Re: [Rkhunter-users] missing hashes 3

2009-01-02 Thread Nils Breunese (Lemonbit)
Dan wrote:

 Are you still getting persistent prelink errors? I have not had these
 for a very long time, and usually found that simply running 'prelink
 filename' resolves any prelink problem.

 Unfortunately so, It only happens on two binaries now but this is on  
 all
 my fully patched/updated CentOS 4.x boxes

 # prelink /usr/bin/less
 prelink: /usr/lib/libncursesw.so.5.4: .debug_loc adjusting unfinished
 # prelink /usr/bin/pstree
 prelink: /usr/lib/libncurses.so.5.4: .debug_loc adjusting unfinished

 I don't think it's a huge problem.

That seems to be a RHEL prelink bug: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240658

Nils Breunese.

--
___
Rkhunter-users mailing list
Rkhunter-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkhunter-users


Re: [Rkhunter-users] missing hashes 3

2009-01-02 Thread Dogsbody

 Unfortunately so, It only happens on two binaries now but this is on  
 all my fully patched/updated CentOS 4.x boxes

 # prelink /usr/bin/less
 prelink: /usr/lib/libncursesw.so.5.4: .debug_loc adjusting unfinished
 # prelink /usr/bin/pstree
 prelink: /usr/lib/libncurses.so.5.4: .debug_loc adjusting unfinished

 I don't think it's a huge problem.
 
 That seems to be a RHEL prelink bug: 
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240658

That's the one!  You would have thought they would have fixed it by now 
:-p  I'm not complaining though as I don't pay them any money :-)

Dan

--
___
Rkhunter-users mailing list
Rkhunter-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkhunter-users


Re: [Rkhunter-users] missing hashes 3

2009-01-02 Thread Dogsbody

 That seems to be a RHEL prelink bug: 
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240658

 That's the one!  You would have thought they would have fixed it by now 
 :-p  I'm not complaining though as I don't pay them any money :-)

 No, but we (my employers) do :-) Having said that though, this problem
 does not exist at RHEL 4.7. Which is why I asked if you were still
 having the problem. I don't see why CentOS should fail, but RHEL works
 fine. Actually I don't see this problem on any RHEL 3 or 4 servers, nor
 on CentOS 5.2.

That is a bit strange!  Reading up on some of the issues with this 
prelinking bug it certainly seems to be a little hit and miss.

 As an aside issue, could you run rkhunter with debugging enabled please:
   rkhunter --debug --enable properties
 
 and email me the resultant file. It should start
 with /tmp/rkhunter-debug, but will have random numbers/letters appended
 to the name. I have been thinking more about the problem, and would like
 to see exactly where it fails. Thanks.

Sure, will send it to you off list :-)

Dan

--
___
Rkhunter-users mailing list
Rkhunter-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkhunter-users


Re: [Rkhunter-users] missing hashes 3

2009-01-01 Thread Dogsbody

 With the release of 1.3.2 is it possible to whitelist these files or 
 do I have to hack /usr/local/bin/rkhunter again to delete the entries 
 to these three files?

 Sorry but whitelisting is still not possible with 1.3.2. It is on my
 todo list, but I have just had so much other (non-RKH) stuff to do that
 it has not progressed very far.
 
 No worries, thanks for keeping it on the radar :-)

Can I please find out if this has been implemented in v1.3.4?  I did 
look but couldn't find anything.

I have v1.3.4 up and running and it works great, thank you for a great 
tool :-)

Take care

Dan


--
___
Rkhunter-users mailing list
Rkhunter-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkhunter-users


Re: [Rkhunter-users] missing hashes 3

2009-01-01 Thread John Horne
On Thu, 2009-01-01 at 20:57 +, Dogsbody wrote:
  With the release of 1.3.2 is it possible to whitelist these files or 
  do I have to hack /usr/local/bin/rkhunter again to delete the entries 
  to these three files?
 
  Sorry but whitelisting is still not possible with 1.3.2. It is on my
  todo list, but I have just had so much other (non-RKH) stuff to do that
  it has not progressed very far.
  
  No worries, thanks for keeping it on the radar :-)
 
 Can I please find out if this has been implemented in v1.3.4?  I did 
 look but couldn't find anything.
 
No it hasn't been implemented. I cannot do it until I have fixed another
part of RKH, and I cannot do that bit because at the moment I'm having
some problems with it. (It's not an easy problem and is taking much
longer than I anticipated.)

Are you still getting persistent prelink errors? I have not had these
for a very long time, and usually found that simply running 'prelink
filename' resolves any prelink problem.




John.

-- 
---
John Horne, University of Plymouth, UK  Tel: +44 (0)1752 587287
E-mail: john.ho...@plymouth.ac.uk   Fax: +44 (0)1752 587001

--
___
Rkhunter-users mailing list
Rkhunter-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkhunter-users


Re: [Rkhunter-users] missing hashes 3

2009-01-01 Thread Dogsbody
Hi John,

 No it hasn't been implemented. I cannot do it until I have fixed another
 part of RKH, and I cannot do that bit because at the moment I'm having
 some problems with it. (It's not an easy problem and is taking much
 longer than I anticipated.)

No worries at all, I just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something 
myself :-)

 Are you still getting persistent prelink errors? I have not had these
 for a very long time, and usually found that simply running 'prelink
 filename' resolves any prelink problem.

Unfortunately so, It only happens on two binaries now but this is on all 
my fully patched/updated CentOS 4.x boxes

# prelink /usr/bin/less
prelink: /usr/lib/libncursesw.so.5.4: .debug_loc adjusting unfinished
# prelink /usr/bin/pstree
prelink: /usr/lib/libncurses.so.5.4: .debug_loc adjusting unfinished

I don't think it's a huge problem.

Dan

--
___
Rkhunter-users mailing list
Rkhunter-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkhunter-users


Re: [Rkhunter-users] missing hashes 3

2008-02-28 Thread John Horne
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 01:01 +, Dogsbody wrote:

 With the release of 1.3.2 is it possible to whitelist these files or do I 
 have 
 to hack /usr/local/bin/rkhunter again to delete the entries to these three 
 files?
 
Sorry but whitelisting is still not possible with 1.3.2. It is on my
todo list, but I have just had so much other (non-RKH) stuff to do that
it has not progressed very far.



John.

-- 
---
John Horne, University of Plymouth, UK  Tel: +44 (0)1752 233914
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Fax: +44 (0)1752 233839

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Rkhunter-users mailing list
Rkhunter-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkhunter-users


Re: [Rkhunter-users] missing hashes 3

2008-02-28 Thread Dogsbody

 With the release of 1.3.2 is it possible to whitelist these files or do I 
 have 
 to hack /usr/local/bin/rkhunter again to delete the entries to these three 
 files?

 Sorry but whitelisting is still not possible with 1.3.2. It is on my
 todo list, but I have just had so much other (non-RKH) stuff to do that
 it has not progressed very far.

No worries, thanks for keeping it on the radar :-)

Take care

Dan

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Rkhunter-users mailing list
Rkhunter-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkhunter-users


Re: [Rkhunter-users] missing hashes 3

2007-12-30 Thread Dogsbody

 It's a known problem caused by prelinking
 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240658). The rkhunter.dat
 file will have entries for these commands, but as the message says no
 *hash* entry. If you run something like 'prelink /usr/bin/less' you will
 get an error. This is what RKH sees.

Ahh, OK, thank you.  Is there any way to exclude these binaries that give 
errors?  I had a look through the /etc/rkhunter.conf file but couldn't find 
anything, perhaps remove the lines from rkhunter.dat?

 The FAQ file also mentions about the 'missing hashes' error.

Was I looking in the wrong place then?  I went to the Rootkit Hunter homepage 
[1] and clicked through to the FAQ [2] but couldn't even find the word 
missing.

Thanks again

Dan

[1] http://rkhunter.sourceforge.net/
[2] http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=35179group_id=155034

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Rkhunter-users mailing list
Rkhunter-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkhunter-users


Re: [Rkhunter-users] missing hashes 3

2007-12-30 Thread John Horne
On Sun, 2007-12-30 at 22:26 +, John Horne wrote:
 On Sun, 2007-12-30 at 13:38 +1100, Larry wrote:
  John Horne wrote:
   On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 12:54 +, Dogsbody wrote:
 
   It's a known problem caused by prelinking
 
  OK .. but how can we fix/get around this in RKHunter?
 
 The only way I can think of is if you use the RPM package manager.
 Running 'rpm -Vf /usr/bin/less' it should give no error (it will show no
 output at all). If you set the PKGMGR option in rkhunter.conf, then run
 'rkhunter --propupd' afterwards.
 
Doh! No that won't work, rpm verification uses prelinking itself. I
suspect the only possible way would be to disable the 'hashes' test
completely. I can think of no other way of avoiding the problem. I'll
look in to some method that could be used for the next release.



John.

-- 
---
John Horne, University of Plymouth, UK  Tel: +44 (0)1752 233914
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Fax: +44 (0)1752 233839

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Rkhunter-users mailing list
Rkhunter-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkhunter-users


Re: [Rkhunter-users] missing hashes 3

2007-12-30 Thread Dogsbody

 It's a known problem caused by prelinking
   
 OK .. but how can we fix/get around this in RKHunter?

 The only way I can think of is if you use the RPM package manager.
 Running 'rpm -Vf /usr/bin/less' it should give no error (it will show no
 output at all). If you set the PKGMGR option in rkhunter.conf, then run
 'rkhunter --propupd' afterwards.

 Doh! No that won't work, rpm verification uses prelinking itself. I
 suspect the only possible way would be to disable the 'hashes' test
 completely. I can think of no other way of avoiding the problem. I'll
 look in to some method that could be used for the next release.

I have just been playing around with removing the relevant three lines from the 
rkhunter.dat file but that didn't work.

The only way I have found so far is to remove the three files from 
PROP_FILE_LIST in /usr/local/bin/rkhunter.

Dan

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Rkhunter-users mailing list
Rkhunter-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkhunter-users


Re: [Rkhunter-users] missing hashes 3

2007-12-29 Thread John Horne
On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 12:54 +, Dogsbody wrote:
 Hi,
 
 After upgrading my operating system (CentOS 4.5 to 4.6) I am getting some 
 errors 
   I don't quite understand.  After upgrading I did a --propupd.
 
 # rkhunter --propupd
 [ Rootkit Hunter version 1.3.0 ]
 File updated: searched for 147 files, found 124, missing hashes 3
 
 # rkhunter --cronjob --report-warnings-only
 Warning: No hash value found for file '/usr/bin/less' in the rkhunter.dat 
 file.
 Warning: No hash value found for file '/usr/bin/lynx' in the rkhunter.dat 
 file.
 Warning: No hash value found for file '/usr/bin/pstree' in the rkhunter.dat 
 file.
 
 # grep /less /var/log/rkhunter.log
 [12:26:32] /usr/bin/less [ Warning ]
 [12:26:32] Warning: No hash value found for file '/usr/bin/less' in the 
 rkhunter.dat file.
 
It's a known problem caused by prelinking
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240658). The rkhunter.dat
file will have entries for these commands, but as the message says no
*hash* entry. If you run something like 'prelink /usr/bin/less' you will
get an error. This is what RKH sees.

The FAQ file also mentions about the 'missing hashes' error.



John.

-- 
---
John Horne, University of Plymouth, UK  Tel: +44 (0)1752 233914
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Fax: +44 (0)1752 233839

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Rkhunter-users mailing list
Rkhunter-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkhunter-users


Re: [Rkhunter-users] missing hashes 3

2007-12-28 Thread Helmut Hullen
Hallo, Larry,

Du (rkhunter) meintest am 28.12.07:

 /var/lib/rkhunter/db/rkhunter.dat
 There you should find an entry for less (among many other entrys).
 It should be a new file (produced by rkhunter --propupd).

 /usr/local/rkhunter/lib/rkhunter/db/rkhunter.dat is where I found
 mine, all of the ones RKHunter is whinging about are listed without
 hashes and show the correct path!

Strange.
Should be:
File:/usr/bin/less:hash:some1:rights:owner:group:length:some2

Viele Gruesse!
Helmut

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Rkhunter-users mailing list
Rkhunter-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkhunter-users


Re: [Rkhunter-users] missing hashes 3

2007-12-28 Thread Dogsbody
Hi Helmut,

 /var/lib/rkhunter/db/rkhunter.dat
 There you should find an entry for less (among many other entrys). It  
 should be a new file (produced by rkhunter --propupd).

Yes, as Larry says, this file seems to get updated except for the hashes for 
these three files, it's all very strange.

# grep /less /var/lib/rkhunter/db/rkhunter.dat
File:/usr/bin/less::594466:0755:0:0:101788:1158143116:

 What tells
 which -a less
 locate bin/less | grep less$

# which -a less
/usr/bin/less
# locate bin/less | grep less$
/usr/bin/less

Dan

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Rkhunter-users mailing list
Rkhunter-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkhunter-users


Re: [Rkhunter-users] missing hashes 3

2007-12-28 Thread Helmut Hullen
Hallo, Dogsbody,

Du (dan) meintest am 28.12.07:

 There you should find an entry for less (among many other entrys).
 It should be a new file (produced by rkhunter --propupd).

 Yes, as Larry says, this file seems to get updated except for the
 hashes for these three files, it's all very strange.

Just to make you nervous: can you put clean files into your computer  
(via a live CD)?
Perhaps for the md5sum job too.

 # which -a less
 /usr/bin/less
 # locate bin/less | grep less$
 /usr/bin/less

Ok - no second file.

Viele Gruesse!
Helmut

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Rkhunter-users mailing list
Rkhunter-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkhunter-users


Re: [Rkhunter-users] missing hashes 3

2007-12-28 Thread unspawn
On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 13:54:32 +0100 Dogsbody [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
# grep /less /var/lib/rkhunter/db/rkhunter.dat
File:/usr/bin/less::594466:0755:0:0:101788:1158143116:

Dan, could please you *gzip*, attach and send the log 
(/tmp/rkhunter-debug) from running 'rkhunter --debug --propupd' to 
me and John?



--
Reconnect with your classmates.  Click here for information on your classmate 
reunion.
http://tagline.hushmail.com/fc/Ioyw6h4fIDWskZcc2TRuDMuHpQ6yzIGQ9L1gVvDy2fgfmUlPgful5u/
TIA, unSpawn


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Rkhunter-users mailing list
Rkhunter-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkhunter-users


Re: [Rkhunter-users] missing hashes 3

2007-12-27 Thread Larry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hmm. Well, maybe you're not doing anything wrong. What does 'file 
 /usr/bin/less' say?
   
I am having this problem too .. tried all the 'options' resolving it 
would be nice so I do not get the compromised message each morning.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] [~]# file /usr/bin/less
/usr/bin/less: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), 
for GNU/Linux 2.2.5, dynamically linked (uses shared libs),  stripped
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [~]# file /usr/bin/lynx
/usr/bin/lynx: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), 
for GNU/Linux 2.2.5, dynamically linked (uses shared libs),  stripped
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [~]# file /usr/bin/pstree
/usr/bin/pstree: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 
(SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.2.5, dynamically linked (uses shared libs ), 
stripped


Thanks,
Larry


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Rkhunter-users mailing list
Rkhunter-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkhunter-users


Re: [Rkhunter-users] missing hashes 3

2007-12-27 Thread Dogsbody

 # rkhunter --propupd
 [ Rootkit Hunter version 1.3.0 ]
 File updated: searched for 147 files, found 124, missing hashes 3
 
 # grep /less /var/lib/rkhunter/db/rkhunter.dat
 File:/usr/bin/less::594466:0755:0:0:101788:1158143116:

 Can you please tell me what I'm doing wrong.
 
 Hmm. Well, maybe you're not doing anything wrong. What does 'file 
 /usr/bin/less' say?

Well I'm glad it's not just me :-)

# file /usr/bin/less
/usr/bin/less: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for 
GNU/Linux 2.2.5, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped

Please let me know if there is anything else I can do to help.

Dan

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Rkhunter-users mailing list
Rkhunter-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkhunter-users