Is there an easy way to set MIME types for static files?
I am learning to do RIA application using curl and pylons. I wonder if there is a way to configure MIME types for static files like I usually do in apache AddType text/vnd.curl .curl AddType text/vnd.curl.dcurl .dcurl --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups pylons-discuss group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pylons-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Is there an easy way to set MIME types for static files?
On Jan 1, 2009, at 3:25 AM, Nopparat C wrote: I am learning to do RIA application using curl and pylons. I wonder if there is a way to configure MIME types for static files like I usually do in apache AddType text/vnd.curl .curl AddType text/vnd.curl.dcurl .dcurl You just need to register these with Python's mimetypes module. The WSGI middleware that serves static files, paste.fileapp.FileApp, uses that module to determine content-types. -- Philip Jenvey --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups pylons-discuss group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pylons-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
pylons.decorators.secure.https throws away the query string ?
This decorator is supposed to redirect HTTP GET requests to HTTPS. But guess what ? The query string in the request URI is lost, so the redirected (https) request will not have any request.params even if the original (http) request did. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups pylons-discuss group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pylons-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Do beaker session store supports using memcached ?
On Dec 31 2008, 5:01 pm, Tycon adie...@gmail.com wrote: if it's not a system service then why does it have it's own /etc/ init.d file (the way it's packaged for most major distributions) ? oh I always just build it from source :) .that theres an /etc/ init.d entry indicates its a decision of those distros to have a single memcached daemon running, its not a decision of memcached. I've read through the memcached website very thoroughly regarding this question and I don't see any guidelines on this issue in either direction. I wouldn't think memcached itself has much of an opinion on how its run. I would almost guarantee that high volume websites which use memcached do not multipurpose a single memcached instance across multiple unrelated applications, though...apart from the difficulty of multiple performance profiles affecting the single memcached process in different ways, why bother taking the risk that two different applications might use the same keynames for different purposes. While it is possible to have a memcached server dedicated to one application, you can't assume this is the default. with that said, of course I agree on this. I made it pretty clear in the CHANGELOG that the remove() method with the memcached backend now does flush_all(), which is not a method that's called by the library except by the erroneous usage of it in Session, and I've sent Ben a patch which changes Session to store a single dict on one key in the namespace regardless of backend so namespace.remove() would not be used. I've also advised that namespace.remove(), just like namespace.keys(), raise a NotImplementedError() when using the memcached backend. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups pylons-discuss group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pylons-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Problems with installation through easy_install
Installation of pylons (easy_install Pylons==0.9.6.2) fails with traceback. Last error is: File /usr/lib/python2.5/httplib.py, line 604, in _safe_read raise IncompleteRead(s) httplib.IncompleteRead: The same thing appears for easy_install -U setuptools too. I do not use easy_install normally. For example originally I installed setuptools as an ubuntu-pkg. So is there any magic, I have to do? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups pylons-discuss group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pylons-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
