Re: Powernet: Powernet questionnaire on unconditional release

2015-01-26 Thread Benjy P Bertossi

Fermi - we use Canberra / Tennelec 5XLB counter for analyzing smears for
free release surveys.

Benjy Bertossi
Fermi2 - RP Supervisor
734-586-4935
bertos...@dteenergy.com



From:   Lee, Sun G. sg...@firstenergycorp.com
To: powernet@hps1.org powernet@hps1.org
Cc: Trickett, Stephen M strick...@firstenergycorp.com, Lee,
Sun G. sg...@firstenergycorp.com
Date:   01/26/2015 12:46 PM
Subject:Powernet: Powernet questionnaire on unconditional release
Sent by:owner-power...@hps1.org



Perry Nuclear Power Plant would like to know:

Our Station Procedures allow unconditional release of items from the RCA
using a frisker to check for contamination on a smear.  What is the
conditional release limit for removable contamination, at your station?

References:

Using a frisker and rate meter to check for contamination on a smear cannot
reliably detect this level of contamination. In addition;

1. The industry standard is to assess the activity on a smear using an
instrument of known efficiency. This is common in the nuclear power
industry for unconditional release. The requirement also exists in
radioactive material licenses issued by Agreement States and the NRC. The
determination of an efficiency requires a scaler and detector calibrated
with an NIST traceable standard. Friskers are not calibrated to determine
an efficiency using an NIST traceable source.

2. INPO 05-008 states that the best available technology should be used for
unconditional release practices. Smear counters are readily available and
provide better detection capability, i.e. a lower MDA, than a frisker with
a rate meter.

3. ANI Inspection Criteria 8.7.7.5 states that defined detection levels
should be established for unconditional release and the levels should be
based on the minimum detection capabilities of the instrumentation being
used for unconditional release. The current procedural requirement of no
increase above background using a frisker is not a defined detection level.

Instrumentation is available that can detect removable contamination below
200 dpm/100 cm2 but it is not currently required to be used.


Question:  Do you use a Tennelec, or similar counter, for meeting release
criteria?


Thank you.

Sun Lee
440-465-8030 cell
440-280-5039 work









The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal
and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for
delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you
have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately,
and delete the original message.



Re: Powernet: Powernet questionnaire on unconditional release

2015-01-26 Thread Noble, Douglas L
Yes.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 26, 2015, at 12:46 PM, Lee, Sun G. 
sg...@firstenergycorp.commailto:sg...@firstenergycorp.com wrote:

Perry Nuclear Power Plant would like to know:

Our Station Procedures allow unconditional release of items from the RCA using 
a frisker to check for contamination on a smear.  What is the conditional 
release limit for removable contamination, at your station?

References:

Using a frisker and rate meter to check for contamination on a smear cannot 
reliably detect this level of contamination. In addition;

1. The industry standard is to assess the activity on a smear using an 
instrument of known efficiency. This is common in the nuclear power industry 
for unconditional release. The requirement also exists in radioactive material 
licenses issued by Agreement States and the NRC. The determination of an 
efficiency requires a scaler and detector calibrated with an NIST traceable 
standard. Friskers are not calibrated to determine an efficiency using an NIST 
traceable source.

2. INPO 05-008 states that the best available technology should be used for 
unconditional release practices. Smear counters are readily available and 
provide better detection capability, i.e. a lower MDA, than a frisker with a 
rate meter.

3. ANI Inspection Criteria 8.7.7.5 states that defined detection levels should 
be established for unconditional release and the levels should be based on the 
minimum detection capabilities of the instrumentation being used for 
unconditional release. The current procedural requirement of no increase above 
background using a frisker is not a defined detection level.

Instrumentation is available that can detect removable contamination below 200 
dpm/100 cm2 but it is not currently required to be used.


Question:  Do you use a Tennelec, or similar counter, for meeting release 
criteria?


Thank you.

Sun Lee
440-465-8030 cell
440-280-5039 work






The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal and 
confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message 
is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this 
document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying 
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original message.


-
The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal and 
confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message 
is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this 
document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying 
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original message.