Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Moving unnecessary notice about empty rpm packages to debug message. (#615)
For the same reason there is ls when a script uses *. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/615#issuecomment-449497239___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Moving unnecessary notice about empty rpm packages to debug message. (#615)
You can get the list of files with rpm -q --qf='[%{FILENAMES}\n]'. There is
nothing dirty about that, those are the building blocks.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/615#issuecomment-449483367___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Moving unnecessary notice about empty rpm packages to debug message. (#615)
You can use rpm -q --qf='%{FILENAMES:arraysize}\n' to get the number of files.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/615#issuecomment-449384859___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Ignore object files as they do not have a build id (#604)
Don't make them executable. -- You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/604#issuecomment-441207296___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [PATCH] debugedit: handle RISC-V relocation
--- tools/debugedit.c | 6 ++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/debugedit.c b/tools/debugedit.c index e0b1d98d99..57cd83030f 100644 --- a/tools/debugedit.c +++ b/tools/debugedit.c @@ -1947,6 +1947,12 @@ edit_dwarf2 (DSO *dso) if (rtype != R_68K_32) goto fail; break; +#if defined(EM_RISCV) && defined(R_RISCV_32) + case EM_RISCV: + if (rtype != R_RISCV_32) + goto fail; + break; +#endif default: fail: error (1, 0, "%s: Unhandled relocation %d in .debug_info section", -- 2.16.2 -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different." ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] debugedit: handle RISC-V relocation (#407)
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/407 -- Commit Summary -- * debugedit: handle RISC-V relocation -- File Changes -- M tools/debugedit.c (4) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/407.patch https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/407.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/407 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Human readable size in --queryformat (#375)
... | numfmt --field 1 --to=iec -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/375#issuecomment-354421883___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] rpm without TTY gives wrong error message (#355)
It's actually rpmlock_acquire not setting errno when it returns with a failure when asked to write-lock a read-only lock. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/355#issuecomment-343745260___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [PATCH] Don't lose errno from rpmPackageFilesInstall
There are a lot of ways to lose the value of errno after a failed
rpmPackageFilesInstall. Typically, stdio will call isatty which then
overwrites errno with ENOTTY. Save and restore errno between the return
from rpmPackageFilesInstall and the logging of the error. There may be
more opportunities inside rpmPackageFilesInstall to clobber the real
errno which I haven't investigated yet.
---
lib/psm.c | 6 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/psm.c b/lib/psm.c
index df09bd3..e327bba 100644
--- a/lib/psm.c
+++ b/lib/psm.c
@@ -806,6 +806,7 @@ static rpmRC rpmpsmStage(rpmpsm psm, pkgStage stage)
case PSM_PROCESS:
if (psm-goal == PKG_INSTALL) {
int fsmrc = 0;
+ int saved_errno = 0;
rpmpsmNotify(psm, RPMCALLBACK_INST_START, 0);
/* make sure first progress call gets made */
@@ -820,6 +821,7 @@ static rpmRC rpmpsmStage(rpmpsm psm, pkgStage stage)
fsmrc = rpmPackageFilesInstall(psm-ts, psm-te, psm-fi,
payload, psm, psm-failedFile);
+ saved_errno = errno;
rpmswAdd(rpmtsOp(psm-ts, RPMTS_OP_UNCOMPRESS),
fdOp(payload, FDSTAT_READ));
@@ -834,7 +836,9 @@ static rpmRC rpmpsmStage(rpmpsm psm, pkgStage stage)
rpmpsmNotify(psm, RPMCALLBACK_INST_STOP, psm-total);
if (fsmrc) {
- char *emsg = rpmcpioStrerror(fsmrc);
+ char *emsg;
+ errno = saved_errno;
+ emsg = rpmcpioStrerror(fsmrc);
rpmlog(RPMLOG_ERR,
_(unpacking of archive failed%s%s: %s\n),
(psm-failedFile != NULL ? _( on file ) : ),
--
1.8.3.1
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
And now for something completely different.
___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [Suse patch] debugedit: include compilation directory if used
Michael Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 02:25:23PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: Michael, any idea what the case behind this patch was? It's not that I object to it or anything, I just have no clue what this is supposed to be doing :) I just asked Andreas Schwab, the guy who created the patch. He said that it is needed so that one can translate relative pathnames to absolute ones. (CC to Andreas, maybe he can shed some more light on this.) compilation directory + relative file name must be a valid file name, which can only be true when the compilation directory exits. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED] SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 And now for something completely different. ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org https://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
