maybe he should be put in the new Potemkin Prison in Iraq

2004-06-05 Thread Devine, James
the US harkens back to the bad old days of the USSR --
According to the LA [TIMES], a California National Guard sergeant claims
he knew soldiers were regularly beating Iraqi prisoners last
summer in Samarra. When he reported the alleged abuse, he says he
was rushed out of the country to military hospitals for mental
evaluations, which he calls a cover-up. His commander claims he
was suffering from combat stress. 
 
[from MS SLATE's news summary]
 
JD



Cyber Prank

2004-06-05 Thread Yoshie Furuhashi
Recently, either I in particular or a local campus Green listserv has
become a victim of a cyber prank, hijacking postings to the Green
listserv [EMAIL PROTECTED] and switching their Reply-to address
to a local peace activist listserv that I moderate:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Could PEN-l computer experts help
me what to do?
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail-mta3.service.ohio-state.edu
 (mail-mta3.service.ohio-state.edu [128.146.216.43])
 by mail1.service.ohio-state.edu
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.14 (built Mar 18 2003))
 with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri,
 04 Jun 2004 10:24:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lists.acs.ohio-state.edu
 (lists.acs.ohio-state.edu [128.146.214.27])
 by mail-mta3.service.ohio-state.edu
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.14 (built Mar 18 2003))
 with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri,
 04 Jun 2004 10:24:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from host (localhost [127.0.0.1])by lists.acs.ohio-state.edu
 (Postfix) with SMTP  id 8B7EC8EC0; Fri, 04 Jun 2004 10:24:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from n38.grp.scd.yahoo.com (n38.grp.scd.yahoo.com [66.218.66.106])
  by lists.acs.ohio-state.edu (Postfix) with SMTP id BD5F38C7Ffor
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 04 Jun 2004 10:24:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [66.218.66.96] by n38.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; Fri,
 04 Jun 2004 14:24:05 +
Received: (qmail 51682 invoked from network); Fri, 04 Jun 2004 14:24:03 +
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m13.grp.scd.yahoo.com with
QMQP; Fri,
 04 Jun 2004 14:24:03 +
Received: from unknown (HELO mail-mta2.service.ohio-state.edu)
(128.146.216.42)
 by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; Fri, 04 Jun 2004 14:24:02 +
Received: from [140.254.114.208]
 (ts36-10.homenet.ohio-state.edu [140.254.114.209])
 by mail-mta2.service.ohio-state.edu
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.14 (built Mar 18 2003))
 with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 04 Jun 2004 09:23:05 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 09:24:46 -0400
From: Yoshie Furuhashi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [cgp-osu] Fri., 6/4: OSU Cancels the 1st Amendment (Press Conference)
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-eGroups-Return:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Apparently-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 128.146.216.42
X-Yahoo-Profile: yoshie_furuhashi
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
--
Yoshie
* Critical Montages: http://montages.blogspot.com/
* Bring Them Home Now! http://www.bringthemhomenow.org/
* Calendars of Events in Columbus:
http://sif.org.ohio-state.edu/calendar.html,
http://www.freepress.org/calendar.php,  http://www.cpanews.org/
* Student International Forum: http://sif.org.ohio-state.edu/
* Committee for Justice in Palestine: http://www.osudivest.org/
* Al-Awda-Ohio: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Al-Awda-Ohio
* Solidarity: http://www.solidarity-us.org/


Re: screwing the hegemons

2004-06-05 Thread Chris Burford
 The hegemons presumably calculate that abject surrender is best
 achieved as promptly as possible so that the technicalities will not
 be noticed against the backdrop of Bush meeting the Pope.

It is a mark of their defeat that they have to pretend they are not
being screwed. Crude domination is not an option now:] - therefore
they have actively to adopt a tone of noble dignity.

Chris Burford


On the Home Front

2004-06-05 Thread Yoshie Furuhashi
Links to articles on interest rates and housing bubbles:
http://montages.blogspot.com/2004/06/day-of-reckoning-on-home-front.html.
--
Yoshie
* Critical Montages: http://montages.blogspot.com/
* Bring Them Home Now! http://www.bringthemhomenow.org/
* Calendars of Events in Columbus:
http://sif.org.ohio-state.edu/calendar.html,
http://www.freepress.org/calendar.php,  http://www.cpanews.org/
* Student International Forum: http://sif.org.ohio-state.edu/
* Committee for Justice in Palestine: http://www.osudivest.org/
* Al-Awda-Ohio: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Al-Awda-Ohio
* Solidarity: http://www.solidarity-us.org/


Reagan dead

2004-06-05 Thread Mark Laffey
Did anyone else see the CNN hagiography?  He was 93 - how many people died as a result 
of his policies?

Mark
Dr Mark Laffey
Department of Politics and International Studies
SOAS, University of London
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
0207 898 4744



Re: Reagan dead

2004-06-05 Thread Carrol Cox
Mark Laffey wrote:

 Did anyone else see the CNN hagiography?  He was 93 - how many people died as a 
 result of his policies?

 Mark


Most or all of the Reagan policies that led to so many deaths were
policies initiated during the Carter administration. I think it
especially important to recall this in the midst of the current ABB
hysteria.

It was Carter above all who sponsored the slaughter in East Timor.

It was Carter who in effect approved in advance of the murder of Bishop
Romero and of the ongoing massacres in Central America.

It was Carter who began the war in Afghanistan that led directly to the
present horrors.

It was Carter who began the military build-up that Reagan merely
continued.

It was Carter who began the deregulation process that Reagan merely
continued.

Carrol


Re: Reagan dead

2004-06-05 Thread Perelman, Michael
It was Ford, not Carter that ok's the slaughter in E. Timor.

Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA
95929

-Original Message-
From: PEN-L list [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carrol Cox
Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2004 2:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PEN-L] Reagan dead

Mark Laffey wrote:

 Did anyone else see the CNN hagiography?  He was 93 - how many people
died as a result of his policies?

 Mark


Most or all of the Reagan policies that led to so many deaths were
policies initiated during the Carter administration. I think it
especially important to recall this in the midst of the current ABB
hysteria.

It was Carter above all who sponsored the slaughter in East Timor.

It was Carter who in effect approved in advance of the murder of Bishop
Romero and of the ongoing massacres in Central America.

It was Carter who began the war in Afghanistan that led directly to the
present horrors.

It was Carter who began the military build-up that Reagan merely
continued.

It was Carter who began the deregulation process that Reagan merely
continued.

Carrol



Venezuela: prospects for recall (5 June 04)

2004-06-05 Thread michael a. lebowitz


Re: new megafraud controversy raging in Venezuela:
imperialism or Chavez
by Perelman, Michael
04 June 2004 21:26 UTC

  
Thread
Index
 

What a wonderful example of American imperialism! On a more
serious
note, Michael, what are the prospects for a recall?
--
Hi Michael,
I've dated
my response because I can only say what it looks like at this very
moment. Any discussion of the prospects has to recognise that there is a
long history of electoral fraud here, that in addition to the domestic
tradition there is the support that can be expected from the usual
suspect (which won't bother to function through the National Endowment
for Destruction) and, of course, that there is the potential and
likelihood of further disruptions to the economy with the idea of
creating despair in the population which currently supports Chavez.
That said,
it is essential to recognise that all that was necessary to trigger the
recall referendum was 20% (or roughly 2.4 million) of the electorate from
the last time. Very few semi-objective observers last year thought it
unlikely that the opposition had much less than 30% support. Although the
opposition goal during the signature campaign at the end of last November
was to get 3.8 million (thus giving them more than Chavez had received to
win--- which would have allowed them to say, Chavez out
now!), despite an incredible amount of fraud they were well below
this. Because of irregularities (some innocent), the Electoral Council
threw out many signatures and assigned others to be 'repaired' (ie.,
people had to show up and prove their legitimacy); in the end, they
barely got their necessary signatures. On this count, the opposition does
not look especially strong.
But, they
are organised--- the NED-financed SUMATE organisation has extensive
computer records on the electorate, and the party organisations that
compose the opposition have experienced, committed and disciplined cadres
able to bring out their support. In contrast, the Chavist supporters,
although likely more in number, demonstrated on this occasion that they
were very poorly organised. The Commando Ayacucho, the group assembled
from the various Chavist parties to coordinate this recent campaign
(which included the attempt to recall opposition legislators), revealed
that it had strong individual spokespeople able to attack the opposition
and to make rousing, confident speeches but that it lacked the
organisation and discipline to deliver what it promised. (This has led to
considerable criticism from the barrios and elsewhere.) So, the central
question, I think, is whether the Chavist forces will learn adequately
from these events. The referendum campaign is an excellent opportunity to
deepen the Bolivarian Revolution and to raise both the consciousness and
the organisational capacity of those who support it.
It is
important to recognise that at every step of the way, the process here
has been propelled forward by the action of the opposition. In achieving
the threshold for a recall referendum on Chavez, the opposition has
provided the government with a gift--- the opportunity to turn this into
a request for a mandate on its education, health and social programmes,
on its attempt to create a new social economy, indeed into a mandate on
the constitution itself. Chavez himself will certainly frame the issues
this way. But, the results will depend on the concrete steps taken at the
base to organise the masses of poor who have been the principal
beneficiaries of the government; if new, effective forms of organisation
are not developed--- in the face of everything that the opposition, the
Bush government and capital will throw at the government, then a
successful recall is possible.
In short,
to coin a phrase, pessimism of the intellect, optimism of the will.

in
solidarity,

michael
 


Michael A. Lebowitz
Professor Emeritus
Economics Department
Simon Fraser University
Burnaby, B.C., Canada V5A 1S6

Currently based in Venezuela. Can be reached at
Residencias Anauco Suites
Departamento 601
Parque Central, Zona Postal 1010, Oficina 1
Caracas, Venezuela
(58-212) 573-4111
fax: (58-212) 573-7724



Nicolás Guillén's Politics of Language

2004-06-05 Thread Yoshie Furuhashi
About Caliban's curse and Nicolás Guillén's Politics of Language:
http://montages.blogspot.com/2004/06/nicols-guillns-politics-of-language.html
--
Yoshie
* Critical Montages: http://montages.blogspot.com/
* Bring Them Home Now! http://www.bringthemhomenow.org/
* Calendars of Events in Columbus:
http://sif.org.ohio-state.edu/calendar.html,
http://www.freepress.org/calendar.php,  http://www.cpanews.org/
* Student International Forum: http://sif.org.ohio-state.edu/
* Committee for Justice in Palestine: http://www.osudivest.org/
* Al-Awda-Ohio: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Al-Awda-Ohio
* Solidarity: http://www.solidarity-us.org/


Oil on Trouble Waters

2004-06-05 Thread sartesian
Try this:

http://thewolfatthedoor.blogspot.com/


More Oil on Trouble Waters

2004-06-05 Thread sartesian
From the World Bank Survey of the Russian Economy:

30. Russia's economy remains fundamentally dependent on oil and gas.
According to offical statistics, approximately 80 percent of Russian exports
in 2003 were natural resources, and 55 percent of all exports were from the
oil and gas sector.  More than 60 percent of Russia's fixed capital
investments either go into the hydrocarbon industries or are in one way or
another related to the public purse.  The budget itself is dependent on oil
and gas: 37 percent of federal budget revenues originate from
hydrocarbons