Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Mac Python is DEAD

2006-04-19 Thread has
Bill Janssen wrote:

 In my opinion, the problem is the term MacPython.  Python is Python,
 period, and we should just call it that, even if it's running on the Mac
 platform.  Perhaps this was different in the pre-OSX days, but not now.

On OS X I think of the 'MacPython' name more as a way to identify the 
particular distribution: MacPython, Fink Python, ActiveState Python, etc. It'd 
probably make more sense in that respect if it was 'Mac Python' rather than 
'MacPython', but that's just an artifact of how it's evolved.

Personally I have no problem dropping the 'Mac' prefix if it proves to be 
causing more confusion than it solves. Might need to think of a new 
distribution name though.

has
-- 
http://freespace.virgin.net/hamish.sanderson/
___
Pythonmac-SIG maillist  -  Pythonmac-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig


Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Mac Python is DEAD

2006-04-19 Thread Ronald Oussoren

On 18-apr-2006, at 22:59, Advertising Department wrote:

 (I'm totally confused about the nine versions of python for Mac OS X,
 the defunct or just not updated for 2 years MacPython pages, the
 current state of the macintosh specific library modules, etc.)

 To give my 2 cents...
 It doesn't really matter about a logo, icon, or universal build. If
 there is no recent info on the OFFICIAL python.org linked web pages,
 most new users will think it's become defunct, and look no further.
 NEWS

Sorry? There is a link to a python installer for macosx on python.org.
We can't help that google points users that search for MacPython to  
Jack's
site who has basically disappeared and hasn't updated his site for a
long time.

It is annoying that www.python.org/download/mac doesn't mention the
universal installer. Could someone please fix that?

Ronald
___
Pythonmac-SIG maillist  -  Pythonmac-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig


Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Mac Python is DEAD

2006-04-19 Thread Bill Janssen
 It is annoying that www.python.org/download/mac doesn't mention the
 universal installer. Could someone please fix that?

Will do.  Should this replace the dual-installer procedure that's
mentioned there?  For both 10.3 and 10.4?

Bill
___
Pythonmac-SIG maillist  -  Pythonmac-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig


Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Mac Python is DEAD

2006-04-19 Thread skip
Bill But the NEWS section of python.org is totally disfunctional.
Bill Months go by without anyone bothering to add anything to it; I
Bill think the trouble is that no one knows what the add procedure
Bill is.

I tend to agree with you.  Given all the recent changes to the site,
including a completely new tool chain used to build it, details about
updating various bits like NEWS have been lost by many.

Skip

___
Pythonmac-SIG maillist  -  Pythonmac-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig


Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Mac Python is DEAD

2006-04-19 Thread skip

Ronald It is annoying that www.python.org/download/mac doesn't mention
Ronald the universal installer.

It does now.  It will take a few minutes for the global build process to
update the website, but I checked in a minimal change to Subversion.

Skip
___
Pythonmac-SIG maillist  -  Pythonmac-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig


Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Mac Python is DEAD

2006-04-19 Thread Ronald Oussoren

On 19-apr-2006, at 22:06, Bill Janssen wrote:

 It is annoying that www.python.org/download/mac doesn't mention the
 universal installer. Could someone please fix that?

 Will do.  Should this replace the dual-installer procedure that's
 mentioned there?  For both 10.3 and 10.4?

The universal installer can be used for OSX 10.3.9 and later. There is
no current installer for earlier releases of the OS.

I haven't checked yet if the universal installer on python.org is still
the original one without optimization or if it got replaced by the  
newer one.
I've removed the latter from my iDisk because I ran out of the  
bandwidth allotment
for my site :-(.

Ronald

___
Pythonmac-SIG maillist  -  Pythonmac-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig


Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Mac Python is DEAD

2006-04-19 Thread Ronald Oussoren

On 19-apr-2006, at 22:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Ronald It is annoying that www.python.org/download/mac doesn't  
 mention
 Ronald the universal installer.

 It does now.  It will take a few minutes for the global build  
 process to
 update the website, but I checked in a minimal change to Subversion.

Thanks.

Ronald

___
Pythonmac-SIG maillist  -  Pythonmac-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig


Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Mac Python is DEAD

2006-04-19 Thread Bill Janssen
NEWS was broken long before the new site.

Bill
___
Pythonmac-SIG maillist  -  Pythonmac-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig


[Pythonmac-SIG] Mac Python is DEAD

2006-04-18 Thread Advertising Department
(I'm totally confused about the nine versions of python for Mac OS X,  
the defunct or just not updated for 2 years MacPython pages, the  
current state of the macintosh specific library modules, etc.)

To give my 2 cents...
It doesn't really matter about a logo, icon, or universal build. If  
there is no recent info on the OFFICIAL python.org linked web pages,  
most new users will think it's become defunct, and look no further.
NEWS

April 2, 2004 MacPython 2.3.3 for Jaguar and MacPython-OS9 2.3.3 have  
finally been released.

And on April 18, 2006, having no other information, we must assume in  
the last two years it's become totally stale, defunct and forgotten.  
Too bad. I guess I'll have to mess around with Java or Ruby.

Doing a Google search produces way too much antique information for a  
newbie to sort thru, and just re-inforces the implication that python  
on Mac is dead.

COME ON GUYS, get something up on the web page. ANYTHING!!! Point us  
to this list and tell us you've been too busy to mess around with  
newbie info. De-link Jack's pages from the Main page, and put up a  
list of current resources.

ANYTHING that shows current activity!!



___
Pythonmac-SIG maillist  -  Pythonmac-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig


Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Mac Python is DEAD

2006-04-18 Thread kernel
On 18 Apr 2006, at 21:59, Advertising Department wrote:

 (I'm totally confused about the nine versions of python for Mac OS X,
 the defunct or just not updated for 2 years MacPython pages, the
 current state of the macintosh specific library modules, etc.)

 To give my 2 cents...
 It doesn't really matter about a logo, icon, or universal build. If
 there is no recent info on the OFFICIAL python.org linked web pages,
 most new users will think it's become defunct, and look no further.

I'm a new user too but I've never got the impression MacPython is dead. 
  the presence of a Universal Binary suggests to me it's still alive.

___
Pythonmac-SIG maillist  -  Pythonmac-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig


Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Mac Python is DEAD

2006-04-18 Thread Bill Janssen
Advertising Department,

In my opinion, the problem is the term MacPython.  Python is Python,
period, and we should just call it that, even if it's running on the
Mac platform.  Perhaps this was different in the pre-OSX days, but not
now.

I'd be happy to go though all the pages on python.org and stamp out
references to MacPython.

But the NEWS section of python.org is totally disfunctional.  Months
go by without anyone bothering to add anything to it; I think the
trouble is that no one knows what the add procedure is.

Bill
___
Pythonmac-SIG maillist  -  Pythonmac-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig


Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Mac Python is DEAD

2006-04-18 Thread Charles Hartman
It seems to me that it would be a good idea to UNLINK this site  
(http://homepages.cwi.nl/~jack/macpython/) -- remove all links to it  
from pythonmac.org, to begin with. In fact, I'd call it urgent.

Charles Hartman



On Apr 18, 2006, at 4:59 PM, Advertising Department wrote:

 (I'm totally confused about the nine versions of python for Mac OS X,
 the defunct or just not updated for 2 years MacPython pages, the
 current state of the macintosh specific library modules, etc.)

 To give my 2 cents...
 It doesn't really matter about a logo, icon, or universal build. If
 there is no recent info on the OFFICIAL python.org linked web pages,
 most new users will think it's become defunct, and look no further.
 NEWS

 April 2, 2004 MacPython 2.3.3 for Jaguar and MacPython-OS9 2.3.3 have
 finally been released.

 And on April 18, 2006, having no other information, we must assume in
 the last two years it's become totally stale, defunct and forgotten.
 Too bad. I guess I'll have to mess around with Java or Ruby.

 Doing a Google search produces way too much antique information for a
 newbie to sort thru, and just re-inforces the implication that python
 on Mac is dead.

 COME ON GUYS, get something up on the web page. ANYTHING!!! Point us
 to this list and tell us you've been too busy to mess around with
 newbie info. De-link Jack's pages from the Main page, and put up a
 list of current resources.

 ANYTHING that shows current activity!!



 ___
 Pythonmac-SIG maillist  -  Pythonmac-SIG@python.org
 http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig

___
Pythonmac-SIG maillist  -  Pythonmac-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig


Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Mac Python is DEAD

2006-04-18 Thread Charlie Moad
On 4/18/06, kernel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 18 Apr 2006, at 21:59, Advertising Department wrote:

  (I'm totally confused about the nine versions of python for Mac OS X,
  the defunct or just not updated for 2 years MacPython pages, the
  current state of the macintosh specific library modules, etc.)
 
  To give my 2 cents...
  It doesn't really matter about a logo, icon, or universal build. If
  there is no recent info on the OFFICIAL python.org linked web pages,
  most new users will think it's become defunct, and look no further.

 I'm a new user too but I've never got the impression MacPython is dead.
   the presence of a Universal Binary suggests to me it's still alive.

 Hmm, I go to python.org and right in my face: Universal Mac OSX
binary for Python 2.4.3.
 Thanks for all the hard work on making this new build guys. 
Especially for getting rid of the need for pythonw.
 If you google mac python you might get those older pages, but
those should be left there for several reasons.

My 2 cents,
Charlie
___
Pythonmac-SIG maillist  -  Pythonmac-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig


Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Mac Python is DEAD

2006-04-18 Thread Bill Janssen
 To give my 2 cents...
 It doesn't really matter about a logo, icon, or universal build. If  
 there is no recent info on the OFFICIAL python.org linked web pages,  
 most new users will think it's become defunct, and look no further.

Apparently this guy got past the main python.org page, with news about
the Universal Binary, and also skipped the downloads/Macintosh
section.  Instead, he went straight to the Macintosh documentation
(not unreasonable), which starts with Using Python on a Macintosh,
which points to Jack's defunct site.

Now let's fix the documentation...

Bill
___
Pythonmac-SIG maillist  -  Pythonmac-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig


Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Mac Python is DEAD

2006-04-18 Thread Terry Jones
| In my opinion, the problem is the term MacPython.  Python is Python,
| period, and we should just call it that, even if it's running on the Mac
| platform.  Perhaps this was different in the pre-OSX days, but not now.

Make that 4 cents on dropping the Mac. The MacPython name is, to my ears,
quite misleading.

Terry
___
Pythonmac-SIG maillist  -  Pythonmac-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig


Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Mac Python is DEAD...Long Live Python on the Mac

2006-04-18 Thread Daniel Lord

On Apr 18, 2006, at 16:46, Terry Jones wrote:

 | In my opinion, the problem is the term MacPython.  Python is  
 Python,
 | period, and we should just call it that, even if it's running on  
 the Mac
 | platform.  Perhaps this was different in the pre-OSX days, but  
 not now.

 Make that 4 cents on dropping the Mac. The MacPython name is, to  
 my ears,
 quite misleading.

In fact, in my view, MacPython was the special build for OS 9 and  
earlier. I have never thought of the OS X distributions as  
'MacPython' but rather Python for OS X just as Python for Red Hat  
Linux are still Python, just packaged and bundled as RPMs in order to  
install and work properly on the Red Hat Linux platform. I noticed  
the web information is trending in that direction, let's just make a  
clean break. Even if John Dvorak thinks Apple and OS X are doomed ;-)

On another topic, we need to archive and keep available Jack Jansen's  
work. Jack made a great contribution to Python on the Mac, more than  
I think any other single individual, and one that should not be  
forgotten. Really. Link to it from the wiki and make it clear it is  
historical in nature and pioneering work by a key individual.

IMHO MacPython _is_ dead (but not forgotten), Long live Python on  
the Mac./IMHO
___
Pythonmac-SIG maillist  -  Pythonmac-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig