Re: CfC: to publish FPWD of Selectors API Level 2; deadline January 15
I support this publication. On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 5:56 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote: This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish the First Public Working Draft (FPWD) of the Selectors API Level 2 spec: http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/selectors-api2/ This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to record the group's decision to request advancement. By publishing this FPWD, the group sends a signal to the community to begin reviewing the document. The FPWD reflects where the group is on this spec at the time of publication; it does not necessarily mean there is consensus on the spec's contents. As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and encouraged and silence will be assumed to be assent. The deadline for comments is January 15. -Regards, Art Barstow Begin forwarded message: From: ext Lachlan Hunt lachlan.h...@lachy.id.au Date: January 7, 2010 9:19:27 AM EST To: public-webapps public-webapps@w3.org Cc: Charles McCathieNevile cha...@opera.com Subject: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD? Archived-At: http://www.w3.org/mid/4b45ed6f.3050...@lachy.id.au Hi, Now that Selectors API Level 1 is published and basically all but finalised (just waiting for some implementations to be officially released before taking it to REC), can we publish Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD? It would be useful to have it more widely reviewed, especially since Mozilla and WebKit have begun their implementation of matchesSelector, which is defined in it. The editor's draft is here. http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/selectors-api2/ -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/
Re: CfC: to publish FPWD of Selectors API Level 2; deadline January 15
I support this publication. - Maciej On Jan 9, 2010, at 5:56 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish the First Public Working Draft (FPWD) of the Selectors API Level 2 spec: http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/selectors-api2/ This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to record the group's decision to request advancement. By publishing this FPWD, the group sends a signal to the community to begin reviewing the document. The FPWD reflects where the group is on this spec at the time of publication; it does not necessarily mean there is consensus on the spec's contents. As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and encouraged and silence will be assumed to be assent. The deadline for comments is January 15. -Regards, Art Barstow Begin forwarded message: From: ext Lachlan Hunt lachlan.h...@lachy.id.au Date: January 7, 2010 9:19:27 AM EST To: public-webapps public-webapps@w3.org Cc: Charles McCathieNevile cha...@opera.com Subject: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD? Archived-At: http://www.w3.org/mid/4b45ed6f.3050...@lachy.id.au Hi, Now that Selectors API Level 1 is published and basically all but finalised (just waiting for some implementations to be officially released before taking it to REC), can we publish Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD? It would be useful to have it more widely reviewed, especially since Mozilla and WebKit have begun their implementation of matchesSelector, which is defined in it. The editor's draft is here. http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/selectors-api2/ -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/
