As soon as Walt left, the skies cleared and the weather warmed up. I went out
last night, looked for the darkest patch of clear sky I could find and stayed
up way too late experimenting with the K-5 bracketing ISO, exposure and even
lenses to try to find out what combination works best for night time landscape
photography. What I learned was that the hills of Bonny Doon (Empire Grade
between Jamieson Creek and Lockheed) have too much light pollution, dust and
vapor in the air to get good star photos.
If your interest is the foreground, it seems that ISO 1600-6400 may be the
sweet spot.
I processed this one to leave the foreground dark, to show that it is at night
(as if the stars aren't enough of a clue)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5579819441/lightbox/
ISO 3200 FA31 at f/1.8 10 seconds
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5579819441/meta/
Pointing at a slightly darker patch of sky, if the goal is the stars, leaving
the foreground dark (or illuminating it in other ways) it seems that ISO
250-500 is the best:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5579893071/in/set-72157626282601669/
This is 4 seconds at ISO 500
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5579893071/meta/
I'm putting my experiments in a flickr collection:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/collections/72157626282696191/
I've got a set of everything straight out of the camera, and one of all of the
shots running lightroom autotone, they're at 400 pixels. I also have sets with
other versions of the two pictures I showed.
If anyone else is trying nighttime photography with the K-5, I would love to
hear what you've learned about sweet spots in various conditions. If you want
to try nighttime work, I hope that you find these useful.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.