[Puppet Users] Re: backup files whith bad arborescence
On 3 juin, 17:26, Patrick kc7...@gmail.com wrote: Out of curiosity, why do you care? i think it damage to keep this arborescence with many intermediate file. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet Users] Re: backup files whith bad arborescence
On Jun 6, 2011, at 12:27 AM, florian wrote: On 3 juin, 17:26, Patrick kc7...@gmail.com wrote: Out of curiosity, why do you care? i think it damage to keep this arborescence with many intermediate file. Do you mean you think it is bad to keep the file structure like this? If so, I still ask why. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
[Puppet Users] Re: backup files whith bad arborescence
The easiest way I can think of is using your favorite find program. I would assume that the unix find program will do this for you. On Jun 6, 2011, at 5:27 AM, florian wrote: If i dont change this arborescence, how I can find a backup at specific date ? Think On 3 juin, 17:26, Patrick kc7...@gmail.com wrote: On Jun 3, 2011, at 8:12 AM, florian wrote: But it's possible to avoid this arborescence ? even if i lose in performance ? My understanding is that the answer is mo because you're not even supposed to be using those files directly, so it shouldn't matter. You should be using the file bucket through puppet instead. Out of curiosity, why do you care? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
[Puppet Users] Re: backup files whith bad arborescence
But it's possible to avoid this arborescence ? even if i lose in performance ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet Users] Re: backup files whith bad arborescence
On Jun 3, 2011, at 8:12 AM, florian wrote: But it's possible to avoid this arborescence ? even if i lose in performance ? My understanding is that the answer is mo because you're not even supposed to be using those files directly, so it shouldn't matter. You should be using the file bucket through puppet instead. Out of curiosity, why do you care? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
