Eliminating internal zlib.
Alexey's flushing patches to rpmio/gzdio.c make the need for internal zlib (with Rusty Russel's --rsyncable padding) superfluous. Should I rip out internal zlib on HEAD and rpm-5.1.4? I see no reason not to start this effort, and am fighting dueling -lz - -lrpmz if building --without-neon anyways. Ripping out internal zlib and backporting rpmio/gzdio.c is likely the best long term fix. 73 de Jeff __ RPM Package Managerhttp://rpm5.org Developer Communication Listrpm-devel@rpm5.org
Re: Eliminating internal zlib.
On Monday, 18 August 2008, at 18:15:53 (-0400), Jeff Johnson wrote: Alexey's flushing patches to rpmio/gzdio.c make the need for internal zlib (with Rusty Russel's --rsyncable padding) superfluous. Should I rip out internal zlib on HEAD and rpm-5.1.4? I see no reason not to start this effort, and am fighting dueling -lz - -lrpmz if building --without-neon anyways. Ripping out internal zlib and backporting rpmio/gzdio.c is likely the best long term fix. Go for it. Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Server/Cluster Admin, LBL.gov Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) --- The Road I have travelled on is paved with good intentions. It's littered with broken dreams that never quite came true. -- Restless Heart, When She Cries __ RPM Package Managerhttp://rpm5.org Developer Communication Listrpm-devel@rpm5.org
Re: Eliminating internal zlib.
In regard to: Eliminating internal zlib., Jeff Johnson said (at 6:15pm on...: Should I rip out internal zlib on HEAD and rpm-5.1.4? Yes, please. Tim -- Tim Mooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] Enterprise Computing Infrastructure 701-231-1076 (Voice) Room 242-J6, IACC Building 701-231-8541 (Fax) North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5164 __ RPM Package Managerhttp://rpm5.org Developer Communication Listrpm-devel@rpm5.org
Re: Eliminating internal zlib.
On Tuesday 19 August 2008 00:15:53 Jeff Johnson wrote: Alexey's flushing patches to rpmio/gzdio.c make the need for internal zlib (with Rusty Russel's --rsyncable padding) superfluous. Should I rip out internal zlib on HEAD and rpm-5.1.4? I see no reason not to start this effort, and am fighting dueling -lz - -lrpmz if building --without-neon anyways. Ripping out internal zlib and backporting rpmio/gzdio.c is likely the best long term fix. 73 de Jeff __ RPM Package Managerhttp://rpm5.org Developer Communication Listrpm-devel@rpm5.org Would be nice :)
