Re: [ql-users] Pirates and mad sheep -a deep groan
On 8 Nov 2002, at 17:15, Dave P wrote: (...) Now that we've had two or three different problems with the license, and Wolfgang has given various reassurances (which has been a positive experience, Wolfgang!), Thanks, but this begs the question - have I been acting in accordance with these reassurances? (Just BEGGING for a compilment here, of course). maybe we can amend the license a little to make these assurances explicit? It's november. Maybe we could make the relatively minor changes and have SMSQ/E license v1.1 come into force on January 1st? Oh groan. Groan. Groan. groan. Mind you,I'm not saying no - just, well, groan. Do you really want us to go through the entire debate again every year? I'm not looking at this as a way to squeeze more out of the license, No comment... but merely to tidy up those parts that have alrerady been found ambiguous? Maybe Wolfgang would like to submit the license to annual review, as the situation will change over time? Actually, I wouldn't like it - but if there is really a demand for that, I'll do it. Wolfgang - www.wlenerz.com
Re: [ql-users] Pirates and mad sheep -a deep groan
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Wolfgang Lenerz wrote: Thanks, but this begs the question - have I been acting in accordance with these reassurances? Put it this way; every time an issue is raised, you have worked diligently to resolve it. Sometimes I question your methods, but your results are usually most satisfactory to most people. relatively minor changes and have SMSQ/E license v1.1 come into force on January 1st? Oh groan. Groan. Groan. groan. Appendix? Do you really want us to go through the entire debate again every year? That isn't necessary. I was thinking maybe in mid-November each year you could post a summary of issues that have arisen during the year, and propose changes. Simply ignore and do not respond to discussion outside of those very limited points. Yearly may well be too much. However, I think some know time and place to suggest and discuss small changes or corrections would be nice. Actually, I wouldn't like it - but if there is really a demand for that, I'll do it. Not the *whole* license. Just the parts that seem contentious or ambiguous? Dave
