Re: K-1 discontinued (mk ii version likely)
Better to ignore him, he makes Kennyboy Rockpoorly look good. On 2/9/2018 9:36 PM, John wrote: Isn't he the traditional whipping boy for Pentax newz & rumors? On 2/9/2018 12:20, P. J. Alling wrote: I'm not going to say I doubt it, but Rice Whine? I don't think he has any more actual information than I have, or anyone else. All published statements of the K-1 being discontinued trace back to one small distributor that doesn't even have it's own web site, which they posted on facebook... The Ricoh imaging websites in the US, Canada, Britain, and the Japanese English language web site still show the K-1 as a current product. Of course Britain still has the Q S1 as a current product, but hey, it's Britain... On 2/9/2018 12:01 PM, John wrote: On 2/9/2018 06:12, Zos Xavius wrote: Its discontinued and a new model is coming. I can confirm this. Don't ask how. ;) RiceHigh says so on his blog, so how can anyone doubt it? -- America wasn't founded so that we could all be better. America was founded so we could all be anything we damn well please. - P.J. O'Rourke -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: February PUG is up
> On 10 February 2018 at 08:14 Bruce Walker wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 3:23 PM, Mark Roberts > wrote: > > Gonz wrote: > > > >>Don't know why PUG is on the forbidden list > > > > I blame Bruce Walker. > > ;-) > > But, but, but ... > > ;-) > > In all seriousness, it could be very well true, and if so I have no > objection to any possibly "infringing" images of mine being removed > for The Greater Good. Possibly even The Greater Photographic Good; I > wouldn't be surprised. For the Greater Photographic Good, I'm leaving it where it is - even if you are to blame :-)> It's a great image. Cheers Brian ++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Sac Ntl Refuge
Magnificent images. The eagle in the first image looks quite annoyed that you are disturbing him. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 7:04 PM, Jack Davis wrote: > > Had a beautiful blue morning working so, went looking for targets. > > Attaching a couple images that are sort of rare. > > > Comments appreciated! > > > Thanks! > > > J > > > https://www.photo.net/photo/18456153 > > https://www.photo.net/photo/18456160 > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Shutter count
l...@red4est.com wrote: Jeff friedl has a plugin to see all of the meta data Now that I'm home and in front of a real computer, here's the metadata viewer: http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/metadata-viewer Here's another excellent, and related plug-in of his http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/data-explorer -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est) http://red4est.com/lrc -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Sac Ntl Refuge
Jack Davis wrote: Had a beautiful blue morning working so, went looking for targets. Attaching a couple images that are sort of rare. Comments appreciated! That first shot is awesome. Great shot. Thanks! J https://www.photo.net/photo/18456153 https://www.photo.net/photo/18456160 -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est) http://red4est.com/lrc -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Scientific (in?)accuracy of another photo by Peter Lik
On 2/9/2018 10:05, Mark Roberts wrote: Larry Colen wrote: I don't have time to find it right now, but some integer number of years ago (3?) I heard a show on NPR about him and the investment value of his photos. Holy shit. I just did a quick search for references to Peter Lik on npr.org. I didn't find any. But I did notice the top related search suggestion was "Peter Lik fraud"! Larry's program probably came from one of the contributing member stations rather than from NPR itself. I'd guess it was contributed by either WNYC (because of the NY Times article) or KQED (because that's San Francisco's flagship NPR member station). -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must never question. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: K-1 discontinued (mk ii version likely)
Isn't he the traditional whipping boy for Pentax newz & rumors? On 2/9/2018 12:20, P. J. Alling wrote: I'm not going to say I doubt it, but Rice Whine? I don't think he has any more actual information than I have, or anyone else. All published statements of the K-1 being discontinued trace back to one small distributor that doesn't even have it's own web site, which they posted on facebook... The Ricoh imaging websites in the US, Canada, Britain, and the Japanese English language web site still show the K-1 as a current product. Of course Britain still has the Q S1 as a current product, but hey, it's Britain... On 2/9/2018 12:01 PM, John wrote: On 2/9/2018 06:12, Zos Xavius wrote: Its discontinued and a new model is coming. I can confirm this. Don't ask how. ;) RiceHigh says so on his blog, so how can anyone doubt it? -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must never question. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Sac Ntl Refuge
Thanks Paul, nice to read! J > On February 9, 2018 at 4:48 PM Paul Stenquist wrote: > > > Great shots. Congratulations! > > Paul > > > > On Feb 9, 2018, at 7:04 PM, Jack Davis wrote: > > > > > > Had a beautiful blue morning working so, went looking for targets. > > > > Attaching a couple images that are sort of rare. > > > > > > Comments appreciated! > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > J > > > > > > https://www.photo.net/photo/18456153 > > > > https://www.photo.net/photo/18456160 > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > PDML@pdml.net mailto:PDML@pdml.net > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > > and follow the directions. > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net mailto:PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Sac Ntl Refuge
Great shots. Congratulations! Paul > On Feb 9, 2018, at 7:04 PM, Jack Davis wrote: > > > Had a beautiful blue morning working so, went looking for targets. > > Attaching a couple images that are sort of rare. > > > Comments appreciated! > > > Thanks! > > > J > > > https://www.photo.net/photo/18456153 > > https://www.photo.net/photo/18456160 > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Shutter count
Jeff friedl has a plugin to see all of the meta data On February 9, 2018 4:08:32 PM PST, Eric Weir wrote: > >It’s in the exif data, but it’s not displayed in Lightroom. > >> On Feb 9, 2018, at 9:02 AM, l...@red4est.com wrote: >> >> It's in the exif metadata for each frame >> >> On February 9, 2018 4:30:40 AM PST, Eric Weir >wrote: >>> >>> I’m selling my K-5. A buyer wants to know the shutter count. How do >I >>> determine that? >>> >>> >-- >>> Eric Weir >>> Decatur, GA USA >>> eew...@bellsouth.net >>> >>> “...we are a form of invitation to others and to otherness..." >>> >>> - David Whyte >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> PDML@pdml.net >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above >and >>> follow the directions. >> >> -- >> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above >and follow the directions. > >-- >Eric Weir >Decatur, GA USA >eew...@bellsouth.net > > >"I can’t believe what you say, because I see what you do.” > >- James Baldwin." > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >PDML@pdml.net >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >follow the directions. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Shutter count
Thanks, John. I thought when I got Larry’s response that I wasn’t going to need this link. When I didn’t find it in Lightroom’s display of exif data I tried the link and got what I wanted. And now I see that exif data is way more than could be efficiently or helpfully displayed in Lightroom, that they have to be selective, and that, I assume, since shutter count has little relevance to image processing, it’s not included. > On Feb 9, 2018, at 11:53 AM, John wrote: > > http://shuttercounter.com/ > > On 2/9/2018 07:30, Eric Weir wrote: >> I’m selling my K-5. A buyer wants to know the shutter count. How do I >> determine that? >> -- >> Eric Weir >> Decatur, GA USA >> eew...@bellsouth.net >> “...we are a form of invitation to others and to otherness..." >> - David Whyte > > > -- > Science - Questions we may never find answers for. > Religion - Answers we must never question. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- Eric Weir Decatur, GA USA eew...@bellsouth.net “Man has been a murderer forever.” - Peter Matthiessen. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Shutter count
It’s in the exif data, but it’s not displayed in Lightroom. > On Feb 9, 2018, at 9:02 AM, l...@red4est.com wrote: > > It's in the exif metadata for each frame > > On February 9, 2018 4:30:40 AM PST, Eric Weir wrote: >> >> I’m selling my K-5. A buyer wants to know the shutter count. How do I >> determine that? >> >> -- >> Eric Weir >> Decatur, GA USA >> eew...@bellsouth.net >> >> “...we are a form of invitation to others and to otherness..." >> >> - David Whyte >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > -- > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- Eric Weir Decatur, GA USA eew...@bellsouth.net "I can’t believe what you say, because I see what you do.” - James Baldwin." -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Sac Ntl Refuge
Had a beautiful blue morning working so, went looking for targets. Attaching a couple images that are sort of rare. Comments appreciated! Thanks! J https://www.photo.net/photo/18456153 https://www.photo.net/photo/18456160 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: February PUG is up
first thing I thought of.. naughty Bruce! ann On 2/9/2018 4:14 PM, Bruce Walker wrote: On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 3:23 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: Gonz wrote: Don't know why PUG is on the forbidden list I blame Bruce Walker. ;-) But, but, but ... ;-) In all seriousness, it could be very well true, and if so I have no objection to any possibly "infringing" images of mine being removed for The Greater Good. Possibly even The Greater Photographic Good; I wouldn't be surprised. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Shutter count
Thanks, Larry. > On Feb 9, 2018, at 9:02 AM, l...@red4est.com wrote: > > It's in the exif metadata for each frame > > On February 9, 2018 4:30:40 AM PST, Eric Weir wrote: >> >> I’m selling my K-5. A buyer wants to know the shutter count. How do I >> determine that? >> >> -- >> Eric Weir >> Decatur, GA USA >> eew...@bellsouth.net >> >> “...we are a form of invitation to others and to otherness..." >> >> - David Whyte >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > -- > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- Eric Weir Decatur, GA USA eew...@bellsouth.net "Our world is a human world." - Hilary Putnam -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Scientific (in?)accuracy of another photo by Peter Lik
Bob W-PDML wrote: >On 9 Feb 2018, at 14:48, Mark Roberts >mailto:postmas...@robertstech.com>> wrote: > >Great job by writer David Segal. Thoroughly researched and written >with an understated style that respects the reader's intelligence. >And he gives Mr. Lik enough rope to hoist himself by his own petard, >to mix metaphors ;-) > >I'm reminded of this quotation (featured in the 2013 PDML Photo >Annual): >"If you're buying it to match the sofa it's not art, it's decoration." >- Louise Reilly Sacco, The Museum of Bad Art > >Yes, all very well, but what if it's this sofa? >https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mae_West_Lips_Sofa Then the photo isn't art but the sofa is. -- Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia www.robertstech.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Scientific (in?)accuracy of another photo by Peter Lik
On 9 Feb 2018, at 14:48, Mark Roberts mailto:postmas...@robertstech.com>> wrote: Great job by writer David Segal. Thoroughly researched and written with an understated style that respects the reader's intelligence. And he gives Mr. Lik enough rope to hoist himself by his own petard, to mix metaphors ;-) I'm reminded of this quotation (featured in the 2013 PDML Photo Annual): "If you're buying it to match the sofa it's not art, it's decoration." - Louise Reilly Sacco, The Museum of Bad Art Yes, all very well, but what if it's this sofa? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mae_West_Lips_Sofa -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: February PUG is up
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 3:23 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: > Gonz wrote: > >>Don't know why PUG is on the forbidden list > > I blame Bruce Walker. > ;-) But, but, but ... ;-) In all seriousness, it could be very well true, and if so I have no objection to any possibly "infringing" images of mine being removed for The Greater Good. Possibly even The Greater Photographic Good; I wouldn't be surprised. -- -bmw -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: February PUG is up
Gonz wrote: >Don't know why PUG is on the forbidden list I blame Bruce Walker. ;-) -- Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia www.robertstech.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: February PUG is up
Yeah, I had seen the photo on my computer at home, but at work the PUG website is blacklisted, so I couldn't go back and see the caption. Don't know why PUG is on the forbidden list On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:42 PM, ann sanfedele wrote: > Thanks, Gonz... > Yes - Albuquerque in 1982 ( see caption ;-)) > It was fabulous and I did ok in the Scrabble tourney too > > ann > > > On 2/9/2018 11:14 AM, Gonz wrote: >> >> Thanks Ann, Rick. I thought about the balloons too, I had been to a >> hot air festival in Austin and took some shots that I really liked, >> but the recent triple moon thingy really made more sense. I love your >> shot Ann, I imagine that is from the big one in New Mexico? >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 8:54 PM, ann sanfedele wrote: >>> >>> Thanks, Rick... >>> I like Gonz's calabaza, a lot , too... >>> >>> my personal fave, though , is Alan's pied kingfisher. >>> >>> ann (starting to come out from under the flu haze) >>> >>> >>> On 2/7/2018 9:09 PM, Rick Womer wrote: My favorites: I like AnnSan’s balloons; it’s an interesting composition of a well-used subject. Gonz’s Calabaza has great color and a simple composition. Joe’s Forbidden City has a great subject and color, and a whimsical composition that fits the subject. Rick > On Feb 6, 2018, at 5:37 PM, Brian Walters > wrote: > > G'day all, > > The largest gallery for some time with some interesting > interpretations. > Well > done all! > > View here: > > http://pug.komkon.org/ > > (you may need to refresh your browser if you see the previous gallery > there). > > Note: The automated submission process usually works well but it's not > infallible. So, if you made a submission and you don't see it in the > gallery, > let me know. > > + > > Next up: 'Arches'. > > Full Submissions Guidelines here: > > http://pug.komkon.org/general/autosubmit.html > > You can submit here: > > http://pug.komkon.org/submit/ > > > Cheers > Brian > ++ > Brian Walters > Western Sydney Australia > http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/ > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> PDML@pdml.net >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>> follow the directions. >> >> >> > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- -- Photography takes an instant out of time, altering life by holding it still. Dorothea Lange -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: February PUG is up
Thanks, Gonz... Yes - Albuquerque in 1982 ( see caption ;-)) It was fabulous and I did ok in the Scrabble tourney too ann On 2/9/2018 11:14 AM, Gonz wrote: Thanks Ann, Rick. I thought about the balloons too, I had been to a hot air festival in Austin and took some shots that I really liked, but the recent triple moon thingy really made more sense. I love your shot Ann, I imagine that is from the big one in New Mexico? On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 8:54 PM, ann sanfedele wrote: Thanks, Rick... I like Gonz's calabaza, a lot , too... my personal fave, though , is Alan's pied kingfisher. ann (starting to come out from under the flu haze) On 2/7/2018 9:09 PM, Rick Womer wrote: My favorites: I like AnnSan’s balloons; it’s an interesting composition of a well-used subject. Gonz’s Calabaza has great color and a simple composition. Joe’s Forbidden City has a great subject and color, and a whimsical composition that fits the subject. Rick On Feb 6, 2018, at 5:37 PM, Brian Walters wrote: G'day all, The largest gallery for some time with some interesting interpretations. Well done all! View here: http://pug.komkon.org/ (you may need to refresh your browser if you see the previous gallery there). Note: The automated submission process usually works well but it's not infallible. So, if you made a submission and you don't see it in the gallery, let me know. + Next up: 'Arches'. Full Submissions Guidelines here: http://pug.komkon.org/general/autosubmit.html You can submit here: http://pug.komkon.org/submit/ Cheers Brian ++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
OT: Interviewee stole photos (for portfolio) of the interviewer
One of my mentors and former bosses once received (from a journal editor) for refereeing a scientific article submitted for publication, - with the results obtained by his group, but the article was written and submitted by a person who was the sole author on the article. That person had spent some short time as a visitor in the said group/lab and was not even the lead person on that project: he was only briefly involved in that project (so, he could've been an author on the article submitted from that lab, but not the first/second author.) So, in essence that "author" stole those results by attributing them to himself. Here is a similar story from the photography world: https://fstoppers.com/humor/stolen-portfolio-interviewer-realizes-his-photos-were-stolen-interviewee-219822 Sometimes you realize how small the submarine is... (the yellow one, of course!) Igor -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Scientific (in?)accuracy of another photo by Peter Lik
Apparently, they have reworked the website (lik.com), removing the two full-moon photos that were being debunked by Fstoppers. I suspect they regenerated web-galleries. So, the new link is https://lik.com/collections/skies/products/lunar-eclipse BTW, the two photos with full-moons were in this collection just 2 days ago: https://lik.com/collections/skies I am guessing if I were to publish my OP in this thread on a more visible website, where it would be picked up by many news outlets (petapixel, boingboing, etc.) - he'd be removing this eclipse photo too, or at least changing the title. So, enjoy while it is still there! [tongue in cheek] Igor Jostein Fri, 09 Feb 2018 03:06:17 -0800 wrote: Link gone dead. Found another link, with suggested retail price and all. Interesting bit of silliness in its own right. https://www.artbrokerage.com/Peter-Lik/Lunar-Eclipse-99065 Jostein Den 07.02.2018 19:28, skrev Igor PDML-StR: ... or rather the photo title. While looking at the moon photos of Peter Lik, I've found one more photo that I suspect to be fake. Well, not the photo itself, but what it claims to be. http://www.lik.com/thework/clouds-skies-stars/lunareclipse.html This one is titled "Lunar eclipse". My claim is that it is not an eclipse. Rather, it is just one of the lunar phases. An eclipse is a shadow of the Earth. So, the dark-light boundary has a circular shape, not a straight one as here. The straight line is consistent with the light source (sun) being on the right, at about 90 degrees. See lunar eclipse photos here: https://www.space.com/25488-total-lunar-eclipse-photos-april-2014.html (you'd need to "click-scroll" to the right to #4, 5, 7) or here: https://www.space.com/11963-unusual-long-total-lunar-eclipse-full-moon.html I wonder what PDML astro-enthusiaststs think about that? Igor -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: K-1 discontinued (mk ii version likely)
I'm not going to say I doubt it, but Rice Whine? I don't think he has any more actual information than I have, or anyone else. All published statements of the K-1 being discontinued trace back to one small distributor that doesn't even have it's own web site, which they posted on facebook... The Ricoh imaging websites in the US, Canada, Britain, and the Japanese English language web site still show the K-1 as a current product. Of course Britain still has the Q S1 as a current product, but hey, it's Britain... On 2/9/2018 12:01 PM, John wrote: On 2/9/2018 06:12, Zos Xavius wrote: Its discontinued and a new model is coming. I can confirm this. Don't ask how. ;) RiceHigh says so on his blog, so how can anyone doubt it? -- America wasn't founded so that we could all be better. America was founded so we could all be anything we damn well please. - P.J. O'Rourke -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Scientific (in?)accuracy of another photo by Peter Lik
That's true, but for the money one could buy a say K-3, a 600mm a 1.4x converter, a very sturdy tripod, and have about a thousand dollars left over, to have a nice print of about 2 feet by 3 feet made and custom framed, after which you've got the camera and lens to start a photography hobby or become a voyeur, whichever... On 2/9/2018 11:42 AM, Bruce Walker wrote: Yes, but the photographic advantage that puts Lik well ahead of the rest of us is a large scale production facility, and storefronts with many persuasive sales people. On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:28 AM, P. J. Alling wrote: That photo doesn't even look like an eclipse, more like a normal half moon. Not particularly artistic either. Something any of us here could do with $3K worth of lens camera body and tripod. On 2/9/2018 6:04 AM, Jostein wrote: Link gone dead. Found another link, with suggested retail price and all. Interesting bit of silliness in its own right. https://www.artbrokerage.com/Peter-Lik/Lunar-Eclipse-99065 Jostein Den 07.02.2018 19:28, skrev Igor PDML-StR: ... or rather the photo title. While looking at the moon photos of Peter Lik, I've found one more photo that I suspect to be fake. Well, not the photo itself, but what it claims to be. http://www.lik.com/thework/clouds-skies-stars/lunareclipse.html This one is titled "Lunar eclipse". My claim is that it is not an eclipse. Rather, it is just one of the lunar phases. An eclipse is a shadow of the Earth. So, the dark-light boundary has a circular shape, not a straight one as here. The straight line is consistent with the light source (sun) being on the right, at about 90 degrees. See lunar eclipse photos here: https://www.space.com/25488-total-lunar-eclipse-photos-april-2014.html (you'd need to "click-scroll" to the right to #4, 5, 7) or here: https://www.space.com/11963-unusual-long-total-lunar-eclipse-full-moon.html I wonder what PDML astro-enthusiaststs think about that? Igor -- America wasn't founded so that we could all be better. America was founded so we could all be anything we damn well please. - P.J. O'Rourke -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- America wasn't founded so that we could all be better. America was founded so we could all be anything we damn well please. - P.J. O'Rourke -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: K-1 discontinued (mk ii version likely)
On 2/9/2018 06:12, Zos Xavius wrote: Its discontinued and a new model is coming. I can confirm this. Don't ask how. ;) RiceHigh says so on his blog, so how can anyone doubt it? -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must never question. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Scientific (in?)accuracy of another photo by Peter Lik
Pfffst! I can get a better print for less at Costco. On 2/9/2018 06:04, Jostein wrote: Link gone dead. Found another link, with suggested retail price and all. Interesting bit of silliness in its own right. https://www.artbrokerage.com/Peter-Lik/Lunar-Eclipse-99065 Jostein Den 07.02.2018 19:28, skrev Igor PDML-StR: ... or rather the photo title. While looking at the moon photos of Peter Lik, I've found one more photo that I suspect to be fake. Well, not the photo itself, but what it claims to be. http://www.lik.com/thework/clouds-skies-stars/lunareclipse.html This one is titled "Lunar eclipse". My claim is that it is not an eclipse. Rather, it is just one of the lunar phases. An eclipse is a shadow of the Earth. So, the dark-light boundary has a circular shape, not a straight one as here. The straight line is consistent with the light source (sun) being on the right, at about 90 degrees. See lunar eclipse photos here: https://www.space.com/25488-total-lunar-eclipse-photos-april-2014.html (you'd need to "click-scroll" to the right to #4, 5, 7) or here: https://www.space.com/11963-unusual-long-total-lunar-eclipse-full-moon.html I wonder what PDML astro-enthusiaststs think about that? Igor -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must never question. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Shutter count
http://shuttercounter.com/ On 2/9/2018 07:30, Eric Weir wrote: I’m selling my K-5. A buyer wants to know the shutter count. How do I determine that? -- Eric Weir Decatur, GA USA eew...@bellsouth.net “...we are a form of invitation to others and to otherness..." - David Whyte -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must never question. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESOs -- Monarch of the Daisies.
On 2/9/2018 02:27, P. J. Alling wrote: Sadly my focus was on the Daisies... Still, while looking for something else, I stumbled upon these shots taken in the dark digital ages of stone knives and bearskins when the *ist-D and Ds ruled the PDML with bloody tooth and claw. https://pdml.updog.co/webster26/PESO%20--%20monarchofthedaisies1.html https://pdml.updog.co/webster26/PESO%20--%20monarchofthedaisies2.html Equipment: Pentax *ist-Ds w/vmc Vivitar Series 1 70-210mm f2.8~4.0. As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored. Behold the mighty hunter, returning once again with tales of the "one that got away"... :-) -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must never question. PS: One quart of daisy heads, one quart of cold water. Let stand forty-eight hours. Strain and add three-quarters pound of sugar to each quart of liquid. Let stand about two weeks, or till it stops fermenting. Strain again and bottle. It improves with keeping. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Old-Time_Recipes_for_Home_Made_Wines_Cordials_and_Liqueurs -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Scientific (in?)accuracy of another photo by Peter Lik
Yes, but the photographic advantage that puts Lik well ahead of the rest of us is a large scale production facility, and storefronts with many persuasive sales people. On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:28 AM, P. J. Alling wrote: > That photo doesn't even look like an eclipse, more like a normal half moon. > Not particularly artistic either. Something any of us here could do with > $3K worth of lens camera body and tripod. > > > > On 2/9/2018 6:04 AM, Jostein wrote: >> >> Link gone dead. >> Found another link, with suggested retail price and all. Interesting bit >> of silliness in its own right. >> https://www.artbrokerage.com/Peter-Lik/Lunar-Eclipse-99065 >> >> Jostein >> >> Den 07.02.2018 19:28, skrev Igor PDML-StR: >>> >>> >>> ... or rather the photo title. >>> >>> While looking at the moon photos of Peter Lik, I've found one >>> more photo that I suspect to be fake. Well, not the photo itself, but >>> what >>> it claims to be. >>> http://www.lik.com/thework/clouds-skies-stars/lunareclipse.html >>> >>> This one is titled "Lunar eclipse". My claim is that it is not an >>> eclipse. >>> Rather, it is just one of the lunar phases. >>> An eclipse is a shadow of the Earth. So, the dark-light boundary has a >>> circular shape, not a straight one as here. >>> The straight line is consistent with the light source (sun) being >>> on the right, at about 90 degrees. >>> >>> >>> See lunar eclipse photos here: >>> https://www.space.com/25488-total-lunar-eclipse-photos-april-2014.html >>> (you'd need to "click-scroll" to the right to #4, 5, 7) >>> or here: >>> >>> https://www.space.com/11963-unusual-long-total-lunar-eclipse-full-moon.html >>> >>> >>> I wonder what PDML astro-enthusiaststs think about that? >>> >>> Igor >>> >>> >>> >> > > -- > America wasn't founded so that we could all be better. > America was founded so we could all be anything we damn well please. > - P.J. O'Rourke > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- -bmw -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Scientific (in?)accuracy of another photo by Peter Lik
In the third paragraph they mention Rhine II which has something important with Lik's work, it's highly manipulated, and not at all representative of the scene as recorded, at least the Cindy Sherman work also mentioned was made using a method that makes endless mechanical reproduction somewhat more difficult due to the process being long out dated. On 2/9/2018 9:15 AM, Bruce Walker wrote: On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 8:51 AM, Mark Roberts wrote: Jostein wrote: Link gone dead. Found another link, with suggested retail price and all. Interesting bit of silliness in its own right. https://www.artbrokerage.com/Peter-Lik/Lunar-Eclipse-99065 This article from the New York Times has the sad, predictable truth about the resale value of Peter Lik photos: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/22/business/peter-liks-recipe-for-success-sell-prints-print-money.html That's just such a great read. -- America wasn't founded so that we could all be better. America was founded so we could all be anything we damn well please. - P.J. O'Rourke -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Scientific (in?)accuracy of another photo by Peter Lik
That photo doesn't even look like an eclipse, more like a normal half moon. Not particularly artistic either. Something any of us here could do with $3K worth of lens camera body and tripod. On 2/9/2018 6:04 AM, Jostein wrote: Link gone dead. Found another link, with suggested retail price and all. Interesting bit of silliness in its own right. https://www.artbrokerage.com/Peter-Lik/Lunar-Eclipse-99065 Jostein Den 07.02.2018 19:28, skrev Igor PDML-StR: ... or rather the photo title. While looking at the moon photos of Peter Lik, I've found one more photo that I suspect to be fake. Well, not the photo itself, but what it claims to be. http://www.lik.com/thework/clouds-skies-stars/lunareclipse.html This one is titled "Lunar eclipse". My claim is that it is not an eclipse. Rather, it is just one of the lunar phases. An eclipse is a shadow of the Earth. So, the dark-light boundary has a circular shape, not a straight one as here. The straight line is consistent with the light source (sun) being on the right, at about 90 degrees. See lunar eclipse photos here: https://www.space.com/25488-total-lunar-eclipse-photos-april-2014.html (you'd need to "click-scroll" to the right to #4, 5, 7) or here: https://www.space.com/11963-unusual-long-total-lunar-eclipse-full-moon.html I wonder what PDML astro-enthusiaststs think about that? Igor -- America wasn't founded so that we could all be better. America was founded so we could all be anything we damn well please. - P.J. O'Rourke -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: K-1 discontinued (mk ii version likely)
Sorry about this, but I'm testing a new annoying behavior from gmail. On 2/7/2018 10:48 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: Excellent. I love my K-1, but an upgraded version would be welcome. Paul On Feb 7, 2018, at 10:32 PM, Darren Addy wrote: https://fstoppers.com/gear/pentax-officially-discontinues-excellent-k-1-camera-mark-ii-version-likely-219429 -- “The Earth is Art, The Photographer is only a Witness ” ― Yann Arthus-Bertrand, Earth from Above -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- America wasn't founded so that we could all be better. America was founded so we could all be anything we damn well please. - P.J. O'Rourke -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: February PUG is up
Thanks Ann, Rick. I thought about the balloons too, I had been to a hot air festival in Austin and took some shots that I really liked, but the recent triple moon thingy really made more sense. I love your shot Ann, I imagine that is from the big one in New Mexico? On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 8:54 PM, ann sanfedele wrote: > Thanks, Rick... > I like Gonz's calabaza, a lot , too... > > my personal fave, though , is Alan's pied kingfisher. > > ann (starting to come out from under the flu haze) > > > On 2/7/2018 9:09 PM, Rick Womer wrote: >> >> My favorites: >> >> I like AnnSan’s balloons; it’s an interesting composition of a well-used >> subject. >> >> Gonz’s Calabaza has great color and a simple composition. >> >> Joe’s Forbidden City has a great subject and color, and a whimsical >> composition that fits the subject. >> >> Rick >> >> >>> On Feb 6, 2018, at 5:37 PM, Brian Walters >>> wrote: >>> >>> G'day all, >>> >>> The largest gallery for some time with some interesting interpretations. >>> Well >>> done all! >>> >>> View here: >>> >>> http://pug.komkon.org/ >>> >>> (you may need to refresh your browser if you see the previous gallery >>> there). >>> >>> Note: The automated submission process usually works well but it's not >>> infallible. So, if you made a submission and you don't see it in the >>> gallery, >>> let me know. >>> >>> + >>> >>> Next up: 'Arches'. >>> >>> Full Submissions Guidelines here: >>> >>> http://pug.komkon.org/general/autosubmit.html >>> >>> You can submit here: >>> >>> http://pug.komkon.org/submit/ >>> >>> >>> Cheers >>> Brian >>> ++ >>> Brian Walters >>> Western Sydney Australia >>> http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/ >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> PDML@pdml.net >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>> follow the directions. >> >> > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- -- Photography takes an instant out of time, altering life by holding it still. Dorothea Lange -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Test
test -- America wasn't founded so that we could all be better. America was founded so we could all be anything we damn well please. - P.J. O'Rourke -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: K-1 discontinued (mk ii version likely)
Interesting. Hopefully we'll hear some news from Pentax soon. On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 5:12 AM, Zos Xavius wrote: > Its discontinued and a new model is coming. I can confirm this. Don't > ask how. ;) > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- -- Photography takes an instant out of time, altering life by holding it still. Dorothea Lange -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: January best of
They do appear brighter now. And it is better. When I was looking on my laptop, - the photo still seems to me a bit dull. I came home and looked on a big desktop screen, maximizing to the full screen, - and it looked much better. So, this is one of those photos where the way you look at it is critical. (It still didn't become my favorite in this set, but I like it more now.) I hope my suggestion was helpful. Igor Larry Colen Thu, 08 Feb 2018 08:14:16 -0800 wrote: Igor PDML-StR wrote: The pinecones is an interesting photo, but it looks dark. It is not necessarily the brightness. It's just that the complex details are not popping out. I don't know what should be done, - but I'd try to play with the fill-in light (boosting up shadow areas), "vibrance", and "presence" sliders in LR. I tried brightening things up a bit. Here is the original: https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/28327455309/in/album-72157693093943405/ Here is the modified: https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/25280799037/in/album-72157693093943405/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Scientific (in?)accuracy of another photo by Peter Lik
Larry Colen wrote: >I don't have time to find it right now, but some integer number of years >ago (3?) I heard a show on NPR about him and the investment value of his >photos. Holy shit. I just did a quick search for references to Peter Lik on npr.org. I didn't find any. But I did notice the top related search suggestion was "Peter Lik fraud"! -- Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia www.robertstech.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Scientific (in?)accuracy of another photo by Peter Lik
I don't have time to find it right now, but some integer number of years ago (3?) I heard a show on NPR about him and the investment value of his photos. Mark Roberts wrote: Bruce Walker wrote: On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 8:51 AM, Mark Roberts wrote: Jostein wrote: Link gone dead. Found another link, with suggested retail price and all. Interesting bit of silliness in its own right. https://www.artbrokerage.com/Peter-Lik/Lunar-Eclipse-99065 This article from the New York Times has the sad, predictable truth about the resale value of Peter Lik photos: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/22/business/peter-liks-recipe-for-success-sell-prints-print-money.html That's just such a great read. Great job by writer David Segal. Thoroughly researched and written with an understated style that respects the reader's intelligence. And he gives Mr. Lik enough rope to hoist himself by his own petard, to mix metaphors ;-) I'm reminded of this quotation (featured in the 2013 PDML Photo Annual): "If you're buying it to match the sofa it's not art, it's decoration." — Louise Reilly Sacco, The Museum of Bad Art -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est) http://red4est.com/lrc -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Scientific (in?)accuracy of another photo by Peter Lik
Bruce Walker wrote: >On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 8:51 AM, Mark Roberts >wrote: >> Jostein wrote: >> >>>Link gone dead. >>>Found another link, with suggested retail price and all. Interesting bit >>>of silliness in its own right. >>>https://www.artbrokerage.com/Peter-Lik/Lunar-Eclipse-99065 >> >> This article from the New York Times has the sad, predictable truth >> about the resale value of Peter Lik photos: >> https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/22/business/peter-liks-recipe-for-success-sell-prints-print-money.html > >That's just such a great read. Great job by writer David Segal. Thoroughly researched and written with an understated style that respects the reader's intelligence. And he gives Mr. Lik enough rope to hoist himself by his own petard, to mix metaphors ;-) I'm reminded of this quotation (featured in the 2013 PDML Photo Annual): "If you're buying it to match the sofa it's not art, it's decoration." Louise Reilly Sacco, The Museum of Bad Art -- Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia www.robertstech.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Scientific (in?)accuracy of another photo by Peter Lik
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 8:51 AM, Mark Roberts wrote: > Jostein wrote: > >>Link gone dead. >>Found another link, with suggested retail price and all. Interesting bit >>of silliness in its own right. >>https://www.artbrokerage.com/Peter-Lik/Lunar-Eclipse-99065 > > This article from the New York Times has the sad, predictable truth > about the resale value of Peter Lik photos: > https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/22/business/peter-liks-recipe-for-success-sell-prints-print-money.html That's just such a great read. -- -bmw -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Shutter count
It's in the exif metadata for each frame On February 9, 2018 4:30:40 AM PST, Eric Weir wrote: > >I’m selling my K-5. A buyer wants to know the shutter count. How do I >determine that? > >-- >Eric Weir >Decatur, GA USA >eew...@bellsouth.net > >“...we are a form of invitation to others and to otherness..." > >- David Whyte > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >PDML@pdml.net >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >follow the directions. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Scientific (in?)accuracy of another photo by Peter Lik
Jostein wrote: >Link gone dead. >Found another link, with suggested retail price and all. Interesting bit >of silliness in its own right. >https://www.artbrokerage.com/Peter-Lik/Lunar-Eclipse-99065 This article from the New York Times has the sad, predictable truth about the resale value of Peter Lik photos: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/22/business/peter-liks-recipe-for-success-sell-prints-print-money.html -- Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia www.robertstech.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Shutter count
I’m selling my K-5. A buyer wants to know the shutter count. How do I determine that? -- Eric Weir Decatur, GA USA eew...@bellsouth.net “...we are a form of invitation to others and to otherness..." - David Whyte -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESP: Yellow Tang
Absolutely! What Paul said. Composition well done, Dan! J Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 8, 2018, at 7:49 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > > Beautiful color and nice framing. A little soft but that could be unavoidable > given the aquarium glass and water. > > Paul > >> On Feb 8, 2018, at 10:41 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote: >> >> From the Maui Ocean Center: >> >> http://dan-matyola.squarespace.com/danmatyolas-pesos/2018/2/8/yellow-tang >> >> Comments are invited >> >> Dan Matyola >> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: K-1 discontinued (mk ii version likely)
Its discontinued and a new model is coming. I can confirm this. Don't ask how. ;) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Scientific (in?)accuracy of another photo by Peter Lik
Link gone dead. Found another link, with suggested retail price and all. Interesting bit of silliness in its own right. https://www.artbrokerage.com/Peter-Lik/Lunar-Eclipse-99065 Jostein Den 07.02.2018 19:28, skrev Igor PDML-StR: ... or rather the photo title. While looking at the moon photos of Peter Lik, I've found one more photo that I suspect to be fake. Well, not the photo itself, but what it claims to be. http://www.lik.com/thework/clouds-skies-stars/lunareclipse.html This one is titled "Lunar eclipse". My claim is that it is not an eclipse. Rather, it is just one of the lunar phases. An eclipse is a shadow of the Earth. So, the dark-light boundary has a circular shape, not a straight one as here. The straight line is consistent with the light source (sun) being on the right, at about 90 degrees. See lunar eclipse photos here: https://www.space.com/25488-total-lunar-eclipse-photos-april-2014.html (you'd need to "click-scroll" to the right to #4, 5, 7) or here: https://www.space.com/11963-unusual-long-total-lunar-eclipse-full-moon.html I wonder what PDML astro-enthusiaststs think about that? Igor -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
