[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Documentation about Python bindings (#1001)
Is there a place where one can get info on the Python bindings? Like explaining all the API and what types of data is returned. Thanks. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1001___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] find-debuginfo.sh: decompress DWARF compressed ELF sections (#473)
@pmatilai With latest elfutils, is this commit still posing a problem? It lives as a patch in Fedora's RPM SPEC, but is not present in EPEL8 which will cause issues with Golang packages. -- You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/473#issuecomment-566788937___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: Disable subpackage check at SRPM build time (#674)
> `%gopkg` should not expand to `%pre` if no package is generated by that macro. I do not understand what you mean. `%gopkg` does not expand at SRPM build time, that's the crux of the issue. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/674#issuecomment-485232297___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: Disable subpackage check at SRPM build time (#674)
> Meh, I think everything needs to be correctly set during build of SRPM too. What is your solution to our current conundrum then? go-rpm-macros can't be in the default buildroot and rpm fails without it. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/674#issuecomment-485150434___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Disable subpackages checking for scriptlets when building SRPM (#675)
Fix #674. Signed-off-by: Robert-André Mauchin It's a bit hackish, and I don't really know C, but it works. Hopefully someone will review it please? Go-SIG is kind of on the clock due to our Change Proposal. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/675 -- Commit Summary -- * Disable subpackages checking for scriptlets when building SRPM -- File Changes -- M build/rpmspec.h (1) M build/spec.c (2) M rpmbuild.c (7) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/675.patch https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/675.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/675 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: Disable subpackage check at SRPM build time (#674)
Following my issue #672: In Golang packaging (Fedora), the -devel subpackages are computed by a Lua macro called `gopkg`. They are handled by the `go-rpm-macros` package. This package is a BR for all Go packages, so available when we build the RPM. However, since it is not in the default BuildRoot (and won't ever be as it pull Golang as a dep), it is not available at SRPM build time. As such, `gopkg` is not expanded as SRPM build time. This cause issue with package containing scriplets: ``` error: line 41: %pretrans devel -p : package golang-github-hashicorp-cleanhttp-devel does not exist ``` The check in place notices that the -devel subpackage do not exist. We would like you to disable this type of check when we're building a SRPM so we don't encounter such failures. The SRPM build part of rpmbuild should not worry about subpackages, only the RPM build part should. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/674___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Regression: rpmbuild/rpmspec do not expand macros before checking subpackages (#672)
I've been very stupid and lost much time on this. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/672#issuecomment-484309849___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Regression: rpmbuild/rpmspec do not expand macros before checking subpackages (#672)
Closed #672. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/672#event-2284310420___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Regression: rpmbuild/rpmspec do not expand macros before checking subpackages (#672)
4.13.0.2 works. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/672#issuecomment-484220430___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Regression: rpmbuild/rpmspec do not expand macros before checking subpackages (#672)
In Golang packaging (Fedora), the -devel subpackages are computed by a Lua
macro called gopkg.
In rpm 4.14.2, if I try to rpmbuild the SPEC containing such macros and a
scriptlet, I get:
```
error: line 41: %pretrans devel -p
: package golang-github-hashicorp-cleanhttp-devel does not exist
```
Similarly if I run rpmspec -P on the SPEC, the macros are not expanded:
```
%description
Convenience utilities for acquiring "clean" http.Transport and http.Client
structs
%gopkg
%prep
%goprep
```
However in EPEL7, with rpm 4.11.3, it works fine: srpm is built and rpmspec -P
expands the macros:
```
Convenience utilities for acquiring "clean" http.Transport and http.Client
structs
%package -n golang-github-hashicorp-cleanhttp-devel
Summary:Convenience utilities for "clean" http.Transport and
http.Client structs
BuildRequires: go-rpm-macros
BuildArch: noarch
%description -n golang-github-hashicorp-cleanhttp-devel
Convenience utilities for acquiring "clean" http.Transport and http.Client
structs
This package contains the source code needed for building packages that
reference the following Go import paths:
– github.com/hashicorp/go-cleanhttp
%prep
%setup -q -n go-cleanhttp-0.5.1
rm -fr "/builddir/build/BUILD/go-cleanhttp-0.5.1/vendor"
if [[ ! -e"/builddir/build/BUILD/go-cleanhttp-0.5.1/_build/bin" ]]
; then
install -m 0755 -vd "/builddir/build/BUILD/go-cleanhttp-0.5.1/_build/bin"
export
GOPATH="/builddir/build/BUILD/go-cleanhttp-0.5.1/_build:${GOPATH:+${GOPATH}:}/usr/share/gocode"
fi
if [[ ! -e
"/builddir/build/BUILD/go-cleanhttp-0.5.1/_build/src/github.com/hashicorp/go-cleanhttp"
]] ; then
install -m 0755 -vd "$(dirname
/builddir/build/BUILD/go-cleanhttp-0.5.1/_build/src/github.com/hashicorp/go-cleanhttp)"
ln -fs "/builddir/build/BUILD/go-cleanhttp-0.5.1"
"/builddir/build/BUILD/go-cleanhttp-0.5.1/_build/src/github.com/hashicorp/go-cleanhttp"
fi
cd
"/builddir/build/BUILD/go-cleanhttp-0.5.1/_build/src/github.com/hashicorp/go-cleanhttp"
```
Something has changed between 4.11.3 and 4.14.2 that makes the macros not being
expanded.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/672___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: BuildRequires generator (#104)
Will it be possible to condition BR generator to output only main deps without tests deps? In some case it could be useful to break a cyclic deps to not have the tests deps included. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/104#issuecomment-475771193___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Dynamic Build Dependencies (#593)
Great work Florian, I hope to see this merged soon! (Not so keen on %generate_buildrequires, it's a bit long) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/593#issuecomment-475354984___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: add way to set macro for --nocheck in rpmbuild (#316)
+1 so this. Please make it possible. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/316#issuecomment-475006060___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
