Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for 2013-12-10

2013-12-11 Thread Markus Armbruster
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws writes:

 On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com wrote
 Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com writes:

 Il 10/12/2013 12:42, Juan Quintela ha scritto:

 Hi

 Please, send any topic that you are interested in covering.

 May not need a phone call, but I'll drop it here: what happened to
 acknowledgement emails from the patches script?

 Also, Anthony, it looks like you're still adjusting to the new job.  If
 you need help with anything, I guess today's call could be a good place
 to discuss it.

 And someone needs to send out the email saying that 1.7.0 is out and
 that the next version will be 2.0!

 Speaking of sending out e-mail: did I miss the promised followup to the
 key signing party?

 I need to find the papers from KVM Forum which are somewhere among the
 stacks of boxes here :-/

Please do, because the longer the delay, the fewer participants will be
willing and able to find *their* papers.



Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for 2013-12-10

2013-12-10 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Il 10/12/2013 12:42, Juan Quintela ha scritto:
 
 Hi
 
 Please, send any topic that you are interested in covering.

May not need a phone call, but I'll drop it here: what happened to
acknowledgement emails from the patches script?

Also, Anthony, it looks like you're still adjusting to the new job.  If
you need help with anything, I guess today's call could be a good place
to discuss it.

And someone needs to send out the email saying that 1.7.0 is out and
that the next version will be 2.0!

Paolo



Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for 2013-12-10

2013-12-10 Thread Markus Armbruster
Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com writes:

 Il 10/12/2013 12:42, Juan Quintela ha scritto:
 
 Hi
 
 Please, send any topic that you are interested in covering.

 May not need a phone call, but I'll drop it here: what happened to
 acknowledgement emails from the patches script?

 Also, Anthony, it looks like you're still adjusting to the new job.  If
 you need help with anything, I guess today's call could be a good place
 to discuss it.

 And someone needs to send out the email saying that 1.7.0 is out and
 that the next version will be 2.0!

Speaking of sending out e-mail: did I miss the promised followup to the
key signing party?



Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for 2013-12-10

2013-12-10 Thread Juan Quintela
Vishant Singh vishant.si...@toshiba-tsip.com wrote:
 Hi,

 I would like to discuss about RHEV VM creation and domain joining.
 Is it possible? It would be great If you can direct me to right
 contact if you are not.

What is RHEVM V creation?

I guess you want to ask on a...@ovirt.org?  This call is about kvm/qemu,
normally upper layers are discussed elsewhere, except when we are
talking about interaction

Anyone has a better idea?

Later,  Juan.



Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for 2013-12-10

2013-12-10 Thread Anthony Liguori
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com wrote
 Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com writes:

 Il 10/12/2013 12:42, Juan Quintela ha scritto:

 Hi

 Please, send any topic that you are interested in covering.

 May not need a phone call, but I'll drop it here: what happened to
 acknowledgement emails from the patches script?

 Also, Anthony, it looks like you're still adjusting to the new job.  If
 you need help with anything, I guess today's call could be a good place
 to discuss it.

 And someone needs to send out the email saying that 1.7.0 is out and
 that the next version will be 2.0!

 Speaking of sending out e-mail: did I miss the promised followup to the
 key signing party?

I need to find the papers from KVM Forum which are somewhere among the
stacks of boxes here :-/

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

 --
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in
 the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
 More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for 2013-12-10

2013-12-10 Thread Anthony Liguori
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 4:37 AM, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
 Il 10/12/2013 12:42, Juan Quintela ha scritto:

 Hi

 Please, send any topic that you are interested in covering.

 May not need a phone call, but I'll drop it here:

Could we move the time on this phone call?  7am conflicts with my
daily commute.  I could do 6am or 9am.  I think it would be very
useful to be able to attend this call.

 what happened to
 acknowledgement emails from the patches script?

It's buggy and I haven't had a chance to rewrite it yet.

 Also, Anthony, it looks like you're still adjusting to the new job.  If
 you need help with anything, I guess today's call could be a good place
 to discuss it.

 And someone needs to send out the email saying that 1.7.0 is out and
 that the next version will be 2.0!

Mail is out now, sorry for the delay.

Pull requests should be getting processed in a reasonable time.  I am
not yet spending enough time doing patch review but that should
improve in the very near future.

It's not so much the new job as it is relocating and moving all at the
same time.  I'm hoping the holiday break is a good way to catch up
things.  Of course, we should revisit again soon.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori


 Paolo
 --
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in
 the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
 More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for 2013-12-10

2013-12-10 Thread Juan Quintela
Juan Quintela quint...@redhat.com wrote:
 Hi

 Please, send any topic that you are interested in covering.

 Thanks, Juan.

As Paolo topics are being handled by email,  call got cancelled.

Later,  Juan.



Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for 2013-12-10

2013-12-10 Thread Juan Quintela
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
 On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 4:37 AM, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
 Il 10/12/2013 12:42, Juan Quintela ha scritto:

 Hi

 Please, send any topic that you are interested in covering.

 May not need a phone call, but I'll drop it here:

 Could we move the time on this phone call?  7am conflicts with my
 daily commute.  I could do 6am or 9am.  I think it would be very
 useful to be able to attend this call.

No problem with me.  Both of them are ok for me.
Votes?

 Also, Anthony, it looks like you're still adjusting to the new job.  If
 you need help with anything, I guess today's call could be a good place
 to discuss it.

 And someone needs to send out the email saying that 1.7.0 is out and
 that the next version will be 2.0!

 Mail is out now, sorry for the delay.

I guess this means no call today.

Later,  Juan.



Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for 2013-12-10

2013-12-10 Thread Juan Quintela
Juan Quintela quint...@redhat.com wrote:
 Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
 On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 4:37 AM, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
 Il 10/12/2013 12:42, Juan Quintela ha scritto:

 Hi

 Please, send any topic that you are interested in covering.

 May not need a phone call, but I'll drop it here:

 Could we move the time on this phone call?  7am conflicts with my
 daily commute.  I could do 6am or 9am.  I think it would be very
 useful to be able to attend this call.

 No problem with me.  Both of them are ok for me.
 Votes?

Move this discussion to a Top post on the list,  please answer there.

Thanks,  Juan.



Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for 2013-12-10

2013-12-10 Thread Kevin Wolf
Am 10.12.2013 um 16:05 hat Juan Quintela geschrieben:
 Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
  On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 4:37 AM, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
  Il 10/12/2013 12:42, Juan Quintela ha scritto:
 
  Hi
 
  Please, send any topic that you are interested in covering.
 
  May not need a phone call, but I'll drop it here:
 
  Could we move the time on this phone call?  7am conflicts with my
  daily commute.  I could do 6am or 9am.  I think it would be very
  useful to be able to attend this call.
 
 No problem with me.  Both of them are ok for me.
 Votes?

It would have been useful to have a time zone specification because
otherwise the message is pretty meaningless.

Juan said on IRC that that would be 15:00 CET or 18:00 CET. So if his
interpretation is right, I'd vote for 15:00 (i.e. one hour earlier than
it used to be, 14:00 UTC).

Kevin



Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for 2013-12-10

2013-12-10 Thread Vishant Singh
Hi,

I would like to discuss about RHEV VM creation and domain joining.
Is it possible? It would be great If you can direct me to right contact if you 
are not. 

Regards,
Vishant

-Original Message-
From: kvm-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:kvm-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of 
Juan Quintela
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 5:13 PM
To: KVM devel mailing list; qemu-devel qemu-devel
Subject: KVM call agenda for 2013-12-10


Hi

Please, send any topic that you are interested in covering.

Thanks, Juan.

PD.  Sorry for the last notice,  but have been on holidays,  and really 
disconnected and forgot about this call :-(


Call details:

10:00 AM to 11:00 AM EDT
Every two weeks

If you need phone number details,  contact me privately.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in the body of a 
message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at  
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
The information contained in this e-mail message and in any
attachments/annexure/appendices is confidential to the 
recipient and may contain privileged information. 
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the
sender and delete the message along with any 
attachments/annexure/appendices. You should not disclose,
copy or otherwise use the information contained in the
message or any annexure. Any views expressed in this e-mail 
are those of the individual sender except where the sender 
specifically states them to be the views of 
Toshiba Software India Pvt. Ltd. (TSIP),Bangalore.

Although this transmission and any attachments are believed to be
free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer 
system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility
of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility 
is accepted by Toshiba Embedded Software India Pvt. Ltd, for any loss or
damage arising in any way from its use.