Re: [pypy-dev] pypy 5.10 release

2018-01-01 Thread Matti Picus 

On 31/12/2017 10:59 AM, blanch wrote:


hello, thanks for the 5.10 release!

just a problem on the mac: it seems that the pypy3 binaries are linked against 
a libffi provided by a package manager (homebrew?), since dyld is looking for 
/usr/local/opt/libffi/lib/libffi.6.dylib (see below the error reported and 
otool output).
since i do not use homebrew, it fails to execute on my mac.
i have the problem with the pypy3 pre-sierra version, but according to a 
comment on the morepypy blog [0], the problem exist for high sierra version of 
pypy3 and for pypy2 (which looks for 
/usr/local/opt/openssl/lib/libssl.1.0.0.dylib)

thanks again for your work, and best wishes for 2018!

renaud

0. 
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=3971202189709462152=3223396318213306071=1
We need someone who uses that OS and knows how to fix it to help us out. 
Any ideas? SInce the same buildslave creates our pypy2 binaries as well, 
I guess the problem occurs there too.
If anyone can help out, please issue a pull request or at least file an 
issue on  https://bitbucket.org/pypy/pypy/issues (login required) with a 
proposal for a fix.

___
pypy-dev mailing list
pypy-dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev

Re: [pypy-dev] Pypy's facelift and certificate issues

2018-01-01 Thread Maciej Fijalkowski 
Hey Daniel

Great, I'm usually at least twice a year in Prague :-)

Let's catch up in February.

Cheers,
fijal

On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Kotrfa  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am based in Prague (UTC+2), but during January, I am travelling and hence
> I am not very available. It should get better during February, so could we
> schedule a Hangout/Skype call or something then?
>
> Also, depending on the volume of the work on the site, I may not be able to
> work on it before July. But have no problem if someone else want start on it
> themselves and I can join :-) ... But I believe I could find some time
> before then for simple redesign.
>
> Best,
> Daniel
>
> so 30. 12. 2017 v 11:49 odesílatel Maciej Fijalkowski 
> napsal:
>>
>> Hi Kotrfa.
>>
>> Great, we would definitely appreciate some help. I have very sketchy
>> internet till next week, maybe we can coordinate something next week
>> on IRC? What timezone are you in?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Maciej Fijalkowski
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Kotrfa  wrote:
>> > Hey,
>> >
>> > as I said, I am not a professional, but I would be willing to help with
>> > the
>> > site. I have built couple of websites in Django/Wagtail (or plain HTML),
>> > have some basic knowledge about design (+ frontend CSS/JS/HTML). The
>> > site
>> > seems quite simple, so if we just did a revamp, it shouldn't take a
>> > long.
>> > Also, if we went with Wagtail, adding blog capabilities would be also
>> > trivial.
>> >
>> > Best,
>> > Daniel
>> >
>> > so 30. 12. 2017 v 10:02 odesílatel Maciej Fijalkowski 
>> > napsal:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Kortrfa
>> >>
>> >> I've even paid for a design of new pypy logo that we can use on the
>> >> new website :-) Maybe it's a good time I spend some effort upgrading
>> >> it. Thanks for the reminder, it's something that's on our heads, but
>> >> it's not like we can just hire someone to do it for us.
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> fijal
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 9:35 PM, Kotrfa  wrote:
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > thank you for all your hard work, I really appreciate it.
>> >> >
>> >> > Firstly, it seems that the website SSL certificate expired or
>> >> > something.
>> >> > At
>> >> > my latest Chromium reports "Not secure".
>> >> >
>> >> > Secondly, I totally understand that there are more pressing issues
>> >> > than
>> >> > cool
>> >> > website, but the current design and functionality is IMO really
>> >> > putting
>> >> > people off. So I am going to through away some things which seems
>> >> > weird
>> >> > to
>> >> > ME (and I understand it's subjective - please take it as a friendly
>> >> > feedback).
>> >> >
>> >> > The jQuery versions suggests November 2012, the design idea seems
>> >> > even
>> >> > older... There are old information such as "We are soon releasing a
>> >> > beta
>> >> > supporting Python 3.3." or the fact that the donations bars are still
>> >> > present even though they are closed (and hence could be moved into
>> >> > some
>> >> > blog
>> >> > post). Blog is also terrible, this is how it renders on my laptop
>> >> > (the
>> >> > same
>> >> > with the external display): https://imgur.com/a/qkjEa . The logo
>> >> > could
>> >> > be
>> >> > surely polished as well (I like the idea, but it seems a bit
>> >> > childish).
>> >> > Even
>> >> > though I am not professional front end developer, I am quite
>> >> > confident
>> >> > this
>> >> > feedback is not far from what a professional would say. It's also not
>> >> > about
>> >> > having "cool" website for itself, but that a nice projects attracts
>> >> > good
>> >> > people. I myself am questioning how good, from technical point of
>> >> > view,
>> >> > Pypy's project can be if the site looks like like it does and the
>> >> > most
>> >> > convenient way how to reach the devs is through mailing list...
>> >> >
>> >> > Best,
>> >> > Daniel
>> >> >
>> >> > ___
>> >> > pypy-dev mailing list
>> >> > pypy-dev@python.org
>> >> > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
>> >> >
___
pypy-dev mailing list
pypy-dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev