Re: Wazzup with the PDML annual?

2017-02-23 Thread Jostein Øksne 
Well done on sending one!
Jostein 

Den 10. februar 2017 11.50.02 CET, skrev Peter McIntosh :
>Hmmm... didn't use my K5 that much last year: only found 1 worth
>submitting, and I won't be the least bit surprised if it doesn't make
>it.
>
>Ciao,
>
>Pete Mac in Melbourne
>--
>
>On 17 January 2017 at 05:45, Jostein  wrote:
>>
>> Only nine photographers have submitted so far.
>> Get your act together. Or your photo archive, or something.
>> Jostein
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
>and follow the directions.

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Wazzup with the PDML annual?

2017-02-11 Thread Bill 

On 2/10/2017 4:50 AM, Peter McIntosh wrote:

Hmmm... didn't use my K5 that much last year: only found 1 worth
submitting, and I won't be the least bit surprised if it doesn't make
it.



We're working on it.
Well. I suspect mostly Mark is working on it.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Wazzup with the PDML annual?

2017-02-10 Thread Peter McIntosh 
Hmmm... didn't use my K5 that much last year: only found 1 worth
submitting, and I won't be the least bit surprised if it doesn't make
it.

Ciao,

Pete Mac in Melbourne
--

On 17 January 2017 at 05:45, Jostein  wrote:
>
> Only nine photographers have submitted so far.
> Get your act together. Or your photo archive, or something.
> Jostein
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Wazzup with the PDML annual?

2017-01-18 Thread Bill 

On 1/18/2017 2:38 PM, Jostein wrote:

Ouch,
Had that coming, hadn't I.

But be careful, mr. Roberts, or your product will become too good for us
to tribute to. ;-)


As long as I am allowed to submit and sit on the editorial board, there 
is zero chance of that.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Wazzup with the PDML annual?

2017-01-18 Thread Jostein 

Ouch,
Had that coming, hadn't I.

But be careful, mr. Roberts, or your product will become too good for us 
to tribute to. ;-)

Jostein

Den 17.01.2017 01.34, skrev Mark Roberts:

Jostein wrote:


Or maybe your standards have gone up?


"We've upped our standards. Up yours!"
;-)




--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Wazzup with the PDML annual?

2017-01-16 Thread Mark Roberts 
Jostein wrote:

>Or maybe your standards have gone up?

"We've upped our standards. Up yours!"
;-)
 
-- 
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Wazzup with the PDML annual?

2017-01-16 Thread P. J. Alling 

What's worse is, maybe they've gone down.


On 1/16/2017 6:51 PM, Jostein wrote:

Or maybe your standards have gone up?

Jostein

Den 16.01.2017 21.31, skrev John:

On 1/16/2017 1:45 PM, Jostein wrote:

Only nine photographers have submitted so far.
Get your act together. Or your photo archive, or something.
Jostein



Some of us have a much more difficult time finding the requisite images
to submit.

I almost wrote "good" images, but that would be just too restrictive for
me this time around.

2016 wasn't a very productive year, and nothing I did really pleases me.
Forget about images I'm proud of, I'm reduced to searching for images
I'm not ashamed of.






--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Wazzup with the PDML annual?

2017-01-16 Thread Jostein 

Or maybe your standards have gone up?

Jostein

Den 16.01.2017 21.31, skrev John:

On 1/16/2017 1:45 PM, Jostein wrote:

Only nine photographers have submitted so far.
Get your act together. Or your photo archive, or something.
Jostein



Some of us have a much more difficult time finding the requisite images
to submit.

I almost wrote "good" images, but that would be just too restrictive for
me this time around.

2016 wasn't a very productive year, and nothing I did really pleases me.
Forget about images I'm proud of, I'm reduced to searching for images
I'm not ashamed of.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Wazzup with the PDML annual?

2017-01-16 Thread Ken Waller 

Forget about images I'm proud of, I'm reduced to searching for images
I'm not ashamed of.


MARK !

Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller

- Original Message - 
From: "John" <sesso...@earthlink.net>

Subject: Re: Wazzup with the PDML annual?



On 1/16/2017 1:45 PM, Jostein wrote:

Only nine photographers have submitted so far.
Get your act together. Or your photo archive, or something.
Jostein



Some of us have a much more difficult time finding the requisite images
to submit.

I almost wrote "good" images, but that would be just too restrictive for
me this time around.

2016 wasn't a very productive year, and nothing I did really pleases me.
Forget about images I'm proud of, I'm reduced to searching for images
I'm not ashamed of.

--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Wazzup with the PDML annual?

2017-01-16 Thread John 

On 1/16/2017 1:45 PM, Jostein wrote:

Only nine photographers have submitted so far.
Get your act together. Or your photo archive, or something.
Jostein



Some of us have a much more difficult time finding the requisite images
to submit.

I almost wrote "good" images, but that would be just too restrictive for
me this time around.

2016 wasn't a very productive year, and nothing I did really pleases me.
Forget about images I'm proud of, I'm reduced to searching for images
I'm not ashamed of.

--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Wazzup with the PDML annual?

2017-01-16 Thread Jostein 

Only nine photographers have submitted so far.
Get your act together. Or your photo archive, or something.
Jostein

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.