Re: [R] lrm in Design

2009-08-30 Thread loch1

Thank you for your reply, it helped. That thread is about glm, I take it that
lrm behaves in the same way?!?



See:
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2009-July/204192.html

and also other posts in that thread.

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/lrm-in-Design-tp25206737p25209958.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


[R] lrm in Design

2009-08-29 Thread loch1

Hello everybody,
I am trying to do a logistic regression model with lrm() from the design
package. I am comparing to groups with different medical outcome which can
either be good or bad. In the help file it says that lrm codes al
responses to 0,1,2,3, etc. internally and does so in alphabetical order. I
would guess this means bad=0 and good=1.

My question: I am trying to figure out the connection between my factors and
my response. Which probability is being calculated that of good or bad (1 or
0, respectively).

I'm not sure whether I made clear what I was trying to say but will be very
grateful for all help.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/lrm-in-Design-tp25206737p25206737.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.