Re: [PHP] Help Sending Mail
Robert Cummings wrote: Yeah, he's all over the place with his line endings. Personally, I use an array to track the headers and use implode in one shot before sending. Cheers, Rob. Same here -- Jim Lucas Perseverance is not a long race; it is many short races one after the other Walter Elliot Some men are born to greatness, some achieve greatness, and some have greatness thrust upon them. Twelfth Night, Act II, Scene V by William Shakespeare -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Command-line PHP script CPU usage goes sky-high, stays there--why?
M5 wrote: Thanks Jim. No problem. The processing is pretty quick. I don't think that's a bottleneck. It basically just inserts the data into MySQL, not much processing actually. What is the likely hood that two connections would come in at the same time, or at least within close enough time that the second would have to wait for the first to finish its job? --PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- Jim Lucas Perseverance is not a long race; it is many short races one after the other Walter Elliot Some men are born to greatness, some achieve greatness, and some have greatness thrust upon them. Twelfth Night, Act II, Scene V by William Shakespeare -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] LoadXML trouble
If i use your script like this: $xml = '?xml version=1.0? response ticketID1197027955_8310/ticketID statusOK/status errCode200/errCode errMsg/errMsg /response'; $obj = new DOMDocument(); $obj-loadXML( $xml ); echo print_r( $obj, true ); echo $obj-saveXML() . PHP_EOL; The first statement writes: DOMDocument Object ( ) The second: ?xml version=1.0? response ticketID1197027955_8310/ticketID statusOK/status errCode200/errCode errMsg/ /response It's just the xml is not properly stored in loadXML method... but the string must be inside due to saveXML returns the proper value. Nathan Nobbe escribió: On Dec 10, 2007 12:08 PM, Dani Castaños [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yep, it works when i do saveXML, but not on loadXML step... did the loadXML() method work in the test script i sent over in my last post? if it does then something else is going on when loadXML() is called in the context of your application. The thing is... i'm trying to do something like this: $request = $_POST['xml']; $logger-debug( 'New ticket request' ); /** * Parse XML request to obtain values */ $xml = new DOMDocument(); //$xml-validateOnParse = true; $xml-loadXML( $request ); you should always sanitize input. at the very least you should be running $_POST['xml'] through a call to trim() before handing it to the DOMDocument instance. $request = trim($_POST['xml']); $xml = new DOMDocument(); $xml-loadXML($request); i suspect there is some garbage in or around the string contained in $_POST['xml'] that the DomDocument instance doesnt like, therefore its not behaving the way youd anticipate. for example if you modify the script i sent over last time by putting some spaces in between the xml declaration and the opening tag of the envelope (response) you should see the following error (or something similar [depending on the value of error_reporting]) Warning: DOMDocument::loadXML(): XML declaration allowed only at the start of the document in Entity, line: 3 in /home/nathan/testDom.php on line 19 which consequently leads to ?xml version=1.0? when invoking echo $domDoc-saveXML() . PHP_EOL; rather than ?xml version= 1.0? response ticketID1197026188_ec76/ticketID statusKO/status errCode500/errCode errMsgInternal Server Error/errMsg /response which is what you would expect. -nathan -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Generating Random Numbers with Normal Distribution
On 10/12/2007, Nathan Nobbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 10, 2007 5:29 PM, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 14:22 -0600, Jay Blanchard wrote: [snip] Can you say for certain nature is truly random? Just because the seed may have occurred 13.7 billion years ago and we don't know what that initial state was and we couldn't possibly calculate all the interactions since, doesn't mean that everything since hasn't been happening in accordance with some universal formula and in absence of randomness. We know that there appear to be certain laws in physics, would they not have applied to that initial state in a non random manner? It may just be that due to the hugantic sample space from which to draw arbitrary values that we think things are random. Food for thought :) [/snip] Without order there cannot be randomness. But is the reverse true? i would have to say randomness came before order. but i suppose thats a chicken and egg problem.. In the worlds before Monkey, primal chaos reigned. Heavens sought order. But the phoenix can fly only when its feathers are grown. The four worlds formed again and yet again, as endless aeons wheeled and passed. Time and the pure essence of Heaven, the moisture of the Earth, the powers of the Sun and the Moon all worked upon a certain rock, old as creation. And it became magically fertile. That first egg was named Thought. Tathagata Buddha, the Father Buddha, said, With our thoughts, we make the World. Elemental forces caused the egg to hatch. From it came a stone monkey. The nature of Monkey was irrepressible! Monkeey -robin [I'll get my coat...] -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Mysqli support - test or complain? [SOLVED]
You use a session variable for that? Why not? That's entirely the wrong place to store something like which database API is installed. Not really. You could even wrap a function called (for example) Feature() around it. It should a class variable or global configuration variable. Heck, I'd say it's more appropriate to do extension_loaded( 'mysqli' ) on every call than to use a session variable. Why? It's very unlikely to be changing between calls. And even if it does, it's once in a blue moon. Granted though, I can't see it being a particularly intensive function call, so I can't see the harm in calling it on every invocation. -- Richard Heyes http://www.websupportsolutions.co.uk Knowledge Base and HelpDesk software that can cut the cost of online support ** NOW OFFERING FREE ACCOUNTS TO CHARITIES AND NON-PROFITS ** -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Mysqli support - test or complain? [SOLVED]
Richard Heyes wrote: You use a session variable for that? Why not? Because it's not user data, it's server data. That's entirely the wrong place to store something like which database API is installed. Not really. You could even wrap a function called (for example) Feature() around it. Yeah, really. Sessions are for user data. If it's the same for all users then it doesn't belong in the session, it belongs in a server-wide cache. It should a class variable or global configuration variable. Heck, I'd say it's more appropriate to do extension_loaded( 'mysqli' ) on every call than to use a session variable. Why? It's very unlikely to be changing between calls. And even if it does, it's once in a blue moon. Granted though, I can't see it being a particularly intensive function call, so I can't see the harm in calling it on every invocation. AFAIK a call to extension_loaded is pretty cheap, but if you really feel the need to cache it between requests the best place to store it would be in a file on the server. However, I'd expect a stat on that file will be more expensive than calling extension_loaded. -Stut -- http://stut.net/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Mysqli support - test or complain? [SOLVED]
Stut wrote: Richard Heyes wrote: You use a session variable for that? Why not? Because it's not user data, it's server data. That's entirely the wrong place to store something like which database API is installed. Not really. You could even wrap a function called (for example) Feature() around it. Yeah, really. Sessions are for user data. If it's the same for all users then it doesn't belong in the session, it belongs in a server-wide cache. It should a class variable or global configuration variable. Heck, I'd say it's more appropriate to do extension_loaded( 'mysqli' ) on every call than to use a session variable. Why? It's very unlikely to be changing between calls. And even if it does, it's once in a blue moon. Granted though, I can't see it being a particularly intensive function call, so I can't see the harm in calling it on every invocation. AFAIK a call to extension_loaded is pretty cheap, but if you really feel the need to cache it between requests the best place to store it would be in a file on the server. However, I'd expect a stat on that file will be more expensive than calling extension_loaded. the on disk file could be [re]generated automatically when the server is started up by the application and dumped onto tmpfs or even not stored as a file at all but directly in memory using apc or something similar either way I agree it's a server wide setting that is garanteed not change as long as the webserver is not restarted - atleast I can't see an extension becoming available 'just like that' ... going on the basis that dl() should be illegal ;-) - actually it is not available if your using a threaded webserver (who does?) and as of php6 not webserver SAPI implements dl() not to mention safe_mode which also disables it. -Stut -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Mysqli support - test or complain? [SOLVED]
Stut wrote: However, I'd expect a stat on that file will be more expensive than calling extension_loaded. Difficult to say, but a stat() is cheap, especially if the inode is cached already. /Per Jessen, Zürich -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Help Sending Mail
If you want a source to very verify against, send yourself an email, then view it's source; then change your class till it outputs the same info, gauranteed winner every time. Nathan Jim Lucas wrote: Robert Cummings wrote: Yeah, he's all over the place with his line endings. Personally, I use an array to track the headers and use implode in one shot before sending. Cheers, Rob. Same here -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Command-line PHP script CPU usage goes sky-high, stays there--why?
stream_socket_server simply listens, stream_socket_accept handles the connection, stream_set_write_buffer and stream_set_blocking help you keep up, especially when combined with stream_get_line, no need to shile forever when you can just: while (is_resource($conn = stream_socket_accept($socket, -1))) while (is_resource($conn) $pkt = stream_get_line($conn, 100, \n)) Key I find though is multithreading, listener thread with stream_socket_server, 2 or 3 stream_socket_accept threads and a pair of new thread spawned to handle each connection (one to read, one to write) (not needed for stateless http style request processing). Nathan M5 wrote: Curiously, would you agree with this guy's comments concerning low-level PHP socket functions vs stream_socket_server() ? If you want a high speed socket server, use the low-level sockets instead (socket_create/bind/listen). The stream_socket_server version appears to have internal fixed 8k buffers that will overflow if you don't keep up by reading. This is a serious problem if you an application that reads the socket for messages and then, say, saves the result in a database. The delay while it is busy processing means you can't read the data in time unless you get involved in muti-threading. With the the low-level functions, the OS quietly buffers TCP/IP packets so there is no problem (tested on Windows XP Professional). (http://www.php.net/manual/en/function.stream-socket-server.php#67837) On 10-Dec-07, at 9:46 PM, Tom Rogers wrote: Hi, Tuesday, December 11, 2007, 10:01:38 AM, you wrote: RF On 10-Dec-07, at 4:42 PM, Tom Rogers wrote: Put a usleep(1000) in the listen while() loop and give the cpu a break. RF Good advice, but I've already been doing that. The thing is, when the RF script first starts up, the CPU rarely exceeds 30%, even when many RF clients (200+) are simultaneously connected and sending data. When a RF few clients are connected, CPU is typically below 10%. Again, it's RF only after 24-48 hours that, all of a sudden, CPU usage increases by RF 40-50%. And it stays high until I stop the script and restart it. RF One question I have though is, is there actually any benefit to using RF mysql_pconnect(), since the script simply loops? My understanding is RF that pconnect only benefits if a script would otherwise be using RF mysql_connect repeatedly--and this script doesn't, since it calls RF mysql_[p]connect() just once, in the start tof execution. RF ...Rene I have found pconnect to be a problem (several years ago) and have never tried it since, it may well be ok now. The most likely cause is memory consumption on long running php scripts, what does top say? I have a script which runs from cron and was hammering the system when it ran and i have had to put the usleep() in the while($result = ..) loop as there are a few thousand rows. Probably bad design but it works and I'm loath to touch it :) One way to solve the memory issue is to have the script started by inetd, slower but more memory friendly. Also have a look at memcached to reduce the load a bit. -- regards, Tom -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Command-line PHP script CPU usage goes sky-high, stays there--why?
hi Nathan, any chance of a 'full blown' example for all the muppets who want to try and grok this stuff? (bork bork, say I :-)) Nathan Rixham wrote: stream_socket_server simply listens, stream_socket_accept handles the connection, stream_set_write_buffer and stream_set_blocking help you keep up, especially when combined with stream_get_line, no need to shile forever when you can just: while (is_resource($conn = stream_socket_accept($socket, -1))) while (is_resource($conn) $pkt = stream_get_line($conn, 100, \n)) Key I find though is multithreading, listener thread with stream_socket_server, 2 or 3 stream_socket_accept threads and a pair of new thread spawned to handle each connection (one to read, one to write) (not needed for stateless http style request processing). Nathan M5 wrote: Curiously, would you agree with this guy's comments concerning low-level PHP socket functions vs stream_socket_server() ? If you want a high speed socket server, use the low-level sockets instead (socket_create/bind/listen). The stream_socket_server version appears to have internal fixed 8k buffers that will overflow if you don't keep up by reading. This is a serious problem if you an application that reads the socket for messages and then, say, saves the result in a database. The delay while it is busy processing means you can't read the data in time unless you get involved in muti-threading. With the the low-level functions, the OS quietly buffers TCP/IP packets so there is no problem (tested on Windows XP Professional). (http://www.php.net/manual/en/function.stream-socket-server.php#67837) On 10-Dec-07, at 9:46 PM, Tom Rogers wrote: Hi, Tuesday, December 11, 2007, 10:01:38 AM, you wrote: RF On 10-Dec-07, at 4:42 PM, Tom Rogers wrote: Put a usleep(1000) in the listen while() loop and give the cpu a break. RF Good advice, but I've already been doing that. The thing is, when the RF script first starts up, the CPU rarely exceeds 30%, even when many RF clients (200+) are simultaneously connected and sending data. When a RF few clients are connected, CPU is typically below 10%. Again, it's RF only after 24-48 hours that, all of a sudden, CPU usage increases by RF 40-50%. And it stays high until I stop the script and restart it. RF One question I have though is, is there actually any benefit to using RF mysql_pconnect(), since the script simply loops? My understanding is RF that pconnect only benefits if a script would otherwise be using RF mysql_connect repeatedly--and this script doesn't, since it calls RF mysql_[p]connect() just once, in the start tof execution. RF ...Rene I have found pconnect to be a problem (several years ago) and have never tried it since, it may well be ok now. The most likely cause is memory consumption on long running php scripts, what does top say? I have a script which runs from cron and was hammering the system when it ran and i have had to put the usleep() in the while($result = ..) loop as there are a few thousand rows. Probably bad design but it works and I'm loath to touch it :) One way to solve the memory issue is to have the script started by inetd, slower but more memory friendly. Also have a look at memcached to reduce the load a bit. -- regards, Tom -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Mysqli support - test or complain? [SOLVED]
Because it's not user data, it's server data. So? It's there - use it. That's entirely the wrong place to store something like which database API is installed. Not really. You could even wrap a function called (for example) Feature() around it. Yeah, really. Sessions are for user data. If it's the same for all users then it doesn't belong in the session, it belongs in a server-wide cache. Sessions are for whatever you choose to put in them. And why implement a cache when you've got something perfectly usable (sessions) already? -- Richard Heyes http://www.websupportsolutions.co.uk Knowledge Base and HelpDesk software that can cut the cost of online support ** NOW OFFERING FREE ACCOUNTS TO CHARITIES AND NON-PROFITS ** -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Command-line PHP script CPU usage goes sky-high, stays there--why?
Jochem Maas wrote: Nathan Rixham wrote: Key I find though is multithreading, listener thread with stream_socket_server, 2 or 3 stream_socket_accept threads and a pair of new thread spawned to handle each connection (one to read, one to write) (not needed for stateless http style request processing). Nathan hi Nathan, any chance of a 'full blown' example for all the muppets who want to try and grok this stuff? (bork bork, say I :-)) I'd be interested to see how he does the multi-threading in php. Personally I'd always opt for C to write this type of thing, except for perhaps the most simple cases. /Per Jessen, Zürich -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Command-line PHP script CPU usage goes sky-high, stays there--why?
Per Jessen wrote: Jochem Maas wrote: Nathan Rixham wrote: Key I find though is multithreading, listener thread with stream_socket_server, 2 or 3 stream_socket_accept threads and a pair of new thread spawned to handle each connection (one to read, one to write) (not needed for stateless http style request processing). Nathan hi Nathan, any chance of a 'full blown' example for all the muppets who want to try and grok this stuff? (bork bork, say I :-)) I'd be interested to see how he does the multi-threading in php. Personally I'd always opt for C to write this type of thing, except for perhaps the most simple cases. any chance of an example from you too? /Per Jessen, Zürich -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] LoadXML trouble
On Dec 11, 2007 3:52 AM, Dani Castaños [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If i use your script like this:
$xml = '?xml version=1.0?
response
ticketID1197027955_8310/ticketID
statusOK/status
errCode200/errCode
errMsg/errMsg
/response';
$obj = new DOMDocument();
$obj-loadXML( $xml );
echo print_r( $obj, true );
echo $obj-saveXML() . PHP_EOL;
The first statement writes:
DOMDocument Object
(
)
The second:
?xml version=1.0?
response
ticketID1197027955_8310/ticketID
statusOK/status
errCode200/errCode
errMsg/
/response
It's just the xml is not properly stored in loadXML method... but the
string must be inside due to saveXML returns the proper value.
that is expected behavior. some of the internal classes dont define
any member variables that the php language has access to. obviously
they are storing data internally, said variables just arent accessible as
member variables of the class thats being defined.
you can look at the structure of a class in one line with:
Reflection::export(new ReflectionClass('DomDocument'));
-nathan
Re: [PHP] Command-line PHP script CPU usage goes sky-high, stays there--why?
Jochem Maas wrote: I'd be interested to see how he does the multi-threading in php. Personally I'd always opt for C to write this type of thing, except for perhaps the most simple cases. any chance of an example from you too? Sure - http://jessen.ch/files/distripg_main.c It can't be compiled, but the pseudo-code goes like this: initialize bind() to address(es) to listen to start a number of threads (=workers) do until terminated poll() for new work if new_work(), accept(), queue it, then wake up the workers. done A worker thread: initialize do until terminated wait for work accept() process work done It wouldn't be too difficult to have threads dynamically started and stopped depending on the amount of work queued up. /Per Jessen, Zürich -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] A SESSION Problem
Hi gang: I just had this happen and wonder what the fix is for it. I am sending session data from a script in a http to another script in https. However, sometimes the data gets through and sometimes it don't. Any ideas or fixes? Both scripts are listed below [1] ?php session_start(); $x = 'zzz'; $_SESSION['x'] = $x; ? form action=https://example.com/a-session2.php; method=post input type=submit value=Proceed to Step 2 /form [2] ?php session_start(); print_r($_SESSION); ? form action=http://example.com/a-session1.php; method=post input type=submit value=Proceed back to Step 1 /form -- --- http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] A SESSION Problem
are you looking at a cache problem - i.e. (pun intended ;-)) the second page is a locally cached copy and thereby not showing the data you would expect? tedd wrote: Hi gang: I just had this happen and wonder what the fix is for it. I am sending session data from a script in a http to another script in https. However, sometimes the data gets through and sometimes it don't. Any ideas or fixes? Both scripts are listed below [1] ?php session_start(); $x = 'zzz'; $_SESSION['x'] = $x; ? form action=https://example.com/a-session2.php; method=post input type=submit value=Proceed to Step 2 /form [2] ?php session_start(); print_r($_SESSION); ? form action=http://example.com/a-session1.php; method=post input type=submit value=Proceed back to Step 1 /form -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] Generating Random Numbers with Normal Distribution
[snip] ...stuff... [/snip] It is also wise to remember that order and randomness are relative, making each less or more so dependent upon observation and observation changes the observed. Furthermore 'random numbers with normal distribution' implies that there is certain order to the randomness since normal distribution typically follows a bell curve. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] A SESSION Problem
On Dec 11, 2007 9:53 AM, tedd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi gang: I just had this happen and wonder what the fix is for it. I am sending session data from a script in a http to another script in https. However, sometimes the data gets through and sometimes it don't. Any ideas or fixes? Both scripts are listed below [1] ?php session_start(); $x = 'zzz'; $_SESSION['x'] = $x; ? form action=https://example.com/a-session2.php; method=post input type=submit value=Proceed to Step 2 /form [2] ?php session_start(); print_r($_SESSION); ? form action=http://example.com/a-session1.php; method=post input type=submit value=Proceed back to Step 1 /form Provided the real code isn't directing to a different CNAME/subdomain (e.g. - [Script 1] http://domain.com redirects to [Script 2] https://www.domain.com/) it shouldn't be a problem. The snippet of code you provided looks fine. The other problem could be, though, that - because a session uses a cookie on the client side - the cookie can't be accessed reliably across both SSL and normal (unsecured) HTTP connections. Try appending the SID to the end of the URL, or as a hidden form field. You may also want to make sure that session.cookie_secure is to set to 'Off', since the SID will change with each page load otherwise. -- Daniel P. Brown [Phone Numbers Go Here!] [They're Hidden From View!] If at first you don't succeed, stick to what you know best so that you can make enough money to pay someone else to do it for you. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] tidy memory corruption problem
My first attempt at leaning the tidy suite of functions has ran into a major
snag
I get this:
*** glibc detected *** /usr/sbin/httpd: malloc(): memory corruption:
0x81946e30
whenever the tidy_parse_string() is called.
I'm running the latest apache/php/tidy that FC6 has to offer...
php-tidy-5.1.6-4.fc6
libtidy-0.99.0-12.20070228.fc6.1
Does the below code work on someone else's FC6 by chance?
thanks,
-eric wood
The code is:
html
head
titlePHP Tidy Test/title
body
?
$xml=EOX
begin
level1
level2
Text
/level2
/level1
/begin
EOX;
?
textarea cols='80' rows='10'
?
echo $xml;
?
/textarea
br/
Becomes...
br/
textarea cols='80' rows='10'
?
$config = array('indent' = TRUE,
'input-xml' = TRUE,
'output-xml' = TRUE,
'wrap' = 200);
$tidy = tidy_parse_string($xml, $config, 'UTF8');
echo $tidy;
?
/textarea
/body
/html
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Mysqli support - test or complain? [SOLVED]
Richard Heyes wrote: Because it's not user data, it's server data. So? It's there - use it. So are cookies, would you stuff this into a cookie? No, because that's not what cookies are there for. Because it's there is never a good reason to do something. That's entirely the wrong place to store something like which database API is installed. Not really. You could even wrap a function called (for example) Feature() around it. Yeah, really. Sessions are for user data. If it's the same for all users then it doesn't belong in the session, it belongs in a server-wide cache. Sessions are for whatever you choose to put in them. And why implement a cache when you've got something perfectly usable (sessions) already? You could potentially be pointlessly duplicating that data hundreds or thousands of times depending on how busy your site is. Also, in this particular example there is no need to cache that information beyond the request level because asking PHP for it is not an expensive operation, or at the very least is no more expensive than maintaining it in a session. One other thing to note is that putting it in the session will survive a rebuild of PHP to add/remove modules and a restart of the web server. It's probably not likely to happen but that could seriously break your application. However this is just my opinion. You're free to implement your application in whatever way you choose. -Stut -- http://stut.net/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] A SESSION Problem
Estrange problem. On 11/12/2007, tedd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi gang: I just had this happen and wonder what the fix is for it. I am sending session data from a script in a http to another script in https. However, sometimes the data gets through and sometimes it don't. Any ideas or fixes? Both scripts are listed below [1] ?php session_start(); $x = 'zzz'; $_SESSION['x'] = $x; ? form action= https://example.com/a-session2.php; method=post input type=submit value=Proceed to Step 2 /form [2] ?php session_start(); print_r($_SESSION); ? form action=http://example.com/a-session1.php; method=post input type=submit value=Proceed back to Step 1 /form + Are those pages in same hostname? + Have you test with other browsers? + The index of you $_SESSION (in this example x) is the same, the index couldn't be a number or start with a number. This i learn by experience.. :-) i don't know where this point is documented. + $_SESSION[1] = wrong + $_SESSION[1a] = wrong -- --- http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com -- PHP General Mailing List ( http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- Best Regards Cesar D. Rodas http://www.cesarodas.com http://www.thyphp.com http://www.phpajax.org Phone: +595-961-974165
Re: [PHP] Mysqli support - test or complain? [SOLVED]
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 15:25 +, Stut wrote: Richard Heyes wrote: Because it's not user data, it's server data. So? It's there - use it. So are cookies, would you stuff this into a cookie? No, because that's not what cookies are there for. Because it's there is never a good reason to do something. That's entirely the wrong place to store something like which database API is installed. Not really. You could even wrap a function called (for example) Feature() around it. Yeah, really. Sessions are for user data. If it's the same for all users then it doesn't belong in the session, it belongs in a server-wide cache. Sessions are for whatever you choose to put in them. And why implement a cache when you've got something perfectly usable (sessions) already? Sre, sessions are for whatever you choose to put in them. That's like saying bodies are for whatever a crazed murderer chooses to put in them... the statement is true, but it's not optimal. Cheers, Rob. -- ... SwarmBuy.com - http://www.swarmbuy.com Leveraging the buying power of the masses! ... -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] LoadXML trouble
that is expected behavior. some of the internal classes dont define any member variables that the php language has access to. obviously they are storing data internally, said variables just arent accessible as member variables of the class thats being defined. Ok! Thank you for this info... But then... Why can i do this in Windows: $xml-getElementsByTagName( 'ticketID' )-item( 0 )-nodeValue; and not in Linux? -- Xml example: ?xml version=1.0? response ticketID1197027955_8310/ticketID statusOK/status errCode200/errCode errMsg/errMsg /response -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] LoadXML trouble
Hi Nathan! Thank you for all your help! Problem has been fixed... The thing is, when request is sent, there is a little difference in what i get... I get ?xml version=\1.0\ and so on... These backslashes make the loadXML not load data properly... I've put an str_replace and the problem has been solved Again... Thank you very much! -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] A SESSION Problem
Looks like the session Id is getting regenerated when it moves from http to https. Check the cookie PHPSID cookie for your domain is same both the pages and if not then you will have to carry forward the SID to every new page and set SESSION_ID to that value and start the session. Hope this works for you. On Dec 11, 2007 9:10 PM, Cesar D. Rodas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Estrange problem. On 11/12/2007, tedd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi gang: I just had this happen and wonder what the fix is for it. I am sending session data from a script in a http to another script in https. However, sometimes the data gets through and sometimes it don't. Any ideas or fixes? Both scripts are listed below [1] ?php session_start(); $x = 'zzz'; $_SESSION['x'] = $x; ? form action= https://example.com/a-session2.php; method=post input type=submit value=Proceed to Step 2 /form [2] ?php session_start(); print_r($_SESSION); ? form action=http://example.com/a-session1.php; method=post input type=submit value=Proceed back to Step 1 /form + Are those pages in same hostname? + Have you test with other browsers? + The index of you $_SESSION (in this example x) is the same, the index couldn't be a number or start with a number. This i learn by experience.. :-) i don't know where this point is documented. + $_SESSION[1] = wrong + $_SESSION[1a] = wrong -- --- http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com -- PHP General Mailing List ( http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- Best Regards Cesar D. Rodas http://www.cesarodas.com http://www.thyphp.com http://www.phpajax.org Phone: +595-961-974165 -- Mark is on the way to make a Mark in your hearts - Fight back spam! Download the Blue Frog. http://www.bluesecurity.com/register/s?user=Z290aHNfMzE4OTg2NA%3D%3D
Re: [PHP] Mysqli support - test or complain? [SOLVED]
So? It's there - use it. So are cookies, would you stuff this into a cookie? No, because that's not what cookies are there for. Not because it's not what cookies are for - but because sessions are a more efficient and easier to use storage medium. You could potentially be pointlessly duplicating that data hundreds or thousands of times depending on how busy your site is. Well as always, if that's a concern then more thought would be required. But storage constraints are rarely a concern nowadays. Also, in this particular example there is no need to cache that information beyond the request level because asking PHP for it is not an expensive operation, or at the very least is no more expensive than maintaining it in a session. Granted. One other thing to note is that putting it in the session will survive a rebuild of PHP to add/remove modules and a restart of the web server. It's probably not likely to happen but that could seriously break your application. Then use the function directly. -- Richard Heyes http://www.websupportsolutions.co.uk Knowledge Base and HelpDesk software that can cut the cost of online support ** NOW OFFERING FREE ACCOUNTS TO CHARITIES AND NON-PROFITS ** -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Mysqli support - test or complain? [SOLVED]
Sre, sessions are for whatever you choose to put in them. That's like saying bodies are for whatever a crazed murderer chooses to put in them... No it's not. the statement is true, but it's not optimal. Real life is rarely optimal. -- Richard Heyes http://www.websupportsolutions.co.uk Knowledge Base and HelpDesk software that can cut the cost of online support ** NOW OFFERING FREE ACCOUNTS TO CHARITIES AND NON-PROFITS ** -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Mysqli support - test or complain? [SOLVED]
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 16:31 +, Richard Heyes wrote: Sre, sessions are for whatever you choose to put in them. That's like saying bodies are for whatever a crazed murderer chooses to put in them... No it's not. Yes it is. Neither is a good argument. the statement is true, but it's not optimal. Real life is rarely optimal. That's not a valid excuse for taking the sloppy pig route to development. Sloppy pig's give conscientious developers a bad name. And when they use PHP to create their slop, they give PHP a bad name. You would think you would lean towards conscientiousness since you use an email address with phpguru in it. But I guess anyone can claim whatever they want... it doesn't make it true. Maybe you could see if phpsloppypig.org is available (it is btw). Cheers, Rob. -- ... SwarmBuy.com - http://www.swarmbuy.com Leveraging the buying power of the masses! ... -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Command-line PHP script CPU usage goes sky-high, stays there--why?
That makes sense, but I'm not sure I really want to do this, since it's fairly important that Listener continue listening without interruption. I also don't think it's probably necessary, since from what I read, I'm not really pushing the envelope in terms of real load. Right now, I might have max ~250 clients connected, each sending 5-20 kb / day of data. It's not much data, nor many concurrent connections. If Jim's Listener handles 80-85k connections per day, then mine should be able to do 250 concurrently easily, and 2000 cumulative per day without a hitch. Did I mention, I'm on Mac OS X Server 10.4.11? Shouldn't matter, but anyway. On 10-Dec-07, at 5:48 PM, Jochem Maas wrote: Jim Lucas wrote: Tom Rogers wrote: Hi, ... Also, make sure you are not using an array that you are not re- initializing through each iteration of the loop. If the array keeps getting bigger, PHP might $*% on itself. Always re-initialize arrays to clean them up. even then he may still have creeping memory ... in which it might be possible to have a mother process that spawns and watchs a child process .. the child process is the actual deamon, the child could then keep a track of it's own memory usage and then kill itself when it gets too big ... the mother in turn would automatically spawn a new child deamon process upon seeing it's child has committed suicide. does that make sense? -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] tidy memory corruption problem
Check for similar bugs here:
http://bugs.php.net
You may find that you have to upgrade something...
Just guessing, really, but PHP 5.1.x should probably be upgraded to
5.2.x anyway.
On Tue, December 11, 2007 9:13 am, Eric Wood wrote:
My first attempt at leaning the tidy suite of functions has ran into a
major
snag
I get this:
*** glibc detected *** /usr/sbin/httpd: malloc(): memory corruption:
0x81946e30
whenever the tidy_parse_string() is called.
I'm running the latest apache/php/tidy that FC6 has to offer...
php-tidy-5.1.6-4.fc6
libtidy-0.99.0-12.20070228.fc6.1
Does the below code work on someone else's FC6 by chance?
thanks,
-eric wood
The code is:
html
head
titlePHP Tidy Test/title
body
?
$xml=EOX
begin
level1
level2
Text
/level2
/level1
/begin
EOX;
?
textarea cols='80' rows='10'
?
echo $xml;
?
/textarea
br/
Becomes...
br/
textarea cols='80' rows='10'
?
$config = array('indent' = TRUE,
'input-xml' = TRUE,
'output-xml' = TRUE,
'wrap' = 200);
$tidy = tidy_parse_string($xml, $config, 'UTF8');
echo $tidy;
?
/textarea
/body
/html
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
Some people have a gift link here.
Know what I want?
I want you to buy a CD from some indie artist.
http://cdbaby.com/from/lynch
Yeah, I get a buck. So?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] A SESSION Problem
On Tue, December 11, 2007 8:53 am, tedd wrote: Hi gang: I just had this happen and wonder what the fix is for it. I am sending session data from a script in a http to another script in https. However, sometimes the data gets through and sometimes it don't. Any ideas or fixes? Both scripts are listed below [1] ?php session_start(); $x = 'zzz'; $_SESSION['x'] = $x; ? form action=https://example.com/a-session2.php; method=post input type=submit value=Proceed to Step 2 /form [2] ?php session_start(); print_r($_SESSION); ? form action=http://example.com/a-session1.php; method=post input type=submit value=Proceed back to Step 1 /form Use FireFox and configure it to ALWAYS ask before accepting a cookie and see when you are getting a new session or not. If it happens sometimes perhaps you are running code that has or hasn't changed the cookie parameters to allow the session ID to travel over secure/insecure HTTP. It's also possible that you have *another* session going in HTTPS sometimes, so it only picks up the HTTP one when there isn't already an active session from another application on HTTPS... -- Some people have a gift link here. Know what I want? I want you to buy a CD from some indie artist. http://cdbaby.com/from/lynch Yeah, I get a buck. So? -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Mysqli support - test or complain? [SOLVED]
Real life is rarely optimal. That's not a valid excuse for taking the sloppy pig route to development. Sloppy pig's give conscientious developers a bad name. And when they use PHP to create their slop, they give PHP a bad name. Well I err towards actually doing something useful. Businesses can rarely wait while developers create a technically perfect application. Those that do are rarely successful. As always there's a balance to be struck between writing technically perfect code and getting the job done. You would think you would lean towards conscientiousness since you use an email address with phpguru in it. But I guess anyone can claim whatever they want... it doesn't make it true. Maybe you could see if phpsloppypig.org is available (it is btw). Ah personal insults. Always a good argument. -- Richard Heyes http://www.websupportsolutions.co.uk Knowledge Base and HelpDesk software that can cut the cost of online support ** NOW OFFERING FREE ACCOUNTS TO CHARITIES AND NON-PROFITS ** -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Mysqli support - test or complain? [SOLVED]
Richard Heyes wrote: Real life is rarely optimal. That's not a valid excuse for taking the sloppy pig route to development. Sloppy pig's give conscientious developers a bad name. And when they use PHP to create their slop, they give PHP a bad name. Well I err towards actually doing something useful. Businesses can rarely wait while developers create a technically perfect application. Those that do are rarely successful. As always there's a balance to be struck between writing technically perfect code and getting the job done. I don't see a reason to compromise. It would take no longer to call extension_loaded on each page request than it will to put the variable in the session. You're right in saying that there's a balance to be struck, but in this particular case I personally see a right way and a wrong way and no compromise needed to do it properly. You would think you would lean towards conscientiousness since you use an email address with phpguru in it. But I guess anyone can claim whatever they want... it doesn't make it true. Maybe you could see if phpsloppypig.org is available (it is btw). Ah personal insults. Always a good argument. I couldn't care less what your domain name is, you're still advocating a poor choice IMHO. -Stut -- http://stut.net/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Help Sending Mail
Until today, there was a very nifty MIME Message Lint tool to check
your email message here:
http://www.apps.ietf.org/msglint.html
The homepage is now the default Apache install page though, and that
URL is 404.
I'm posting it in hopes that somebody knows a good similar tool and/or
that it will come back to life before you read this, or shortly
thereafter.
On Mon, December 10, 2007 10:33 pm, Me2resh Lists wrote:
Dear All,
i wrote this class below to send Mail. but when i use it. i get the
sender
No Body. and from the address of the server, not the From address that
i
specify. and the MIME Headers as text in the message itself. and the
attachment is pasted as binary text also.
can anyone help please ??
here is the code :
?php
$Mail = new MainClass();
$Mail-Construct(Ahmed, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Test Mail,
Hello,
this is my first message);
$Mail-AddTo([EMAIL PROTECTED], Ahmed);
$Mail-AddCc([EMAIL PROTECTED], Me2resh);
$Mail-AddBcc([EMAIL PROTECTED], hola);
$Mail-AddAttach(favicon.ico);
$Mail-SendMail();
echo pre;
print_r($Mail);
/**
*
*/
class MainClass{
/**
*
*/
var $To = ;
var $Cc = ;
var $Bcc = ;
var $From = ;
var $Name = ;
var $Subject = ;
var $Message = ;
var $Headers = ;
function Construct($name, $from, $subject, $message){
//construct message
if ($name == ){
$name = $from;
}
$this-Name = $name;
$this-From = $from;
$this-Subject = $subject;
$this-Message = $message;
}//end of Construct
function AddTo($email, $name){
// add reciepnt to To array
if ($name == ){
$name = $email;
}
if ($this-To == ){
$this-To .= $name.' '.$email.'';
}else{
$this-To .= ,.$name.' '.$email.'';
}
}// end of AddTo
function AddCc($email, $name){
// add reciepnt to Cc array
if ($name == ){
$name = $email;
}
if ($this-Cc == ){
$this-Cc .= $name.' '.$email.'';
}else{
$this-Cc .= ,.$name.' '.$email.'';
}
}
function AddBcc($email, $name){
// add reciepnt to Bcc array
if ($name == ){
$name = $email;
}
if ($this-Bcc == ){
$this-Bcc .= $name.' '.$email.'';
}else{
$this-Bcc .= ,.$name.' '.$email.'';
}
}
function AddAttach($attach){
//add attach to array
//if (is_uploaded_file($attach)) {
// Read the file to be attached ('rb' = read binary)
$file = fopen($attach,'rb');
$data = fread($file,filesize($attach));
fclose($file);
// Generate a boundary string
$semi_rand = md5(time());
$mime_boundary = ==Multipart_Boundary_x{$semi_rand}x;
// Add the headers for a file attachment
$this-Headers .= \nMIME-Version: 1.0\n .
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;\n .
boundary=\{$mime_boundary}\;
// Add a multipart boundary above the plain message
$this-Message = This is a multi-part message in MIME
format.\n\n .
--{$mime_boundary}\n .
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=\iso-8859-1\\n
.
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit\n\n .
$this-Message . \n\n;
// Base64 encode the file data
$data = chunk_split(base64_encode($data));
// Add file attachment to the message
$this-Message .= --{$mime_boundary}\n .
Content-Type: {filetype($attach)};\n .
name=\{$attach}\\n .
Content-Disposition: attachment;\n .
filename=\{$attach}\\n .
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64\n\n .
$data . \n\n .
--{$mime_boundary}--\n;
// }// end of if
}// end of add attach
function SendMail(){
$this-Headers .= \r\n;
$this-Headers .= 'To: '.$this-To.\r\n;
$this-Headers .= 'From:
'.$this-Name.''.$this-From.''.\r\n;
$this-Headers .= 'Cc: '.$this-Cc.\r\n;
$this-Headers .= 'Bcc: '.$this-Bcc.\r\n;
mail($this-From, $this-Subject, $this-Message,
$this-Headers);
}
}// end of class
?
Here is the text in the email :
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary===Multipart_Boundary_xd609c629ba34ecb645a7572abb61eb27x
To: Ahmed [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Ahmed[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Me2resh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bcc: hola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is a
Re: [PHP] Mysqli support - test or complain? [SOLVED]
I don't see a reason to compromise. It would take no longer to call extension_loaded on each page request than it will to put the variable in the session. You're right in saying that there's a balance to be struck, but in this particular case I personally see a right way and a wrong way and no compromise needed to do it properly. I think the discussion has moved beyond extension_loaded(), but in that case, yes, personally I would use extension_loaded() directly. Probably in a factory type function which returns the appropriate type of object. I couldn't care less what your domain name is, you're still advocating a poor choice IMHO. Practical though. And I'm conscientious as far as business allows. -- Richard Heyes http://www.websupportsolutions.co.uk Knowledge Base and HelpDesk software that can cut the cost of online support ** NOW OFFERING FREE ACCOUNTS TO CHARITIES AND NON-PROFITS ** -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Help Sending Mail
PS
GMail will not accept \r\n between header lines, only \n
I dunno if RFC822 specifies which ending but I *do* know that this
breaks the current PEAR mimePart.php code.
Editing the code to hack \r\n to just \n for the _CRLF constant works
for gmail, but may break other mail clients if \r\n is the RFC822
correct newline.
PPS
Is anybody else tired of this endless newline war between \n and \r\n?!
Can we just shoot anybody who doesn't accept either as valid?
On Mon, December 10, 2007 10:33 pm, Me2resh Lists wrote:
Dear All,
i wrote this class below to send Mail. but when i use it. i get the
sender
No Body. and from the address of the server, not the From address that
i
specify. and the MIME Headers as text in the message itself. and the
attachment is pasted as binary text also.
can anyone help please ??
here is the code :
?php
$Mail = new MainClass();
$Mail-Construct(Ahmed, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Test Mail,
Hello,
this is my first message);
$Mail-AddTo([EMAIL PROTECTED], Ahmed);
$Mail-AddCc([EMAIL PROTECTED], Me2resh);
$Mail-AddBcc([EMAIL PROTECTED], hola);
$Mail-AddAttach(favicon.ico);
$Mail-SendMail();
echo pre;
print_r($Mail);
/**
*
*/
class MainClass{
/**
*
*/
var $To = ;
var $Cc = ;
var $Bcc = ;
var $From = ;
var $Name = ;
var $Subject = ;
var $Message = ;
var $Headers = ;
function Construct($name, $from, $subject, $message){
//construct message
if ($name == ){
$name = $from;
}
$this-Name = $name;
$this-From = $from;
$this-Subject = $subject;
$this-Message = $message;
}//end of Construct
function AddTo($email, $name){
// add reciepnt to To array
if ($name == ){
$name = $email;
}
if ($this-To == ){
$this-To .= $name.' '.$email.'';
}else{
$this-To .= ,.$name.' '.$email.'';
}
}// end of AddTo
function AddCc($email, $name){
// add reciepnt to Cc array
if ($name == ){
$name = $email;
}
if ($this-Cc == ){
$this-Cc .= $name.' '.$email.'';
}else{
$this-Cc .= ,.$name.' '.$email.'';
}
}
function AddBcc($email, $name){
// add reciepnt to Bcc array
if ($name == ){
$name = $email;
}
if ($this-Bcc == ){
$this-Bcc .= $name.' '.$email.'';
}else{
$this-Bcc .= ,.$name.' '.$email.'';
}
}
function AddAttach($attach){
//add attach to array
//if (is_uploaded_file($attach)) {
// Read the file to be attached ('rb' = read binary)
$file = fopen($attach,'rb');
$data = fread($file,filesize($attach));
fclose($file);
// Generate a boundary string
$semi_rand = md5(time());
$mime_boundary = ==Multipart_Boundary_x{$semi_rand}x;
// Add the headers for a file attachment
$this-Headers .= \nMIME-Version: 1.0\n .
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;\n .
boundary=\{$mime_boundary}\;
// Add a multipart boundary above the plain message
$this-Message = This is a multi-part message in MIME
format.\n\n .
--{$mime_boundary}\n .
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=\iso-8859-1\\n
.
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit\n\n .
$this-Message . \n\n;
// Base64 encode the file data
$data = chunk_split(base64_encode($data));
// Add file attachment to the message
$this-Message .= --{$mime_boundary}\n .
Content-Type: {filetype($attach)};\n .
name=\{$attach}\\n .
Content-Disposition: attachment;\n .
filename=\{$attach}\\n .
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64\n\n .
$data . \n\n .
--{$mime_boundary}--\n;
// }// end of if
}// end of add attach
function SendMail(){
$this-Headers .= \r\n;
$this-Headers .= 'To: '.$this-To.\r\n;
$this-Headers .= 'From:
'.$this-Name.''.$this-From.''.\r\n;
$this-Headers .= 'Cc: '.$this-Cc.\r\n;
$this-Headers .= 'Bcc: '.$this-Bcc.\r\n;
mail($this-From, $this-Subject, $this-Message,
$this-Headers);
}
}// end of class
?
Here is the text in the email :
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary===Multipart_Boundary_xd609c629ba34ecb645a7572abb61eb27x
To: Ahmed [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [PHP] shared memory access - shmod_open
I tried the php function chmod($sem, 0644) which works fine even if it
converts the octal number too, cf. xdebug trace file:
0.0037 50280 - chmod('/tmp/1521387531.sem', 420)
...myScripts/test.php:11
= TRUE
0.0039 50280 - shmop_open(2013277949, 'c', 420, 1)
...myScripts/test.php:15
= FALSE
So I think there must be something else wrong with my shmop_open. I also
tried shmop_open($sem_key, c, 0644, 1) and shmop_open($sem_key, c,
420, 1), which doesn´t work either.
Thank you for your help,
Rolf.
Peter Ford-4 wrote:
Richard Lynch wrote:
On Thu, December 6, 2007 2:44 am, Rolf_ wrote:
I have a problem working with shmop_open() in a Solaris environment.
The
following cli-script works fine, except shmod_open returns a warning
'unable
to attach or create shared memory segment':
?php
$sem = /tmp/ . rand() . .sem;
touch ($sem);
echo sem $sem \n;
$sem_key = ftok($sem, 'w');
echo sem_key $sem_key \n;
if ($sem_key == -1) { die (ftok error); }
$shm_id = shmop_open($sem_key, w, 0644, 1);
echo shm_id $shm_id\n;
?
I checked the $sem_key with the Solaris ipcs command. The file exists
and
the read/write rights are correct. I tried explictly to call
shmop_open with
the right key - the error message remains the same.
Checking out different access mode like r does not succeed too. In
the
Xdebug output, php changes the value 0644 to 420, i.e.
shmop_open(1258300033, 'w', 420, 1). Of course, I compiled php with
--enable-shmop.
Does anyone has an idea what I might also check?
Perhaps the 0644 needs to be expressed in some other way?
I know it works fine that way for chmod and friends, so I wouldn't
expect it, but...
Or maybe 420 *IS* the right value, and you're on a red herring.
Try Googling for the error message and Solaris if you haven't done
that yet.
The problem is that 0644 == 420, because 0644 is parsed as 644 base 8
(the
zero prefix forces the number to octal...)
So 420 (decimal) is actually the correct value. RTFM for chmod, which
gives you
a big hint about this...
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/shared-memory-access---shmod_open-tp14188465p14278683.html
Sent from the PHP - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Mysqli support - test or complain? [SOLVED]
Stut wrote: I couldn't care less what your domain name is, you're still advocating a poor choice IMHO. I have been trying hard not to join this thread, but ... apart from the principle, what's _really_ so poor about it? Having to write application code that needs to work with two different APIs is poor enough, using a session variable for keeping a status won't make it much worse. So what if the status is server-scope, yet kept in user-scope. In particular if the app already uses session storage. /Per Jessen, Zürich -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] sftp connecting to remove server via php
I have to write a script that will connect to a remove server using sftp and pull in specific files for processing. Currently I can get to the server by just using sftp [EMAIL PROTECTED] How can I open these files via php? Is the only way to use fopen with the PECL sftp, ssh2 modules? Thanks!
RE: [PHP] sftp connecting to remove server via php
[snip] I have to write a script that will connect to a remove server using sftp and pull in specific files for processing. Currently I can get to the server by just using sftp [EMAIL PROTECTED] How can I open these files via php? Is the only way to use fopen with the PECL sftp, ssh2 modules? [/snip] http://www.php.net/ftp http://www.php.net/ftp_get -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] sftp connecting to remove server via php
[snip] Yes but will these handle sftp? I have a key on the other server so don't need a password. [/snip] http://us.php.net/manual/en/function.ftp-ssl-connect.php always reply to all so the mail gets back on the list -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] sftp connecting to remove server via php
Sorry, thanks for the info! On Dec 11, 2007 3:26 PM, Jay Blanchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] Yes but will these handle sftp? I have a key on the other server so don't need a password. [/snip] http://us.php.net/manual/en/function.ftp-ssl-connect.php always reply to all so the mail gets back on the list
Re: [PHP] Mysqli support - test or complain? [SOLVED]
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 17:01 +, Richard Heyes wrote: Real life is rarely optimal. That's not a valid excuse for taking the sloppy pig route to development. Sloppy pig's give conscientious developers a bad name. And when they use PHP to create their slop, they give PHP a bad name. Well I err towards actually doing something useful. Businesses can rarely wait while developers create a technically perfect application. Those that do are rarely successful. As always there's a balance to be struck between writing technically perfect code and getting the job done. You would think you would lean towards conscientiousness since you use an email address with phpguru in it. But I guess anyone can claim whatever they want... it doesn't make it true. Maybe you could see if phpsloppypig.org is available (it is btw). Ah personal insults. Always a good argument. It was just a suggestion... if you take it as an insult perhaps it hit a chord. Cheers, Rob. -- ... SwarmBuy.com - http://www.swarmbuy.com Leveraging the buying power of the masses! ... -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Mysqli support - test or complain? [SOLVED]
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 18:14 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
Stut wrote:
I couldn't care less what your domain name is, you're still advocating
a poor choice IMHO.
I have been trying hard not to join this thread, but ... apart from the
principle, what's _really_ so poor about it? Having to write
application code that needs to work with two different APIs is poor
enough, using a session variable for keeping a status won't make it
much worse. So what if the status is server-scope, yet kept in
user-scope. In particular if the app already uses session storage.
It's bad because it places data in a storage area not related to the
kind of configuration being tracked. Sessions are for managing user and
user related data. This particular value is related to the server in
general. It places a large WTF factor on the code for anyone down the
road maintaining it. It may be true that nobody else will ever manage
this code, but it's unlikely. I absolutely agree with you though, the
whole design is off. The best way to do this IMHO is to use a singleton
class that only loads the appropriate library type. Then the interface
would be generic and no extension switching would occur once the library
is loaded. Functional equivalents can be used to facilitate the same
design pattern as the singleton... such as a stub library containing one
function:
File: db.stub.php
?
function getConnection( $dbConnectionParams )
{
if( extension_loaded( 'mysqli' ) )
{
require_once( 'db.layer.mysql.php' );
}
else
if( extension_loaded( 'mysql' ) )
{
require_once( 'db.layer.mysqli.php' );
}
else
{
die( 'No appropriate database library installed' );
}
}
?
Then only the necessary code would be loaded and all db function (or
method) requests would execute only the appropriate code without
run-time switching. This is not only fairly optimal, but simpler,
cleaner, and much more maintainable.
Cheers,
Rob.
--
...
SwarmBuy.com - http://www.swarmbuy.com
Leveraging the buying power of the masses!
...
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Help Sending Mail
On Dec 11, 2007 12:20 PM, Richard Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PS GMail will not accept \r\n between header lines, only \n I dunno if RFC822 specifies which ending but I *do* know that this breaks the current PEAR mimePart.php code. Editing the code to hack \r\n to just \n for the _CRLF constant works for gmail, but may break other mail clients if \r\n is the RFC822 correct newline. PPS Is anybody else tired of this endless newline war between \n and \r\n?! Can we just shoot anybody who doesn't accept either as valid? As far as RFC822 is concerned: 3.1.2. STRUCTURE OF HEADER FIELDS Once a field has been unfolded, it may be viewed as being com- posed of a field-name followed by a colon (:), followed by a field-body, and terminated by a carriage-return/line-feed. The field-name must be composed of printable ASCII characters (i.e., characters that have values between 33. and 126., decimal, except colon). The field-body may be composed of any ASCII characters, except CR or LF. (While CR and/or LF may be present in the actual text, they are removed by the action of unfolding the field.) and later... 3.2. HEADER FIELD DEFINITIONS These rules show a field meta-syntax, without regard for the particular type or internal syntax. Their purpose is to permit detection of fields; also, they present to higher-level parsers an image of each field as fitting on one line. field = field-name : [ field-body ] CRLF (http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc822.html) That said, I can't recall having problems with a simple \n, but I usually stick to \r\n for mail headers. Andrew -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Command-line PHP script CPU usage goes sky-high, stays there--why?
René Fournier wrote: However, the number of socket clients connecting in the past 3-4 months has steadily increased, and this seems to have exposed (if not created) a strange performance issue with PHP 5.2.4, MySQL 5.0.45 and/or Mac OS X Server 10.4.11. (I say and/or because I am unsure where the problem's cause really lies.) Basically, after the script has been running for a day or so (processing essentially the amount data that used to take two weeks), the CPU usage of the machine goes from 30% (normal) to 80-90%. Have you tried stracing it to see what's really happening when the load goes that high? /Per Jessen, Zürich -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Help Sending Mail
heh Richard! long time no see, guess you had withdrawal symtoms or you managed to bust out of whatever compound they were holding you in ;-) ... Richard Lynch wrote: PS GMail will not accept \r\n between header lines, only \n I dunno if RFC822 specifies which ending but I *do* know that this breaks the current PEAR mimePart.php code. Editing the code to hack \r\n to just \n for the _CRLF constant works for gmail, but may break other mail clients if \r\n is the RFC822 correct newline. I've never bothered with \r\n and with the exception of opening stuff in notepad I've never had any problem is an email context or otherwise ... at least it's never been brought to my intention which is good enough for me :-) PPS Is anybody else tired of this endless newline war between \n and \r\n?! Can we just shoot anybody who doesn't accept either as valid? no, it's a waste of good ammo. use a baseball bat or something. that's problem with kids these days no idea of the cost of things ... I wonder if that's the reason *doze went with the extra byte \r entails? -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Bug in stream_socket_server()?
If you want a high speed socket server, use the low-level sockets instead (socket_create/bind/listen). The stream_socket_server version appears to have internal fixed 8k buffers that will overflow if you don't keep up by reading. This is a serious problem if you an application that reads the socket for messages and then, say, saves the result in a database. The delay while it is busy processing means you can't read the data in time unless you get involved in muti-threading. With the the low-level functions, the OS quietly buffers TCP/IP packets so there is no problem (tested on Windows XP Professional). ( http://php.oregonstate.edu/manual/en/function.stream-socket- server.php#67837 ) Has anyone confirmed this? I am doing tests with a stripped-down multi-client socket server, wonder if this issue is causing some of the problems I've seen. ...Rene -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Mysqli support - test or complain? [SOLVED]
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 22:11 +0100, Per Jessen wrote: Robert Cummings wrote: On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 18:14 +0100, Per Jessen wrote: I have been trying hard not to join this thread, but ... apart from the principle, what's _really_ so poor about it? Having to write application code that needs to work with two different APIs is poor enough, using a session variable for keeping a status won't make it much worse. So what if the status is server-scope, yet kept in user-scope. In particular if the app already uses session storage. It's bad because it places data in a storage area not related to the kind of configuration being tracked. Sessions are for managing user and user related data. This particular value is related to the server in general. It places a large WTF factor on the code for anyone down the road maintaining it. Possibly, but nothing that a single line comment won't explain. Making a potentially poor decision is bad, but explaining why takes most of the sting out of it. It may be true that nobody else will ever manage this code, but it's unlikely. I absolutely agree with you though, the whole design is off. The best way to do this IMHO is to use a singleton class that only loads the appropriate library type. I can't remember what sort of environment the OP was in, but if any sort of organised testing is done, the use of two different APIs will just about double the test-effort. Which is why I still think the best option is to mandate _one_ of the APIs and choose your hoster accordingly. Well if you write unit tests, having the unit tests applied to one or the other is the same amount of work since it just requires a switch to change between mysql and mysqli. Cheers, Rob. -- ... SwarmBuy.com - http://www.swarmbuy.com Leveraging the buying power of the masses! ... -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Command-line PHP script CPU usage goes sky-high, stays there--why?
Per Jessen wrote: René Fournier wrote: However, the number of socket clients connecting in the past 3-4 months has steadily increased, and this seems to have exposed (if not created) a strange performance issue with PHP 5.2.4, MySQL 5.0.45 and/or Mac OS X Server 10.4.11. (I say and/or because I am unsure where the problem's cause really lies.) Basically, after the script has been running for a day or so (processing essentially the amount data that used to take two weeks), the CPU usage of the machine goes from 30% (normal) to 80-90%. Have you tried stracing it to see what's really happening when the load goes that high? am I correct that that would be done like so?: strace -p process id of php deamon Im a little new to this kind of coolness, I found this page which is very helpful: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/aix/library/au-unix-strace.html I was going to suggest using gdb to figure what the process is doing but figured it wouldn't be handy to have the deamon running via gdb for 48 hours ... silly me didn't grok that you can attach to an existing process (something that ibm article made clear to me) can't wait till my macbook arrives so that I can start to play with this kind of stuff locally ... aka another excuse to justify the aluminium beast ;-) /Per Jessen, Zürich -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Mysqli support - test or complain? [SOLVED]
On Dec 11, 2007 4:11 PM, Per Jessen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't remember what sort of environment the OP was in, but if any sort of organised testing is done, the use of two different APIs will just about double the test-effort. Which is why I still think the best option is to mandate _one_ of the APIs and choose your hoster accordingly. ideally there should be an abstraction layer. beneath it either mysql or mysqli would work. this is the nature of any respectable database layer. it prevents a need to modify stable client code (written against the abstraction layer) when you have to switch the underlying database client. -nathan
Re: [PHP] Mysqli support - test or complain? [SOLVED]
Robert Cummings wrote: On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 18:14 +0100, Per Jessen wrote: I have been trying hard not to join this thread, but ... apart from the principle, what's _really_ so poor about it? Having to write application code that needs to work with two different APIs is poor enough, using a session variable for keeping a status won't make it much worse. So what if the status is server-scope, yet kept in user-scope. In particular if the app already uses session storage. It's bad because it places data in a storage area not related to the kind of configuration being tracked. Sessions are for managing user and user related data. This particular value is related to the server in general. It places a large WTF factor on the code for anyone down the road maintaining it. Possibly, but nothing that a single line comment won't explain. Making a potentially poor decision is bad, but explaining why takes most of the sting out of it. It may be true that nobody else will ever manage this code, but it's unlikely. I absolutely agree with you though, the whole design is off. The best way to do this IMHO is to use a singleton class that only loads the appropriate library type. I can't remember what sort of environment the OP was in, but if any sort of organised testing is done, the use of two different APIs will just about double the test-effort. Which is why I still think the best option is to mandate _one_ of the APIs and choose your hoster accordingly. /Per Jessen, Zürich -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] LoadXML trouble
Dani Castaños wrote: Hi Nathan! Thank you for all your help! Problem has been fixed... The thing is, when request is sent, there is a little difference in what i get... I get ?xml version=\1.0\ and so on... These backslashes make the loadXML not load data properly... I've put an str_replace and the problem has been solved ah, that will be this: http://php.net/manual/en/ref.info.php#ini.magic-quotes-gpc you have just learned to carefully study the differences between dev and production php.ini settings (e.g. via phpinfo()) when you run into these kind of problems :-) Again... Thank you very much! -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Re: running cmd via php
First off I must ask, why do you need to run windows commands when you don't even know how to use a PHP function. First thing taht came to my mind was some kind thought, woah, I'm gona learn to hack I'm gona be a leet haxor. In the case I'm wrong, sorry, and also you might want to know that exec doesn't always work some hosts have it turned off for obvious security reasons, also there's other alternatives other than exec such as shell_exec I think that's the name, etc although that's for Linux which can do a lot of the stuff that Windows can also. - Dan adam_99 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello! I'm trying a lot to find how I can run the cmd (command line of windows) and send to the cmd commands? Thanks. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Re: Bug in stream_socket_server()?
Would this class as a test?
?php
$socket = stream_socket_server(tcp://0.0.0.0:8000, $errno, $errstr);
if (!$socket) {
echo $errstr ($errno)br /\n;
} else {
while (is_resource($conn = stream_socket_accept($socket, 30))) {
while (is_resource($conn) $pkt = stream_get_line($conn, 100, \n)) {
fwrite($conn, '');
sleep(10);
echo $pkt;
}
}
}
?
I then sent 2*384kb loads per second through a terminal to it without
problems, 10 minutes since i stopped writing data to it and it's still
echoing out 1 line every 10 secs!
Nathan
René Fournier wrote:
If you want a high speed socket server, use the low-level sockets
instead (socket_create/bind/listen). The stream_socket_server version
appears to have internal fixed 8k buffers that will overflow if you
don't keep up by reading.
This is a serious problem if you an application that reads the socket
for messages and then, say, saves the result in a database. The delay
while it is busy processing means you can't read the data in time unless
you get involved in muti-threading.
With the the low-level functions, the OS quietly buffers TCP/IP packets
so there is no problem (tested on Windows XP Professional).
(
http://php.oregonstate.edu/manual/en/function.stream-socket-server.php#67837
)
Has anyone confirmed this? I am doing tests with a stripped-down
multi-client socket server, wonder if this issue is causing some of the
problems I've seen.
...Rene
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Help Sending Mail
On Dec 11, 2007 12:20 PM, Richard Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I dunno if RFC822 specifies which ending but I *do* know that this breaks the current PEAR mimePart.php code. RFC 822 has been obsolete since RFC 2822 was introduced in 2001. We (that is, myself and other members of the IETF) are working on a new BIS/Draft for a new RFC that will revise (obsolete certain parts of) 822 and 2822. However, it's already been mentioned that headers should remain as standardized in 2822 (which I think will most likely be the case). -- Daniel P. Brown [Phone Numbers Go Here!] [They're Hidden From View!] If at first you don't succeed, stick to what you know best so that you can make enough money to pay someone else to do it for you. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: running cmd via php
On Dec 11, 2007 5:10 PM, Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First off I must ask, why do you need to run windows commands when you don't even know how to use a PHP function. First thing taht came to my mind was some kind thought, woah, I'm gona learn to hack I'm gona be a leet haxor. That's 1337 h4x0R. In the case I'm wrong, sorry, and also you might want to know that exec doesn't always work some hosts have it turned off for obvious security reasons, also there's other alternatives other than exec such as shell_exec I think that's the name, etc although that's for Linux which can do a lot of the stuff that Windows can also. only better! ;-P -- Daniel P. Brown [Phone Numbers Go Here!] [They're Hidden From View!] If at first you don't succeed, stick to what you know best so that you can make enough money to pay someone else to do it for you. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Re: running cmd via php
First off I must ask, why do you need to run windows commands when you don't even know how to use a PHP function. First thing taht came to my mind was some kind thought, woah, I'm gona learn to hack I'm gona be a leet haxor. In the case I'm wrong, sorry, and also you might want to know that exec doesn't always work some hosts have it turned off for obvious security reasons, also there's other alternatives other than exec such as shell_exec I think that's the name, etc although that's for Linux which can do a lot of the stuff that Windows can also. - Dan adam_99 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello! I'm trying a lot to find how I can run the cmd (command line of windows) and send to the cmd commands? Thanks. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Pushing the limits of stream_socket_server() and stream_select()
Just curious what people found the limits to be with stream_socket_server(), in terms of maximum concurrent connections, packet sizes, etc. I'm am presently stress-testing a multi-client socket server and am finding I can sometimes break it with as few as 100 concurrent connections, and always break it with [precisely] 252 connections--with a variety of errors getting thrown: Client-side (100 connections, sometimes): PHP Warning: stream_socket_client(): unable to connect to tcp:// 192.168.0.41: (Operation timed out) in /Tuning/client.php on line 3 PHP Notice: fwrite(): send of 68 bytes failed with errno=32 Broken pipe in /Tuning/client.php on line 14 Server-side error ( 252+ connections, every time): PHP Warning: stream_select(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in /Tuning/server.php on line 15 Interestingly, the above server-side error only occurs when 252 clients are connected. At 251, it's okay. At 252, it generates the above PHP Warning. (Which really is strange. Anyone have any ideas?) If anyone is interested, I will post the sample code I'm using, in case--perish the thought--the problem is self-inflicted. :-) ...Rene -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: running cmd via php
Dan wrote: First off I must ask, why do you need to run windows commands when you don't even know how to use a PHP function. That's a pretty extreme response - maybe the OP forgot the function name or didn't know it in the first place. There is a lot of stuff in php and there's no way anyone will remember every part of it. -- Postgresql php tutorials http://www.designmagick.com/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Pushing the limits of stream_socket_server() and stream_select()
On 11-Dec-07, at 4:32 PM, René Fournier wrote: Just curious what people found the limits to be with stream_socket_server(), in terms of maximum concurrent connections, packet sizes, etc. I'm am presently stress-testing a multi-client socket server and am finding I can sometimes break it with as few as 100 concurrent connections, and always break it with [precisely] 252 connections--with a variety of errors getting thrown: Client-side (100 connections, sometimes): PHP Warning: stream_socket_client(): unable to connect to tcp:// 192.168.0.41: (Operation timed out) in /Tuning/client.php on line 3 PHP Notice: fwrite(): send of 68 bytes failed with errno=32 Broken pipe in /Tuning/client.php on line 14 Server-side error ( 252+ connections, every time): PHP Warning: stream_select(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in /Tuning/server.php on line 15 Interestingly, this 251 connection limit does not appear to be obviously system-related (I am running Mac OS X 10.4.11). I can run two instances of server.php and have each client.php spawn 175 connections (350 total concurrent to the machine), with no problem. Interestingly, the above server-side error only occurs when 252 clients are connected. At 251, it's okay. At 252, it generates the above PHP Warning. (Which really is strange. Anyone have any ideas?) If anyone is interested, I will post the sample code I'm using, in case--perish the thought--the problem is self-inflicted. :-) ...Rene -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Re: Mac OS X Server limits... was [PHP] Pushing the limits of stream_socket_server() and stream_select()
OK, having done more digging, this bizarre 251-255 connections per socket limit seems to be an OS X thing. (Linux people, any comments?) At least that's I've read: http://www.macgeekery.com/tips/ configuration/mac_os_x_network_tuning_guide_revisited#comment-1433 So... Do any Mac OS X gurus out there know how to increase OS X Server's (10.4.11) maximum connections per socket value? There seems to no such setting in sysctl or ulimit. Any ideas? Anyone? Anyone? ...Rene On 11-Dec-07, at 4:55 PM, René Fournier wrote: On 11-Dec-07, at 4:32 PM, René Fournier wrote: Just curious what people found the limits to be with stream_socket_server(), in terms of maximum concurrent connections, packet sizes, etc. I'm am presently stress-testing a multi-client socket server and am finding I can sometimes break it with as few as 100 concurrent connections, and always break it with [precisely] 252 connections--with a variety of errors getting thrown: Client-side (100 connections, sometimes): PHP Warning: stream_socket_client(): unable to connect to tcp:// 192.168.0.41: (Operation timed out) in /Tuning/client.php on line 3 PHP Notice: fwrite(): send of 68 bytes failed with errno=32 Broken pipe in /Tuning/client.php on line 14 Server-side error ( 252+ connections, every time): PHP Warning: stream_select(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in /Tuning/server.php on line 15 Interestingly, this 251 connection limit does not appear to be obviously system-related (I am running Mac OS X 10.4.11). I can run two instances of server.php and have each client.php spawn 175 connections (350 total concurrent to the machine), with no problem. Interestingly, the above server-side error only occurs when 252 clients are connected. At 251, it's okay. At 252, it generates the above PHP Warning. (Which really is strange. Anyone have any ideas?) If anyone is interested, I will post the sample code I'm using, in case--perish the thought--the problem is self-inflicted. :-) ...Rene -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: running cmd via php
Chris wrote: Dan wrote: First off I must ask, why do you need to run windows commands when you don't even know how to use a PHP function. That's a pretty extreme response - maybe he's an extreme programmer :-P maybe the OP forgot the function name or didn't know it in the first place. There is a lot of stuff in php and there's no way anyone will remember every part of it. let's not forget the place you learned the command in the first place?!?! manual meet the new guy, new guy meet the manual - may you have many beautiful children together. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: running cmd via php
Jochem Maas wrote: Chris wrote: Dan wrote: First off I must ask, why do you need to run windows commands when you don't even know how to use a PHP function. That's a pretty extreme response - maybe he's an extreme programmer :-P maybe the OP forgot the function name or didn't know it in the first place. There is a lot of stuff in php and there's no way anyone will remember every part of it. let's not forget the place you learned the command in the first place?!?! manual meet the new guy, new guy meet the manual - may you have many beautiful children together. Doesn't help if you don't know what to look for in the first place :) I'm all for rtfm type responses but if you're not sure what category to start looking in how does it help? Don't tell me you'd scan the 189 categories for lack of a better term (taken from http://www.php.net/manual/en/funcref.php) to look for a particular fn that you don't know the name of let alone which area it belongs in. -- Postgresql php tutorials http://www.designmagick.com/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: running cmd via php
Chris wrote: Jochem Maas wrote: Chris wrote: Dan wrote: First off I must ask, why do you need to run windows commands when you don't even know how to use a PHP function. That's a pretty extreme response - maybe he's an extreme programmer :-P maybe the OP forgot the function name or didn't know it in the first place. There is a lot of stuff in php and there's no way anyone will remember every part of it. let's not forget the place you learned the command in the first place?!?! manual meet the new guy, new guy meet the manual - may you have many beautiful children together. Doesn't help if you don't know what to look for in the first place :) I'm all for rtfm type responses but if you're not sure what category to start looking in how does it help? Don't tell me you'd scan the 189 categories for lack of a better term (taken from http://www.php.net/manual/en/funcref.php) to look for a particular fn that you don't know the name of let alone which area it belongs in.\ it's all moot - the OP got his answer way back when - but ... a manual is a book. we all know how to read a book, if you have no idea how to do anything with php shouldn't be your responsibility to read the man front to back ... at least perusing each major section to get a feel of it. jmho -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: running cmd via php
On 12/11/07 6:02 PM, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jochem Maas wrote: Chris wrote: Dan wrote: First off I must ask, why do you need to run windows commands when you don't even know how to use a PHP function. That's a pretty extreme response - maybe he's an extreme programmer :-P maybe the OP forgot the function name or didn't know it in the first place. There is a lot of stuff in php and there's no way anyone will remember every part of it. let's not forget the place you learned the command in the first place?!?! manual meet the new guy, new guy meet the manual - may you have many beautiful children together. Doesn't help if you don't know what to look for in the first place :) I'm all for rtfm type responses but if you're not sure what category to start looking in how does it help? Don't tell me you'd scan the 189 categories for lack of a better term (taken from http://www.php.net/manual/en/funcref.php) to look for a particular fn that you don't know the name of let alone which area it belongs in. OK then how about a STFW answer... Google : php exexcute windows commands You can even hit the I'm feeling lucky button. ;) -- Stephen Johnson The Lone Coder http://www.ouradoptionblog.com *Join us on our adoption journey* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.thelonecoder.com *Continuing the struggle against bad code* -- -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: running cmd via php
OK then how about a STFW answer... Google : php exexcute windows commands I'm not sure what that particular phrase would produce ;) (surprisingly - a few answers :P). -- Postgresql php tutorials http://www.designmagick.com/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Mysqli support - test or complain? [SOLVED]
On Tuesday 11 December 2007, Per Jessen wrote: Stut wrote: I couldn't care less what your domain name is, you're still advocating a poor choice IMHO. I have been trying hard not to join this thread, but ... apart from the principle, what's _really_ so poor about it? Having to write application code that needs to work with two different APIs is poor enough, using a session variable for keeping a status won't make it much worse. So what if the status is server-scope, yet kept in user-scope. In particular if the app already uses session storage. Are you saying there's something wrong with doing something non-stupid on principle? Any employer that wants me to cut even small corners like that to do something sloppy to save the 10 seconds it would take to do it right can find a new programmer, thank you. (The market is good enough that you can say that, if you're good enough.) You could also make every property of an object public, or always use an input/output parameter to a function instead of a return. They would all work. That doesn't mean any of those aren't dumb. For all those suggesting that adding an if() check is better than caching it to the session, you're right. It's also still less than optimal. You have a database config file somewhere that stores your database credentials. Put which DB driver to use in there. It's not like it's going to change, and you have to edit that file anyway to install the app. It's part of the database configuration. Most of the open source systems I've seen do that in some form or another. And if you don't know what driver you have on your system, it's not like it's hard to try one, watch it die, and then use the other. :-) How did this get so complicated? -- Larry Garfield AIM: LOLG42 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 6817012 If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an idea, which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps it to himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the possession of every one, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of it. -- Thomas Jefferson -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] How to install ISAPI version on Vista IIS 6
Hello, I'm running Vista Ultimate on my computer with IIS 6.0. I'm trying to manually install PHP 5 (ISAPI) on IIS but in the Handler mappings I get this message: One or more of the modules specified for this handler does not exist in the modules list. If you are trying to add a script map the IsapiModule or the CgiModule is not prensent in the modules list. I have Googled this but did not find any answers. Even on php.net there is no mention on Vista. Can you point me to guidance for installing PHP 5 on Vista running IIS 6.0? Regards, SED
RE: [PHP] How to install ISAPI version on Vista IIS 6
-Original Message- From: SED [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 12:25 AM To: php-general@lists.php.net Subject: [PHP] How to install ISAPI version on Vista IIS 6 Hello, I'm running Vista Ultimate on my computer with IIS 6.0. I'm trying to manually install PHP 5 (ISAPI) on IIS but in the Handler mappings I get this message: One or more of the modules specified for this handler does not exist in the modules list. If you are trying to add a script map the IsapiModule or the CgiModule is not prensent in the modules list. I have Googled this but did not find any answers. Even on php.net there is no mention on Vista. Can you point me to guidance for installing PHP 5 on Vista running IIS 6.0? Regards, SED Hope you don't get offended but... check http://www.apple.com/getamac/ads/ (the last one choose a vista is very instructive). I've never had a Mac, but I've laughed a lot... and I'm every day thinking more and more certain of not upgrading my XP. Hope you smile at least for 30 seconds. :) Rob Andrés Robinet | Lead Developer | BESTPLACE CORPORATION 5100 Bayview Drive 206, Royal Lauderdale Landings, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33308 | TEL 954-607-4207 | FAX 954-337-2695 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | MSN Chat: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | SKYPE: bestplace | Web: http://www.bestplace.biz | Web: http://www.seo-diy.com -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] How to install ISAPI version on Vista IIS 6
Hi Rob, I'm not offended, I'm pistoff with Microsoft. Paying so much for VISTA and so many troubles and so litle support... I have other computers running various others systems but I need to solve this case. Your comment, only makes me smile, over how stupid I was to pay for Vista. Regards, SED -Original Message- From: Andrés Robinet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12. desember 2007 04:08 To: php-general@lists.php.net Subject: RE: [PHP] How to install ISAPI version on Vista IIS 6 -Original Message- From: SED [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 12:25 AM To: php-general@lists.php.net Subject: [PHP] How to install ISAPI version on Vista IIS 6 Hello, I'm running Vista Ultimate on my computer with IIS 6.0. I'm trying to manually install PHP 5 (ISAPI) on IIS but in the Handler mappings I get this message: One or more of the modules specified for this handler does not exist in the modules list. If you are trying to add a script map the IsapiModule or the CgiModule is not prensent in the modules list. I have Googled this but did not find any answers. Even on php.net there is no mention on Vista. Can you point me to guidance for installing PHP 5 on Vista running IIS 6.0? Regards, SED Hope you don't get offended but... check http://www.apple.com/getamac/ads/ (the last one choose a vista is very instructive). I've never had a Mac, but I've laughed a lot... and I'm every day thinking more and more certain of not upgrading my XP. Hope you smile at least for 30 seconds. :) Rob Andrés Robinet | Lead Developer | BESTPLACE CORPORATION 5100 Bayview Drive 206, Royal Lauderdale Landings, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33308 | TEL 954-607-4207 | FAX 954-337-2695 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | MSN Chat: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | SKYPE: bestplace | Web: http://www.bestplace.biz | Web: http://www.seo-diy.com -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] How to install ISAPI version on Vista IIS 6
I think I found a solution for you... or at least a step closer. One correction though, you are likely running IIS 7.0 and not IIS 6.0, right? Check this out http://www.phpbuilder.com/board/showthread.php?t=10344435highlight=php+5.2. 3 It seems that the default installation of windows IIS 7.0 for Vista does not include the CGI and ISAPI modules. You need to include at least the one you'll be using for PHP, I guess ISAPI but I've read about some problems with extensions, so... give it a try, it's a pity I don't have a Vista box to try it and tell you. Anyway... hope you manage to get it installed, and when you do... POST IT BACK, there will surely be other people willing to know about it in this list. Rob Andrés Robinet | Lead Developer | BESTPLACE CORPORATION 5100 Bayview Drive 206, Royal Lauderdale Landings, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33308 | TEL 954-607-4207 | FAX 954-337-2695 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | MSN Chat: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | SKYPE: bestplace | Web: http://www.bestplace.biz | Web: http://www.seo-diy.com -Original Message- From: SED [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 1:44 AM To: 'Andrés Robinet' Cc: php-general@lists.php.net Subject: RE: [PHP] How to install ISAPI version on Vista IIS 6 Hi Rob, I'm not offended, I'm pistoff with Microsoft. Paying so much for VISTA and so many troubles and so litle support... I have other computers running various others systems but I need to solve this case. Your comment, only makes me smile, over how stupid I was to pay for Vista. Regards, SED -Original Message- From: Andrés Robinet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12. desember 2007 04:08 To: php-general@lists.php.net Subject: RE: [PHP] How to install ISAPI version on Vista IIS 6 -Original Message- From: SED [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 12:25 AM To: php-general@lists.php.net Subject: [PHP] How to install ISAPI version on Vista IIS 6 Hello, I'm running Vista Ultimate on my computer with IIS 6.0. I'm trying to manually install PHP 5 (ISAPI) on IIS but in the Handler mappings I get this message: One or more of the modules specified for this handler does not exist in the modules list. If you are trying to add a script map the IsapiModule or the CgiModule is not prensent in the modules list. I have Googled this but did not find any answers. Even on php.net there is no mention on Vista. Can you point me to guidance for installing PHP 5 on Vista running IIS 6.0? Regards, SED Hope you don't get offended but... check http://www.apple.com/getamac/ads/ (the last one choose a vista is very instructive). I've never had a Mac, but I've laughed a lot... and I'm every day thinking more and more certain of not upgrading my XP. Hope you smile at least for 30 seconds. :) Rob Andrés Robinet | Lead Developer | BESTPLACE CORPORATION 5100 Bayview Drive 206, Royal Lauderdale Landings, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33308 | TEL 954-607-4207 | FAX 954-337-2695 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | MSN Chat: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | SKYPE: bestplace | Web: http://www.bestplace.biz | Web: http://www.seo- diy.com -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] running cmd via php
Hi,
Thursday, November 29, 2007, 2:17:15 AM, you wrote:
a Hello!
a I'm trying a lot to find how I can run the cmd (command line of windows) and
a send to the cmd commands?
a Thanks.
Here is one way to do it, its from a function to check php syntax.
it opens up php then sends it the text to check and reads the answer
back.
function checkPhpSyntax($text){
$r = false;
$cwd = getcwd();
chdir(C:\\php5);
$descriptorspec = array(
0 = array(pipe, r), // stdin is a pipe that the child will read from
1 = array(pipe, w),
2 = array(file, C:\\php5\\error.txt, a));
$process = proc_open(C:\\php5\\php -c C:\\php5 -l, $descriptorspec,
$pipes);
fwrite($pipes[0], $text);
fclose($pipes[0]);
$out = '';
while(!feof($pipes[1])) {
$out .= fgets($pipes[1], 1024);
}
fclose($pipes[1]);
proc_close($process);
chdir($cwd);
if(!empty($out)){
$res = split(\n,$out);
if(preg_match('/No syntax errors/',$res[0])){
$r =true;
}else{
$error = $res[1];
if(preg_match('/Parse error:/',$error)){
$match = preg_split('/line/',$error);
$line = intval(trim($match[1]));
//show error here
}
}
}
return $r;
}
--
regards,
Tom
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Regular expressions
I am trying to do a password match with php..
It needs to be at least 6 characters, contains 2 alphabets and at least 1
number or a special character...
if
(!preg_match(/^.*(?=.{6,})((?=.*\d)|(?=.*[,[EMAIL
PROTECTED]\/'+\*\?\.\[\]\^$\(\){}\|\\:;'~`#%_-]))([a-zA-Z]{2,}).*$/,
$pw1)) {error message}
is failing to pass e1w2qw as a good password although it follows the
instructions...
I cannot figure out why..
Please help!
Thank you,
Re: [PHP] Regular expressions
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 22:33 -0800, Liz Kim wrote:
I am trying to do a password match with php..
It needs to be at least 6 characters, contains 2 alphabets and at least 1
number or a special character...
if
(!preg_match(/^.*(?=.{6,})((?=.*\d)|(?=.*[,[EMAIL
PROTECTED]\/'+\*\?\.\[\]\^$\(\){}\|\\:;'~`#%_-]))([a-zA-Z]{2,}).*$/,
$pw1)) {error message}
is failing to pass e1w2qw as a good password although it follows the
instructions...
I cannot figure out why..
Any reason you took such a complex route?
?php
if( strlen( $pw1 ) 6
||
!ereg( '[[:digit:]]', $pw1 )
||
strlen( ereg_replace( '[^[:alpha:]]', '', $pw1 ) ) 2
||
strlen( ereg_replace( '[[:alnum:][:space:]]', '', $pw1 ) ) 1 )
{
// error message
}
?
Cheers,
Rob.
--
...
SwarmBuy.com - http://www.swarmbuy.com
Leveraging the buying power of the masses!
...
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
