Re: [pca] question to folks running Oracle Solaris Studio 12 or 12.3

2014-02-18 Thread Laurent Blume

Le 2014/02/18 09:47 +0100, Dennis Clarke a écrit:

Merely a polite question to anyone out there that still has Solaris
systems doing compile work AND you are still using Oracle Solaris Studio
12 or 12.3 releases.

Has anyone bothered to spend the money for the separate support on
the compiler tools and was it worth the expense as near as you can
tell?


You need support to get patches, and the compilers our-of-the-box have 
*a lot* of bugs, So practically, if you want to legally produce reliable 
binaries, you need support.



Not sure why Oracle separated out the compilers from the normal support
contracts. Other than to get an additional 0.01% revenue from the one
person in 10,000 that still has these things running.


Not sure what you mean here. Compiler support has been separate from OS 
support since before I starting dabbling with Solaris, and that was more 
than 15 years ago. Sun's policy (and naming) kept changing, so I'm not 
sure how Oracle is to blame for the mess Sun made.
For sure, Oracle doesn't seem any more intent on winning hearts and 
minds on the product.


Laurent



Re: [pca] question to folks running Oracle Solaris Studio 12 or 12.3

2014-02-14 Thread Andy Fiddaman

On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Dennis Clarke wrote:

; Merely a polite question to anyone out there that still has Solaris
; systems doing compile work AND you are still using Oracle Solaris Studio
; 12 or 12.3 releases.
;
; Has anyone bothered to spend the money for the separate support on
; the compiler tools and was it worth the expense as near as you can
; tell?

One of my customers bought this support specifically to obtain patches to
add T5 processor support. The whole process was a pain but they did
eventually get access to the patches. It's a 'Named User+' product which
further complicated the issue.

Andy



Re: [pca] question to folks running Oracle Solaris Studio 12 or 12.3

2014-02-14 Thread BABAULT . Daniel
As our security officers says All patches must be applied, no unaplied patch 
could be 90 days oldest ...) we baught an extended support for Solaris 
Studio, necessary to download patches, cost is 300 €ur for 1 machine by year.

Daniel 

-Message d'origine-
De : pca-boun...@lists.univie.ac.at [mailto:pca-boun...@lists.univie.ac.at] De 
la part de Andy Fiddaman
Envoyé : vendredi 14 février 2014 12:14
À : PCA (Patch Check Advanced) Discussion
Objet : Re: [pca] question to folks running Oracle Solaris Studio 12 or 12.3


On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Dennis Clarke wrote:

; Merely a polite question to anyone out there that still has Solaris ; systems 
doing compile work AND you are still using Oracle Solaris Studio ; 12 or 12.3 
releases.
;
; Has anyone bothered to spend the money for the separate support on ; the 
compiler tools and was it worth the expense as near as you can ; tell?

One of my customers bought this support specifically to obtain patches to add 
T5 processor support. The whole process was a pain but they did eventually get 
access to the patches. It's a 'Named User+' product which further complicated 
the issue.

Andy



Re: [pca] question to folks running Oracle Solaris Studio 12 or 12.3

2014-02-13 Thread Glen Gunselman
We have Oracle Solaris Studio.  I have not patched it in awhile.

We did have support some years ago - but when I inquired about it I was told 
that the patches are free, the support is if you need help using it, so we 
dropped support.

It's my understanding that gcc uses (or can use) the Solaris Studio code 
generator (my words) - I don't know if this is for both SPARC and X86, or just 
SPARC.

I have not used gcc or Solaris Studio - so have no experience with either.


Glen Gunselman
Systems Software Specialist
Information Technology
Emporia State University
1200 Commerical St
Emporia Kansas 66801




-Original Message-
From: pca-boun...@lists.univie.ac.at [mailto:pca-boun...@lists.univie.ac.at] On 
Behalf Of Dennis Clarke
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 1:15 PM
To: pca@lists.univie.ac.at
Subject: [pca] question to folks running Oracle Solaris Studio 12 or 12.3

Merely a polite question to anyone out there that still has Solaris
systems doing compile work AND you are still using Oracle Solaris Studio
12 or 12.3 releases.

Has anyone bothered to spend the money for the separate support on
the compiler tools and was it worth the expense as near as you can
tell?





Re: [pca] question to folks running Oracle Solaris Studio 12 or 12.3

2014-02-13 Thread Dennis Clarke

On 13/02/14 04:10 PM, Brookins, Neil (Philadelphia) wrote:

Yes (compile work)   Yes (use Studio 12.3)
No (pay for Studio support)   Reason -- license says that we don't have to pay 
if we don't want support. I support it myself, for my own use.

When I do a build, I always update and patch my tools, such as Studio 12.3, 
before I compile for each release.
I have not yet installed the patches below because we have not had a 
build/release since the patches came out.
When we build, I do use the optimizations in the compiler specific to the 
platform we are deploying on. These are not all available w/ GCC.

I just tried to download 148917-07.zip which is in your list below. It worked 
for me, but I'm not paying any extra for Oracle Solaris Studio support.
Perhaps its included in something else I'm paying for? I'm not sure.  Are you 
saying you can't download it?



I have had a support contract for years and I can tell you that the
compiler patches are not free. I tried to call Oracle about this
and they bounced me around for months ( yes months ) before handing
me over to a third party that told me the Oracle Studio tools were
a free download and thus there are no patches.

I kid you not. I have all the emails.

So I went full circle until I was shown this :

http://www.oracle.com/us/support/development-tools/index.html

click on Oracle Solaris Development Tools Support 
https://shop.oracle.com/pls/ostore/f?p=dstore:product:4426670536659428::NO:RP,6:P6_LPI,P6_PPI:14755510228390585509244, 
and you see a nice price there.


So it looks to be a pay more money to get support but no one seems to know
anything about the patches to update the Studio Compiler.

Really frustrating.

Dennis *

*