Re: [R] [OT] _ inserted in postings

2009-09-08 Thread Ted Harding
On 08-Sep-09 10:40:18, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
 On 08/09/2009 6:09 AM, (Ted Harding) wrote:
 Sorry if this is too OT, but there is a particular relevance to
 postings to R-help.
 
 Of recent times, I have received several postings via R-help (and some
 other mailing-lists) in which the _ character is inserted where,
 presumably, a space,  , was intended. An example (received this
 morning) is below, which (from the headers) was originally sent
 through Yahoo web-mail. This is as seen when I read it.
 [ From: FMH kagba2...@yahoo.com
   Subject: [R] Derivative of nonparametric curve
   Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 02:07:10 -0700 (PDT) ]
 
 
 Dear All,
 
 I'm looking for_a way on computing the derivative of first and second
 order_of a smoothing curve produced by a nonprametric regression. For
 instance, if we run the R script below, a smooth nonparametric
 regression
 curve is produced. 
 
 provide.data(trawl)
 Zone92__ - (Year == 0  Zone == 1)
 Position - cbind(Longitude - 143, Latitude)
 dimnames(Position)[[2]][1] - Longitude - 143
 sm.regression(Longitude, Score1, method = aicc, col = red,_ model
 =
 linear)
 
 Could someone please give some hints_on the way to_find the
 derivative_on
 the curve at_some points ?
 
 Thank you.
 Kagba
 
 
 In the message headers I see:
 
   Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
   Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
 and, on inspection of the message text in the inbox folder (i.e. as
 it was delivered to me), I see that each and every occurrence of the
 _ is represented there as the three successive characters =A0,
 i.e. a quoted-printable code.
 
 Normally, I can happily ignore this kind of thing when it just occurs
 in text. But since, as in the above message, it can also be
 interpolated
 into R code, this could cause unnecessary inconvenience for people
 who want to test the code which people post to R-help. Ditto if
 someone
 should post code (such as the above) as a solution to someone else's
 problem: As received, it just would not work!
 
 Comment: I have for long time been under the impression, now
 apparently
 a delusion, that the abominable quoted-printable had found its due
 final
 resting-place in the Museum of Dishonorable Obsolescence; apparently
 not!
 
 Also, if people are using web-mailers (Yahoo or other) that wantonly
 insert this kind of rubbish, they should look into the possibility of
 either changing the configuration under which they post their mails
 (if possible), or mailing via a different agent.
 
 The quoted-printable aspect may be a red herring, since I also see
 that the = signs in the code are represented as =3D, as is forced
 in quoted-printable; but they have been rendered correctly in the
 text as seen (and copied). So it may just be due to substitution of
 _ for   on the ,art of the mailer.
 
 What do others think?
 
 I don't see the underscores in that posting, but I do see this as the 
 last line in the headers:
 
 X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by 
 fisher.stats.uwo.ca id n8898BkC031633
 
 (fisher.stats.uwo.ca is the server that receives my email).
 
 So it looks as though whatever is doing the conversion on your system 
 isn't doing it as well as it should.
 
 Duncan Murdoch

Thanks for this. No such conversion was performed in my case: it was
delivered as-is, i.e. in the original quoted-printable (QP). The
destination to which it was originally delivered (manchester.ac.uk)
apparently does nothing about re-encoding it. My local mailer handles
the decoding and rendering of encoded content.

The QP code =A0 in the source
  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
corresponds to Non-Breakable Space (NBSP), so presumably my mailer
displays this as _ to distinguish it from the basic ASCII space (SP)
(ASCII code 32, QP code =20). (Note that the QP elements =3D in the
original were correctly rendered as =, so the decoding indeed took
place).

This still leaves open the issue that what was presumably a simple
ASCII space SP when originally entered, got changed to NBSP somehow
in the process of being sent!

Thanks for the comment,
Ted.


E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 08-Sep-09   Time: 12:46:42
-- XFMail --

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] [OT] _ inserted in postings

2009-09-08 Thread Duncan Murdoch

On 08/09/2009 6:09 AM, (Ted Harding) wrote:

Sorry if this is too OT, but there is a particular relevance to
postings to R-help.

Of recent times, I have received several postings via R-help (and some
other mailing-lists) in which the _ character is inserted where,
presumably, a space,  , was intended. An example (received this
morning) is below, which (from the headers) was originally sent
through Yahoo web-mail. This is as seen when I read it.
[ From: FMH kagba2...@yahoo.com
  Subject: [R] Derivative of nonparametric curve
  Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 02:07:10 -0700 (PDT) ]


Dear All,

I'm looking for_a way on computing the derivative of first and second
order_of a smoothing curve produced by a nonprametric regression. For
instance, if we run the R script below, a smooth nonparametric regression
curve is produced. 


provide.data(trawl)
Zone92__ - (Year == 0  Zone == 1)
Position - cbind(Longitude - 143, Latitude)
dimnames(Position)[[2]][1] - Longitude - 143
sm.regression(Longitude, Score1, method = aicc, col = red,_ model =
linear)

Could someone please give some hints_on the way to_find the derivative_on
the curve at_some points ?

Thank you.
Kagba


In the message headers I see:

  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
  Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

and, on inspection of the message text in the inbox folder (i.e. as
it was delivered to me), I see that each and every occurrence of the
_ is represented there as the three successive characters =A0,
i.e. a quoted-printable code.

Normally, I can happily ignore this kind of thing when it just occurs
in text. But since, as in the above message, it can also be interpolated
into R code, this could cause unnecessary inconvenience for people
who want to test the code which people post to R-help. Ditto if someone
should post code (such as the above) as a solution to someone else's
problem: As received, it just would not work!

Comment: I have for long time been under the impression, now apparently
a delusion, that the abominable quoted-printable had found its due final
resting-place in the Museum of Dishonorable Obsolescence; apparently not!

Also, if people are using web-mailers (Yahoo or other) that wantonly
insert this kind of rubbish, they should look into the possibility of
either changing the configuration under which they post their mails
(if possible), or mailing via a different agent.

The quoted-printable aspect may be a red herring, since I also see
that the = signs in the code are represented as =3D, as is forced
in quoted-printable; but they have been rendered correctly in the
text as seen (and copied). So it may just be due to substitution of
_ for   on the ,art of the mailer.

What do others think?


I don't see the underscores in that posting, but I do see this as the 
last line in the headers:


X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by 
fisher.stats.uwo.ca id n8898BkC031633


(fisher.stats.uwo.ca is the server that receives my email).

So it looks as though whatever is doing the conversion on your system 
isn't doing it as well as it should.


Duncan Murdoch

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] [OT] _ inserted in postings

2009-09-08 Thread Patrick Connolly
On Tue, 08-Sep-2009 at 06:40AM -0400, Duncan Murdoch wrote:



 I don't see the underscores in that posting, but I do see this as the  
 last line in the headers:

That's interesting.  I see them using Mutt as well as with Thunderbird.
I bounced the message to a Yahoo account, and the underscores all
appear there too.

In my experience, I usually get those underscores in mail sent from
computers which are used to work in Japanese.  Something to do with
the use of those characters seems to have some unintended consequences.



 X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by  
 fisher.stats.uwo.ca id n8898BkC031633

 (fisher.stats.uwo.ca is the server that receives my email).

 So it looks as though whatever is doing the conversion on your system  
 isn't doing it as well as it should.

 Duncan Murdoch

 __
 R-help@r-project.org mailing list
 https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
 PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
 and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

-- 
~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.   
   ___Patrick Connolly   
 {~._.~}   Great minds discuss ideas
 _( Y )_ Average minds discuss events 
(:_~*~_:)  Small minds discuss people  
 (_)-(_)  . Eleanor Roosevelt
  
~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.