Hi Joe,
Are there any tips on how to port the json example to ersatz since it
does not support pipe? I experimented with parsing out the string into
a new string and calling str on it but didn't get very far yet. I'd
like something that can parse a string.
The function 'str' is the brother of 'read' in this context. It accepts
an analog argument syntax:
: (str { \foo\: 1, \bar\: [10, \apples\] } _)
- ({ foo : 1 , bar : [ 10 , apples ] })
You could modify 'readJson' so that it operates on the resulting list
instead of the current input channel.
On the other hand, is this really necessary? I see JSON primarily as an
I/O format. The string argument was just a requirement of the
RosettaCode task. I would expect that typical application would rather
call (readJson) in an 'in' body (reading from a file or socket). Reading
a string first, and converting it immediately, is just overhead.
Cheers,
- Alex
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe