Re: GESO Broken Shades

2018-11-14 Thread Igor PDML-StR




That's not impossible, Ann.
... except that the view is purple from your point. ;-)

On a serious note, - my comment was not really a reflection on your 
comment. Rather, your comment was just a trigger for my old thoughts to 
get shared publicly.


Cheers,

Igor

PS. After a quick google search, I suspect you were referring to
Sheb Wooley's song from 1958. Surprisingly, despite its popularity, I 
don't think I've heard that song before, at least not "consciously".




 ann sanfedele Tue, 13 Nov 2018 15:42:02 -0800 wrote:

Just to be clear, Igor - you don't at all understand my point of view ...


I think, however, Larry does :-)

ann

On Tue, 13 Nov 2018, Igor PDML-StR wrote:




These photos tell a story, even if some of them are not perfect as
stand-alone photographs.
And I agree with Ann about that B portrait: it stands on its own.

I know that type of challenging light quite well: it is very popular in the 
blues and jazz/swing music/dance community. So, I appreciate the

challenges and the outcome.

Now, Ann's comment about purple people eaters raised in my mind the old
debate about how the photos reflect what we see/saw in real life.

When we have an incandescent light and yellowish faces, we are trying to 
compensate for that yellow cast (filters and probably some film processing in 
the era of film photography, or color balance for digital).

But the people do look under that light as if they had jaundice.
It's just that our brain corrects/compensates for that in real time.

So, the question is: should or should we not compensate for that
while taking the photos (filters/color balance/...) or in post-processing?
The same question applies to recording a video.
After all, in many situations (these days, when different color lights are 
available), - people purposely choose "warm light" (2700K) to create

a certain mood.


And now, for the purple/coquelicot/smaragdine/mikado/glaucous/fulvous lights: 
They do create a certain atmosphere. So, why we do not get shocked seeing 
those glaucous faces in the room, but many people get the reaction like that 
of Ann's by any face color short of sarcoline in the photos? Those colors in 
the photos should reflect the "real" look of that room and people in it and 
convey that mood. Right?



Cheers,

Igor

PS. I am not being critical of Ann's reaction, I understand it.
Rather, I am thinking out loud about the interesting effect our
brain plays on us. These thoughts are also a followup to the
previous conversation about "truthful" images in photography.

PPS. Strange color names? Look them up! ;-)



Larry Colen Mon, 12 Nov 2018 06:40:24 -0800 wrote:



ann sanfedele wrote on 11/12/18 5:24 AM:


   To say the light was challenging was an understatement - purple people 
eaters yikes



The super saturated light from LEDs can make photography very challenging. 
You have to carefully watch the histogram so that you don't blow out one of 
the channels, even if you aren't going to try to bring things back to 
"normal"




--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: GESO Broken Shades

2018-11-13 Thread ann sanfedele

Just to be clear, Igor - you don't at all understand my point of view ...

I think, however, Larry does :-)

ann

On 11/13/2018 5:23 PM, Igor PDML-StR wrote:



These photos tell a story, even if some of them are not perfect as
stand-alone photographs.
And I agree with Ann about that B portrait: it stands on its own.

I know that type of challenging light quite well: it is very popular 
in the blues and jazz/swing music/dance community. So, I appreciate the

challenges and the outcome.

Now, Ann's comment about purple people eaters raised in my mind the old
debate about how the photos reflect what we see/saw in real life.

When we have an incandescent light and yellowish faces, we are trying 
to compensate for that yellow cast (filters and probably some film 
processing in the era of film photography, or color balance for digital).

But the people do look under that light as if they had jaundice.
It's just that our brain corrects/compensates for that in real time.

So, the question is: should or should we not compensate for that
while taking the photos (filters/color balance/...) or in 
post-processing?

The same question applies to recording a video.
After all, in many situations (these days, when different color lights 
are available), - people purposely choose "warm light" (2700K) to create

a certain mood.


And now, for the purple/coquelicot/smaragdine/mikado/glaucous/fulvous 
lights: They do create a certain atmosphere. So, why we do not get 
shocked seeing those glaucous faces in the room, but many people get 
the reaction like that of Ann's by any face color short of sarcoline 
in the photos? Those colors in the photos should reflect the "real" 
look of that room and people in it and convey that mood. Right?



Cheers,

Igor

PS. I am not being critical of Ann's reaction, I understand it.
Rather, I am thinking out loud about the interesting effect our
brain plays on us. These thoughts are also a followup to the
previous conversation about "truthful" images in photography.

PPS. Strange color names? Look them up! ;-)



Larry Colen Mon, 12 Nov 2018 06:40:24 -0800 wrote:



ann sanfedele wrote on 11/12/18 5:24 AM:


    To say the light was challenging was an understatement - purple 
people eaters yikes



The super saturated light from LEDs can make photography very 
challenging. You have to carefully watch the histogram so that you 
don't blow out one of the channels, even if you aren't going to try to 
bring things back to "normal"




--
ann sanfedele photography
https://annsan.smugmug.com
https://www.cafepress.com/annsanstuff
https://www.lulu.com/spotlight/annsan



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: GESO Broken Shades

2018-11-13 Thread Igor PDML-StR




These photos tell a story, even if some of them are not perfect as
stand-alone photographs.
And I agree with Ann about that B portrait: it stands on its own.

I know that type of challenging light quite well: it is very popular in 
the blues and jazz/swing music/dance community. So, I appreciate the

challenges and the outcome.

Now, Ann's comment about purple people eaters raised in my mind the old
debate about how the photos reflect what we see/saw in real life.

When we have an incandescent light and yellowish faces, we are trying to 
compensate for that yellow cast (filters and probably some film processing 
in the era of film photography, or color balance for digital).

But the people do look under that light as if they had jaundice.
It's just that our brain corrects/compensates for that in real time.

So, the question is: should or should we not compensate for that
while taking the photos (filters/color balance/...) or in post-processing?
The same question applies to recording a video.
After all, in many situations (these days, when different color lights are 
available), - people purposely choose "warm light" (2700K) to create

a certain mood.


And now, for the purple/coquelicot/smaragdine/mikado/glaucous/fulvous 
lights: They do create a certain atmosphere. So, why we do not get shocked 
seeing those glaucous faces in the room, but many people get the reaction 
like that of Ann's by any face color short of sarcoline in the photos? 
Those colors in the photos should reflect the "real" look of that room and 
people in it and convey that mood. Right?



Cheers,

Igor

PS. I am not being critical of Ann's reaction, I understand it.
Rather, I am thinking out loud about the interesting effect our
brain plays on us. These thoughts are also a followup to the
previous conversation about "truthful" images in photography.

PPS. Strange color names? Look them up! ;-)



Larry Colen Mon, 12 Nov 2018 06:40:24 -0800 wrote:



ann sanfedele wrote on 11/12/18 5:24 AM:


To say the light was challenging was an understatement - purple people 
eaters yikes



The super saturated light from LEDs can make photography very challenging. 
You have to carefully watch the histogram so that you don't blow out one 
of the channels, even if you aren't going to try to bring things back to 
"normal"


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: GESO Broken Shades

2018-11-12 Thread Larry Colen




ann sanfedele wrote on 11/12/18 5:24 AM:


  20181110-LRC98806-2 the BW portrait  is super -


Thanks a bunch.


really feel like I've met the guy from this one 


You probably have seen photos of him. Rich is the one that plays guitar 
with some other friends of mine.
and you can tell he was 
ahving a private though and didnt' know you were shooting at that 
point.. at least, it appers that way





To say the light was challenging was an understatement - purple people 
eaters yikes


The super saturated light from LEDs can make photography very 
challenging. You have to carefully watch the histogram so that you don't 
blow out one of the channels, even if you aren't going to try to bring 
things back to "normal"


--
Larry Colen       l...@red4est.com  http://red4est.com/lrc
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/collections/72157612824732477/

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: GESO Broken Shades

2018-11-12 Thread ann sanfedele



 20181110-LRC98806-2 the BW portrait  is super -

really feel like I've met the guy from this one and you can tell he was 
ahving a private though and didnt' know you were shooting at that 
point.. at least, it appers that way


To say the light was challenging was an understatement - purple people 
eaters yikes


ann

On 11/12/2018 1:29 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
I wasn't planning on taking photos at the party I went to last night, 
but it turned out that a friend was playing with one of the bands. The 
lighting was quite challenging, LEDs, not necessarily aimed at the 
musicians, but very saturated when they were.  I tried doing a bit of 
fill with a snouted speedlight on a few.


Despite the challenges, I think I got a few keepers.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157673391340397



--
ann sanfedele photography
https://annsan.smugmug.com
https://www.cafepress.com/annsanstuff
https://www.lulu.com/spotlight/annsan



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


GESO Broken Shades

2018-11-11 Thread Larry Colen
I wasn't planning on taking photos at the party I went to last night, 
but it turned out that a friend was playing with one of the bands. The 
lighting was quite challenging, LEDs, not necessarily aimed at the 
musicians, but very saturated when they were.  I tried doing a bit of 
fill with a snouted speedlight on a few.


Despite the challenges, I think I got a few keepers.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157673391340397

--
Larry Colen       l...@red4est.com  http://red4est.com/lrc
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/collections/72157612824732477/

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.