RE: New Extension for revealing Structured Data Islands embedded in HTML pages

[Eric Franzon]

Excellent!

-- 
Eric Axel Franzon


-Original Message-
From: Kingsley Idehen [mailto:kide...@openlinksw.com] 
Sent: Saturday, December 5, 2015 11:50 AM
To: 'W3C Web Schemas Task Force' 
Cc: public-lod@w3.org; ontolog-fo...@googlegroups.com
Subject: New Extension for revealing Structured Data Islands embedded in HTML 
pages

All,

Here's a quick FYI about our recently released browser extension that
simplifies discovery of metadata oriented structured data embedded in
HTML docs. Naturally, this extension also functions as a Linked Data
exploration launch point for follow-your-nose discovery of related Web
resources.

A few key benefits:

[1] Discovering use of schema.org terms across pages and web sites
[2] Evaluating document metadata quality in relation of SEO optimization .

Current browser support includes: Chrome, Opera, and Firefox (nightly
builds only).

Enjoy!

Links:

[1] http://osds.openlinksw.com -- Home Page
[2]
http://kidehen.blogspot.com/2015/12/openlink-structured-data-sniffer-osds.html
-- Blog Post about extension
[3] https://github.com/openlink/structured-data-sniffer/releases

-- 
Regards,

Kingsley Idehen   
Founder & CEO 
OpenLink Software 
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog 1: http://kidehen.blogspot.com
Personal Weblog 2: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Personal WebID: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this

Re: Breaking news: GoodRelations now fully integrated with schema.org!

[Eric Franzon]

Congrats to all involved! I have written a post for SemanticWeb.com about
the work:
http://semanticweb.com/goodrelations-fully-integrated-with-schema-org_b33306

Cheers,
--Eric
-- 
*Eric Axel Franzon*
Vice President of Community
SemanticWeb.com

e...@semanticweb.com
LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/ericfranzon
Twitter: http://twitter.com/SemanticWeb


On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Martin Hepp martin.h...@ebusiness-unibw.org
 wrote:

 Dear all:

 Effective immediately, the full GoodRelations vocabulary for e-commerce (
 http://purl.org/goodrelations/) is now directly available from schema.org,
 the official library of data schemas maintained and promoted by the four
 biggest Web search engines, i.e. Google, Bing, Yahoo, and Yandex.

 Official schema.org blogpost:
http://blog.schema.org/2012/11/good-relations-and-schemaorg.html

 Example type:
http://schema.org/ProductModel

 Technical background information:
http://wiki.goodrelations-vocabulary.org/Cookbook/Schema.org

 In the next days, we will complete the integration on the GoodRelations
 side, including full mapping axioms so that consumers of crawled data will
 be able to use the official identifiers of GoodRelations elements in SPARQL
 queries.

 I am happy to share with you these great news. It was a a lot of hard work
 - a great thanks goes to everybody involved, namely Dan Brickley and
 Ramanathan V. Guha from Google, and all the other supporters of
 GoodRelations, listed at
 http://wiki.goodrelations-vocabulary.org/Acknowledgments.

 Best wishes

 Martin Hepp
 
 martin hepp
 e-business  web science research group
 universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen

 e-mail:  h...@ebusiness-unibw.org
 phone:   +49-(0)89-6004-4217
 fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620
 www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
 http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
 skype:   mfhepp
 twitter: mfhepp

 Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data!
 =
 * Project Main Page: http://purl.org/goodrelations/

Re: Google Knowledge Graph Experiment

[Eric Franzon]

I also am still not getting to view GKG enrichments either. It truly seems
to be a gradual roll-out (as Google confirmed to us yesterday:
http://semanticweb.com/google-knowledge-graph-interview_b29172). I have
tried all three of my Google accounts, all of which have completed
profiles, but to no avail.

What the representative we interviewed indicated is that they are rolling
out slowly to account holders over the next few days. THEN, they will
begin with general Google.com visitors. And then I suspect they will (again
gradually) start rolling it out across other global Googles.

I was interested in Kingsley's experiment because it was based on the
theory that some measure of social influence might be at play in the
algorithm. While my ego might certainly wish to believe that I (and
semanticweb.com) have such influence, I acknowledge that Danny Sullivan,
Kara Swisher, et al probably have more in the broader tech world. ;-)

Of course, if Google would mention Semantic Web in their marketing
material or acknowledge any of the other work that has come before, that
would no doubt help with the influence of all of us on these lists. But I
digress... for more on *that* perspective, you may wish to see Sean
Golliher's editorial which will be published at SemanticWeb.com at the top
of the next hour (2:00pm ET in the US).

Cheers,
--Eric



On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Ivan Herman i...@w3.org wrote:

 Well... I tried this trick, but does not change a thing. Yes, the search
 happens on www.google.com, but I presume it knows that I am, hm,
 considered as Dutch and sticks to its guns: I see nothing of the GKG on my
 screen.

 Ivan

 On May 18, 2012, at 17:57 , Aidan Hogan wrote:

  All,
 
  On 18/05/2012 05:51, Eric Franzon wrote:
  Actually, some modest testing has shown something other than geography
 at play here. Earlier today, colleagues in London and California were able
 to see GKG rich data visualizations, while others in the US (myself
 included -- also in California) and Europe could not.
 
  I spoke to a Google representative this afternoon who confirmed the
 gradual roll-out, but would not (or could not) discuss the algorithm. He
 did hint that people with Google accounts will be first to see the
 enhancements.
 
  In my experience, the most reliable way to see GKG in action is:
 
  Visit http://google.com/ncr
  (the /ncr suffix stops you redirecting to a local version)
 
  Be logged in with a Google account.
 
  Try a typical entity search (e.g., Galway).
 
  Cheers,
  Aidan


 
 Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
 Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
 mobile: +31-641044153
 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf








-- 
*Eric Axel Franzon*
Vice President of Community
SemanticWeb.com
6080 Center Dr., 6th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90045

e...@semanticweb.com
O: +1.323.856.1474
C: +1.323.309.1601

LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/ericfranzon
Twitter: http://twitter.com/SemanticWeb

Re: Google Knowledge Graph Experiment

[Eric Franzon]

Although, really, if TimBL doesn't yet see anything as he just reported,
that may shoot the influence hypothesis right out of the water. ;)

Cheers,
--Eric

On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Eric Franzon e...@semanticweb.com wrote:

 I also am still not getting to view GKG enrichments either. It truly seems
 to be a gradual roll-out (as Google confirmed to us yesterday:
 http://semanticweb.com/google-knowledge-graph-interview_b29172). I have
 tried all three of my Google accounts, all of which have completed
 profiles, but to no avail.

 What the representative we interviewed indicated is that they are rolling
 out slowly to account holders over the next few days. THEN, they will
 begin with general Google.com visitors. And then I suspect they will (again
 gradually) start rolling it out across other global Googles.

 I was interested in Kingsley's experiment because it was based on the
 theory that some measure of social influence might be at play in the
 algorithm. While my ego might certainly wish to believe that I (and
 semanticweb.com) have such influence, I acknowledge that Danny Sullivan,
 Kara Swisher, et al probably have more in the broader tech world. ;-)

 Of course, if Google would mention Semantic Web in their marketing
 material or acknowledge any of the other work that has come before, that
 would no doubt help with the influence of all of us on these lists. But I
 digress... for more on *that* perspective, you may wish to see Sean
 Golliher's editorial which will be published at SemanticWeb.com at the top
 of the next hour (2:00pm ET in the US).

 Cheers,
 --Eric




 On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Ivan Herman i...@w3.org wrote:

 Well... I tried this trick, but does not change a thing. Yes, the search
 happens on www.google.com, but I presume it knows that I am, hm,
 considered as Dutch and sticks to its guns: I see nothing of the GKG on my
 screen.

 Ivan

 On May 18, 2012, at 17:57 , Aidan Hogan wrote:

  All,
 
  On 18/05/2012 05:51, Eric Franzon wrote:
  Actually, some modest testing has shown something other than geography
 at play here. Earlier today, colleagues in London and California were able
 to see GKG rich data visualizations, while others in the US (myself
 included -- also in California) and Europe could not.
 
  I spoke to a Google representative this afternoon who confirmed the
 gradual roll-out, but would not (or could not) discuss the algorithm. He
 did hint that people with Google accounts will be first to see the
 enhancements.
 
  In my experience, the most reliable way to see GKG in action is:
 
  Visit http://google.com/ncr
  (the /ncr suffix stops you redirecting to a local version)
 
  Be logged in with a Google account.
 
  Try a typical entity search (e.g., Galway).
 
  Cheers,
  Aidan


 
 Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
 Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
 mobile: +31-641044153
 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf








 --
 *Eric Axel Franzon*
 Vice President of Community
 SemanticWeb.com
 6080 Center Dr., 6th Floor
 Los Angeles, CA 90045

 e...@semanticweb.com
 O: +1.323.856.1474
 C: +1.323.309.1601

 LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/ericfranzon
 Twitter: http://twitter.com/SemanticWeb




-- 
*Eric Axel Franzon*
Vice President of Community
SemanticWeb.com
6080 Center Dr., 6th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90045

e...@semanticweb.com
O: +1.323.856.1474
C: +1.323.309.1601

LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/ericfranzon
Twitter: http://twitter.com/SemanticWeb

Re: Google Knowledge Graph Experiment

[Eric Franzon]

Ivan,

Actually, some modest testing has shown something other than geography at play 
here. Earlier today, colleagues in London and California were able to see GKG 
rich data visualizations, while others in the US (myself included -- also in 
California) and Europe could not.

I spoke to a Google representative this afternoon who confirmed the gradual 
roll-out, but would not (or could not) discuss the algorithm. He did hint that 
people with Google accounts will be first to see the enhancements.

Cheers,
--Eric

Sent from my iPhone

On May 17, 2012, at 9:28 PM, Ivan Herman i...@w3.org wrote:

 Kingsley,
 
 the problem is that, as usual, the GKG is a US centric thing for now, At 
 least here in the Netherlands it does not seem to work yet.
 
 (I guess I could set up a proxy to my account in MIT, and reconfigure my 
 browsers to work that way, but that is too much trouble...)
 
 :-(
 
 Ivan
 ---
 Ivan Herman
 Tel:+31 641044153
 http://www.ivan-herman.net
 
 (Written on mobile, sorry for brevity and misspellings...)
 
 
 
 On 17 May 2012, at 22:38, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
 
 All,
 
 I have a theory (at this point) that Google has used profile analytics (not 
 a bad thing per se.) to drive the rollout of their new Knowledge Graph 
 service. I've dropped a post on G+ with links to a Google Drive folder with 
 screenshots that feed my current theory about profile driven rollout. 
 Basically, you have two users (distinct profiles) issuing the same query, 
 with different results.
 
 I am interested in finding out how many of you actually see the new 
 Knowledge Graph sidebar.
 
 Links:
 
 1. http://goo.gl/dZgxf -- G+ post about my theory
 2. http://goo.gl/6eemj -- Shared Google Drive Folder .
 
 -- 
 
 Regards,
 
 Kingsley Idehen
 Founder  CEO
 OpenLink Software
 Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
 Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
 Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
 Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
 LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] SOPA, Wikipedia, and dbpedia

[Eric Franzon]

Whatever is decided here, I offer SemanticWeb.com as a platform for
announcing a blackout as well as any supporting statements anyone wants to
put forth. I will continue to follow this thread, but if anyone wishes to
reach out to me privately, please feel free: e...@semanticweb.com.

Cheers,
--Eric

On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.comwrote:

 On 1/17/12 10:38 AM, Bryan Burgers wrote:

 On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Kingsley Idehenkide...@openlinksw.com
  wrote:

 On 1/17/12 10:01 AM, Jörn Hees wrote:

 Hi,

 On 17. Jan. 2012, at 15:08, Kingsley Idehen wrote:

 On 1/17/12 8:39 AM, Mischa Tuffield wrote:

 Following on from the news that the English Wikipedia is going dark in
 opposition to the SOPA/PIPA tomorrow (2012-01-18) given the activity
 in the
 US [1], I wonder whether we as the Semantic Web Community feel like we
 should turn around and turn off dbpedia? What do people think?
 Wouldn't that
 be a nice show of support to Wikipedia, dbpedia's parent project, I
 think so
 ...

 Note that en.wikipedia.org won't be turned off, they will have a
 black
 click through page before being able to access articles.
 While ok (for me) for pages intended for humans, i don't know if it's
 wise
 to do the same for machine accessible data.


 In the case of DBpedia that means: /page/ links can do similar.

 As for the machine vs human matter, SOPA doesn't make any distinction.
 Same
 really applies to Linked Data, its all about representation formats for
 structured data via description oriented directed graphs.


 The machines will get confused.


 That's part of the point.

 Except that most machines don't understand SOPA, and won't call their
 representatives. Although SOPA (and PIPA) affect machines, too, it's
 the humans that can affect whether the legislation passes. So it's all
 about informing humans with the hope that they'll take action.


 The machines are driven by Humans. There's always a human at the end of
 the value chain.


 When Wikipedia goes black, there will be information on WHY it has
 gone black, and what SOPA means to internet users.

 Fine, and that can also make its way, via Linked Data mesh to the human at
 the end of the value chain.


 If the data portion of DBPedia goes black, there will be no
 information on WHY it has gone black and there will be no mention of
 SOPA, so there will be no action taken on the part of humans.


 Of course not, it might even be a nice Linked Data implications showcase.

 Yes,
 humans eventually see the data that the machines get from DBPedia, but
 if the data portion of DBPedia goes black, the applications that use
 it as a datasource will probably just say DBPedia is down, or that
 data is unavailable; no mention will be made about SOPA.


 Not if done right. The humans at the end of the value chain will know why
 :-)

 Kingsley


 Bryan



 --

 Regards,

 Kingsley Idehen
 Founder  CEO
 OpenLink Software
 Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
 Personal Weblog: 
 http://www.openlinksw.com/**blog/~kidehenhttp://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
 Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
 Google+ Profile: 
 https://plus.google.com/**112399767740508618350/abouthttps://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
 LinkedIn Profile: 
 http://www.linkedin.com/in/**kidehenhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen









-- 
*Eric Axel Franzon*
Vice President of Community
SemanticWeb.com
6080 Center Dr., 6th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90045

e...@semanticweb.com
O: +1.323.856.1474
C: +1.323.309.1601

LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/ericfranzon
Twitter: http://twitter.com/SemanticWeb_com

RE: RDFa editors

[Eric Franzon]

I also recall a Dreamweaver extension by Martin McEvoy from a couple years ago. 
 I don't know the current status of this extension, but it is called RDFa 
Documents.  That said, I found it relatively easy to add RDFa to existing HTML 
documents using Dreamweaver even without this extension.

 

--Eric

e...@semanticweb.com

 

 

From: semantic-web-requ...@w3.org [mailto:semantic-web-requ...@w3.org] On 
Behalf Of Stéphane Corlosquet
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 2:42 PM
To: Juan Sequeda
Cc: Semantic Web; public-lod; Jean-François Hovinne; Rene Kapusta
Subject: Re: RDFa editors

 

Not sure whether you mean wysiwyg style editor, but you can check these two, 
both are prototypes when it comes to RDFa at this stage afaik.

 

WYMeditor - http://wymeditor.org/ http://wymeditor.org/  - which integrates 
with Drupal, Rails, Django, or WordPress. Prototype: 
http://files.wymeditor.org/wymeditor/trunk/src/examples/15-rdfa-editor.html 
(I'm cc'ing Jean-François who might be able to give some updates)

 

There is also the very recent Aloha editor with a RDFa prototype at 
http://aloha-drupal.evo42.net/moc/node/9 
http://aloha-drupal.evo42.net/moc/node/9  (cc'ing Rene who might be able to 
give some updates).

 

Steph.

 

On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Juan Sequeda juanfeder...@gmail.com wrote:

Hi Everybody

 

I want to add RDFa into my HTML. What is the easiest way to do this? What are 
the RDFa editors out there? I know of loomp.org, but it seems like it is still 
in private testing.

 

Thanks


Juan Sequeda
+1-575-SEQ-UEDA
www.juansequeda.com