Re: [PD] iemlib low pass filters exhibiting jitter?

2011-03-03 Thread Luka Princic // Nova deViator
cyrille henry c...@chnry.net:
 the biquad object from nusmuk audio (bq~) does also have audio inlet
 for filter coef. since it's a biquad, you can shape your filter...


thanks everyone for suggestions and comments. in the meanwhile i
disovered biquad object, which was perfect for my needs.

i will also try high (150ms) interpolation time and [block~ 1].
and, ah, yes, moog filter...

best,
luka


-- 
sujet est machinique!
Nova deViator ¤ http://deviator.si ¤ http://skylined.org ¤


pgpM27fs4DqYD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


[PD] iemlib low pass filters exhibiting jitter?

2011-03-02 Thread Luka Princic // Nova deViator


hi,

just a quick question, 
is it normal or somewhat on purpose that all versions of low pass
filters in iemlib (from lp2 - lp10 and cheb, butt, bess and crit)
exhibit slight high pitched jitter when cutoff frequency is being
dynamicly changed? is it a nature of such filter or just a type of
implementation that somewhat doesn't take care of interpolation (if
interpolation is a problem at all)?

any thoughts welcome...

is there a way i could avoid that jitter with these filters?

is there some other high-pole low pass filter in some other library i
could use?

sure, i can always use series of [lop~] ..



best, luka


-- 
sujet est machinique!
Nova deViator ¤ http://deviator.si ¤ http://skylined.org ¤


pgpFY5k2xpLbh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] iemlib low pass filters exhibiting jitter?

2011-03-02 Thread Mike Moser-Booth
I've noticed this, too. It sounds like the noise you'd get if you were just
using [line] to change the frequency. My guess is the cutoff frequency is
being sampled and held at the block boundaries. If you put these objects in
a patch with [block~ 1], it goes away.

.mmb

On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Luka Princic // Nova deViator 
n...@deviator.si wrote:



 hi,

 just a quick question,
 is it normal or somewhat on purpose that all versions of low pass
 filters in iemlib (from lp2 - lp10 and cheb, butt, bess and crit)
 exhibit slight high pitched jitter when cutoff frequency is being
 dynamicly changed? is it a nature of such filter or just a type of
 implementation that somewhat doesn't take care of interpolation (if
 interpolation is a problem at all)?

 any thoughts welcome...

 is there a way i could avoid that jitter with these filters?

 is there some other high-pole low pass filter in some other library i
 could use?

 sure, i can always use series of [lop~] ..



 best, luka


 --
 sujet est machinique!
 Nova deViator ¤ http://deviator.si ¤ http://skylined.org ¤

 ___
 Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
 UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
 http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list




-- 
Mike Moser-Booth
mmoserbo...@gmail.com
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] iemlib low pass filters exhibiting jitter?

2011-03-02 Thread Ingo
I'm having the same problem. It's like a zipper noise that you can't avoid
no matter what interpolation time you set. If you set it to 150 ms or above
it works. But how can you have fast attacks like that?
At the moment I am changing interpolation times after the initial attack
time of the envelope generator. So I got rid of most of it. But still some
noise during the attack period.

Moog filter has audio ins. That one works a lot better but has a rather
fixed, predefined (but good) sound.

Ingo


 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
 Von: pd-list-boun...@iem.at [mailto:pd-list-boun...@iem.at] Im Auftrag von
 Luka Princic // Nova deViator
 Gesendet: Mittwoch, 2. März 2011 17:26
 An: pd-list@iem.at
 Betreff: [PD] iemlib low pass filters exhibiting jitter?
 
 
 
 hi,
 
 just a quick question,
 is it normal or somewhat on purpose that all versions of low pass
 filters in iemlib (from lp2 - lp10 and cheb, butt, bess and crit)
 exhibit slight high pitched jitter when cutoff frequency is being
 dynamicly changed? is it a nature of such filter or just a type of
 implementation that somewhat doesn't take care of interpolation (if
 interpolation is a problem at all)?
 
 any thoughts welcome...
 
 is there a way i could avoid that jitter with these filters?
 
 is there some other high-pole low pass filter in some other library i
 could use?
 
 sure, i can always use series of [lop~] ..
 
 
 
 best, luka
 
 
 --
 sujet est machinique!
 Nova deViator ¤ http://deviator.si ¤ http://skylined.org ¤


___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] iemlib low pass filters exhibiting jitter?

2011-03-02 Thread cyrille henry



Le 02/03/2011 20:33, Ingo a écrit :

I'm having the same problem. It's like a zipper noise that you can't avoid
no matter what interpolation time you set. If you set it to 150 ms or above
it works. But how can you have fast attacks like that?
At the moment I am changing interpolation times after the initial attack
time of the envelope generator. So I got rid of most of it. But still some
noise during the attack period.

Moog filter has audio ins.

the biquad object from nusmuk audio (bq~) does also have audio inlet for filter 
coef.
since it's a biquad, you can shape your filter...

c

That one works a lot better but has a rather

fixed, predefined (but good) sound.

Ingo



-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: pd-list-boun...@iem.at [mailto:pd-list-boun...@iem.at] Im Auftrag von
Luka Princic // Nova deViator
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 2. März 2011 17:26
An: pd-list@iem.at
Betreff: [PD] iemlib low pass filters exhibiting jitter?



hi,

just a quick question,
is it normal or somewhat on purpose that all versions of low pass
filters in iemlib (from lp2 - lp10 and cheb, butt, bess and crit)
exhibit slight high pitched jitter when cutoff frequency is being
dynamicly changed? is it a nature of such filter or just a type of
implementation that somewhat doesn't take care of interpolation (if
interpolation is a problem at all)?

any thoughts welcome...

is there a way i could avoid that jitter with these filters?

is there some other high-pole low pass filter in some other library i
could use?

sure, i can always use series of [lop~] ..



best, luka


--
sujet est machinique!
Nova deViator ¤ http://deviator.si ¤ http://skylined.org ¤



___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -  
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list



___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list