Re: [comment-rex] Processing and well-formedness

2006-09-21 Thread Robin Berjon


Hi Karl,

thanks for your review!

On Jul 03, 2006, at 06:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

About http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-rex-20060202/#processing

When the user agent ignores the remainder of the rex messages,  
should the user agent inform the user that it has stopped processing.


Unless you're running a debug environment or have comparable  
requirements, definitely not. REX is designed to be resilient over  
unreliable networks (since it can be used for events broadcasting),  
and it doesn't make much sense to alert the user to every network issue.


Would you like to see a specific change concerning this question, or  
is this answer sufficient?


--
Robin Berjon
   Senior Research Scientist
   Expway, http://expway.com/





[comment-rex] Processing and well-formedness

2006-07-03 Thread karl

Hi,
This is a QA Review comment for Remote Events for XML (REX) 1.0
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-rex-20060202/
2006-02-02
1st WD 

About http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-rex-20060202/#processing

When the user agent ignores the remainder of the rex messages, should the user 
agent inform the user that it has stopped processing. 




-- 
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
   QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
  *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***