Re: MSDev sim project?

2006-02-12 Thread Daniel Stenberg

On Sun, 12 Feb 2006, Thom Johansen wrote:

The sim used to be able to be built in MSDev, but not anymore. However, the 
SDL sim _should_ work fine in MSDev after you've set it up (assuming no 
Cygwin/UNIX specific functions are used).


I'd be very surprised if that worked without a sufficient amount of hand 
editing. The whole build system for Rockbox and the sim is currently quite GNU 
make and gcc centric.


--
 Daniel Stenberg -- http://www.rockbox.org/ -- http://daniel.haxx.se/


Re: MSDev sim project?

2006-02-12 Thread Thom Johansen

gl wrote:




Just not maintained, and it was for the old Win32 build which we are now
trying to phase out in favour of the SDL one.



Check.  Is the old MSDev project still in CVS, or does somebody have a 
copy? I googled one link but it's vanished.  Would anybody else be 
interested in it?

--
gl


It's probably in the CVS attic somewhere. But anyway, I'd urge you to 
start over. The
project file was old, crummy, doesn't apply to CVS these days and 
probably needs

conversion to any new version of MSDev.

Thom


Re: MSDev sim project?

2006-02-12 Thread [IDC]Dragon
  The sim used to be able to be built in MSDev, but not anymore.
 
 Did something break compatibility or was it just not maintained?  I'm
 happy 
 to update an old project if there is one.

It was me who once made the MSDev6 project for Rockbox. It's ages old, prior
to the plugin system. It was in parallel to the make files, ignoring these.
So any change had to be merged manually in there, too.
And that's how it became unmaintained.
If you really insist, I can look for the remains, but dont complain, you
have been warned.  ;-)
Debugging was a breeze with it, though...  sigh

Jörg

-- 
DSL-Aktion wegen großer Nachfrage bis 28.2.2006 verlängert:
GMX DSL-Flatrate 1 Jahr kostenlos* http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl


Re: MSDev sim project?

2006-02-12 Thread gl


It was me who once made the MSDev6 project for Rockbox. It's ages old, 
prior
to the plugin system. It was in parallel to the make files, ignoring 
these.

So any change had to be merged manually in there, too.
And that's how it became unmaintained.


Right, I wonder if it's possible to generate the project from the makefiles 
automatically?



If you really insist, I can look for the remains, but dont complain, you
have been warned.  ;-)


Yes please, you can mail it direct.
--
gl