Re: Pylons' redirect_to function does not work with HTTPS
Yes, WebFaction uses nginX for HTTPS. WebFaction said that they send 'X-FORWARDED-PROTO' and 'X-FORWARDED-SSL' headers which apparently Pylons doesn't parse. Is there a better solution here? On Aug 2, 10:28 pm, Mike Orr sluggos...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 9:03 PM, hekevintranhekevint...@gmail.com wrote: I found a good solution. It will know which protocol to use if you specify it in the function call to redirect_to: return redirect_to(protocol='https', controller='myController', action='index') That's a workaround, yes. Is WebFaction doing proxying? Because my HTTPS application uses ProxyPass and the URLs are generated correctly even without the protocol option. -- Mike Orr sluggos...@gmail.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups pylons-discuss group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pylons-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Using %(here)s in logging config
Mike Orr wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:05 PM, kochharkochhar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to use the %(here)s variable in my logging config but I get the
following error:
ConfigParser.InterpolationMissingOptionError: Bad value substitution:
section: [handler_file]
option : args
key: here
rawval : ('%(here)s/var/log/krumplez.local.log', 'midnight', 1, 3)
The corresponding section of my ini file is:
[handler_file]
class = handlers.TimedRotatingFileHandler
args = ('%(here)s/var/log/kurmplez.local.log', 'midnight', 1, 3)
level = NOTSET
formatter = generic
Google wasn't very helpful in figuring out how to configure logging output
to a
directory relative to the config file. Is there some trick to getting the
interpolation to work? The comment at the top of the file says:
# The %(here)s variable will be replaced with the parent directory of this
file
#
The file is used in two different ways. Variables are extracted using
paste.deploy.loadwsgi.NicerConfigParser, which interpolates %(here)s.
Logging configuration is done by logging.config.fileConfig, which
doesn't know about interpolation.
That's quite non-intuitive. What's the benefit of lumping the configs together
if they behave differently? Could NicerConfigParser be used to generate an
temporary interpolated version of the config file to give to logging's
fileConfig? I'd be happy to write a patch if that's a reasonable fix.
You'll probably have to use
absolute paths. Or if you're running the application under
Supervisor, you can let it default to stdout and then redirect it to a
file in the Supervisor config.
I'm using absolute paths now, it makes running the app from multiple locations
painful.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
pylons-discuss group.
To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
pylons-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Using %(here)s in logging config
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 2:41 AM, kochharkochhar...@gmail.com wrote:
Mike Orr wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:05 PM, kochharkochhar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to use the %(here)s variable in my logging config but I get the
following error:
ConfigParser.InterpolationMissingOptionError: Bad value substitution:
section: [handler_file]
option : args
key : here
rawval : ('%(here)s/var/log/krumplez.local.log', 'midnight', 1, 3)
The corresponding section of my ini file is:
[handler_file]
class = handlers.TimedRotatingFileHandler
args = ('%(here)s/var/log/kurmplez.local.log', 'midnight', 1, 3)
level = NOTSET
formatter = generic
Google wasn't very helpful in figuring out how to configure logging output
to a
directory relative to the config file. Is there some trick to getting the
interpolation to work? The comment at the top of the file says:
# The %(here)s variable will be replaced with the parent directory of this
file
#
The file is used in two different ways. Variables are extracted using
paste.deploy.loadwsgi.NicerConfigParser, which interpolates %(here)s.
Logging configuration is done by logging.config.fileConfig, which
doesn't know about interpolation.
That's quite non-intuitive. What's the benefit of lumping the configs together
if they behave differently? Could NicerConfigParser be used to generate an
temporary interpolated version of the config file to give to logging's
fileConfig? I'd be happy to write a patch if that's a reasonable fix.
The 'benefit' is using Python's standard configuration mechanism. The
code is all in paste.deploy.loadwsgi or thereabouts, so you'd have to
file a bug there and convince Ian to include it.
One thing I wish it would do is to configure the logging when loading
the file standalone; e.g., in model tests. Currently it configures
logging only when you go through 'paster serve'.
--
Mike Orr sluggos...@gmail.com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
pylons-discuss group.
To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
pylons-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Using Multiple Databases (SQLALCHEMY)
On Aug 1, 10:20 am, Raoul Snyman raoul.sny...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/8/1 RossC sendrossem...@gmail.com: I've followed the instructions about adding databases and using binds instead of bind to the SA Session; However and this is the bit that I'm missing, how do I associate a table def / Model with that second Session connection? and indeed how do I connect using the DB details selected from the central Database? Can this be done using SA? or do I have to use the DB Engine API? While I haven't done dynamic database connections, I have written a Pylons app that connects to 3 different databases using SQLAlchemy. I had to use 3 different Session and metadata objects. It is fairly straightforward to have just *one* metadata and *one* Session with multiple engines. You can use the `binds` arg when creating the session, or you can subclass `Session` and override `get_bind` (that's what I did). Don't know if that's helpful for your situation... --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups pylons-discuss group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pylons-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Parsing hash arguments in routing.py
It seems that pylons truncates part of the URL including and after the hash. For example, there does not seem to be a way to extract the xxx in the following URL: http://zzz#xxx --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups pylons-discuss group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pylons-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Parsing hash arguments in routing.py
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Roy Hyunjin Hanstarsareblueandfara...@gmail.com wrote: It seems that pylons truncates part of the URL including and after the hash. For example, there does not seem to be a way to extract the xxx in the following URL: http://zzz#xxx The fragment part is never sent to the server; it's used by the browser to scroll to a position within the page. So what Pylons receives is http://zzz;. -- Mike Orr sluggos...@gmail.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups pylons-discuss group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pylons-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Using Multiple Databases (SQLALCHEMY)
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 05:13:23AM -0700, RossC wrote: I've just started researching and prototyping with pylons and sqlalchemy and have a question that I'm sure can be answered quickly. My project has the requirement to connect to a central db, get a second connections details from that central database and then open another connection to that specified connection. Do you need to maintain the original connection, or is it merely a broker for the actual connection? If you don't need it, have your function that sets up the model replace the metadata and sessionmaker with new ones from the second connection. Ross -- Ross Vandegrift r...@kallisti.us If the fight gets hot, the songs get hotter. If the going gets tough, the songs get tougher. --Woody Guthrie --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups pylons-discuss group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pylons-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Parsing hash arguments in routing.py
On Aug 3, 2009, at 12:01 PM, Roy Hyunjin Han wrote: It seems that pylons truncates part of the URL including and after the hash. For example, there does not seem to be a way to extract the xxx in the following URL: http://zzz#xxx Anchors are not sent to the remote website. It's not Pylons, its the way the browser works. Cheers, Ben --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups pylons-discuss group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pylons-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Parsing hash arguments in routing.py
On Aug 3, 3:24 pm, Ben Bangert b...@groovie.org wrote: Anchors are not sent to the remote website. It's not Pylons, its the way the browser works. Cheers, Ben On Aug 3, 4:33 pm, Mike Orr sluggos...@gmail.com wrote: The fragment part is never sent to the server; it's used by the browser to scroll to a position within the page. So what Pylons receives is http://zzz;. Ah. I thought I found a clever way for a dynamic site to have a bookmarkable state, but I guess not. Thanks for responding. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups pylons-discuss group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pylons-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Using %(here)s in logging config
On Aug 3, 2009, at 2:41 AM, kochhar wrote: Mike Orr wrote: On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:05 PM, kochharkochhar...@gmail.com wrote: The file is used in two different ways. Variables are extracted using paste.deploy.loadwsgi.NicerConfigParser, which interpolates %(here)s. Logging configuration is done by logging.config.fileConfig, which doesn't know about interpolation. That's quite non-intuitive. What's the benefit of lumping the configs together if they behave differently? Could NicerConfigParser be used to generate an temporary interpolated version of the config file to give to logging's fileConfig? I'd be happy to write a patch if that's a reasonable fix. fileConfig accepts a set of defaults to pass to ConfigParser, so I've made PasteScript's logging config loader pass 'here' (and also '__file__' which PasteDeploy apparently sets up): http://trac.pythonpaste.org/pythonpaste/changeset/8052 -- Philip Jenvey --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups pylons-discuss group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pylons-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Is passing a session id as a post param a security risk?
For my website I'm using SWFUpload (http://swfupload.org/) to handle multiple file uploading. The problem is when the uploader sends an upload request, it creates a new session. My solution to this was to set the session id for the mako template, and then post the session back with SWFUpload. Then I would load the session back with the session id and I could use the old session. My question is, is this a big security risk? Is there aa better solution to this problem (perhaps a more pylons-friendly multiple file uploader)? Thanks. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups pylons-discuss group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pylons-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
