Re: OT. OM-5 first impressions

2024-05-11 Thread John Francis
On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 04:50:59PM -0700, Larry Colen wrote:
> After the weight of my new (13 months) K3III in my handlebar bag caused my 
> bike to fall over and but the Smart Function knob, I looked into OM-5s again. 
>  The price had dropped below my pain point, and since thanks to online 
> shopping there aren???t any convenient camera stores to look at them, I 
> bought on on Amazon, and if I don???t like it I???ll feel no guilt over 
> returning it.
> 
> My one word review:
> Adequate

Hmm.

I was considering getting an OM-5 as a backup/lighter alternative;
I still feel nervous going anywhere with only a single camera body,
even though I'v never yet had a digital camera body fail on me
(and, in 50 years, only had two mechanical failures; once when my
MX motor drive bent a drive shaft in my MX, and once when my PZ-1p
objected to being used in rain, and took some time off to dry out.
I don't count my MZ-S objecting to having its lens mount knocked
off when I slipped climbing down from a photo tower and banged it
hard against an upright - that was entirely my own fault).

I suspect 'adequate' might still serve my purpose, although I will
admit that I was verging towards the slightly newer OM-D E-M5 Mk III.

I'll be interested to see how you feel about it after a week or two.
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Did anyone get Aurora photos?

2024-05-11 Thread David Mann
I took a few with my phone from my front gate last night, just as a record.  
What amazed me is that they were visible at this latitude, from in the city 
with all its light pollution.

I have vague plans to keep an eye out tonight, not sure if I want to go to the 
effort of getting any proper photos.

Cheers,
Dave

> On May 12, 2024, at 12:37 PM, Stan Halpin  wrote:
> 
> Cloudy here last night, looks more promising tonight…
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
>> On May 11, 2024, at 8:06 PM, Larry Colen  wrote:
>> 
>> I’m afraid that even if they’re visible this far south, I can’t get to 
>> anyplace dark enough
>> --
>> Larry Colen
>> l...@red4est.com  sent from ret13est
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
> --
> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Did anyone get Aurora photos?

2024-05-11 Thread Stan Halpin
Cloudy here last night, looks more promising tonight…

Sent from my iPad

> On May 11, 2024, at 8:06 PM, Larry Colen  wrote:
> 
> I’m afraid that even if they’re visible this far south, I can’t get to 
> anyplace dark enough
> --
> Larry Colen
> l...@red4est.com  sent from ret13est
> 
> 
> 
> --
> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Did anyone get Aurora photos?

2024-05-11 Thread Larry Colen
I’m afraid that even if they’re visible this far south, I can’t get to anyplace 
dark enough
--
Larry Colen
l...@red4est.com  sent from ret13est



--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

OT. OM-5 first impressions

2024-05-11 Thread Larry Colen
After the weight of my new (13 months) K3III in my handlebar bag caused my bike 
to fall over and but the Smart Function knob, I looked into OM-5s again.  The 
price had dropped below my pain point, and since thanks to online shopping 
there aren’t any convenient camera stores to look at them, I bought on on 
Amazon, and if I don’t like it I’ll feel no guilt over returning it.

My one word review:
Adequate

My basic review of the Lumix GH3 was that I loved the size, was unimpressed by 
the sensor/image quality and hated the UI.

The OM-5 is the same size, seems to have a substantially better sensor, and the 
UI is better but really makes me appreciate my Pentax cameras.  I would not 
want one as my primary camera, but for something light and convenient to carry, 
if not use, it’ll work.

One example of something that I do on my pentax bodies that I can’t quite do on 
the OM 5 is my nominal shooting modes are two stop bracketing, either nominal 
and -2, or three stops shot in order of -2, nominal and +2.  First of all, with 
the OM, I get at most one stop per frame, it also always shoots nominal first.  
Another difference is that with the Pentax, one press of the shutter shoots all 
of the bracket frames at once.

In daylight, the EVF, frankly, looks like shit.  It is little better than 
giving me the shape of the objects in the frame.  I recognize that there are 
advantages of EVF, particularly in low light, for manual focusing, focus 
peaking is nice to have, and other info, but for the experience of photography, 
not ready for prime, or even zoom, time.

Also the camera’s biggest strength is also a weakness, the small size makes it 
awkward to shoot with, even with my tiny hands.  

Battery life seems mediocre, I’m used to running on Pentax batteries for hours, 
and this seems to be running low fairly quickly, but batteries are light and 
can be bought cheaply.


--
Larry Colen
l...@red4est.com  sent from ret13est



--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: PESO: Bellbird

2024-05-11 Thread David Mann
On May 12, 2024, at 5:56 AM, Alan Cole  wrote:

> Dave, what was the shutter speed?

1/3000th.  ISO was 1600.

Cheers,
Dave
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Bellbird

2024-05-11 Thread Alan Cole
Dave, what was the shutter speed?

On Sat, 11 May 2024, 12:07 David Mann,  wrote:

> On May 11, 2024, at 4:56 AM, Alan Cole  wrote:
>
> > Very nice, Dave. That 400 is a great asset.
>
> It is, although I do struggle with it at times.  When the AF gets it right
> I get some great images.  I was lucky with this one as I'd been in such a
> hurry I'd forgotten to pay attention to the settings and it shot at f/6.7
> so depth of field was not in my favour.
>
> I remember trying to calibrate the focus of my lenses soon after getting
> the K5ii but gave up as the AF system just wouldn't quite focus
> consistently.  If I focused on the target a few times in a row it'd always
> come out slightly different, which made me wonder what was the point of
> calibrating it.  I seem to remember my target wasn't perfect but I never
> quite got around to having another go with a better one.  I do wonder it
> if's simply a mechanical limitation of the screw-drive mechanism.
>
> Cheers,
> Dave
> --
> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
>
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: New LRC catalog

2024-05-11 Thread Bill
That would be the ideal solution. If you can get the drive your 
catalogue is on working long enough to copy it to a good drive, copy it 
then tell Lightroom to use it.


You should also have a back up of it somewhere, though sometimes it ends 
up on the same drive as the working catalogue if you aren't careful.


bill

On 5/10/2024 6:19 PM, David J Brooks wrote:

Thanks Bill

The drive does work on occasion I guess I just can’t copy to catalog over
to the other then redirect it at closing LR??

Dave

Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York Region, Ontario, Canada


On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 8:12 PM Bill  wrote:


It is, but any edits you have made within Lightroom will be lost.

bill

On 5/10/2024 5:37 PM, David J Brooks wrote:

My old external drive is not being read on my new iMac, but my other one
is. The non working one has my LRC cataloge, do I just go agphead and
create a new catalog on the working drive, is it really that simple?

Dave

--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.


--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: PESO: Bellbird

2024-05-11 Thread David Mann
On May 11, 2024, at 4:56 AM, Alan Cole  wrote:

> Very nice, Dave. That 400 is a great asset.

It is, although I do struggle with it at times.  When the AF gets it right I 
get some great images.  I was lucky with this one as I'd been in such a hurry 
I'd forgotten to pay attention to the settings and it shot at f/6.7 so depth of 
field was not in my favour.

I remember trying to calibrate the focus of my lenses soon after getting the 
K5ii but gave up as the AF system just wouldn't quite focus consistently.  If I 
focused on the target a few times in a row it'd always come out slightly 
different, which made me wonder what was the point of calibrating it.  I seem 
to remember my target wasn't perfect but I never quite got around to having 
another go with a better one.  I do wonder it if's simply a mechanical 
limitation of the screw-drive mechanism.

Cheers,
Dave
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.