Re: [rdiff-backup-users] 1.11 on windows/cygwin - unable to perform a point in time recovery
Ralph Lehmann wrote: --- Found 7 increments: tiffs.2007-06-21T10;05849;05834+02;05800.missing Thu Jun 21 10:49:34 2007 tiffs.2007-06-21T10;05854;05849+02;05800.dir Thu Jun 21 10:54:49 2007 tiffs.2007-06-21T10;05857;05849+02;05800.dir Thu Jun 21 10:57:49 2007 tiffs.2007-06-21T10;05858;05840+02;05800.dir Thu Jun 21 10:58:40 2007 tiffs.2007-06-21T10;05859;05823+02;05800.dir Thu Jun 21 10:59:23 2007 tiffs.2007-06-21T14;05817;05804+02;05800.missing Thu Jun 21 14:17:04 2007 tiffs.2007-06-21T14;05818;05820+02;05800.dir Thu Jun 21 14:18:20 2007 Current mirror: Thu Jun 21 14:20:31 2007 I doubt that the original problem is fixed, but I just committed a patch to clean-up this display by un-quoting the increment names. Andrew -- Andrew Ferguson - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ rdiff-backup-users mailing list at rdiff-backup-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users Wiki URL: http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki
Re: [rdiff-backup-users] crash
On Wednesday 04 July 2007, Andrew Ferguson wrote: Neal Becker wrote: rdiff-backup-1.0.5-2.fc7 fedora fc7 x86_64: ending back exception signed integer is greater than maximum of type type 'exceptions.OverflowError': File /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/rdiff_backup/rpath.py, line 790, in chown else: os.chown(self.path, uid, gid) Are you using 64-bit python on both sides? Yes, both are fc7-x86_64 (python-2.5-12.fc7) Python has a bug when dealing with 64-bit UID's and the chown command. I'm not sure if using 64-bit python will make a difference. Would you mind filing a bug report with the Python project? I wouldn't mind, but I'm not sure what to say at this point. Do you understand what the issue is? ___ rdiff-backup-users mailing list at rdiff-backup-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users Wiki URL: http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki
