Re: update devel/fossil

2024-05-03 Thread James Turner
On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 09:38:03AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2024/05/03 09:22, Solene Rapenne wrote:
> > this updates fossil to latest version,
> > changelog available 
> > https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/changes.wiki#v2_24
> > 
> > ok?
> > 
> > diff --git a/devel/fossil/Makefile b/devel/fossil/Makefile
> > index fb869e9fa31..1311dd4fd49 100644
> > --- a/devel/fossil/Makefile
> > +++ b/devel/fossil/Makefile
> > @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
> >  COMMENT =  simple distributed software configuration management
> >  
> > -DISTNAME = fossil-2.23
> > -EPOCH =0
> 
> EPOCH cannot be removed

ok jturner@ with EPOCH staying

> 
> > +DISTNAME = fossil-2.24
> >  CATEGORIES =   devel www
> >  
> >  MAINTAINER =   James Turner 
> > diff --git a/devel/fossil/distinfo b/devel/fossil/distinfo
> > index 6eaaf2a218f..eec4ebdd1f7 100644
> > --- a/devel/fossil/distinfo
> > +++ b/devel/fossil/distinfo
> > @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
> > -SHA256 (fossil-2.23.tar.gz) = dfgI6BNRAYqXFnRtnvGh/huxkEcz6LQYZDiB04GYhZM=
> > -SIZE (fossil-2.23.tar.gz) = 6798900
> > +SHA256 (fossil-2.24.tar.gz) = 7bXPKgf4FBDPUjl+DoQVWKp4qJFsYmin9xH2IXPYXMk=
> > +SIZE (fossil-2.24.tar.gz) = 6798925
> > 



Re: update devel/fossil

2024-05-03 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2024/05/03 09:38, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2024/05/03 09:22, Solene Rapenne wrote:
> > this updates fossil to latest version,
> > changelog available 
> > https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/changes.wiki#v2_24
> > 
> > ok?
> > 
> > diff --git a/devel/fossil/Makefile b/devel/fossil/Makefile
> > index fb869e9fa31..1311dd4fd49 100644
> > --- a/devel/fossil/Makefile
> > +++ b/devel/fossil/Makefile
> > @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
> >  COMMENT =  simple distributed software configuration management
> >  
> > -DISTNAME = fossil-2.23
> > -EPOCH =0
> 
> EPOCH cannot be removed

you could say, it is fossilized...

> > +DISTNAME = fossil-2.24
> >  CATEGORIES =   devel www
> >  
> >  MAINTAINER =   James Turner 
> > diff --git a/devel/fossil/distinfo b/devel/fossil/distinfo
> > index 6eaaf2a218f..eec4ebdd1f7 100644
> > --- a/devel/fossil/distinfo
> > +++ b/devel/fossil/distinfo
> > @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
> > -SHA256 (fossil-2.23.tar.gz) = dfgI6BNRAYqXFnRtnvGh/huxkEcz6LQYZDiB04GYhZM=
> > -SIZE (fossil-2.23.tar.gz) = 6798900
> > +SHA256 (fossil-2.24.tar.gz) = 7bXPKgf4FBDPUjl+DoQVWKp4qJFsYmin9xH2IXPYXMk=
> > +SIZE (fossil-2.24.tar.gz) = 6798925
> > 



Re: update devel/fossil

2024-05-03 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2024/05/03 09:22, Solene Rapenne wrote:
> this updates fossil to latest version,
> changelog available 
> https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/changes.wiki#v2_24
> 
> ok?
> 
> diff --git a/devel/fossil/Makefile b/devel/fossil/Makefile
> index fb869e9fa31..1311dd4fd49 100644
> --- a/devel/fossil/Makefile
> +++ b/devel/fossil/Makefile
> @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
>  COMMENT =simple distributed software configuration management
>  
> -DISTNAME =   fossil-2.23
> -EPOCH =  0

EPOCH cannot be removed

> +DISTNAME =   fossil-2.24
>  CATEGORIES = devel www
>  
>  MAINTAINER = James Turner 
> diff --git a/devel/fossil/distinfo b/devel/fossil/distinfo
> index 6eaaf2a218f..eec4ebdd1f7 100644
> --- a/devel/fossil/distinfo
> +++ b/devel/fossil/distinfo
> @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
> -SHA256 (fossil-2.23.tar.gz) = dfgI6BNRAYqXFnRtnvGh/huxkEcz6LQYZDiB04GYhZM=
> -SIZE (fossil-2.23.tar.gz) = 6798900
> +SHA256 (fossil-2.24.tar.gz) = 7bXPKgf4FBDPUjl+DoQVWKp4qJFsYmin9xH2IXPYXMk=
> +SIZE (fossil-2.24.tar.gz) = 6798925
> 



Re: update: devel/fossil-20101005035549

2010-10-07 Thread Alex Libman
Thank you for the update, James.

FYI, I comment out the following Makefile lines to reduce dependencies,
and it seems to work fine (4.7-stable):

# MODULES =   lang/tcl

# RUN_DEPENDS =   :gnupg-*:security/gnupg

# REGRESS_DEPENDS =   ${MODTCL_RUN_DEPENDS}

# do-regress:

# @cd ${WRKSRC}  ${MODTCL_BIN} test/tester.tcl fossil

Perhaps down the road it might make sense to use additional flavors to
simplify disabling those? I think a lot of OpenBSD users, particularly
those who choose Fossil, might be trying to reduce their dependencies on
GNU components (i.e. gnupg), or avoid installing a zillion different
scripting languages (i.e. tcl).


Best regards,
Alex Libman

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - Access your email from home and the web



Re: update: devel/fossil-20101005035549

2010-10-07 Thread James Turner
You are correct, gnupg is not required, if it's installed however you
can use it to sign your commits. Also why comment out REGRESS_DEPENDS?
tcl shouldn't get installed unless you run make regress if I'm not
mistaken. A normal user running make install or pkg_add will never get
tcl installed.

On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 12:36:32PM -0400, Alex Libman wrote:
 Thank you for the update, James.
 
 FYI, I comment out the following Makefile lines to reduce dependencies,
 and it seems to work fine (4.7-stable):
 
 # MODULES =   lang/tcl
 
 # RUN_DEPENDS =   :gnupg-*:security/gnupg
 
 # REGRESS_DEPENDS =   ${MODTCL_RUN_DEPENDS}
 
 # do-regress:
 
 # @cd ${WRKSRC}  ${MODTCL_BIN} test/tester.tcl fossil
 
 Perhaps down the road it might make sense to use additional flavors to
 simplify disabling those? I think a lot of OpenBSD users, particularly
 those who choose Fossil, might be trying to reduce their dependencies on
 GNU components (i.e. gnupg), or avoid installing a zillion different
 scripting languages (i.e. tcl).
 
 
 Best regards,
 Alex Libman
 
 -- 
 http://www.fastmail.fm - Access your email from home and the web
 



Re: update: devel/fossil-20101005035549

2010-10-07 Thread Alex Libman
My bad for making it sound as if it installed tcl by default, I was
mostly speaking in generalities.  Thank you once again for the work you
do on the ports.


On Thu, 7 Oct 2010 12:51:41 -0400, James Turner ja...@bsdgroup.org said:
 You are correct, gnupg is not required, if it's installed however you
 can use it to sign your commits. Also why comment out REGRESS_DEPENDS?
 tcl shouldn't get installed unless you run make regress if I'm not
 mistaken. A normal user running make install or pkg_add will never get
 tcl installed.

 On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 12:36:32PM -0400, Alex Libman wrote:
  Thank you for the update, James.
 
  FYI, I comment out the following Makefile lines to reduce
  dependencies, and it seems to work fine (4.7-stable):
 
  # MODULES =   lang/tcl
 
  # RUN_DEPENDS =   :gnupg-*:security/gnupg
 
  # REGRESS_DEPENDS =   ${MODTCL_RUN_DEPENDS}
 
  # do-regress:
 
  # @cd ${WRKSRC}  ${MODTCL_BIN} test/tester.tcl fossil
 
  Perhaps down the road it might make sense to use additional
  flavors to simplify disabling those? I think a lot of OpenBSD
  users, particularly those who choose Fossil, might be trying to
  reduce their dependencies on GNU components (i.e. gnupg), or avoid
  installing a zillion different scripting languages (i.e. tcl).


Best regards,
Alex Libman

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - Does exactly what it says on the tin



Re: update: devel/fossil-20101005035549

2010-10-07 Thread Stuart Henderson
 On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 12:36:32PM -0400, Alex Libman wrote:
  
  Perhaps down the road it might make sense to use additional flavors to
  simplify disabling those? I think a lot of OpenBSD users, particularly
  those who choose Fossil, might be trying to reduce their dependencies on
  GNU components (i.e. gnupg), or avoid installing a zillion different
  scripting languages (i.e. tcl).

This type of flavour exists in some ports but rarely gets tested
properly on an ongoing basis, so we generally do not do this.
Especially where it only reduces build dependencies rather than
runtime ones (if you wish to avoid having a bunch of build
dependencies installed, just use the packages already produced,
they're the same as the packages produced/installed when you
build/install from ports).

On 2010/10/07 12:51, James Turner wrote:
 You are correct, gnupg is not required, if it's installed however you
 can use it to sign your commits.

This could be changed to a note in pkg/DESCR rather than an actual
dependency but in the case of gnupg, it doesn't pull in all that many
other packages so I don't think there's much point.



Re: update: devel/fossil-20100918155143

2010-09-21 Thread James Turner
I had the same diff, just forgot to send it. I tested on loongson.

On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:09:06PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
 update to latest fossil snapshot
 
 ok?
 
 Index: Makefile
 ===
 RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/fossil/Makefile,v
 retrieving revision 1.11
 diff -u -p -r1.11 Makefile
 --- Makefile  10 Sep 2010 14:12:00 -  1.11
 +++ Makefile  21 Sep 2010 19:49:28 -
 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
  
  COMMENT =simple distributed software configuration management 
  
 -VERSION =20100823222416
 +VERSION =20100918155143
  DISTNAME =   fossil-src-${VERSION}
  PKGNAME =fossil-${VERSION}
  CATEGORIES = devel www
 Index: distinfo
 ===
 RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/fossil/distinfo,v
 retrieving revision 1.8
 diff -u -p -r1.8 distinfo
 --- distinfo  10 Sep 2010 14:12:00 -  1.8
 +++ distinfo  21 Sep 2010 19:50:28 -
 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 -MD5 (fossil-src-20100823222416.tar.gz) = VyOvMHSVFqHhcFIDgyOvXQ==
 -RMD160 (fossil-src-20100823222416.tar.gz) = LBqxIf0WkJagjP3XjICvTaBYE8s=
 -SHA1 (fossil-src-20100823222416.tar.gz) = YwHsXtl72fCayHXV53LuxDnrvmI=
 -SHA256 (fossil-src-20100823222416.tar.gz) = 
 G2kP+p3dXM6wGiPpMhm9XTZ/+3zAqYrLPTt/f494nZs=
 -SIZE (fossil-src-20100823222416.tar.gz) = 1976206
 +MD5 (fossil-src-20100918155143.tar.gz) = /KAhmeF5URQhLrWI4tmqjA==
 +RMD160 (fossil-src-20100918155143.tar.gz) = NqCLnB5AUYJX+dwaB6RFDj2apTY=
 +SHA1 (fossil-src-20100918155143.tar.gz) = R+Y0SIouc+4YN5Kzf+nJLbO9Ipw=
 +SHA256 (fossil-src-20100918155143.tar.gz) = 
 ab03kwl7MsPCfZRi8VjT909FJiLKV0cK9QpunuMrc/Y=
 +SIZE (fossil-src-20100918155143.tar.gz) = 1992373