[R] Bayesian functions for mle2 object

2011-08-29 Thread Billy.Requena
Hi everybody,

I'm interested in evaluating the effect of a continuous variable on the mean
and/or the variance of my response variable. I have built functions
expliciting these and used the 'mle2' function to estimate the coefficients,
as follows:

func.1 - function(m=62.9, c0=8.84, c1=-1.6)
{
s - c0+c1*(x)
-sum(dnorm(y, mean=m, sd=s,log=T))
}

m1 - mle2(func.1, method=SANN)

However, the estimation of the effect of x on the variance of y usually has
dealt some troubles, resulting in no convergencies or sd of estimates
extremely huge. I tried using different optimizers, but I still faced the
some problems.

When I had similar troubles in 'GLMM' statistical universe, I used bayesian
functions to solve this problem, enjoyning the flexibility of different
start points to reach the maximum likelihood estimates. However, I have no
idea which package or which function to use to solve the specific problem
I'm facing now.
Does anyone have a clue?
Thanks in advance

Gustavo Requena
PhD Student - Laboratory of Arthropod Behavior and Evolution
Universidade de Sao Paulo - Brazil

--
View this message in context: 
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Bayesian-functions-for-mle2-object-tp3776442p3776442.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


[R] Logistic regression with factorial effect

2010-11-18 Thread Billy.Requena

Hello,

I’d like to evaluate the temporal effect on the relationship between a
continuous variable (e.g. size) and the probability of mate success.
Initially I was trying to do a logistic regression model incorporating the
temporal effect, but I don’t know if that is the best option. I simulated
some data and that’s the problem:


rep(c(Jan,Feb,Mar,Apr,May), each=20) - month
as.factor(month)

rep(LETTERS[seq(1:20)], 5) - ind

rep(sort(rnorm(20, 5.5, 0.2)), 5) - size
size

c(c(rep(0,12), rep(1,8)), c(rep(0,12), rep(1,8)),
c(rep(c(0,1), 10)),
c(rep(1,8), rep(0,12)),
c(rep(1,8), rep(0,12))) - success1
success1

With the object ‘success1’, only the highest values of size are successful
at the two first months, but only the lowest values of size are successful
at the two last months. So, the overall effect of size on the successful
probability should not exist, but if we consider the interaction between
size and time, we should be able to see that effect.


glm(success1 ~ size, family=binomial) - test1.1
glmer(success1 ~ size + (1|ind), family=binomial) - test2.1
glmer(success1 ~ size + month + (1|ind), family=binomial) - test3.1
glmer(success1 ~ size : month + (1|ind), family=binomial) - test4.1


However, the expected result is not observed in the output of all these
models. Using a model selection approach and comparing the AIC values of all
models, it seems that ‘test1.1’ model is the most likely. All the deviances
are almost at the same level and the differences in AIC values are due for
the new parameters added.

Given the data was simulated to generate differences between models and
model ‘test4.1’ is supposed to be the best one, I’m probably doing something
wrong.
Has anyone faced this kind of problem? Or has anyone any idea how to solve
that?

Thanks and Regards 
Gustavo Requena 
PhD student - Laboratory of Arthropod Behavior and Evolution 
Universidade de São Paulo 
http://ecologia.ib.usp.br/opilio/gustavo.html

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Logistic-regression-with-factorial-effect-tp3049208p3049208.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] several Filled.contour plots on the same device...

2010-08-19 Thread Billy.Requena

Hi Alexis!

I had the same problem you faced and the solution I found was modifying the
layout function.
That’s an example:

f1 - function (a, x) {2.15*a -0.25*x}
f2 - function (a,x) {exp(2.36*a - 0.04*x)}
a1 - seq(from=5.2, to=6.2, by=(6.2-5.2)/19)
b1 - seq(0,32)
zeros - rep(0, length(a)*length(b))
mat1 - matrix(zeros, ncol=length(a), nrow=length(b))
 for (i in 1:20)
 {
 for(j in 1:33)
 {
 est - f1(a=a1[i], x=b1[j])
 mat1[j,i] - est
 }
 }

mat2 - matrix(zeros, ncol=length(a), nrow=length(b))
 for (i in 1:20)
 {
 for(j in 1:33)
 {
 est - f2(a=a1[i], x=b1[j])
 mat2[j,i] - est
 }
 }


mar.orig - (par.orig - par(c(mar, las, mfrow)))$mar
w - (3 + mar.orig[2L]) * par(csi) * 2.54
a - layout(matrix(c(2, 1,0,4,3), ncol = 5), heights=lcm(20), widths =
c(1.2, lcm(w/1.75),0.05, 1, lcm(w/1.75)))
layout.show(a) #device dividido ppara apresentar duas figuras compostas

#Scale 1
par(las = 1)
mar - mar.orig
mar[4L] - mar[2L]
mar[2L] - 1
par(mar = mar)
lev.m.vol - pretty(range(mat1),4)
plot.new()
plot.window(xlim=c(0, 1), ylim=range(lev.m.vol), xaxs=i, yaxs=i)
rect(0, lev.m.vol[-length(lev.m.vol)], 1, lev.m.vol[-1L], col =
gray((6:1)/6))
axis(4, cex.axis=1.2)
mtext(Mean, at=2.5, side=3, line=1, adj=1, cex=1.35)

#Graph1
mar - mar.orig
mar[4L] - 1
par(mar = c(6,8,4,2))
plot.new()
plot.window(xlim=range(b1, finite = TRUE), ylim=range(a1, finite = 
TRUE), 
, xaxs = i, yaxs = i, asp = NA)
storage.mode(mat1) - double
.Internal(filledcontour(as.double(b1), as.double(a1), mat1, 
as.double(lev.m.vol), col = gray((6:1)/6)))
box()
axis(1, at=seq(0,32,by=4),seq(0, 32, by =4), cex.axis=1.2)
axis(2, at=seq(5.2, 6.2, by =0.2),labels=c(5.2, 5.4, 5.6, 5.8,
6.0, 6.2), cex.axis=1.2)
mtext(X, side=1, line=3.5, cex =1.2)
mtext(Y, at=5.62, side=2, line=3.5, cex =1.2, las=0)
mtext(A, at=1, side=3, line=1, cex =2.2)

#Scale 2
par(las = 1)
mar - mar.orig
mar[4L] - mar[2L]
mar[2L] - 1
par(mar = mar)
lev.sd.vol - pretty(range(mat2),4)
plot.new()
plot.window(xlim=c(0, 1), ylim=range(lev.sd.vol), xaxs=i, yaxs=i)
rect(0, lev.sd.vol[-length(lev.sd.vol)], 1, lev.sd.vol[-1L], col =
gray((6:1)/6))
axis(4, cex.axis=1.2)
mtext(Standard, at=3.3, side=3, line=2.5, adj=1, cex=1.25)
mtext(deviation, at=3.3, side=3, line=1, adj=1, cex=1.25)

#Graph2
mar - mar.orig
mar[4L] - 1
par(mar = c(6,1,4,2))
plot.new()
plot.window(xlim=range(b1, finite = TRUE), ylim=range(a1, finite = 
TRUE), 
, xaxs = i, yaxs = i, asp = NA)
storage.mode(mat2) - double
.Internal(filledcontour(as.double(b1), as.double(a1), mat2, 
as.double(lev.sd.vol), col = gray((6:1)/6)))
box()
axis(1, at=seq(0,32,by=4),seq(0, 32, by =4), cex.axis=1.2)
axis(2, at=seq(5.2, 6.2, by =0.2),labels=c(5.2, 5.4, 5.6, 5.8,
6.0, 6.2), cex.axis=1.2)
mtext(X, side=1, line=3.5, cex =1.2)
mtext(B, at=1, side=3, line=1, cex =2.2)

I wish it could help you

Gustavo Requena
PhD student - Laboratory of Arthropod Behavior and Evolution
Universidade de São Paulo
http://ecologia.ib.usp.br/opilio/gustavo.html

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/several-Filled-contour-plots-on-the-same-device-tp819040p2332041.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.