beaker session without cookie

[lapcchan]

i am wondering if it is possible to get back the session data by id
with no cookie access.

i have run thru the source code and found out
session.get_by_id(sessionid). but
it always return None.

there is only one cookie item so i am sure i have the correct session
id.

rgds,
 Vincent
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
pylons-discuss group.
To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Deployment Question

[lapcchan]

what is your platform?

i just tried fcgid on centos 5.1 not long ago,  with
mod_fcgid-2.1-3.el5 from epel.repo + apache (version come with
centos2.5) + python 2.4, following this wiki
http://wiki.pylonshq.com/display/pylonscookbook/Production+Deployment+Using+Apache%2C+FastCGI+and+mod_rewrite%2C+alternate+version

there seems to be a bug and i can reproduce it easy. a fresh project
create by paster create -t pylons project will run no problem. any
other project with sql access will just crash. i've try the quickwiki
demo and it won't work too. i've also try mod_wsgi from epel.repo but
the same occur.

i am too lazy to try and recompile everything so i end up running it
behind proxy

rgds,
 Vincent

On May 19, 3:44 am, Ross Vandegrift [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 01:38:24PM -0700, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:

  I'm a little unclear on the better ways to deploy a Pylons app.

  My production servers run nginx -- is it better to use some fastcgi
  support (if so, how?) or just do a paster serve and proxy to that
  port?

  I've read a handful of ways on how-to-deploy apps, and all seem
  different.  I've yet to see a comparison or this is THE way to do it
  document.

 All of my apps are deployed in a FastCGI environment with Apache.  Our
 live application server has a custom install of python2.4 with
 appropriate module versions that we can care for beside the ones that
 RedHat wants.

 This works really well.  It seems a lot of people hate FCGI for
 different reasons, but I have found it to be pretty awesome.  Apps are
 very stable, no complicated proxying, and it's almost as performant as
 mod_python.

 I have considered converting our deployments to mod_python, but only
 recently acquired a practical staging environment to test things like
 that.

 --
 Ross Vandegrift
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 The good Christian should beware of mathematicians, and all those who
 make empty prophecies. The danger already exists that the mathematicians
 have made a covenant with the devil to darken the spirit and to confine
 man in the bonds of Hell.
 --St. Augustine, De Genesi ad Litteram, Book II, xviii, 37
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
pylons-discuss group.
To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

mako marco? webhelpers plugin?

[lapcchan]

i am new to pylons and found the webhelpers are quite handy. i need to
program on other javascript lib(dhtml calendar) which is not include
in webhelpers. if i want to make something reusable other than
hardcode the js everytime, i can think of  marco of the template
system or extend the webhelpers myself.

can anyone please show me some lights? any example or sample
available?

thanks in advance.



--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
pylons-discuss group.
To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---