrote an XML that exposes this filter to ParaView, and 
vtkImageGaussianSource and vtkImageMagnitude too. Please, could you try 
that and tell me if you can reproduce this behaviour ?

- Load plugin as XML
- Create a Gaussian Source and Apply with default settings
- Plug an Image Resample proxy to the Gaussian Source output
- Set Spacing to 0.5 0.5 0.5
- Apply.

Then, a normal behaviour would be for ImageResample to produce a volume 
with Extent twice more than input, so dimension (256, 256, 256). This is 
not the case. Extent is blocked to 0 127 0 127 0 127. With the given 
spacing, the bounding box is smaller than the input! You can try with a 
down-sampling of the input: set Spacing to 2 2 2 in Image Resample 
object property panel, Apply. Extent is twice less than input, Spacing 
twice more: bounding box is the same, this behaviour is correct.


It acts like there is a saturation of the output extent according to the 
input one. I didn't note that problem within a python script (outside 
ParaView) and with an VTK-only dependent executable.


Find attached the XML.

Thanks for your time!
Best regards,

Jerome
WIndows XP SP3, ParaView CVS, VS2008X

2009/1/30 Bryn Lloyd bll...@vision.ee.ethz.ch 
mailto:bll...@vision.ee.ethz.ch


Hi again,

It seems the vtkImageResample filter (and it's parent
vtkImageReslice probably too) does not give the output array a name
(unless no resampling is done).

This would seem to be a bug. However, I couldn't follow the code in
vtkImageReslice to see where the name could be set or what the
problem is.

Cheers
Bryn








Bryn Lloyd wrote:

Hi,

I have tried it in a similar way with no success.


It works though using following Set-methods:


//

void vtkImageResample2::SetOutputSpacing(double v[3])
{
 this-SetOutputSpacing(v[0],v[1],v[2]);
}


//

void vtkImageResample2::SetOutputSpacing(double v0,double
v1,double v2)
{
 this-SetAxisOutputSpacing(0,v0);
 this-SetAxisOutputSpacing(1,v1);
 this-SetAxisOutputSpacing(2,v2);
}



With standard xml description:

 DoubleVectorProperty
name=OutputSpacing
command=SetOutputSpacing
number_of_elements=3
default_values=0 0 0 
 /DoubleVectorProperty



I have place the code here:

http://www.vision.ee.ethz.ch/~blloyd/vtkImageResample2/
http://www.vision.ee.ethz.ch/%7Eblloyd/vtkImageResample2/



This seems to work (extent is changed say for
MagnifactionFactos=0.5 0.5 1.0). But the image data becomes
invisible. I think it converts the PointData-Arrays to some
other form, e.g. image scalars or something, which paraview
doesn't display.


--Bryn










Jérôme wrote:

Hi,

I tried to do what you talked about, because I need
isotropic volumes
for a number of algorithms. I think it is the same for you,
right?

I wrote an xml file that you can load in the plugin manager
menu,
according to this wiki page:
  http://paraview.org/Wiki/Plugin_HowTo#Enabling_a_filter_in_VTK

The problem is that the VTK filter seems not to be
paraview-compliant:
it didn't work, but unfortunately I didn't have time to
describe the
bugs. I joint the xml file, so that you can try and please
tell me if
it works for you -then I may guess it is because of my
settings...-.

In a nutshell, here are my problems for a volume of spacing
0.5x0.5x1
that I want to be 0.5x0.5x0.5 ie magnification factor = 0.5
on axis z
(= 2)
- The filter updates, but the extent does not change in the
output
- When representation of input is 'Slice', the output
dimensionality is 2 !!!

I hope someone could find the mistake, wherever it comes (my
xml,
paraview, or VTK)

I also write a Cxx class that inherites from
vtkImageResample and
computes automatically the magnification factor depending on a

Re: [Paraview] Feature request

2009-03-13 Thread Berk Geveci
I am not trying to shoot your idea down. I am trying to understand the
use case better. My biggest issue is that I always end up editing the
display settings when the wrong view is active. I am not sure how to
solve that problem. What is the particular problem in your case? You
have a large pipeline and you want to quickly get to an object to
modify its parameters? What  if you could just select the object in
the view?

-berk

On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Renato Elias rnel...@gmail.com wrote:
 I see... I have not thought about this possibility. Maybe cloning the
 object's name in the views that it's owned by. I don't know... I was just
 willing to suggest a way to make the pipeline's representation more
 organized and easy to understand when we have mutiple views...

 Renato.

 On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Berk Geveci berk.gev...@kitware.com
 wrote:

 OK, how do you decide which object belongs to which view? An object
 can be shown in more than one view.

 -berk

 On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Renato Elias rnel...@gmail.com wrote:
  Oops, sorry for not being more clear. I was thinking about grouping by
  objects itself, not by visibility. In this way we would have something
  like
  this:
 
  view_1
      dataset_1
      filter_1.1
      filter_1.2
 
  view_2
      dataset_2
      filter_2.1
      filter_2.2
 
  view_3
      dataset_3
      filter_3.1
      filter_3.2
 
  and so on...
 
  Regards
 
  Renato.
 
 
  On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Berk Geveci berk.gev...@kitware.com
  wrote:
 
  Can you be more specific? Grouped based on visibility? Is the idea to
  quickly find the panel of an object you see in a view?
 
  -berk
 
  On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Renato Elias rnel...@gmail.com
  wrote:
   Just a suggestion: It would be great have the pipeline objects
   grouped
   when
   we have multiple views. Sometimes, when the pipeline is large, it's
   hard
   to
   find what object is in each view just looking for the visibility icon
   (that
   small eye).
  
   Cheers
  
   Renato.
  
   p.s.: I forgot the link to the bug/feature request system
  
   ___
   Powered by www.kitware.com
  
   Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
   http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
  
   Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
   http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
  
   Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
   http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
  
  
 
 


___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview


[Paraview] Feature request

2009-03-12 Thread Renato Elias
Just a suggestion: It would be great have the pipeline objects grouped when
we have multiple views. Sometimes, when the pipeline is large, it's hard to
find what object is in each view just looking for the visibility icon (that
small eye).

Cheers

Renato.

p.s.: I forgot the link to the bug/feature request system
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview


Re: [Paraview] Feature request

2009-03-12 Thread Utkarsh Ayachit
Here's the link: http://paraview.org/Bug/


On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Renato Elias rnel...@gmail.com wrote:
 Just a suggestion: It would be great have the pipeline objects grouped when
 we have multiple views. Sometimes, when the pipeline is large, it's hard to
 find what object is in each view just looking for the visibility icon (that
 small eye).

 Cheers

 Renato.

 p.s.: I forgot the link to the bug/feature request system

 ___
 Powered by www.kitware.com

 Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
 http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

 Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
 http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

 Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
 http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview


___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview


Re: [Paraview] Feature request

2009-03-12 Thread Renato Elias
Thanks Utkarsh, I've just filled in a feature request.

regards

Renato.

On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Utkarsh Ayachit 
utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com wrote:

 Here's the link: http://paraview.org/Bug/


 On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Renato Elias rnel...@gmail.com wrote:
  Just a suggestion: It would be great have the pipeline objects grouped
 when
  we have multiple views. Sometimes, when the pipeline is large, it's hard
 to
  find what object is in each view just looking for the visibility icon
 (that
  small eye).
 
  Cheers
 
  Renato.
 
  p.s.: I forgot the link to the bug/feature request system
 
  ___
  Powered by www.kitware.com
 
  Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
  http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
 
  Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
  http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
 
  Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
  http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
 
 

___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview


Re: [Paraview] Feature request

2009-03-12 Thread Berk Geveci
Can you be more specific? Grouped based on visibility? Is the idea to
quickly find the panel of an object you see in a view?

-berk

On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Renato Elias rnel...@gmail.com wrote:
 Just a suggestion: It would be great have the pipeline objects grouped when
 we have multiple views. Sometimes, when the pipeline is large, it's hard to
 find what object is in each view just looking for the visibility icon (that
 small eye).

 Cheers

 Renato.

 p.s.: I forgot the link to the bug/feature request system

 ___
 Powered by www.kitware.com

 Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
 http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

 Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
 http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

 Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
 http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview


___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview


Re: [Paraview] Feature request

2009-03-12 Thread Renato Elias
Oops, sorry for not being more clear. I was thinking about grouping by
objects itself, not by visibility. In this way we would have something like
this:

view_1
dataset_1
filter_1.1
filter_1.2

view_2
dataset_2
filter_2.1
filter_2.2

view_3
dataset_3
filter_3.1
filter_3.2

and so on...

Regards

Renato.


On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Berk Geveci berk.gev...@kitware.comwrote:

 Can you be more specific? Grouped based on visibility? Is the idea to
 quickly find the panel of an object you see in a view?

 -berk

 On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Renato Elias rnel...@gmail.com wrote:
  Just a suggestion: It would be great have the pipeline objects grouped
 when
  we have multiple views. Sometimes, when the pipeline is large, it's hard
 to
  find what object is in each view just looking for the visibility icon
 (that
  small eye).
 
  Cheers
 
  Renato.
 
  p.s.: I forgot the link to the bug/feature request system
 
  ___
  Powered by www.kitware.com
 
  Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
  http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
 
  Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
  http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
 
  Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
  http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
 
 

___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview


Re: [Paraview] Feature request

2009-03-12 Thread Berk Geveci
OK, how do you decide which object belongs to which view? An object
can be shown in more than one view.

-berk

On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Renato Elias rnel...@gmail.com wrote:
 Oops, sorry for not being more clear. I was thinking about grouping by
 objects itself, not by visibility. In this way we would have something like
 this:

 view_1
     dataset_1
     filter_1.1
     filter_1.2

 view_2
     dataset_2
     filter_2.1
     filter_2.2

 view_3
     dataset_3
     filter_3.1
     filter_3.2

 and so on...

 Regards

 Renato.


 On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Berk Geveci berk.gev...@kitware.com
 wrote:

 Can you be more specific? Grouped based on visibility? Is the idea to
 quickly find the panel of an object you see in a view?

 -berk

 On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Renato Elias rnel...@gmail.com wrote:
  Just a suggestion: It would be great have the pipeline objects grouped
  when
  we have multiple views. Sometimes, when the pipeline is large, it's hard
  to
  find what object is in each view just looking for the visibility icon
  (that
  small eye).
 
  Cheers
 
  Renato.
 
  p.s.: I forgot the link to the bug/feature request system
 
  ___
  Powered by www.kitware.com
 
  Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
  http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
 
  Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
  http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
 
  Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
  http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
 
 


___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview


[Paraview] Feature Request: vtkImageResample

2009-01-30 Thread Bryn Lloyd

Dear VTK Developers


I would like to use the vtkResampleImage class in Paraview (plugin). For 
this purpose it would be helpful if in addition to the methods


SetAxisMagnificationFactor (int axis, double factor)
SetAxisOutputSpacing (int axis, double spacing)


which are valid for axis 0,1 and 2, following new functions could be added:

SetAxisMagnificationFactor (double, double, double)
SetAxisOutputSpacing (double, double, double)


i.e. taking values for all three axis directions simultaneously.


Could this be done?


Thanks in advance!

Bryn




--
-
Bryn Lloyd
Computer Vision Laboratory
ETH Zürich, Sternwartstrasse 7
CH - 8092 Zürich, Switzerland
Tel: +41 44 63 26668
Fax: +41 44 63 21199
-
___
ParaView mailing list
ParaView@paraview.org
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview


Re: [Paraview] Feature Request: vtkImageResample

2009-01-30 Thread Jérôme
Hi,

I tried to do what you talked about, because I need isotropic volumes
for a number of algorithms. I think it is the same for you, right?

I wrote an xml file that you can load in the plugin manager menu,
according to this wiki page:
   http://paraview.org/Wiki/Plugin_HowTo#Enabling_a_filter_in_VTK

The problem is that the VTK filter seems not to be paraview-compliant:
it didn't work, but unfortunately I didn't have time to describe the
bugs. I joint the xml file, so that you can try and please tell me if
it works for you -then I may guess it is because of my settings...-.

In a nutshell, here are my problems for a volume of spacing 0.5x0.5x1
that I want to be 0.5x0.5x0.5 ie magnification factor = 0.5 on axis z
(= 2)
- The filter updates, but the extent does not change in the output
- When representation of input is 'Slice', the output dimensionality is 2 !!!

I hope someone could find the mistake, wherever it comes (my xml,
paraview, or VTK)

I also write a Cxx class that inherites from vtkImageResample and
computes automatically the magnification factor depending on a
user-chosen reference axis (in my example, x or y). Today, I use an
independent executable that converts an input mhd file into an
isotropic volume, and then I open it in paraview. I would be glad if
this step is part of a paraview pipeline, but my inherited class has
the same behaviour than vtkImageResample (and I think that when I
tried with the parent class vtkImageReslice, the same problem
occured...).

Jerome

2009/1/30 Bryn Lloyd bll...@vision.ee.ethz.ch:
 Dear VTK Developers


 I would like to use the vtkResampleImage class in Paraview (plugin). For
 this purpose it would be helpful if in addition to the methods

 SetAxisMagnificationFactor (int axis, double factor)
 SetAxisOutputSpacing (int axis, double spacing)


 which are valid for axis 0,1 and 2, following new functions could be added:

 SetAxisMagnificationFactor (double, double, double)
 SetAxisOutputSpacing (double, double, double)


 i.e. taking values for all three axis directions simultaneously.


 Could this be done?


 Thanks in advance!

 Bryn




 --
 -
 Bryn Lloyd
 Computer Vision Laboratory
 ETH Zürich, Sternwartstrasse 7
 CH - 8092 Zürich, Switzerland
 Tel: +41 44 63 26668
 Fax: +41 44 63 21199
 -
 ___
 ParaView mailing list
 ParaView@paraview.org
 http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview

ServerManagerConfiguration
  ProxyGroup name=filters
SourceProxy name=ImageResample class=vtkImageResample label=Resample
  Documentation
long_help=
short_help=
  /Documentation

  InputProperty
name=Input
command=SetInputConnection
ProxyGroupDomain name=groups
  Group name=sources/
  Group name=filters/
/ProxyGroupDomain
DataTypeDomain name=input_type
  DataType value=vtkImageData/
/DataTypeDomain

Documentation

/Documentation
  /InputProperty

  StringVectorProperty
name=AxisMagnificationFactor
command=SetAxisMagnificationFactor
number_of_elements=2
element_types=0 1
animateable=0
Documentation

/Documentation
  /StringVectorProperty

  IntVectorProperty
name=Dimensionality
command=SetDimensionality
number_of_elements=1
default_values=3
animateable=0

Documentation

/Documentation
  /IntVectorProperty


/SourceProxy
!--End ImageResample--
  /ProxyGroup
/ServerManagerConfiguration
___
ParaView mailing list
ParaView@paraview.org
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview


Re: [Paraview] Feature Request: vtkImageResample

2009-01-30 Thread Bryn Lloyd

Hi again,

It seems the vtkImageResample filter (and it's parent vtkImageReslice 
probably too) does not give the output array a name (unless no 
resampling is done).


This would seem to be a bug. However, I couldn't follow the code in 
vtkImageReslice to see where the name could be set or what the problem is.


Cheers
Bryn







Bryn Lloyd wrote:

Hi,

I have tried it in a similar way with no success.


It works though using following Set-methods:

// 


void vtkImageResample2::SetOutputSpacing(double v[3])
{
  this-SetOutputSpacing(v[0],v[1],v[2]);
}

// 


void vtkImageResample2::SetOutputSpacing(double v0,double v1,double v2)
{
  this-SetAxisOutputSpacing(0,v0);
  this-SetAxisOutputSpacing(1,v1);
  this-SetAxisOutputSpacing(2,v2);
}



With standard xml description:

  DoubleVectorProperty
 name=OutputSpacing
 command=SetOutputSpacing
 number_of_elements=3
 default_values=0 0 0 
  /DoubleVectorProperty



I have place the code here:

http://www.vision.ee.ethz.ch/~blloyd/vtkImageResample2/



This seems to work (extent is changed say for MagnifactionFactos=0.5 
0.5 1.0). But the image data becomes invisible. I think it converts the 
PointData-Arrays to some other form, e.g. image scalars or something, 
which paraview doesn't display.



--Bryn










Jérôme wrote:

Hi,

I tried to do what you talked about, because I need isotropic volumes
for a number of algorithms. I think it is the same for you, right?

I wrote an xml file that you can load in the plugin manager menu,
according to this wiki page:
   http://paraview.org/Wiki/Plugin_HowTo#Enabling_a_filter_in_VTK

The problem is that the VTK filter seems not to be paraview-compliant:
it didn't work, but unfortunately I didn't have time to describe the
bugs. I joint the xml file, so that you can try and please tell me if
it works for you -then I may guess it is because of my settings...-.

In a nutshell, here are my problems for a volume of spacing 0.5x0.5x1
that I want to be 0.5x0.5x0.5 ie magnification factor = 0.5 on axis z
(= 2)
- The filter updates, but the extent does not change in the output
- When representation of input is 'Slice', the output dimensionality 
is 2 !!!


I hope someone could find the mistake, wherever it comes (my xml,
paraview, or VTK)

I also write a Cxx class that inherites from vtkImageResample and
computes automatically the magnification factor depending on a
user-chosen reference axis (in my example, x or y). Today, I use an
independent executable that converts an input mhd file into an
isotropic volume, and then I open it in paraview. I would be glad if
this step is part of a paraview pipeline, but my inherited class has
the same behaviour than vtkImageResample (and I think that when I
tried with the parent class vtkImageReslice, the same problem
occured...).

Jerome

2009/1/30 Bryn Lloyd bll...@vision.ee.ethz.ch:

Dear VTK Developers


I would like to use the vtkResampleImage class in Paraview (plugin). For
this purpose it would be helpful if in addition to the methods

SetAxisMagnificationFactor (int axis, double factor)
SetAxisOutputSpacing (int axis, double spacing)


which are valid for axis 0,1 and 2, following new functions could be 
added:


SetAxisMagnificationFactor (double, double, double)
SetAxisOutputSpacing (double, double, double)


i.e. taking values for all three axis directions simultaneously.


Could this be done?


Thanks in advance!

Bryn




--
-
Bryn Lloyd
Computer Vision Laboratory
ETH Zürich, Sternwartstrasse 7
CH - 8092 Zürich, Switzerland
Tel: +41 44 63 26668
Fax: +41 44 63 21199
-
___
ParaView mailing list
ParaView@paraview.org
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview







--
-
Bryn Lloyd
Computer Vision Laboratory
ETH Zürich, Sternwartstrasse 7
CH - 8092 Zürich, Switzerland
Tel: +41 44 63 26668
Fax: +41 44 63 21199
-
___
ParaView mailing list
ParaView@paraview.org
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview


[Paraview] Feature request: point information

2008-10-01 Thread Jason Hoogland
Hi,
 
Is this the right place for a feature request?
 
Is there a way to get (x,y,z) for selected point(s)?  Maybe using a
filter?
 
If not, an intuitive place for me would be in the Selection Inspector.
I'd like it to provide a list of the points selected with ID's and
(x,y,z).  This could be a list box within the Selection Inspector
itself, or else a table in a new view window as for the Integrate
Variables filter.  I'm using 3.2.1.  I need this _all_ the time with
OpenFOAM 1.4.  e.g. Build a mesh, then want to move internal walls
(baffles) around, need an easy way to readily pick points for selection
using OpenFOAM utilities (e.g. faceSet). If there are any OF'ers out
there, does the OF 1.5 paraFoam plugin already do what I need?
 
Cheers
hoogs
___
ParaView mailing list
ParaView@paraview.org
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview


Re: [Paraview] Feature request: point information

2008-10-01 Thread David E DeMarle
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Jason Hoogland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,

 Is this the right place for a feature request?

Yes. The bug tracker (http://paraview.org/Bug/my_view_page.php) will
also work if there is no resolution.


 Is there a way to get (x,y,z) for selected point(s)?  Maybe using a filter?


In 3.2, you can apply the calculator filter with an expression of
iHat*coordsX + jHat *coordsY + kHat * coordsZ, then use the selection
labeling (at the bottom of the selection inspector panel) to show
Result in the 3D view.

In 3.4+, the spreadsheet view shows point coordinates automatically
and you don't need to do the above.
___
ParaView mailing list
ParaView@paraview.org
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview