Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] PA Roadmap Planning and LAC Conference
Hi all, I was wondering what happed with the LAC meetup. Were any plans firmed up to have a pulseaudio working session before/after LAC? Kurt Taylor (irc krtaylor) On 19 February 2011 00:40, Arun Raghavan arun.ragha...@collabora.co.ukwrote: On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 23:00 +0200, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 11:15 -0600, Kurt Taylor wrote: Thanks for organizing this Colin! I will do my best to attend, but that is 5am (UTC-6) for me. It sounds like a few hours later would be better than the suggested 11:00 UTC. Arun would probably be the first person to be annoyed by the time being moved too much forward, but he's going to sleep at 21:30 UTC, so there's plenty of headroom :) :) Indeed. If it helps, I created a little webthingummy to get everyone's preferences (we can add more options, but it seemed to me 24th was acceptable to all): http://www.doodle.com/ivx28di2kzztm2dt Cheers, Arun ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] PA Roadmap Planning and LAC Conference
'Twas brillig, and Kurt Taylor at 24/03/11 23:21 did gyre and gimble: Hi all, I was wondering what happed with the LAC meetup. Were any plans firmed up to have a pulseaudio working session before/after LAC? Nothing formal arranged as of yet, but I'll be going, open to timing suggestions. Col -- Colin Guthrie gmane(at)colin.guthr.ie http://colin.guthr.ie/ Day Job: Tribalogic Limited [http://www.tribalogic.net/] Open Source: Mageia Contributor [http://www.mageia.org/] PulseAudio Hacker [http://www.pulseaudio.org/] Trac Hacker [http://trac.edgewall.org/] ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] PA Roadmap Planning and LAC Conference
On 2011-02-17 00:54, Colin Guthrie wrote: Hi all, There have been a few discussions recently about getting a solid roadmap organised for the next medium term of PA development. While the stable-queue stuff has been bubbling along nicely enough, there are several new features in the 1.x master branch but no real timescales decided. There are quite a few willing people out there these days which is really encouraging, but we need to get a solid focus on when to expect releases and what we hope to achieve in each one. This email is the start of that process. This is a great initiative, thanks! In addition, there is the LAC conference[1] in Dublin (or just outside) in May and there is already plans for quite a few PA developers and interested parties attending. I will book my flights very soon, but if there are several of us going, then I wonder if it would make sense to try and have a sprint day before the conference (or after) to see if we can all sit down in once place and concentrate on stuff for a little while. Being in one pace would probably help a lot with certain discussions and really help progress. So this email is really about two things: 1. Planning a time for an IRC meeting on the near term Road Map. 2. Discussions if a sprint day at LAC is possible (so we can book flights. With regards to IRC meeting, I propose initially that we do this next week sometime (the sooner the better). For the sake of argument, I'll pick a time: 11am UTC Thursday 24th. Other timing suggestions welcome. I'd expect it to take at least 1h but probably less than 2h and it would be good if people involved could be fairly focused during the meeting window. I'll prepare an agenda and ensure that notes/logs are taken (with a meetbot) and made available afterwords. We will likely use a new IRC channel for this but anyone who wants to sit in, lurk or actively particpate would be most welcome. Q: Is this time suitable for everyone (Lennart in particular)? Works for me. With regards to LAC, David has already indicated he'll have to leave on the Sunday (after the conf which is on Fri/Sat), so if no-one has any objections, I'll propose that we have a Sprint day on Thursday 5th May (ideally so people can arrive on Wed evening or early Thursday so we get the full day). How would that fit for everyone? I've no idea about space/location, but I'm sure something can be arranged, even if it's just in the corner of a pub! Agreed. Could also be worth checking with the LAC organisers if they could spare a room for us on Thursday. Perhaps this can just be incorporated into the Fri/Sat programme anyway and a separate day is not needed? Having not been before, I'm not sure how practical the conf is and whether the extra day would be needed or beneficial, but my general thoughts would be more time = more code, so an extra day could still be nice! I would prefer a separate day. This is because I don't want to miss the rest of the conference. -- David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd. http://launchpad.net/~diwic ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] PA Roadmap Planning and LAC Conference
On 2/16/2011 at 04:54 PM, Colin Guthrie gm...@colin.guthr.ie wrote: Hi all, There have been a few discussions recently about getting a solid roadmap organised for the next medium term of PA development. While the stable-queue stuff has been bubbling along nicely enough, there are several new features in the 1.x master branch but no real timescales decided. There are quite a few willing people out there these days which is really encouraging, but we need to get a solid focus on when to expect releases and what we hope to achieve in each one. This email is the start of that process. Sounds great. Have you pushed a stable-queue+latest updates out recently for your distro? I've been testing it the last few days and it seems pretty good. I'm thinking about pushing it to openSUSE With regards to IRC meeting, I propose initially that we do this next week sometime (the sooner the better). For the sake of argument, I'll pick a time: 11am UTC Thursday 24th. Other timing suggestions welcome. I'd expect it to take at least 1h but probably less than 2h and it would be good if people involved could be fairly focused during the meeting window. I'll prepare an agenda and ensure that notes/logs are taken (with a meetbot) and made available afterwords. We will likely use a new IRC channel for this but anyone who wants to sit in, lurk or actively particpate would be most welcome. Q: Is this time suitable for everyone (Lennart in particular)? I would really like to attend but I am UTC-7 so that's 4am for me. A couple hours later would be great but I understand moving it for me probably makes it worse for someone else. I'll try and attend but will certainly read the logs if not. ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] PA Roadmap Planning and LAC Conference
Thanks for organizing this Colin! I will do my best to attend, but that is 5am (UTC-6) for me. Regards, Kurt Taylor (irc krtaylor) On 18 February 2011 11:03, Scott Reeves sree...@novell.com wrote: On 2/16/2011 at 04:54 PM, Colin Guthrie gm...@colin.guthr.ie wrote: Hi all, There have been a few discussions recently about getting a solid roadmap organised for the next medium term of PA development. While the stable-queue stuff has been bubbling along nicely enough, there are several new features in the 1.x master branch but no real timescales decided. There are quite a few willing people out there these days which is really encouraging, but we need to get a solid focus on when to expect releases and what we hope to achieve in each one. This email is the start of that process. Sounds great. Have you pushed a stable-queue+latest updates out recently for your distro? I've been testing it the last few days and it seems pretty good. I'm thinking about pushing it to openSUSE With regards to IRC meeting, I propose initially that we do this next week sometime (the sooner the better). For the sake of argument, I'll pick a time: 11am UTC Thursday 24th. Other timing suggestions welcome. I'd expect it to take at least 1h but probably less than 2h and it would be good if people involved could be fairly focused during the meeting window. I'll prepare an agenda and ensure that notes/logs are taken (with a meetbot) and made available afterwords. We will likely use a new IRC channel for this but anyone who wants to sit in, lurk or actively particpate would be most welcome. Q: Is this time suitable for everyone (Lennart in particular)? I would really like to attend but I am UTC-7 so that's 4am for me. A couple hours later would be great but I understand moving it for me probably makes it worse for someone else. I'll try and attend but will certainly read the logs if not. ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] PA Roadmap Planning and LAC Conference
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 11:15 -0600, Kurt Taylor wrote: Thanks for organizing this Colin! I will do my best to attend, but that is 5am (UTC-6) for me. It sounds like a few hours later would be better than the suggested 11:00 UTC. Arun would probably be the first person to be annoyed by the time being moved too much forward, but he's going to sleep at 21:30 UTC, so there's plenty of headroom :) -- Tanu ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] PA Roadmap Planning and LAC Conference
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 23:00 +0200, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 11:15 -0600, Kurt Taylor wrote: Thanks for organizing this Colin! I will do my best to attend, but that is 5am (UTC-6) for me. It sounds like a few hours later would be better than the suggested 11:00 UTC. Arun would probably be the first person to be annoyed by the time being moved too much forward, but he's going to sleep at 21:30 UTC, so there's plenty of headroom :) :) Indeed. If it helps, I created a little webthingummy to get everyone's preferences (we can add more options, but it seemed to me 24th was acceptable to all): http://www.doodle.com/ivx28di2kzztm2dt Cheers, Arun ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] PA Roadmap Planning and LAC Conference
2011/2/17 Colin Guthrie gm...@colin.guthr.ie: There have been a few discussions recently about getting a solid roadmap organised for the next medium term of PA development. While the stable-queue stuff has been bubbling along nicely enough, there are several new features in the 1.x master branch but no real timescales decided. There are quite a few willing people out there these days which is really encouraging, but we need to get a solid focus on when to expect releases and what we hope to achieve in each one. This email is the start of that process. A solid plan for the next releases would indeed be very nice. With regards to IRC meeting, I propose initially that we do this next week sometime (the sooner the better). For the sake of argument, I'll pick a time: 11am UTC Thursday 24th. Other timing suggestions welcome. I'd expect it to take at least 1h but probably less than 2h and it would be good if people involved could be fairly focused during the meeting window. I'll prepare an agenda and ensure that notes/logs are taken (with a meetbot) and made available afterwords. We will likely use a new IRC channel for this but anyone who wants to sit in, lurk or actively particpate would be most welcome. Q: Is this time suitable for everyone (Lennart in particular)? I'll try to be there. I'm not sure if there is space on the agenda, but I'd like to discuss pavucontrol for a little bit. Not so much the current status, but rather what our vision is to what it should be, especially compared to the Gnome/KDE-specific alternatives. Maarten ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
[pulseaudio-discuss] PA Roadmap Planning and LAC Conference
Hi all, There have been a few discussions recently about getting a solid roadmap organised for the next medium term of PA development. While the stable-queue stuff has been bubbling along nicely enough, there are several new features in the 1.x master branch but no real timescales decided. There are quite a few willing people out there these days which is really encouraging, but we need to get a solid focus on when to expect releases and what we hope to achieve in each one. This email is the start of that process. In addition, there is the LAC conference[1] in Dublin (or just outside) in May and there is already plans for quite a few PA developers and interested parties attending. I will book my flights very soon, but if there are several of us going, then I wonder if it would make sense to try and have a sprint day before the conference (or after) to see if we can all sit down in once place and concentrate on stuff for a little while. Being in one pace would probably help a lot with certain discussions and really help progress. So this email is really about two things: 1. Planning a time for an IRC meeting on the near term Road Map. 2. Discussions if a sprint day at LAC is possible (so we can book flights. With regards to IRC meeting, I propose initially that we do this next week sometime (the sooner the better). For the sake of argument, I'll pick a time: 11am UTC Thursday 24th. Other timing suggestions welcome. I'd expect it to take at least 1h but probably less than 2h and it would be good if people involved could be fairly focused during the meeting window. I'll prepare an agenda and ensure that notes/logs are taken (with a meetbot) and made available afterwords. We will likely use a new IRC channel for this but anyone who wants to sit in, lurk or actively particpate would be most welcome. Q: Is this time suitable for everyone (Lennart in particular)? With regards to LAC, David has already indicated he'll have to leave on the Sunday (after the conf which is on Fri/Sat), so if no-one has any objections, I'll propose that we have a Sprint day on Thursday 5th May (ideally so people can arrive on Wed evening or early Thursday so we get the full day). How would that fit for everyone? I've no idea about space/location, but I'm sure something can be arranged, even if it's just in the corner of a pub! Perhaps this can just be incorporated into the Fri/Sat programme anyway and a separate day is not needed? Having not been before, I'm not sure how practical the conf is and whether the extra day would be needed or beneficial, but my general thoughts would be more time = more code, so an extra day could still be nice! Q: Lennart, are you going to LAC (I kinda assume so!) Have you booked your flights yet, and could a sprint day be incorporated into your plans? Comments and feedback welcome, but with LAC in particular, feedback would be welcomed ASAP so people can book their flights (the sooner the cheaper usually!). FWIW, the things most interesting me personally (and things that I will hopefully find time to actively work on!) will be the routing priority lists I've talked about in the past and how to incorporate that into the core, jack sensing, how to deal with the various virtual sinks in UI friendly ways, and how to query what sinks a card profile would produce without activating it (essentially higher level things that lead to good user experience/tools/UI). All the best Col [1] http://lac.linuxaudio.org/2011/?page=about -- Colin Guthrie gmane(at)colin.guthr.ie http://colin.guthr.ie/ Day Job: Tribalogic Limited [http://www.tribalogic.net/] Open Source: Mageia Contributor [http://www.mageia.org/] PulseAudio Hacker [http://www.pulseaudio.org/] Trac Hacker [http://trac.edgewall.org/] ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
