Re: [libreoffice-projects] QA manual test Litmus session on 3.3.3Rc

2011-06-06 Thread Michael Münch
Hi Sophie,

Am Sonntag, den 05.06.2011, 23:36 +0300 schrieb Sophie Gautier:
 Hi all,
 
 *please, follow up on the projects list, thanks in advance*
 
 I would like to try to organize a first session of manual tests - 
 release scenarios - on Litmus [1]. Mostly to see how it goes and fine 
 tune what needs to be done to go further. We need to push our QA process 
 further and log what is done in the language community.
 
 The first version will 3.3.3 RC. Yifan (thanks a lot! ) did upload a 
 session for 3.4, but I guess we were a bit distracted by what happened 
 to the OOo code. But we can use this basis for the next session.

Should a test run 3.3.3 already be visable? 

 Tests already exists in US - DE - FR, it's a first set that needs to be 
 improved and made available for all languages.

Would a additional testgroup with those bugs that occured as  blockers
for past releases make sense at this early stage of the process? They
should be easily found in the bugzilla. 

Another question, would tests against the daily builds of the 3.4 series
go into the libreoffice 3.4 test run or should there just be tests
against beta and/or RC versions?

Regards,
Michael 


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to projects+h...@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/projects/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-projects] QA manual test Litmus session on 3.3.3Rc

2011-06-06 Thread Sophie Gautier

Hi Michael,
On 06/06/2011 08:57, Michael Münch wrote:

Hi Sophie,

Am Sonntag, den 05.06.2011, 23:36 +0300 schrieb Sophie Gautier:

Hi all,

*please, follow up on the projects list, thanks in advance*

I would like to try to organize a first session of manual tests -
release scenarios - on Litmus [1]. Mostly to see how it goes and fine
tune what needs to be done to go further. We need to push our QA process
further and log what is done in the language community.

The first version will 3.3.3 RC. Yifan (thanks a lot! ) did upload a
session for 3.4, but I guess we were a bit distracted by what happened
to the OOo code. But we can use this basis for the next session.


Should a test run 3.3.3 already be visable?


As soon as I, or another admin, have create them :) but surely today



Tests already exists in US - DE - FR, it's a first set that needs to be
improved and made available for all languages.


Would a additional testgroup with those bugs that occured as  blockers
for past releases make sense at this early stage of the process? They
should be easily found in the bugzilla.


Oh, yes, that's a good idea.


Another question, would tests against the daily builds of the 3.4 series
go into the libreoffice 3.4 test run or should there just be tests
against beta and/or RC versions?


all releases should be tested and have the results log in Litmus, but 
not everybody will be able to follow the rate. There is a trunk category 
that Yifan (I think) has open, may be we can put branches here?


Kind regards
Sophie
--
Founding member of The Document Foundation

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to projects+h...@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/projects/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


[libreoffice-projects] Testtool on Mac

2011-06-06 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Hi all,

Following Sophie's announcement about QA testing and the use of Litmus,
I thought I'd try and use the VCLTesttool.

On Mac, the user/tester has to know that testtool.bin is stored in the
app bundle under LibreOffice/Contents/basis-link/program/testtool.bin.
There is also a symbolic link to the same binary in
LibreOffice/Contents/MacOS.


However, if I try to start the LO 3.3.3rc1 testtool from a terminal :


/Applications/LO333.app/Contents/basis-link/program/testtool.bin ; exit;
2011-06-06 11:07:04.563 testtool.bin[7596:903] No Info.plist file in
application bundle or no NSPrincipalClass in the Info.plist file, exiting
2011-06-06 11:07:04.566 testtool.bin[7596:903] ***
__NSAutoreleaseNoPool(): Object 0x3906270 of class
RemoteControlContainer autoreleased with no pool in place - just leaking
2011-06-06 11:07:04.566 testtool.bin[7596:903] ***
__NSAutoreleaseNoPool(): Object 0x3906230 of class
MultiClickRemoteBehavior autoreleased with no pool in place - just leaking


and of course, the app doesn't launch the testtool.


The way to get VCLTestTool to launch is to use the symbolic link via a
terminal in the LibreOffice/Contents/MacOS directory.

Now, where are the *.bas files for testing. Since I happen to have the
source repo, I can find a collection in

/git/libo/clone/testing/testautomation

but are they provided anywhere else separately ?


Alex






-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to projects+h...@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/projects/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-projects] QA manual test Litmus session on 3.3.3Rc

2011-06-06 Thread Michael Münch
Hi,

Am Montag, den 06.06.2011, 12:56 +0200 schrieb klaus-jürgen weghorn ol:
 Some things Christian K. mentioned on the German-ml [1]:
[...]
 2. The German tests are different from the English. Is there any problem 
 with it?

I do see some advantages in having tests regarding localization in all
the languages. 

But I am not sure if there is any risk in the build process, that bugs
in the logic of the program occur just in a subset of languages. 
If not the language does not matter and there is no need to translate
und multiply the work with translating all the tests in more than 100
languages. Litmus becomes unusable and getting statistics gets much
harder as you have to aggregate over all the languages. 
Also members that do not speak every language will have no chance to get
information out of more than 80% of the tests and in the end when tests
fail you have to use the english only bgzilla. 

But I guess the lang-projects insist on having translated tests, so
whatever.

Having even differing tests in all the languages just make the mess so
much bigger.
So even if we want translated tests please use a top down english -
rest approach.  

Regards,
Michael


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to projects+h...@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/projects/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-projects] QA manual test Litmus session on 3.3.3Rc

2011-06-06 Thread Sophie Gautier

Hi Klaus-Jürgen,
On 06/06/2011 13:56, klaus-jürgen weghorn ol wrote:

Hi Sophie, QAlies,
Am 05.06.2011 22:36, schrieb Sophie Gautier:

Hi all,

*please, follow up on the projects list, thanks in advance*

I would like to try to organize a first session of manual tests -
release scenarios - on Litmus [1]. Mostly to see how it goes and fine
tune what needs to be done to go further. We need to push our QA process
further and log what is done in the language community.

The first version will 3.3.3 RC. Yifan (thanks a lot! ) did upload a
session for 3.4, but I guess we were a bit distracted by what happened
to the OOo code. But we can use this basis for the next session.

Tests already exists in US - DE - FR, it's a first set that needs to be
improved and made available for all languages.
So please, join the projects@ list and let us organize a nice and fun QA
process for our future versions.
For testing, you don't need technical skills, only about 3/4 hours
available (for beginners, less if you have already participate) per
tested version and some curiosity for the new features and the bug you
will find.
For translation, understanding of English will be enough, the tests and
the process are simple and most of the time written by non English
speakers.
If you run VCLTesTool, we will also try to centralize the feedback, so
don't hesitate to jump in either.

Process and info on Litmus are available on the wiki [2], but don't
hesitate to come on the list, I'll help and answer your questions from
there, also on irc #libreoffice

[1] https://tcm.documentfoundation.org/
[2] http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Litmus

Thanks in advance for your help on the organization and your
participation.


Some things Christian K. mentioned on the German-ml [1]:

1. Should we re-place Litmus on the Wiki-menu?


Yes, why not


2. The German tests are different from the English. Is there any problem
with it?


Yes, because, the English one should be the master set. Frequently, when 
we lack of one tester (you know the OOo rule of 2 testers/plateform to 
validate it) I check the other language to help validate the version. If 
there is an issue with one test, it's easier to see if it's language 
dependent or not.
And we want to offer the same level of quality for all the versions, so 
really we need to ensure the English is the master.


3. Obviously the testcases can only be changed by admins although there
is an option in the menu. If only admins can do this we should give some
more people admin rights especially mindst 2 persons per l10n. And it
should be unlighted for the others.


This will be done on demand. I can also upload tests for the other 
language who don't have enough resources or don't want to deal with Litmus


4. Who are the admins now?


Volker Heggerman, Jean-Baptiste Faure and me.

Kind regards
Sophie
--
Founding member of The Document Foundation

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to projects+h...@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/projects/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


[libreoffice-projects] Re: marketing confcall for June

2011-06-06 Thread Florian Effenberger

Hello,

Florian Effenberger wrote on 2011-06-02 18.48:

it's time to have another marketing conference call. :-) I have added
some proposals to a Doodle poll - let me know when you have time, so we
can pick a date:

http://www.doodle.com/ydxwk7sqynvswa99


don't forget to cast your vote. :-)

Florian

--
Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to projects+h...@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/projects/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted