I have a couple of preliminary thoughts about this order:
http://blogs.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2016/03/29/about-that-order-for-supplemental-briefing-in-zubik-v-burwell/
On Mar 29, 2016, at 2:41 PM, Laycock, H Douglas (hdl5c)
> wrote:
The Court wants supplemental briefing on whether the government can make the
insurance companies do this without requiring any notice or letter from the
employer.
Douglas Laycock
Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Virginia Law School
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-243-8546
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the
messages to others.