Re: [ql-users] Size of the current QL market

2003-01-15 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz

On 14 Jan 2003, at 18:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Does anyone have any indication of the current QL market??

market ?
Wolfgang



Re: [ql-users] Size of the current QL market

2003-01-15 Thread François Van Emelen



Tony Firshman wrote:

On  Tue, 14 Jan 2003 at 18:34:01,  wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])



Does anyone have any indication of the current QL market??
I guess we can only base this on the readership of QL Today and the
Quanta membership, although possibly Tony may have a better idea.


My emailing list is now about 450 - but maybe 50 duplicate entries (I
wish people would let me know - a very few do!) plus one notable
well-known person who does not want to receive 'spam'

There are an additional 300 or so without email addresses.

 so it looks like 700 worldwide.

Most users are still in the UK of course.
There are still people using their QLs who have no idea that anyone else
is around.  Often when they find the internet, they are staggered to
find such an active electronic scene.

The snailmail list (those without email addresses on file) definitely
excludes some active QLers.
It was based on returns from the QL2000 mailing where we sent out about
2000 postcards asking for snail/email addresses.
We had a pitifully poor response, and it really was a waste of time and
money.
I then excluded everyone who hadn't replied.
I then went manually through my 6000 entry database and re-enabled
everyone I knew.  It amounted to a very large number - maybe five times
the number who returned postcards, and a very large number of very well
known people.

The postcard mailing was one of the most depressing things we have done.
At the end of it, I felt that the QL scene deserved to die if the people
left could not even be bothered to let us know.
People removed from the active QL list on my database still keep popping
up again after all this time.

Apathy can be a real killer.
If _you_ want the QL scene to survive, then please let me know when you
change email (especially) or snail  address.
... or your email address if you have never received any of our trader
'spam' (quoting that anonymous QLer again)

Moan over - ah I do feel better (8-)#


You can add me to your database.
François Van Emelen




Re: [ql-users] Size of the current QL market

2003-01-15 Thread Phoebus Dokos

??? 15/1/2003 6:58:11 ??, ?/? John G Hitchcock [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
??:


Re:
It was based on returns from the QL2000 mailing where we sent out about
2000 postcards asking for snail/email addresses
===

Sorry Tony.  But don't think I got one.


Me either

Phoebus






[ql-users] Size of the current QL market

2003-01-14 Thread RWAPSoftware
Does anyone have any indication of the current QL market??

I guess we can only base this on the readership of QL Today and the Quanta membership, although possibly Tony may have a better idea.

Any guesses are invited (wild or not).

--
Rich Mellor 
RWAP Software
35 Chantry Croft, Kinsley, Pontefract, West Yorkshire, WF9 5JH
TEL: 01977 610509
http://hometown.aol.co.uk/rwapsoftware


Re: [ql-users] Size of the current QL market

2003-01-14 Thread paul holmgren

Tony Firshman wrote:

snip

 The postcard mailing was one of the most depressing things we have done.
 At the end of it, I felt that the QL scene deserved to die if the people
 left could not even be bothered to let us know.
 People removed from the active QL list on my database still keep popping
 up again after all this time.

snip

 --
  QBBS (QL fido BBS 2:252/67) +44(0)1442-828255
  tony@surname.co.uk  http://www.firshman.co.uk
Voice: +44(0)1442-828254   Fax: +44(0)1442-828255
 TF Services, 29 Longfield Road, TRING, Herts, HP23 4DG

Do not be to disheartened about the response you got with this effort.
history indicates that maybe only 10% will respond to this sort of
solicitation.

-- 
Paul Holmgren
Hoosier Corps #33, L-6
2 57 300-C's in Indy