Re: [PATCH] qemu/timer: Add host ticks function for RISC-V
On 2023/9/10 1:43, Richard Henderson wrote: On 9/7/23 20:23, LIU Zhiwei wrote: From: LIU Zhiwei Signed-off-by: LIU Zhiwei --- include/qemu/timer.h | 19 +++ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/qemu/timer.h b/include/qemu/timer.h index 9a91cb1248..ce0b66d122 100644 --- a/include/qemu/timer.h +++ b/include/qemu/timer.h @@ -979,6 +979,25 @@ static inline int64_t cpu_get_host_ticks(void) return cur - ofs; } +#elif defined(__riscv) && defined(__riscv_xlen) && __riscv_xlen == 32 +static inline int64_t cpu_get_host_ticks(void) +{ + uint32_t lo, hi; + asm volatile("RDCYCLE %0\n\t" + "RDCYCLEH %1" + : "=r"(lo), "=r"(hi)); + return lo | (uint64_t)hi << 32; +} + +#elif defined(__riscv) && defined(__riscv_xlen) && __riscv_xlen > 32 +static inline int64_t cpu_get_host_ticks(void) +{ + int64_t val; + + asm volatile("RDCYCLE %0" : "=r"(cc)); + return val; +} __riscv_xlen should never be undefined. OK Don't you need a loop for RDCYCLEH to avoid time going backward? do { asm("rdcycleh %0\n\t" "rdcycle %1\n\t" "rdcycleh %2\n\t" : "=r"(hi), "=r"(lo), "=r"(tmph)); } while (unlikely(tmph != hi)); Yes, I think we should do this for XLEN == 32bits. Thanks, Zhiwei r~
Re: [PATCH] qemu/timer: Add host ticks function for RISC-V
On 9/7/23 20:23, LIU Zhiwei wrote: From: LIU Zhiwei Signed-off-by: LIU Zhiwei --- include/qemu/timer.h | 19 +++ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/qemu/timer.h b/include/qemu/timer.h index 9a91cb1248..ce0b66d122 100644 --- a/include/qemu/timer.h +++ b/include/qemu/timer.h @@ -979,6 +979,25 @@ static inline int64_t cpu_get_host_ticks(void) return cur - ofs; } +#elif defined(__riscv) && defined(__riscv_xlen) && __riscv_xlen == 32 +static inline int64_t cpu_get_host_ticks(void) +{ +uint32_t lo, hi; +asm volatile("RDCYCLE %0\n\t" + "RDCYCLEH %1" + : "=r"(lo), "=r"(hi)); +return lo | (uint64_t)hi << 32; +} + +#elif defined(__riscv) && defined(__riscv_xlen) && __riscv_xlen > 32 +static inline int64_t cpu_get_host_ticks(void) +{ +int64_t val; + +asm volatile("RDCYCLE %0" : "=r"(cc)); +return val; +} __riscv_xlen should never be undefined. Don't you need a loop for RDCYCLEH to avoid time going backward? do { asm("rdcycleh %0\n\t" "rdcycle %1\n\t" "rdcycleh %2\n\t" : "=r"(hi), "=r"(lo), "=r"(tmph)); } while (unlikely(tmph != hi)); r~
[PATCH] qemu/timer: Add host ticks function for RISC-V
From: LIU Zhiwei Signed-off-by: LIU Zhiwei --- include/qemu/timer.h | 19 +++ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/qemu/timer.h b/include/qemu/timer.h index 9a91cb1248..ce0b66d122 100644 --- a/include/qemu/timer.h +++ b/include/qemu/timer.h @@ -979,6 +979,25 @@ static inline int64_t cpu_get_host_ticks(void) return cur - ofs; } +#elif defined(__riscv) && defined(__riscv_xlen) && __riscv_xlen == 32 +static inline int64_t cpu_get_host_ticks(void) +{ +uint32_t lo, hi; +asm volatile("RDCYCLE %0\n\t" + "RDCYCLEH %1" + : "=r"(lo), "=r"(hi)); +return lo | (uint64_t)hi << 32; +} + +#elif defined(__riscv) && defined(__riscv_xlen) && __riscv_xlen > 32 +static inline int64_t cpu_get_host_ticks(void) +{ +int64_t val; + +asm volatile("RDCYCLE %0" : "=r"(cc)); +return val; +} + #else /* The host CPU doesn't have an easily accessible cycle counter. Just return a monotonically increasing value. This will be -- 2.17.1