Re: OT: Big cojones flash metering

2005-11-02 Thread David Mann

On Nov 2, 2005, at 8:20 PM, Derby Chang wrote:


http://tinyurl.com/dvgps


Wow!  Cool photo but it's a shame he didn't have an ultrawide lens :)

In these parts we don't get lightning very often, and ground strikes  
are pretty rare.  I wonder what the GN of that thing is.


- Dave



Re: OT: Big cojones flash metering

2005-11-02 Thread Kenneth Waller
While it would be more technically perfect if the flash was not blown out, in 
an image as unusual as this, exposure becomes somewhat less important than the 
actual event.

YMMV

Kenneth Waller

-Original Message-
From: Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Subject: OT: Big cojones flash metering


I am way too cowardly to try this. I wonder how you judge exposure for this

http://tinyurl.com/dvgps

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc




PeoplePC Online
A better way to Internet
http://www.peoplepc.com



Re: Re: OT: Big cojones flash metering

2005-11-02 Thread mike wilson

 
 From: Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: 2005/11/02 Wed PM 02:25:15 GMT
 To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
 Subject: Re: OT: Big cojones flash metering
 
 While it would be more technically perfect if the flash was not blown out, in 
 an image as unusual as this, exposure becomes somewhat less important than 
 the actual event.
 

???  It's a lightning flash - millions of volts producing ionisation of the 
air.  If it was not blown out it would be invisible.  Wouldn't it?

mike


-
Email sent from www.ntlworld.com
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software 
Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information



Re: OT: Big cojones flash metering

2005-11-02 Thread Charles Robinson

On Nov 2, 2005, at 9:31, mike wilson wrote:


???  It's a lightning flash - millions of volts producing  
ionisation of the air.  If it was not blown out it would be  
invisible.  Wouldn't it?




Naw, it would be 18% grey +0.7 EV!

 -Charles

--
Charles Robinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Minneapolis, MN
http://charles.robinsontwins.org



Re: Re: OT: Big cojones flash metering

2005-11-02 Thread Kenneth Waller
If it was not blown out it would be invisible.  Wouldn't it?

Why?

Exposure settings at capture would have the same effect on this image as it 
does with any other image  it should be possible to record the strike such 
that it would be less over exposed. Of course this would be done @ the expense 
of the exposure of foreground elements.

Kenneth Waller 

-Original Message-
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re: OT: Big cojones flash metering


 
 From: Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: 2005/11/02 Wed PM 02:25:15 GMT
 To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
 Subject: Re: OT: Big cojones flash metering
 
 While it would be more technically perfect if the flash was not blown out, in 
 an image as unusual as this, exposure becomes somewhat less important than 
 the actual event.
 

???  It's a lightning flash - millions of volts producing ionisation of the 
air.  If it was not blown out it would be invisible.  Wouldn't it?

mike


-
Email sent from www.ntlworld.com
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software 
Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information




PeoplePC Online
A better way to Internet
http://www.peoplepc.com