RE: myth of the self-made man

2002-01-10 Thread Devine, James

Tom, since when do you examine sites that sell term papers to student
plagiarists?  

-Original Message-
From: Tom Walker
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 1/9/02 11:20 PM
Subject: [PEN-L:21282] myth of the self-made man

Deliberate or unconscious humour?
 
http://www.ezwrite.com/Store/itemdetail.asp?IDNO=116
http://www.ezwrite.com/Store/itemdetail.asp?IDNO=116 
 
Tom Walker




re: myth of the self-made man

2002-01-10 Thread Tom Walker



Jim Devine asked,

Tom, since when do you examine sites that sell term 
papers to studentplagiarists? 

When I was a sessional instructor in the late 1980s I once 
encountered a plague of plagiarism in my class. I think the total number of 
offenders was eight or ten. Coincidentally, I also came across a lit 
critessay by Neil Hertz onthemoral instructionof 
punishingplagiarism. Hertz didn't say so but one might see an almost 
Franklinesque tone to the discourse on plagiarism.

There arefurther ironic delights that may be had by 
juxtaposing the "essay-for-sale" on the plagiarism site to Franklin's essay on 
"The Way to Wealth." At theproverbial level, the student who buys one of 
those term papers is violating the principle of character buildingthat 
Benjamin prescribes. But at the structural level, the essay itself is a 
veritablewhirlpool of citation (and sometimes misattribution) that 
anticipates and satirizes the academic apparatus. The conceit is that the author 
of the "letter" is Poor Richard, who at the beginning of the essay mentions how 
he sometimes quotes himselfto set an example for others so thattheir 
citation mayelevate his literary authority. 

Poor Richard happens upon a public soliloquy being 
delivered by "Father Abraham" that consists entirely of sayings attributed to 
Poor Richard, "as Poor Richard says." At the conclusion 
of Abraham's speech, his audience (with the exception of Richard)approves 
of his moral instruction and proceeds to do the opposite. It is an open 
questionwhether Richard's compliance is a sign of his having been 
persuaded (by what were ultimately "his own words") or of his having been 
*implicated* by the profusion of his sayings.

In other words, the "myth of the self-made man" is first 
and foremost a literary construction --and a conscious literary 
construction at that. Think also of Robinson Crusoe. Subsequent political and 
economic (mis)uses of the motif are suspect not simply because they are based on 
myth, nor because they are based on "bad", archaic ormisleadingmyth. 
They are suspect because they misrepresent the very myth upon which they are 
founded (often without attribution) -- an instance of plagiarism.

Of course I am referring to "economic man" as one such 
instance of plagiarism.It isthrough such plagiarism that what 
originates as a democratic myth of character building can be falsely presented 
as a justification and defense of the devious ways and meansof an 
autocracy. 

I could go on but I have work to do. "Time is money," as 
Poor Richard advised. I'll close with three passages from the turn of the last 
century that retell and inflect the Franklinian myth of self-reliance from the 
vantage point of autocratic power. The first is from a National Association of 
Manufacturers' pamphlet, the second and third froma book published by a 
Washington public relations firm.All threewere produced as agitation 
against the eight-hour day.

1. "This is a strenuous life. The rewards are for those who work for them 
--a corollary of which is that the rewards are not for those who do not 
workfor them. The useful man in business -- and the laborer is a man of 
businessin his relations with his employer -- succeeds in making himself 
efficientand still more successful in proportion as he sees opportunities 
andembraces them. If these involve his rising early in the morning, he 
risesearly; if they mean that he must sit up late at night, he sits up late 
atnight. He lends his hand to the work that is before him, wherever it is 
andwhenever it is before him."

2. "Mr. Tynan 
in himself furnishes the finest of examples of what a willing,strong, 
self-reliant lad may do for himself in America. He left his home inCounty 
Tyrone, Ireland, ten years ago and came to this country without 
anacquaintance to welcome him anywhere in all its broad limits, He began 
workas a mechanic at 25 cents an hour for the Cramp company and has 
risensteadily to his present position, one of the most important in the 
yards.Mr. Tynan came to America a poor boy in the steerage of a common ship 
of thetimes. Within less than seven years he went back to British waters in 
chargeof one of the swiftest and finest of the " ocean greyhounds," the 
steamshipSt. Paul, built by the Cramps. From the very beginning of his 
connectionwith the yard, he worked overtime and his willingness in that 
respect withhis intelligence, strength and skill, brought him rapid 
advancement."3. "Mr. Tucker is a well-equipped native American, having 
had, before heentered the shop, training at one of the leading colleges of 
the land andhaving served in the shops with the commonest day laborers and 
having risento his present conspicuous and useful office through his own 
inherentaptness and sterling qualities of application and energy. He is a 
readyreliance to the masters and men of the yard in more ways than can be 
definedin the duties he is expected daily to discharge because of his