I guess the reviewer's point in this pointless review is that he doesn't
like your book. I get more information about what the book is about from the
title than the review. What is this story that you apparently add nothing
too? Is there some sin in making comparison to the biological sciences. The
reviewer doesn't even explain what you are comparing with them. I think it
would be understandable if you unsubscribed the reviewer if he or she is on
Pen-L :)
Cheers, Ken Hanly
michael wrote:
> Here is my first review from Amazon for my new book, The Natural
> Instability of Markets..
>
> A reader from Harvard University , June 23, 1999
>
> This Book is nothing more than anecdotal
> nonsense!!!
> This book was easy to read and kept me reading for a
> reason: I was looking for the point!!!
>
> Dr. Perelman quotes so many other economists and
> non-economists without ever bringing anything new to
> the story. He even goes so far as to provide comparisons
>
> to the Biological Sciences, which cloud his point even
> more.
>
> --
> Michael Perelman
> Economics Department
> California State University
> Chico, CA 95929
>
> Tel. 530-898-5321
> E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
