Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

2010-08-19 Thread petedcurtis
If you have a problem with a ground due to terrain issues, you might want to
look into using Lyncole grounding rods.  These are hollow copper tubes with
a chemical crystal compound inside.  The rod has some tapes around breather
holes which you remove prior to burying in betonite clay etc..  The top of
the rod is left just above ground in a round housing / inspection cover.
These create temperature differential between top and bottom and create
moisture condensation which leaches out and creates a better ground over
time.  There is also a L shaped grounding rod which is laid in a trench in
case you can't dig down 8ft or so.  Usually only one or two rods are
required to achieve the 4 ohms.

Peter

On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:01 AM, Tim tahr...@swtexas.net wrote:



 This has been a very interesting thread to watch, and most of the
 installations that I've done have been 'add-ons' to existing well
 designed systems.

 On a different note, I'm now working on a solar powered system,
 and was wondering about the grounding there. Everything will
 be mounted on a single pole, which will be several feet in the ground.

 I had planned to make a ground system in a 3 or 4 'spoke' design,
 with a ground rod at each end of the spoke. There will also be a
 ground rod within several inches of the pole. Each spoke and
 the pole will be tied together at a common point.

 I haven't put any of the rods into the ground here... I use the term
 'ground' somewhat loosely.. there is a LOT of rock on the tops
 of these hills here. Not sure I'll be able to get them all the desired
 depth.

 Anyhow, suggestions and comments are welcome. The pole will
 not be the tallest thing on the hill, there are several Oak trees that
 will be higher. Provide any cover?

 Thanks,

 Tim
  



RE: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

2010-08-19 Thread n5sxq.0

 Tim tahr...@swtexas.net wrote: 
 This has been a very interesting thread to watch, and most of the
 installations that I've done have been 'add-ons' to existing well
 designed systems.
 
 On a different note, I'm now working on a solar powered system,
 and was wondering about the grounding there.  Everything will
 be mounted on a single pole, which will be several feet in the ground.
 
 I had planned to make a ground system in a 3 or 4 'spoke' design,
 with a ground rod at each end of the spoke.  There will also be a
 ground rod within several inches of the pole.  Each spoke and
 the pole will be tied together at a common point.
 
 I haven't put any of the rods into the ground here...  I use the term
 'ground' somewhat loosely.. there is a LOT of rock on the tops
 of these hills here.  Not sure I'll be able to get them all the desired
 depth.
 
 Anyhow, suggestions and comments are welcome.  The pole will
 not be the tallest thing on the hill,  there are several Oak trees that
 will be higher.  Provide any cover?
 
 Thanks,
 
 Tim
Tim , when I needed to add ground rods in rocks soil I use a 1/2 inch 
masonary drill bit with 2 or 3 18 inch bit extensions and a CORDLESS drill.  
The cordless drill lets you add a small amount of water to thehole as you 
drill.  By using a 1/2 inch bit, the 5/8 inch ground rods are still in tight 
contact with the sides of the hole, as you drive them in.  Remember to space 
the ground rods apart a distance equal to their length. An 8 foot rod will need 
8 foot from each ground rod AND the center rod. Personally, I use bare, tinned 
#8 or larger wire and complete the ring around the furthest ground rods buried 
below the frost line.  I have done this for many years, including a solar site 
I built near Bloomfield, NM. I went to check it after a bad storm, as a 
precaution. My site had survived ok with just a little brush on the panels. The 
commerical site  next door on commerical power was like an ant bed with all of 
the techs crawling over each other to fix their equipment. 
Jeff N5SXQ


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

2010-08-18 Thread Joe
I don't think that you have necessarily wasted your time, but you have 
severely limited your chances of decreasing lightning damage.  It's like 
replacing 3 tires on your car that has 4 bad tires, you've bettered your 
odds but it is not the best fix.

I have a site that the owner would throw me off if I started installing 
single;e point grounding and all kinds of wiring.  I use a grounded 
Polyphasor in hopes that it will decrease my odds of lightning damage.  
Yes, the purist will say that this is wrong, but it's not my site and 
I'm a guest.  That's the deal and I accept it.

It's a case of something is better than nothing.

73, Joe, K1ike

On 8/17/2010 10:42 PM, Chuck Kelsey wrote:
 Leave one unprotected path available and
 you've wasted your time.

 Chuck
 WB2EDV




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

2010-08-18 Thread Chuck Kelsey
OK, yes, you have severely limited your chances of being protected. I'd 
hazard a guess that it would be a fraction of a percent better than having 
no protection at all. Your condom has a hole in it ;-)

Chuck
WB2EDV


- Original Message - 
From: Joe k1ike_m...@snet.net
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 8:34 AM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question


I don't think that you have necessarily wasted your time, but you have
 severely limited your chances of decreasing lightning damage.  It's like
 replacing 3 tires on your car that has 4 bad tires, you've bettered your
 odds but it is not the best fix.

 I have a site that the owner would throw me off if I started installing
 single;e point grounding and all kinds of wiring.  I use a grounded
 Polyphasor in hopes that it will decrease my odds of lightning damage.
 Yes, the purist will say that this is wrong, but it's not my site and
 I'm a guest.  That's the deal and I accept it.

 It's a case of something is better than nothing.

 73, Joe, K1ike

 On 8/17/2010 10:42 PM, Chuck Kelsey wrote:
 Leave one unprotected path available and
 you've wasted your time.

 Chuck
 WB2EDV



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

2010-08-18 Thread Joe
Better than a fraction of a percent protection.  I've lost a couple of 
polyphasors in the years, but never had lightning damage.  I'm a 
realist, everything isn't perfect all of the time.

73, Joe, K1ike

On 8/18/2010 9:04 AM, Chuck Kelsey wrote:
 OK, yes, you have severely limited your chances of being protected. I'd
 hazard a guess that it would be a fraction of a percent better than having
 no protection at all. Your condom has a hole in it ;-)

 Chuck
 WB2EDV


 - Original Message -
 From: Joek1ike_m...@snet.net
 To:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 8:34 AM
 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question



 I don't think that you have necessarily wasted your time, but you have
 severely limited your chances of decreasing lightning damage.  It's like
 replacing 3 tires on your car that has 4 bad tires, you've bettered your
 odds but it is not the best fix.

 I have a site that the owner would throw me off if I started installing
 single;e point grounding and all kinds of wiring.  I use a grounded
 Polyphasor in hopes that it will decrease my odds of lightning damage.
 Yes, the purist will say that this is wrong, but it's not my site and
 I'm a guest.  That's the deal and I accept it.

 It's a case of something is better than nothing.

 73, Joe, K1ike

 On 8/17/2010 10:42 PM, Chuck Kelsey wrote:
  
 Leave one unprotected path available and
 you've wasted your time.

 Chuck
 WB2EDV



 



 Yahoo! Groups Links








Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

2010-08-18 Thread william474
Lightning protection is not simply a surge protector but a system  of surge 
protectors, grounds and installation techniques that  may reduce the 
effects of a nearby lightning event.   And as  Chuck says unless you install a 
lightning/grounding system the effect of a  single device is negligible.
 
Bill - WA0CBW
 
 
In a message dated 8/18/2010 8:05:20 A.M. Central Daylight Time,  
wb2...@roadrunner.com writes:

OK, yes,  you have severely limited your chances of being protected. I'd 
hazard a  guess that it would be a fraction of a percent better than having 
no  protection at all. Your condom has a hole in it  ;-)

Chuck
WB2EDV


- Original Message - 
From:  Joe k1ike_m...@snet.net
To:  Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010  8:34 AM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser  Question


I don't think that you have necessarily wasted your  time, but you have
 severely limited your chances of decreasing  lightning damage.  It's like
 replacing 3 tires on your car that  has 4 bad tires, you've bettered your
 odds but it is not the best  fix.

 I have a site that the owner would throw me off if I  started installing
 single;e point grounding and all kinds of  wiring.  I use a grounded
 Polyphasor in hopes that it will  decrease my odds of lightning damage.
 Yes, the purist will say that  this is wrong, but it's not my site and
 I'm a guest.  That's the  deal and I accept it.

 It's a case of something is better than  nothing.

 73, Joe, K1ike

 On 8/17/2010 10:42 PM,  Chuck Kelsey wrote:
 Leave one unprotected path available  and
 you've wasted your time.

  Chuck
  WB2EDV







Yahoo!  Groups Links






Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

2010-08-18 Thread wd8chl
On 8/17/2010 11:55 PM, Ray Brown wrote:
What do you do when you want to install a small UHF linking repeater on
 a 4-story building that has no lightning protection on its' roof? (this is to
 link an ambulance at a hospital to its' base repeater 40 miles away)

From what I've heard, it may not be a good idea to hook it to the HVAC,
 either.

(sigh)


  Ray, KB0STN


No. I would find the nearest copper pipe from either the in-house water 
system or the sprinkler system, and clamp to that (making sure you don't 
crimp the pipe!!!) using #6 or maybe #8 wire if it's REALLY close (less 
then 5')
Again, not as good as a dedicated system, but MUCH better then nothing.


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

2010-08-18 Thread Tony KT9AC
Remember the objective is not to take the brunt of a lightning strike, 
but to drain off any static that would attract that strike. Lightning is 
just a spark looking to close the gap, and if your antenna is closer to 
DC ground, it will find something closer to its potential (i.e. static 
charged) to hit.


Any protection is better than nothing, and don't scrimp on buying the 
cheapest used protector. Its your equipment your protecting and 
potentially avoiding liability. I buy new Polyphasers for our site and 
sleep just fine.


On 08/18/2010 08:56 AM, wd8chl wrote:


On 8/17/2010 11:55 PM, Ray Brown wrote:
 What do you do when you want to install a small UHF linking repeater on
 a 4-story building that has no lightning protection on its' roof? 
(this is to

 link an ambulance at a hospital to its' base repeater 40 miles away)

 From what I've heard, it may not be a good idea to hook it to the HVAC,
 either.

 (sigh)


 Ray, KB0STN

No. I would find the nearest copper pipe from either the in-house water
system or the sprinkler system, and clamp to that (making sure you don't
crimp the pipe!!!) using #6 or maybe #8 wire if it's REALLY close (less
then 5')
Again, not as good as a dedicated system, but MUCH better then nothing.




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

2010-08-18 Thread Chuck Kelsey
Well, at least we can say you've lost some PolyPhasers in the process. 
Whether they've helped is anyone's guess.  Yes, I've got some equipment in 
different locations with what I feel less than adequate protection. My 
point was essentially making people aware that by simply putting a 
suppression device on a single I/O port, while others receive none, and a 
poor grounding system, isn't going to give a high level of protection. If 
one chooses to proceed knowing this, then that's a personal decision.

Chuck
WB2EDV



- Original Message - 
From: Joe k1ike_m...@snet.net
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 9:26 AM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question


 Better than a fraction of a percent protection.  I've lost a couple of
 polyphasors in the years, but never had lightning damage.  I'm a
 realist, everything isn't perfect all of the time.

 73, Joe, K1ike

 


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

2010-08-18 Thread Bill Smith
The building has a steel support structure, I'm sure. You will need to bond to 
that as a start.

Bill



From: Eric Lemmon wb6...@verizon.net
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, August 17, 2010 11:30:03 PM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

Ray,

I suggest that you obtain the most recent edition (2011) of NFPA 780, the
Standard for the Installation of Lightning Protection Systems, and install a
proper lightning protection system for your antenna and mast per that
document.  It can be purchased for about $40, but you might find a copy in a
municipal library.

Please be aware that installing an antenna atop a building that has no
lightning protection system installed may impose liability on you, if the
antenna is not protected by a proper system and a fire or other damage
occurs due to a lightning strike.  In some landmark cases, the insurance
company declined to pay for damages resulting from a poorly-designed and/or
-installed LP system.  Choose wisely...

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
  

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Ray Brown
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 8:55 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

  

What do you do when you want to install a small UHF linking repeater on
a 4-story building that has no lightning protection on its roof? (this is to
link an ambulance at a hospital to its base repeater 40 miles away)

From what I've heard, it may not be a good idea to hook it to the HVAC,
either.

(sigh)

Ray, KB0STN











Yahoo! Groups Links



    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

2010-08-18 Thread wd8chl
On 8/18/2010 11:46 AM, Bill Smith wrote:
 The building has a steel support structure, I'm sure. You will need to bond to
 that as a start.

 Bill

An even better choice, yes.
You should be able to clean off a spot and clamp to an I-beam. Make sure 
you get down to bare metal under the clamp.




 
 From: Eric Lemmonwb6...@verizon.net
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Tue, August 17, 2010 11:30:03 PM
 Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

 Ray,

 I suggest that you obtain the most recent edition (2011) of NFPA 780, the
 Standard for the Installation of Lightning Protection Systems, and install a
 proper lightning protection system for your antenna and mast per that
 document.  It can be purchased for about $40, but you might find a copy in a
 municipal library.

 Please be aware that installing an antenna atop a building that has no
 lightning protection system installed may impose liability on you, if the
 antenna is not protected by a proper system and a fire or other damage
 occurs due to a lightning strike.  In some landmark cases, the insurance
 company declined to pay for damages resulting from a poorly-designed and/or
 -installed LP system.  Choose wisely...

 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY


 -Original Message-
 From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Ray Brown
 Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 8:55 PM
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question



 What do you do when you want to install a small UHF linking repeater on
 a 4-story building that has no lightning protection on its roof? (this is to
 link an ambulance at a hospital to its base repeater 40 miles away)

 From what I've heard, it may not be a good idea to hook it to the HVAC,
 either.

 (sigh)

 Ray, KB0STN







 



 Yahoo! Groups Links



  http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

2010-08-18 Thread petedcurtis
You might like to look at the latest Motorola R56 Installation standards
manual. It's very comprehensive. Has good section on grounding and
protective devices.

Yes, a good grounding system and a full lightning and surge protection of an
RF site doesn't come cheap.  But if you live in Florida the lightning
capital of USA  or similar location then every step you can take can save
really big bucks in system damage and give you more system up time.

Back in the mid 1990's I did a R56 installation of a 800MHZ trunking system
in Manaus, Amazonas in Brazil.This was co-located with a 50KW TV and
20KW FM radio site and also at the same site he was running the local ISP
vial dial in landlines. The customer initially thought we were really
overdoing the trunking installation by following R56.But after a massive
direct strike which took out both broadcast transmitters and burnt out every
one of his hundred or so Modems, but thanks to our following the R56
installation guidelines the 800Mhz site kept on happily trunking. He then
read with great interest the R56 manual and applied it to his whole
installation.

Peter

On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Joe k1ike_m...@snet.net wrote:



 I don't think that you have necessarily wasted your time, but you have
 severely limited your chances of decreasing lightning damage. It's like
 replacing 3 tires on your car that has 4 bad tires, you've bettered your
 odds but it is not the best fix.

 I have a site that the owner would throw me off if I started installing
 single;e point grounding and all kinds of wiring. I use a grounded
 Polyphasor in hopes that it will decrease my odds of lightning damage.
 Yes, the purist will say that this is wrong, but it's not my site and
 I'm a guest. That's the deal and I accept it.

 It's a case of something is better than nothing.

 73, Joe, K1ike


 On 8/17/2010 10:42 PM, Chuck Kelsey wrote:
  Leave one unprotected path available and
  you've wasted your time.
 
  Chuck
  WB2EDV
 

  



RE: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

2010-08-18 Thread Gary Schafer
Here is a little primer on lightning:

 

Having your antenna grounded does not drain off any charge that helps
prevent a strike. As a matter of  fact grounding the antenna makes it
slightly more prone to a strike but not grounding it is much worse as you
have no control over what path the energy will take if not grounded.

 

When a storm cloud moves over the area charge builds on objects on the
ground. The ground items, towers etc start to emit streamers. When a strike
is imminent step leaders come down from the charged cloud and move in
approximately 150 foot steps. Changing directions with each step. When a
step leader gets close enough to a streamer a connection is made. What
follows is a plasma trail which is a very low impedance path that the
lightning charge follows. 

 

Lightning can be thought of as a current source. In other words if there is
a 10 KA strike it is going to develop that much current into whatever it
strikes. If for example it hits your tower and the total impedance to ground
is quite low then the voltage developed across the tower will be relatively
low. But if the ground system is not a good one then the voltage will rise
higher. It will still develop the 10 KA current. 

 

Bonding all equipment to a common point is one of the first steps to take.
Just adding a polyphaser coax protector to the coax line will only equalize
the current between center conductor and shield. If power is not protected
and everything bonded together the coax protector will do little good. Even
without a coax protector, just bonding everything is a great first step.

The whole idea is to keep everything at the same voltage level when a strike
occurs. 

 

73

Gary  K4FMX

 

  _  

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Tony KT9AC
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 9:25 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

 



Remember the objective is not to take the brunt of a lightning strike, but
to drain off any static that would attract that strike. Lightning is just a
spark looking to close the gap, and if your antenna is closer to DC ground,
it will find something closer to its potential (i.e. static charged) to hit.

Any protection is better than nothing, and don't scrimp on buying the
cheapest used protector. Its your equipment your protecting and potentially
avoiding liability. I buy new Polyphasers for our site and sleep just fine.

On 08/18/2010 08:56 AM, wd8chl wrote: 

  

On 8/17/2010 11:55 PM, Ray Brown wrote:
 What do you do when you want to install a small UHF linking repeater on
 a 4-story building that has no lightning protection on its' roof? (this is
to
 link an ambulance at a hospital to its' base repeater 40 miles away)

 From what I've heard, it may not be a good idea to hook it to the HVAC,
 either.

 (sigh)


 Ray, KB0STN

No. I would find the nearest copper pipe from either the in-house water 
system or the sprinkler system, and clamp to that (making sure you don't 
crimp the pipe!!!) using #6 or maybe #8 wire if it's REALLY close (less 
then 5')
Again, not as good as a dedicated system, but MUCH better then nothing.










Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

2010-08-18 Thread Chuck Kelsey
And to not create (or leave) a path for current flow to destroy equipment.

Chuck
WB2EDV
  - Original Message - 
  From: Gary Schafer 
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 8:39 PM
  Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question





  Here is a little primer on lightning:

   [SNIP]

  The whole idea is to keep everything at the same voltage level when a strike 
occurs. 

   

  73

  Gary  K4FMX


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

2010-08-18 Thread petedcurtis
I agree totally with Gary.  Common grounding point is essential to avoid
voltage differences between equipment during a strike. When you  get a
strike the grounding point will rise, so you want to make sure everything
that is grounded goes up together. As the leading edges of the voltages
strikes are very sharp, low inductance grounding is important, so a large
size cable or strip,  smooth curves from the expected strike source to
ground point and definitely no loops in those equipment ground cables.
Covering every possible strike source, so ground kits on the transmission
lines, surge protectors on tower light wiring, a main surge arrestor
 located at the incoming AC breaker  or if you have a generator set at the
AC entry before the Transfer panel.  All Telephone lines or external T1's or
control lines should have suitable grounded surge protectors. Transtector
has a great line of AC  Telephone, T1 protectors and they have just merged
with Polyphasor.  They even have a web page with items approved for Motorola
R56 installations.

The coax Polyphasor are really there to stop a high voltage developing
between the center and shield. Thats just a small part of the problem.  You
need ground kits along the transmission lines, one at the top, one in the
middle and one just before it enters the building, AC protectors, and a well
grounded tower. All that will connect to common point to a good buried
external grounding system using Exothermic Cadwelded connections with
hopefully a less than 4 ohms ground resistance. A now you are all set to
take on those strikes :)

Peter


On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Gary Schafer gascha...@comcast.net wrote:



  Here is a little primer on lightning:



 Having your antenna grounded does not drain off any charge that helps
 prevent a strike. As a matter of  fact grounding the antenna makes it
 slightly more prone to a strike but not grounding it is much worse as you
 have no control over what path the energy will take if not grounded.



 When a storm cloud moves over the area charge builds on objects on the
 ground. The ground items, towers etc start to emit streamers. When a strike
 is imminent step leaders come down from the charged cloud and move in
 approximately 150 foot steps. Changing directions with each step. When a
 step leader gets close enough to a streamer a connection is made. What
 follows is a plasma trail which is a very low impedance path that the
 lightning charge follows.



 Lightning can be thought of as a current source. In other words if there is
 a 10 KA strike it is going to develop that much current into whatever it
 strikes. If for example it hits your tower and the total impedance to ground
 is quite low then the voltage developed across the tower will be relatively
 low. But if the ground system is not a good one then the voltage will rise
 higher. It will still develop the 10 KA current.



 Bonding all equipment to a common point is one of the first steps to take.
 Just adding a polyphaser coax protector to the coax line will only equalize
 the current between center conductor and shield. If power is not protected
 and everything bonded together the coax protector will do little good. Even
 without a coax protector, just bonding everything is a great first step.

 The whole idea is to keep everything at the same voltage level when a
 strike occurs.



 73

 Gary  K4FMX


   --

 *From:* Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:
 repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Tony KT9AC
 *Sent:* Wednesday, August 18, 2010 9:25 AM

 *To:* Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 *Subject:* Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question





 Remember the objective is not to take the brunt of a lightning strike, but
 to drain off any static that would attract that strike. Lightning is just a
 spark looking to close the gap, and if your antenna is closer to DC ground,
 it will find something closer to its potential (i.e. static charged) to hit.

 Any protection is better than nothing, and don't scrimp on buying the
 cheapest used protector. Its your equipment your protecting and potentially
 avoiding liability. I buy new Polyphasers for our site and sleep just fine.

 On 08/18/2010 08:56 AM, wd8chl wrote:



 On 8/17/2010 11:55 PM, Ray Brown wrote:
  What do you do when you want to install a small UHF linking repeater on
  a 4-story building that has no lightning protection on its' roof? (this
 is to
  link an ambulance at a hospital to its' base repeater 40 miles away)
 
  From what I've heard, it may not be a good idea to hook it to the HVAC,
  either.
 
  (sigh)
 
 
  Ray, KB0STN

 No. I would find the nearest copper pipe from either the in-house water
 system or the sprinkler system, and clamp to that (making sure you don't
 crimp the pipe!!!) using #6 or maybe #8 wire if it's REALLY close (less
 then 5')
 Again, not as good as a dedicated system, but MUCH better then nothing.


 



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

2010-08-18 Thread n5sxq.0

 Michael Ryan mryan...@tampabay.rr.com wrote: 
  
 
  I notice when looking at the Polyphaser website, there are a wide range of
 products, even a wide variety of items that on the surface appear to be
 suited to my particular needs. I want to put a Polyphaser on my 220
 repeater. There are DC blocked and unblocked. I don't suppose it matters in
 that area as there is no DC going up the coax.  There are freq ranges,
 1.5-400  and 100 - 700 mhz, etc, etc..  Is it best to select a model that
 places my operating freq somewhere in the middle of the unit's operating
 range or does that matter as long as it IS WITHIN the range of the device
 someplace?  I need the protected end to be an N-female and the antenna end
 to be and N-Male.   Suggestions?  - Mike
 
Mike...At the risk of sounding dumb, when in doubt ask the manufacturer. In 
other words call Polyphaser and TALK with them. The have info that is NOT
always listed where the general public can access it. And I can say from 
experience that the techs I have talked to at Polyphaser are very friendly and 
helpful. Just give them HONEST info about the power output level, bands, number 
of tx on at a time, etc. They're glad to helpyou become a satisfied customer.
Jeff N5sxq


RE: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

2010-08-18 Thread Michael Ryan
Will do….in fact I meant to call them today. Just got busy…I was emailed about 
a possible unit that is available, but provides a block for DC which was not 
apparently a favorite amongst the group here. But I will call them on Thursday 
and see what the recommend.  Thanks to all ….  - Mike

 

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of n5sx...@charter.net
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 11:19 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Cc: Michael Ryan
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

 

  


 Michael Ryan mryan...@tampabay.rr.com mailto:mryan001%40tampabay.rr.com 
 wrote: 
 
 
 I notice when looking at the Polyphaser website, there are a wide range of
 products, even a wide variety of items that on the surface appear to be
 suited to my particular needs. I want to put a Polyphaser on my 220
 repeater. There are DC blocked and unblocked. I don't suppose it matters in
 that area as there is no DC going up the coax. There are freq ranges,
 1.5-400 and 100 - 700 mhz, etc, etc.. Is it best to select a model that
 places my operating freq somewhere in the middle of the unit's operating
 range or does that matter as long as it IS WITHIN the range of the device
 someplace? I need the protected end to be an N-female and the antenna end
 to be and N-Male. Suggestions? - Mike
 
Mike...At the risk of sounding dumb, when in doubt ask the manufacturer. In 
other words call Polyphaser and TALK with them. The have info that is NOT
always listed where the general public can access it. And I can say from 
experience that the techs I have talked to at Polyphaser are very friendly and 
helpful. Just give them HONEST info about the power output level, bands, number 
of tx on at a time, etc. They're glad to helpyou become a satisfied customer.
Jeff N5sxq





__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 5377 (20100818) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

 

__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 5377 (20100818) __

 

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

 

http://www.eset.com



RE: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

2010-08-18 Thread Tim
This has been a very interesting thread to watch, and most of the
installations that I've done have been 'add-ons' to existing well
designed systems.

On a different note, I'm now working on a solar powered system,
and was wondering about the grounding there.  Everything will
be mounted on a single pole, which will be several feet in the ground.

I had planned to make a ground system in a 3 or 4 'spoke' design,
with a ground rod at each end of the spoke.  There will also be a
ground rod within several inches of the pole.  Each spoke and
the pole will be tied together at a common point.

I haven't put any of the rods into the ground here...  I use the term
'ground' somewhat loosely.. there is a LOT of rock on the tops
of these hills here.  Not sure I'll be able to get them all the desired
depth.

Anyhow, suggestions and comments are welcome.  The pole will
not be the tallest thing on the hill,  there are several Oak trees that
will be higher.  Provide any cover?

Thanks,

Tim


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

2010-08-17 Thread petedcurtis
Hi Michael,

Probably  for 220MHZ  choose between VHF50HN-ME for high powered TX or
multiple TX'sand  a   IS-B50LN-C0-MA is  for a single normal power TX.
 These have the N connectors sexed as you want.Check the power rating of
each device at your frequency.

Peter


On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 2:51 AM, Michael Ryan mryan...@tampabay.rr.comwrote:





  I notice when looking at the Polyphaser website, there are a wide range of
 products, even a wide variety of items that on the surface appear to be
 suited to my particular needs. I want to put a Polyphaser on my 220
 repeater. There are DC blocked and unblocked. I don’t suppose it matters in
 that area as there is no DC going up the coax.  There are freq ranges,
 1.5-400  and 100 – 700 mhz, etc, etc..  Is it best to select a model that
 places my operating freq somewhere in the middle of the unit’s operating
 range or does that matter as long as it IS WITHIN the range of the device
 someplace?  I need the protected end to be an N-female and the antenna end
 to be and N-Male.   Suggestions?  - Mike


 __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
 signature database 5371 (20100816) __

 The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

 http://www.eset.com

  



RE: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

2010-08-17 Thread Michael Ryan
Thanks a lot.I see them on QTH.com for sale once in a while. I just posted
an ad looking for one. '73, Mike

 

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of petedcur...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 11:03 AM
To: Repeater-Builder
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

 

  

Hi Michael,

 

Probably  for 220MHZ  choose between VHF50HN-ME for high powered TX or
multiple TX'sand  a   IS-B50LN-C0-MA is  for a single normal power TX.
These have the N connectors sexed as you want.Check the power rating of
each device at your frequency.

 

Peter

 

On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 2:51 AM, Michael Ryan mryan...@tampabay.rr.com
wrote:

  

 

 I notice when looking at the Polyphaser website, there are a wide range of
products, even a wide variety of items that on the surface appear to be
suited to my particular needs. I want to put a Polyphaser on my 220
repeater. There are DC blocked and unblocked. I don't suppose it matters in
that area as there is no DC going up the coax.  There are freq ranges,
1.5-400  and 100 - 700 mhz, etc, etc..  Is it best to select a model that
places my operating freq somewhere in the middle of the unit's operating
range or does that matter as long as it IS WITHIN the range of the device
someplace?  I need the protected end to be an N-female and the antenna end
to be and N-Male.   Suggestions?  - Mike



__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5371 (20100816) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

 





__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5373 (20100817) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

 

__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5373 (20100817) __

 

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

 

http://www.eset.com



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

2010-08-17 Thread Chuck Kelsey
If you are buying used, buyer beware. They could be shot.

Chuck
WB2EDV



  - Original Message - 
  From: Michael Ryan 
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 11:12 AM
  Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question





  Thanks a lot.I see them on QTH.com for sale once in a while. I just posted an 
ad looking for one. '73, Mike

   

  From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of petedcur...@gmail.com
  Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 11:03 AM
  To: Repeater-Builder
  Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

   



  Hi Michael,

   

  Probably  for 220MHZ  choose between VHF50HN-ME for high powered TX or 
multiple TX'sand  a   IS-B50LN-C0-MA is  for a single normal power TX.
These have the N connectors sexed as you want.Check the power rating of 
each device at your frequency.

   

  Peter

   

  On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 2:51 AM, Michael Ryan mryan...@tampabay.rr.com 
wrote:



   

   I notice when looking at the Polyphaser website, there are a wide range of 
products, even a wide variety of items that on the surface appear to be suited 
to my particular needs. I want to put a Polyphaser on my 220 repeater. There 
are DC blocked and unblocked. I don't suppose it matters in that area as there 
is no DC going up the coax.  There are freq ranges, 1.5-400  and 100 - 700 mhz, 
etc, etc..  Is it best to select a model that places my operating freq 
somewhere in the middle of the unit's operating range or does that matter as 
long as it IS WITHIN the range of the device someplace?  I need the protected 
end to be an N-female and the antenna end to be and N-Male.   Suggestions?  - 
Mike



  __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 5371 (20100816) __

  The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

  http://www.eset.com

   




  __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 5373 (20100817) __

  The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

  http://www.eset.com

   

  __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 5373 (20100817) __

   

  The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

   

  http://www.eset.com



  __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 5373 (20100817) __

  The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

  http://www.eset.com



  


--



  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
  Version: 9.0.851 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3077 - Release Date: 08/17/10 
02:35:00


RE: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

2010-08-17 Thread Michael Ryan
Chuck, Thanks for that.wouldn't still pass RF if they are blown will they?
- m

 

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Chuck Kelsey
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 11:51 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

 

  

If you are buying used, buyer beware. They could be shot.

 

Chuck

WB2EDV

 

 

 

- Original Message - 

From: Michael Ryan mailto:mryan...@tampabay.rr.com  

To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 

Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 11:12 AM

Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

 

Thanks a lot.I see them on QTH.com for sale once in a while. I just posted
an ad looking for one. '73, Mike

 

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of petedcur...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 11:03 AM
To: Repeater-Builder
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

 

  

Hi Michael,

 

Probably  for 220MHZ  choose between VHF50HN-ME for high powered TX or
multiple TX'sand  a   IS-B50LN-C0-MA is  for a single normal power TX.
These have the N connectors sexed as you want.Check the power rating of
each device at your frequency.

 

Peter

 

On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 2:51 AM, Michael Ryan mryan...@tampabay.rr.com
wrote:

  

 

 I notice when looking at the Polyphaser website, there are a wide range of
products, even a wide variety of items that on the surface appear to be
suited to my particular needs. I want to put a Polyphaser on my 220
repeater. There are DC blocked and unblocked. I don't suppose it matters in
that area as there is no DC going up the coax.  There are freq ranges,
1.5-400  and 100 - 700 mhz, etc, etc..  Is it best to select a model that
places my operating freq somewhere in the middle of the unit's operating
range or does that matter as long as it IS WITHIN the range of the device
someplace?  I need the protected end to be an N-female and the antenna end
to be and N-Male.   Suggestions?  - Mike



__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5371 (20100816) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

 



__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5373 (20100817) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

 

__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5373 (20100817) __

 

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

 

http://www.eset.com



__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5373 (20100817) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

  _  


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 9.0.851 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3077 - Release Date: 08/17/10
02:35:00





__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5374 (20100817) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

 

__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5374 (20100817) __

 

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

 

http://www.eset.com



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

2010-08-17 Thread Chuck Kelsey
Usually, from any reports I've seen, they can exhibit higher than normal VSWR 
and/or loss if they've seen better days. So, yes, they could still pass RF and 
not be good.

Chuck
WB2EDV



  - Original Message - 
  From: Michael Ryan 
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 3:02 PM
  Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question





  Chuck, Thanks for that.wouldn't still pass RF if they are blown will they?  - 
m

   


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

2010-08-17 Thread Oz-in-DFW
 Polyphasers have a shunt protection element.  It usually fails and
becomes leaky so you get a loss/VSWR indication.  It can fail open or
short.  If it's open, there is nothing to detect. 

On 8/17/2010 2:02 PM, Michael Ryan wrote:
  

 Chuck, Thanks for that...wouldn't still pass RF if they are blown will
 they?  - m

  

 *From:* Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Chuck Kelsey
 *Sent:* Tuesday, August 17, 2010 11:51 AM
 *To:* Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 *Subject:* Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

  

 If you are buying used, buyer beware. They could be shot.

  

 Chuck

 WB2EDV

-- 
mailto:o...@ozindfw.net
Oz
POB 93167 
Southlake, TX 76092 (Near DFW Airport) 






RE: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

2010-08-17 Thread David Jordan
I recently opened up a Polyphaser unit we used on one of our remote sites.
it covered both 2m and 70cm.  We were experiencing poor receive at the site.
Replaced the unit and receiver sensitivity is once again hot.  Anyone want
pics of the insides respond direct and I'll ship you the photos.not much to
see. a gas tube and what looks like a surface mount resistor in series with
the gas tube.

 

73,

Dave

Wa3gin

 

  _  

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Oz-in-DFW
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 4:37 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

 

  Polyphasers have a shunt protection element.  It usually fails and becomes
leaky so you get a loss/VSWR indication.  It can fail open or short.  If
it's open, there is nothing to detect.  





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

2010-08-17 Thread Chuck Kelsey
Wasn't there a capacitor too? Seems like there was in one I saw open.

Chuck
WB2EDV

  - Original Message - 
  From: David Jordan 
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 4:44 PM
  Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question





  I recently opened up a Polyphaser unit we used on one of our remote sites. it 
covered both 2m and 70cm.  We were experiencing poor receive at the site.  
Replaced the unit and receiver sensitivity is once again hot.  Anyone want pics 
of the insides respond direct and I'll ship you the photos.not much to see. a 
gas tube and what looks like a surface mount resistor in series with the gas 
tube.

   

  73,

  Dave

  Wa3gin

   


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

2010-08-17 Thread MCH
Upload the pics to the group PHOTOS section. Always nice to have stuff 
like that available for reference.

Joe M.

David Jordan wrote:
 
 
 I recently opened up a Polyphaser unit we used on one of our remote 
 sites… it covered both 2m and 70cm.  We were experiencing poor receive 
 at the site.  Replaced the unit and receiver sensitivity is once again 
 hot.  Anyone want pics of the insides respond direct and I’ll ship you 
 the photos…not much to see… a gas tube and what looks like a surface 
 mount resistor in series with the gas tube.
 
  
 
 73,
 
 Dave
 
 Wa3gin
 
  
 
 
 
 *From:* Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
 [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Oz-in-DFW
 *Sent:* Tuesday, August 17, 2010 4:37 PM
 *To:* Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 *Subject:* Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question
 
  
 
   Polyphasers have a shunt protection element.  It usually fails and 
 becomes leaky so you get a loss/VSWR indication.  It can fail open or 
 short.  If it's open, there is nothing to detect. 
 
 
 
 






Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
repeater-builder-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
repeater-builder-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
repeater-builder-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

2010-08-17 Thread WA3GIN
The units are probably different depending on whether they are HF, VHF, UHF, or 
2.4Ghz, etc.
  - Original Message - 
  From: Chuck Kelsey 
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 4:58 PM
  Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question




  Wasn't there a capacitor too? Seems like there was in one I saw open.

  Chuck
  WB2EDV

- Original Message - 
From: David Jordan 
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 4:44 PM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question


I recently opened up a Polyphaser unit we used on one of our remote sites. 
it covered both 2m and 70cm.  We were experiencing poor receive at the site.  
Replaced the unit and receiver sensitivity is once again hot.  Anyone want pics 
of the insides respond direct and I'll ship you the photos.not much to see. a 
gas tube and what looks like a surface mount resistor in series with the gas 
tube.



73,

Dave

Wa3gin




  

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

2010-08-17 Thread Oz-in-DFW
 Yup, huge variation by application.  Some gas tubes, some MOVs, some
resonant stuff.

This stuff has a finite life.   They have some pretty information on
their site:

http://www.protectiongroup.com/knowledgebase

On 8/17/2010 7:14 PM, WA3GIN wrote:
  

 The units are probably different depending on whether they are HF,
 VHF, UHF, or 2.4Ghz, etc.

 - Original Message -
 *From:* Chuck Kelsey mailto:wb2...@roadrunner.com
 *To:* Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 *Sent:* Tuesday, August 17, 2010 4:58 PM
 *Subject:* Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

  

 Wasn't there a capacitor too? Seems like there was in one I saw open.
  
 Chuck
 WB2EDV
  

 - Original Message -
 *From:* David Jordan mailto:wa3...@comcast.net
 *To:* Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 *Sent:* Tuesday, August 17, 2010 4:44 PM
 *Subject:* RE: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

 I recently opened up a Polyphaser unit we used on one of our
 remote sites... it covered both 2m and 70cm.  We were
 experiencing poor receive at the site.  Replaced the unit and
 receiver sensitivity is once again hot.  Anyone want pics of
 the insides respond direct and I'll ship you the photos...not
 much to see... a gas tube and what looks like a surface mount
 resistor in series with the gas tube.

 73,

 Dave

 Wa3gin

 


-- 
mailto:o...@ozindfw.net
Oz
POB 93167 
Southlake, TX 76092 (Near DFW Airport) 






RE: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

2010-08-17 Thread Eric Lemmon
Mike,

Perhaps the best course is to choose the unit with the highest Joule rating
that meets your power level and frequency ratings.  Do not buy a DC-blocked
unit if you don't need that feature, because the capacitor is usually the
first component to fail.  Do not buy a used unit, because it was pulled from
service for a reason- probably because the gas tube has reached the end of
life due to multiple firings.  Finally, be certain that you have a robust
grounding connection from the PolyPhaser to Mother Earth; do not depend on
the green wire conductor in the power cord to provide this connection.

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
 

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Michael Ryan
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 11:51 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

  

 

 I notice when looking at the Polyphaser website, there are a wide range of
products, even a wide variety of items that on the surface appear to be
suited to my particular needs. I want to put a Polyphaser on my 220
repeater. There are DC blocked and unblocked. I don't suppose it matters in
that area as there is no DC going up the coax.  There are freq ranges,
1.5-400  and 100 - 700 mhz, etc, etc..  Is it best to select a model that
places my operating freq somewhere in the middle of the unit's operating
range or does that matter as long as it IS WITHIN the range of the device
someplace?  I need the protected end to be an N-female and the antenna end
to be and N-Male.   Suggestions?  - Mike



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

2010-08-17 Thread STeve Andre'
This has been a great discussion.  Eric, from the reading I've done it
didn't seem to me that the Polyphasers were the best out there, but
a European company whose initials were S + H, I think.  Care to
comment on the best ones, in your opinion?

On Tuesday 17 August 2010 21:53:30 Eric Lemmon wrote:
 Mike,

 Perhaps the best course is to choose the unit with the highest Joule rating
 that meets your power level and frequency ratings.  Do not buy a DC-blocked
 unit if you don't need that feature, because the capacitor is usually the
 first component to fail.  Do not buy a used unit, because it was pulled
 from service for a reason- probably because the gas tube has reached the
 end of life due to multiple firings.  Finally, be certain that you have a
 robust grounding connection from the PolyPhaser to Mother Earth; do not
 depend on the green wire conductor in the power cord to provide this
 connection.

 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY

 -Original Message-
 From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Michael Ryan
 Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 11:51 PM
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

  I notice when looking at the Polyphaser website, there are a wide range of
 products, even a wide variety of items that on the surface appear to be
 suited to my particular needs. I want to put a Polyphaser on my 220
 repeater. There are DC blocked and unblocked. I don't suppose it matters in
 that area as there is no DC going up the coax.  There are freq ranges,
 1.5-400  and 100 - 700 mhz, etc, etc..  Is it best to select a model that
 places my operating freq somewhere in the middle of the unit's operating
 range or does that matter as long as it IS WITHIN the range of the device
 someplace?  I need the protected end to be an N-female and the antenna end
 to be and N-Male.   Suggestions?  - Mike

-- 
STeve Andre'
Disease Control Warden
Dept. of Political Science
Michigan State University

A day without Windows is like a day without a nuclear incident.


RE: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

2010-08-17 Thread Mark
Huber and Suhner, I think is who you mean... GOOD stuff, but you pay for it.
Headquartered in Switzerland.

http://www.hubersuhner.com/products/hs-p-rf/hs-rf-lightning-protectors.htm 

Mark - N9WYS

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com On Behalf Of STeve Andre'

This has been a great discussion.  Eric, from the reading I've done it
didn't seem to me that the Polyphasers were the best out there, but
a European company whose initials were S + H, I think.  Care to
comment on the best ones, in your opinion?



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

2010-08-17 Thread Chuck Kelsey
Actually Eric brings up the more important aspect of lightning protection. 
Simply installing a PolyPhaser on your antenna line won't cut it. A 
single-point grounding panel where your transmission lines, power, 
telephone, etc. are all run through protective devices and then are tied in 
to a ground system is necessary. Leave one unprotected path available and 
you've wasted your time.

Chuck
WB2EDV


- Original Message - 
From: Eric Lemmon wb6...@verizon.net
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 9:53 PM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question


 Mike,

 Perhaps the best course is to choose the unit with the highest Joule 
 rating
 that meets your power level and frequency ratings.  Do not buy a 
 DC-blocked
 unit if you don't need that feature, because the capacitor is usually the
 first component to fail.  Do not buy a used unit, because it was pulled 
 from
 service for a reason- probably because the gas tube has reached the end of
 life due to multiple firings.  Finally, be certain that you have a robust
 grounding connection from the PolyPhaser to Mother Earth; do not depend on
 the green wire conductor in the power cord to provide this connection.

 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY

 



RE: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

2010-08-17 Thread Camilo So
Can I have a copy of the photo, it's nice to learn something from it.

 

 

73

W4CSO   Camilo

 

 

 

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of David Jordan
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 4:45 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

 

  

I recently opened up a Polyphaser unit we used on one of our remote sites.
it covered both 2m and 70cm.  We were experiencing poor receive at the site.
Replaced the unit and receiver sensitivity is once again hot.  Anyone want
pics of the insides respond direct and I'll ship you the photos.not much to
see. a gas tube and what looks like a surface mount resistor in series with
the gas tube.

 

73,

Dave

Wa3gin

 

  _  

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Oz-in-DFW
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 4:37 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

 

  Polyphasers have a shunt protection element.  It usually fails and becomes
leaky so you get a loss/VSWR indication.  It can fail open or short.  If
it's open, there is nothing to detect.  






image001.jpgimage002.jpg

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

2010-08-17 Thread Eric Lemmon
Steve,

PolyPhasers are popular with Hams and commercial users with tight budgets,
but they are the economy line as lightning and surge protectors go.  Most
cellular systems and professional installers prefer to use Huber + Suhner
protectors, which cost two or three times what a PolyPhaser costs.  I use
them at all of my repeater sites, not only because they are waterproof and
very robust, but also because the gas tube is easily replaced.  The body of
the typical unit is machined from a solid billet of stainless steel, and is
completely reliable.  More information is here:
www.hubersuhner.com/ie70/products/hs-p-rf/hs-rf-lightning-protectors.htm

H+S products are distributed through commercial communications suppliers
such as Tessco, Hutton, and Talley.  I have no financial relationship with
H+S, being just a satisfied customer.

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
 

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of STeve Andre'
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 7:53 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

  

This has been a great discussion. Eric, from the reading I've done it
didn't seem to me that the Polyphasers were the best out there, but
a European company whose initials were S + H, I think. Care to
comment on the best ones, in your opinion?

On Tuesday 17 August 2010 21:53:30 Eric Lemmon wrote:
 Mike,

 Perhaps the best course is to choose the unit with the highest Joule
rating
 that meets your power level and frequency ratings. Do not buy a DC-blocked
 unit if you don't need that feature, because the capacitor is usually the
 first component to fail. Do not buy a used unit, because it was pulled
 from service for a reason- probably because the gas tube has reached the
 end of life due to multiple firings. Finally, be certain that you have a
 robust grounding connection from the PolyPhaser to Mother Earth; do not
 depend on the green wire conductor in the power cord to provide this
 connection.

 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY

 -Original Message-
 From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com 
 [mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Michael Ryan
 Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 11:51 PM
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com 
 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

 I notice when looking at the Polyphaser website, there are a wide range of
 products, even a wide variety of items that on the surface appear to be
 suited to my particular needs. I want to put a Polyphaser on my 220
 repeater. There are DC blocked and unblocked. I don't suppose it matters
in
 that area as there is no DC going up the coax. There are freq ranges,
 1.5-400 and 100 - 700 mhz, etc, etc.. Is it best to select a model that
 places my operating freq somewhere in the middle of the unit's operating
 range or does that matter as long as it IS WITHIN the range of the device
 someplace? I need the protected end to be an N-female and the antenna end
 to be and N-Male. Suggestions? - Mike

-- 
STeve Andre'
Disease Control Warden
Dept. of Political Science
Michigan State University

A day without Windows is like a day without a nuclear incident.






Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

2010-08-17 Thread Ray Brown
  What do you do when you want to install a small UHF linking repeater on
a 4-story building that has no lightning protection on its' roof? (this is to
link an ambulance at a hospital to its' base repeater 40 miles away)

  From what I've heard, it may not be a good idea to hook it to the HVAC,
either.

  (sigh)


Ray, KB0STN




RE: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

2010-08-17 Thread Eric Lemmon
Ray,

I suggest that you obtain the most recent edition (2011) of NFPA 780, the
Standard for the Installation of Lightning Protection Systems, and install a
proper lightning protection system for your antenna and mast per that
document.  It can be purchased for about $40, but you might find a copy in a
municipal library.

Please be aware that installing an antenna atop a building that has no
lightning protection system installed may impose liability on you, if the
antenna is not protected by a proper system and a fire or other damage
occurs due to a lightning strike.  In some landmark cases, the insurance
company declined to pay for damages resulting from a poorly-designed and/or
-installed LP system.  Choose wisely...

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
   

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Ray Brown
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 8:55 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Polyphaser Question

  

What do you do when you want to install a small UHF linking repeater on
a 4-story building that has no lightning protection on its roof? (this is to
link an ambulance at a hospital to its base repeater 40 miles away)

From what I've heard, it may not be a good idea to hook it to the HVAC,
either.

(sigh)

Ray, KB0STN