Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] The rpm Python binding may be missing a license (#1236)

2020-05-31 Thread Philippe Ombredanne
@pmatilai thank you ++ 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1236#issuecomment-636624718___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint


Re: [Rpm-maint] [Rpm-announce] RPM 4.16.0 beta1 released!

2020-05-31 Thread Thierry Vignaud
Le ven. 29 mai 2020 à 09:57, Panu Matilainen  a écrit :

>
> The gap between alpha and beta was longer than usual because we were
> waiting for bug reports for the new sqlite backend from wider exposure
> in Fedora. After two months, we figured we can't wait forever. Zero
> filed bugs is almost certainly too good to be entirely true, but it's a
> not a bad situation either.
>
> In the meanwhile, on top of the usual assorted fixes and minor
> enhancements, the highligh since the alpha is that rpm expressions
> gained native version comparison powers and new version parsing and
> comparison API was added to C and Python.
>
> Download info and the usual, including updated details and examples on
> the new expression capabilities of 4.16 at:
>
> https://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.16.0
>
> Enjoy!
>
> On behalf of rpm-team,
>
> - Panu -
>

Hi
/usr/share/man8/rpm-plugin-selinux.8 is installed even if selinux is
disabled (--without-selinux)…
See you
___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint