Re: [Red5] Unique Client IDs PROBLEM
Yes, it was OK before. Ive checked some source code, but ive nothing found. An InstanceAlreadyExists Exception raises when there are 2 MBeans are created with the SAME ID. mfg nomIad Steven Gong schrieb: Was it ok before? On 7/19/07, *nomIad* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys, Have probs with the latest Trunk. The the pervios productive trunk was before Ivy implementation. K now im not sure but it can be the problem. My application use a custom client registry. If a client connects with a parameter i set his NAME as the CLIENT ID in the client registry. If a client with the same name and authentication connects the SAME client is returned. 2 month it was no problem. BUT since the jmx intrudution the JMX throws an error that the instance of a connection already exists. K i ignored that because it worked. BUT NOW strange things happens. Messages from Shared objects are pumped on the same client but different OBJECTS, different Scopes. Is it maybe because an user can have more than one connection to a scope? Structure: connection to chat connection to chat/room1 connection to chat/roomx for each connection a seperate Netconnection BUT finally grouped on the server to ONE Client Object. COULD this be a problem, was there something changed? mfg nomIad ___ Red5 mailing list Red5@osflash.org mailto:Red5@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org -- I cannot tell why this heart languishes in silence. It is for small needs it never asks, or knows or remembers. -- Tagore Best Regards Steven Gong ___ Red5 mailing list Red5@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org ___ Red5 mailing list Red5@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
Re: [Red5] Unique Client IDs PROBLEM
YEEEHAAA Ive found the problem, just for documentation. symptoms: Everything works fine, but the shared objects got REALLY WIERED. Some messages start to spread over several Shared Objects in the SAME App. cause: Ive tested the Terracota POC and forget it to uninstall. Teracotta POC modified the Shared Object itself in the source. solution: Delete the Terracota POC, compile new from Trunk and everything works fine. Creapy, and i thought something really important has changed. Hope this could help people saving hours work *g*. nomIad schrieb: Yes, it was OK before. Ive checked some source code, but ive nothing found. An InstanceAlreadyExists Exception raises when there are 2 MBeans are created with the SAME ID. mfg nomIad Steven Gong schrieb: Was it ok before? On 7/19/07, *nomIad* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys, Have probs with the latest Trunk. The the pervios productive trunk was before Ivy implementation. K now im not sure but it can be the problem. My application use a custom client registry. If a client connects with a parameter i set his NAME as the CLIENT ID in the client registry. If a client with the same name and authentication connects the SAME client is returned. 2 month it was no problem. BUT since the jmx intrudution the JMX throws an error that the instance of a connection already exists. K i ignored that because it worked. BUT NOW strange things happens. Messages from Shared objects are pumped on the same client but different OBJECTS, different Scopes. Is it maybe because an user can have more than one connection to a scope? Structure: connection to chat connection to chat/room1 connection to chat/roomx for each connection a seperate Netconnection BUT finally grouped on the server to ONE Client Object. COULD this be a problem, was there something changed? mfg nomIad ___ Red5 mailing list Red5@osflash.org mailto:Red5@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org -- I cannot tell why this heart languishes in silence. It is for small needs it never asks, or knows or remembers. -- Tagore Best Regards Steven Gong ___ Red5 mailing list Red5@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org ___ Red5 mailing list Red5@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org ___ Red5 mailing list Red5@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
Re: [Red5] Unique Client IDs PROBLEM
Could you please tell me the revision number that works? On 7/19/07, nomIad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, it was OK before. Ive checked some source code, but ive nothing found. An InstanceAlreadyExists Exception raises when there are 2 MBeans are created with the SAME ID. mfg nomIad Steven Gong schrieb: Was it ok before? On 7/19/07, nomIad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys, Have probs with the latest Trunk. The the pervios productive trunk was before Ivy implementation. K now im not sure but it can be the problem. My application use a custom client registry. If a client connects with a parameter i set his NAME as the CLIENT ID in the client registry. If a client with the same name and authentication connects the SAME client is returned. 2 month it was no problem. BUT since the jmx intrudution the JMX throws an error that the instance of a connection already exists. K i ignored that because it worked. BUT NOW strange things happens. Messages from Shared objects are pumped on the same client but different OBJECTS, different Scopes. Is it maybe because an user can have more than one connection to a scope? Structure: connection to chat connection to chat/room1 connection to chat/roomx for each connection a seperate Netconnection BUT finally grouped on the server to ONE Client Object. COULD this be a problem, was there something changed? mfg nomIad ___ Red5 mailing list Red5@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org -- I cannot tell why this heart languishes in silence. It is for small needs it never asks, or knows or remembers. -- Tagore Best Regards Steven Gong -- ___ Red5 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org ___ Red5 mailing list Red5@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org -- I cannot tell why this heart languishes in silence. It is for small needs it never asks, or knows or remembers. -- Tagore Best Regards Steven Gong ___ Red5 mailing list Red5@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
[Red5] Unique Client IDs PROBLEM
Hi guys, Have probs with the latest Trunk. The the pervios productive trunk was before Ivy implementation. K now im not sure but it can be the problem. My application use a custom client registry. If a client connects with a parameter i set his NAME as the CLIENT ID in the client registry. If a client with the same name and authentication connects the SAME client is returned. 2 month it was no problem. BUT since the jmx intrudution the JMX throws an error that the instance of a connection already exists. K i ignored that because it worked. BUT NOW strange things happens. Messages from Shared objects are pumped on the same client but different OBJECTS, different Scopes. Is it maybe because an user can have more than one connection to a scope? Structure: connection to chat connection to chat/room1 connection to chat/roomx for each connection a seperate Netconnection BUT finally grouped on the server to ONE Client Object. COULD this be a problem, was there something changed? mfg nomIad ___ Red5 mailing list Red5@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
Re: [Red5] Unique Client IDs PROBLEM
Was it ok before? On 7/19/07, nomIad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys, Have probs with the latest Trunk. The the pervios productive trunk was before Ivy implementation. K now im not sure but it can be the problem. My application use a custom client registry. If a client connects with a parameter i set his NAME as the CLIENT ID in the client registry. If a client with the same name and authentication connects the SAME client is returned. 2 month it was no problem. BUT since the jmx intrudution the JMX throws an error that the instance of a connection already exists. K i ignored that because it worked. BUT NOW strange things happens. Messages from Shared objects are pumped on the same client but different OBJECTS, different Scopes. Is it maybe because an user can have more than one connection to a scope? Structure: connection to chat connection to chat/room1 connection to chat/roomx for each connection a seperate Netconnection BUT finally grouped on the server to ONE Client Object. COULD this be a problem, was there something changed? mfg nomIad ___ Red5 mailing list Red5@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org -- I cannot tell why this heart languishes in silence. It is for small needs it never asks, or knows or remembers. -- Tagore Best Regards Steven Gong ___ Red5 mailing list Red5@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
