Re: [PATCH] qemu/timer: Add host ticks function for RISC-V

2023-09-10 Thread LIU Zhiwei



On 2023/9/10 1:43, Richard Henderson wrote:

On 9/7/23 20:23, LIU Zhiwei wrote:

From: LIU Zhiwei 

Signed-off-by: LIU Zhiwei 
---
  include/qemu/timer.h | 19 +++
  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/qemu/timer.h b/include/qemu/timer.h
index 9a91cb1248..ce0b66d122 100644
--- a/include/qemu/timer.h
+++ b/include/qemu/timer.h
@@ -979,6 +979,25 @@ static inline int64_t cpu_get_host_ticks(void)
  return cur - ofs;
  }
  +#elif defined(__riscv) && defined(__riscv_xlen) && __riscv_xlen == 32
+static inline int64_t cpu_get_host_ticks(void)
+{
+    uint32_t lo, hi;
+    asm volatile("RDCYCLE %0\n\t"
+ "RDCYCLEH %1"
+ : "=r"(lo), "=r"(hi));
+    return lo | (uint64_t)hi << 32;
+}
+
+#elif defined(__riscv) && defined(__riscv_xlen) && __riscv_xlen > 32
+static inline int64_t cpu_get_host_ticks(void)
+{
+    int64_t val;
+
+    asm volatile("RDCYCLE %0" : "=r"(cc));
+    return val;
+}


__riscv_xlen should never be undefined.

OK


Don't you need a loop for RDCYCLEH to avoid time going backward?

    do {
    asm("rdcycleh %0\n\t"
    "rdcycle %1\n\t"
    "rdcycleh %2\n\t"
    : "=r"(hi), "=r"(lo), "=r"(tmph));
    } while (unlikely(tmph != hi));


Yes, I think we should do this for XLEN == 32bits.

Thanks,
Zhiwei



r~




Re: [PATCH] qemu/timer: Add host ticks function for RISC-V

2023-09-09 Thread Richard Henderson

On 9/7/23 20:23, LIU Zhiwei wrote:

From: LIU Zhiwei 

Signed-off-by: LIU Zhiwei 
---
  include/qemu/timer.h | 19 +++
  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/qemu/timer.h b/include/qemu/timer.h
index 9a91cb1248..ce0b66d122 100644
--- a/include/qemu/timer.h
+++ b/include/qemu/timer.h
@@ -979,6 +979,25 @@ static inline int64_t cpu_get_host_ticks(void)
  return cur - ofs;
  }
  
+#elif defined(__riscv) && defined(__riscv_xlen) && __riscv_xlen == 32

+static inline int64_t cpu_get_host_ticks(void)
+{
+uint32_t lo, hi;
+asm volatile("RDCYCLE %0\n\t"
+ "RDCYCLEH %1"
+ : "=r"(lo), "=r"(hi));
+return lo | (uint64_t)hi << 32;
+}
+
+#elif defined(__riscv) && defined(__riscv_xlen) && __riscv_xlen > 32
+static inline int64_t cpu_get_host_ticks(void)
+{
+int64_t val;
+
+asm volatile("RDCYCLE %0" : "=r"(cc));
+return val;
+}


__riscv_xlen should never be undefined.

Don't you need a loop for RDCYCLEH to avoid time going backward?

do {
asm("rdcycleh %0\n\t"
"rdcycle %1\n\t"
"rdcycleh %2\n\t"
: "=r"(hi), "=r"(lo), "=r"(tmph));
} while (unlikely(tmph != hi));


r~



[PATCH] qemu/timer: Add host ticks function for RISC-V

2023-09-07 Thread LIU Zhiwei
From: LIU Zhiwei 

Signed-off-by: LIU Zhiwei 
---
 include/qemu/timer.h | 19 +++
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/qemu/timer.h b/include/qemu/timer.h
index 9a91cb1248..ce0b66d122 100644
--- a/include/qemu/timer.h
+++ b/include/qemu/timer.h
@@ -979,6 +979,25 @@ static inline int64_t cpu_get_host_ticks(void)
 return cur - ofs;
 }
 
+#elif defined(__riscv) && defined(__riscv_xlen) && __riscv_xlen == 32
+static inline int64_t cpu_get_host_ticks(void)
+{
+uint32_t lo, hi;
+asm volatile("RDCYCLE %0\n\t"
+ "RDCYCLEH %1"
+ : "=r"(lo), "=r"(hi));
+return lo | (uint64_t)hi << 32;
+}
+
+#elif defined(__riscv) && defined(__riscv_xlen) && __riscv_xlen > 32
+static inline int64_t cpu_get_host_ticks(void)
+{
+int64_t val;
+
+asm volatile("RDCYCLE %0" : "=r"(cc));
+return val;
+}
+
 #else
 /* The host CPU doesn't have an easily accessible cycle counter.
Just return a monotonically increasing value.  This will be
-- 
2.17.1