Re: [Rdkit-discuss] Problem finding potential stereo-centres in bridged bicyclics involving 4-membered rings?

2021-05-19 Thread Greg Landrum
Thanks James!

On Wed, 19 May 2021 at 17:40, James Davidson 
wrote:

> Hi Greg,
>
>
>
> Thanks for the response (and sorry to be the bearer of bad news!).
>
> Issue added:  https://github.com/rdkit/rdkit/issues/4155
>
>
>
> Kind regards
>
>
>
> James
>
>
>
> *From:* Greg Landrum 
> *Sent:* 19 May 2021 14:59
> *To:* James Davidson 
> *Cc:* rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
> *Subject:* Re: [Rdkit-discuss] Problem finding potential stereo-centres
> in bridged bicyclics involving 4-membered rings?
>
>
>
> Hi James,
>
>
>
> I don't think that's the same bug as #3490. I think it's something
> different; "yay".
>
> ;-)
>
>
>
> It would be great if you could file a github issue for this.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> -greg
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 3:20 PM James Davidson 
> wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> I’ve got a strong suspicion that what I am seeing is related to the open
> issue 3490 (https://github.com/rdkit/rdkit/issues/3490), but as I can’t
> seem to find a mention of a non-spiro problem then I thought I would share.
>
> Tested in 2020.09.4 and 2021.03.2 with the same result.
>
>
>
> smi_list = ['CC1CCC(CC1)C(N)=O', 'CC12CCC(CC1)(C2)C(N)=O',
> 'CC1CC(C1)C(N)=O', 'CC12CC(C1)(CC2)C(N)=O']
>
> for smi in smi_list:
>
> mol = Chem.MolFromSmiles(smi)
>
> display(show_mol(mol, size=(450, 200)))  # wrapper function for new
> drawing code in jupyter
>
> print(list(Chem.FindPotentialStereo(mol)))
>
> print(Chem.FindMolChiralCenters(mol, includeUnassigned=True,
> useLegacyImplementation=False))
>
>
>
> The 4 cases are:
>
>- Symmetrically-disubstituted 6-membered ring
>- A bridged version (using a 1-atom bridge to avoid a completely
>symmetrical product)
>- Symmetrically-disubstituted 4-membered ring
>- A bridged version (this time using a 2-atom bridge to avoid symmetry)
>
>
>
> And this is what I see:
>
>
>
>
>
> In the case of the bridged 4-membered ring (or bridged 5-membererd ring,
> depending on your viewpoint!), FindPotentialStereo() fails to identify the
> two potential stereo atoms.
>
> If anyone can spot if this is the same issue as 3490, or something
> different, then that would be appreciated!
>
>
>
> Kind regards
>
>
>
> James
> --
>
>
> PLEASE READ - This email is confidential and may be privileged. It is
> intended for the named addressee(s) only and access to it by anyone else is
> unauthorised. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the
> contents of this email or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it
> is unauthorised and may be unlawful. If you have received this email in
> error, please notify the sender or postmas...@vernalis.com. Email is not
> a secure method of communication and the Company cannot accept
> responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message or any
> attachment(s). Please check this email for virus infection for which the
> Company accepts no responsibility. If verification of this email is sought
> then please request a hard copy. Unless otherwise stated, any views or
> opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not represent
> those of the Company.
>
> Vernalis (R) Limited (no. 1985479)
> Granta Park, Great Abington
> Cambridge, CB21 6GB, United Kingdom
> Tel: +44 (0)1223 895 555
> --
>
> ___
> Rdkit-discuss mailing list
> Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss
>
>
___
Rdkit-discuss mailing list
Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss


Re: [Rdkit-discuss] Problem finding potential stereo-centres in bridged bicyclics involving 4-membered rings?

2021-05-19 Thread James Davidson
Hi Greg,

Thanks for the response (and sorry to be the bearer of bad news!).
Issue added:  https://github.com/rdkit/rdkit/issues/4155

Kind regards

James

From: Greg Landrum 
Sent: 19 May 2021 14:59
To: James Davidson 
Cc: rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Rdkit-discuss] Problem finding potential stereo-centres in 
bridged bicyclics involving 4-membered rings?

Hi James,

I don't think that's the same bug as #3490. I think it's something different; 
"yay".
;-)

It would be great if you could file a github issue for this.

Thanks,
-greg


On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 3:20 PM James Davidson 
mailto:j.david...@vernalis.com>> wrote:
Dear All,

I’ve got a strong suspicion that what I am seeing is related to the open issue 
3490 (https://github.com/rdkit/rdkit/issues/3490), but as I can’t seem to find 
a mention of a non-spiro problem then I thought I would share.
Tested in 2020.09.4 and 2021.03.2 with the same result.

smi_list = ['CC1CCC(CC1)C(N)=O', 'CC12CCC(CC1)(C2)C(N)=O', 'CC1CC(C1)C(N)=O', 
'CC12CC(C1)(CC2)C(N)=O']
for smi in smi_list:
mol = Chem.MolFromSmiles(smi)
display(show_mol(mol, size=(450, 200)))  # wrapper function for new drawing 
code in jupyter
print(list(Chem.FindPotentialStereo(mol)))
print(Chem.FindMolChiralCenters(mol, includeUnassigned=True, 
useLegacyImplementation=False))

The 4 cases are:

  *   Symmetrically-disubstituted 6-membered ring
  *   A bridged version (using a 1-atom bridge to avoid a completely 
symmetrical product)
  *   Symmetrically-disubstituted 4-membered ring
  *   A bridged version (this time using a 2-atom bridge to avoid symmetry)

And this is what I see:

[cid:image001.png@01D74CCD.B6F2A180]

In the case of the bridged 4-membered ring (or bridged 5-membererd ring, 
depending on your viewpoint!), FindPotentialStereo() fails to identify the two 
potential stereo atoms.
If anyone can spot if this is the same issue as 3490, or something different, 
then that would be appreciated!

Kind regards

James


PLEASE READ - This email is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended 
for the named addressee(s) only and access to it by anyone else is 
unauthorised. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the 
contents of this email or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is 
unauthorised and may be unlawful. If you have received this email in error, 
please notify the sender or 
postmas...@vernalis.com<mailto:postmas...@vernalis.com>. Email is not a secure 
method of communication and the Company cannot accept responsibility for the 
accuracy or completeness of this message or any attachment(s). Please check 
this email for virus infection for which the Company accepts no responsibility. 
If verification of this email is sought then please request a hard copy. Unless 
otherwise stated, any views or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not represent those of the Company.

Vernalis (R) Limited (no. 1985479)
Granta Park, Great Abington
Cambridge, CB21 6GB, United Kingdom
Tel: +44 (0)1223 895 555

___
Rdkit-discuss mailing list
Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss
___
Rdkit-discuss mailing list
Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss


Re: [Rdkit-discuss] Problem finding potential stereo-centres in bridged bicyclics involving 4-membered rings?

2021-05-19 Thread Greg Landrum
Hi James,

I don't think that's the same bug as #3490. I think it's something
different; "yay".
;-)

It would be great if you could file a github issue for this.

Thanks,
-greg


On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 3:20 PM James Davidson 
wrote:

> Dear All,
>
>
>
> I’ve got a strong suspicion that what I am seeing is related to the open
> issue 3490 (https://github.com/rdkit/rdkit/issues/3490), but as I can’t
> seem to find a mention of a non-spiro problem then I thought I would share.
>
> Tested in 2020.09.4 and 2021.03.2 with the same result.
>
>
>
> smi_list = ['CC1CCC(CC1)C(N)=O', 'CC12CCC(CC1)(C2)C(N)=O',
> 'CC1CC(C1)C(N)=O', 'CC12CC(C1)(CC2)C(N)=O']
>
> for smi in smi_list:
>
> mol = Chem.MolFromSmiles(smi)
>
> display(show_mol(mol, size=(450, 200)))  # wrapper function for new
> drawing code in jupyter
>
> print(list(Chem.FindPotentialStereo(mol)))
>
> print(Chem.FindMolChiralCenters(mol, includeUnassigned=True,
> useLegacyImplementation=False))
>
>
>
> The 4 cases are:
>
>- Symmetrically-disubstituted 6-membered ring
>- A bridged version (using a 1-atom bridge to avoid a completely
>symmetrical product)
>- Symmetrically-disubstituted 4-membered ring
>- A bridged version (this time using a 2-atom bridge to avoid symmetry)
>
>
>
> And this is what I see:
>
>
>
>
>
> In the case of the bridged 4-membered ring (or bridged 5-membererd ring,
> depending on your viewpoint!), FindPotentialStereo() fails to identify the
> two potential stereo atoms.
>
> If anyone can spot if this is the same issue as 3490, or something
> different, then that would be appreciated!
>
>
>
> Kind regards
>
>
>
> James
> --
>
> PLEASE READ - This email is confidential and may be privileged. It is
> intended for the named addressee(s) only and access to it by anyone else is
> unauthorised. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the
> contents of this email or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it
> is unauthorised and may be unlawful. If you have received this email in
> error, please notify the sender or postmas...@vernalis.com. Email is not
> a secure method of communication and the Company cannot accept
> responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message or any
> attachment(s). Please check this email for virus infection for which the
> Company accepts no responsibility. If verification of this email is sought
> then please request a hard copy. Unless otherwise stated, any views or
> opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not represent
> those of the Company.
>
> Vernalis (R) Limited (no. 1985479)
> Granta Park, Great Abington
> Cambridge, CB21 6GB, United Kingdom
> Tel: +44 (0)1223 895 555
> --
> ___
> Rdkit-discuss mailing list
> Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss
>
___
Rdkit-discuss mailing list
Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss


[Rdkit-discuss] Problem finding potential stereo-centres in bridged bicyclics involving 4-membered rings?

2021-05-19 Thread James Davidson
Dear All,

I've got a strong suspicion that what I am seeing is related to the open issue 
3490 (https://github.com/rdkit/rdkit/issues/3490), but as I can't seem to find 
a mention of a non-spiro problem then I thought I would share.
Tested in 2020.09.4 and 2021.03.2 with the same result.

smi_list = ['CC1CCC(CC1)C(N)=O', 'CC12CCC(CC1)(C2)C(N)=O', 'CC1CC(C1)C(N)=O', 
'CC12CC(C1)(CC2)C(N)=O']
for smi in smi_list:
mol = Chem.MolFromSmiles(smi)
display(show_mol(mol, size=(450, 200)))  # wrapper function for new drawing 
code in jupyter
print(list(Chem.FindPotentialStereo(mol)))
print(Chem.FindMolChiralCenters(mol, includeUnassigned=True, 
useLegacyImplementation=False))

The 4 cases are:

  *   Symmetrically-disubstituted 6-membered ring
  *   A bridged version (using a 1-atom bridge to avoid a completely 
symmetrical product)
  *   Symmetrically-disubstituted 4-membered ring
  *   A bridged version (this time using a 2-atom bridge to avoid symmetry)

And this is what I see:

[cid:image001.png@01D74CB9.B0931950]

In the case of the bridged 4-membered ring (or bridged 5-membererd ring, 
depending on your viewpoint!), FindPotentialStereo() fails to identify the two 
potential stereo atoms.
If anyone can spot if this is the same issue as 3490, or something different, 
then that would be appreciated!

Kind regards

James


PLEASE READ - This email is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended 
for the named addressee(s) only and access to it by anyone else is 
unauthorised. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the 
contents of this email or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is 
unauthorised and may be unlawful. If you have received this email in error, 
please notify the sender or postmas...@vernalis.com. Email is not a secure 
method of communication and the Company cannot accept responsibility for the 
accuracy or completeness of this message or any attachment(s). Please check 
this email for virus infection for which the Company accepts no responsibility. 
If verification of this email is sought then please request a hard copy. Unless 
otherwise stated, any views or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not represent those of the Company.

Vernalis (R) Limited (no. 1985479)
Granta Park, Great Abington
Cambridge, CB21 6GB, United Kingdom
Tel: +44 (0)1223 895 555

___
Rdkit-discuss mailing list
Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss