Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add support for sysusers group membership lines (PR #2990)
@pmatilai approved this pull request. Other than the dependencies doc nit, looks fine to me now. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2990#pullrequestreview-1978812025 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Support for 'm' in sysusers file? (Issue #2816)
Closed #2816 as completed via ad0eb9a461bce444271d9cf18748e8de821a8960. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2816#event-12352560560 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Ignore non-scriptlet weak dependencies in ordering (PR #3004)
Merged #3004 into master. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3004#event-12352564263 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Transaction ordering should break dependency loops at weak dependencies (if there are any) (#1346)
Closed #1346 as completed via #3004. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1346#event-12352564431 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add support for sysusers group membership lines (PR #2990)
Merged #2990 into master. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2990#event-12352560333 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: ensure unwritable buildroot during %check (Issue #3010)
Having a separate short-circuit for check is fine, but it's NOT the same benefit! I get that you look at the world through mock lenses, but not everybody does :smile: -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3010#issuecomment-2036261052 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add support for sysusers group membership lines (PR #2990)
@ffesti pushed 1 commit. c3ea56e308e81e83a55ffb1a5b4fe5bb4b6b7cad Add support for sysusers group membership lines -- View it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2990/files/8558a2c2bf06c4b89a4ea59b50cedb80b00c6d87..c3ea56e308e81e83a55ffb1a5b4fe5bb4b6b7cad You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: execute rpmbuild tests as a regular user (Issue #3005)
> I believe this is not true. I see no code in rpmbuild that would elevate UID > to root. Nor any consolehelper. Nor setuid bits. In the container. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3005#issuecomment-2036268291 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RPM v6 package format draft, major update (Discussion #2919)
How about defaulting to Zstd compression as opposed to Gzip? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2919#discussioncomment-9014566 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: add option to use an external decompressor to rpm2cpio and rpm2archive (Issue #1939)
@pmatilai As a behavioral change, perhaps this is suitable for RPM v6? (as in v6 of the tool, not v6 of the format) -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1939#issuecomment-2038570348 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RPM v6 package format draft, major update (Discussion #2919)
It's not a bad idea. Gzip is getting a bit long in the tooth, and I guess all distros moved to something better 10-15 years ago. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2919#discussioncomment-9017177 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: add option to use an external decompressor to rpm2cpio and rpm2archive (Issue #1939)
Uh? This would be just an extra option, not replace any existing functionality. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1939#issuecomment-2038983260 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Bump version to 5.99.90 to begin a new devel cycle (PR #3016)
Let the floodgates open! You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3016 -- Commit Summary -- * Bump version to 5.99.90 to begin a new devel cycle -- File Changes -- M CMakeLists.txt (2) M tests/pinned/rpmsigdig.txt (6) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3016.patch https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3016.diff -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3016 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3...@github.com ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] First batch of v6 package format (PR #3017)
Merged #3017 into master. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3017#event-12355437943 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Ensure rpmbuild's cleanup doesn't fail due to permissions (PR #3006)
If this breaks something, we're not going to find it by studying this on a petri-dish. I'll merge and if all hell breaks loose in testing, we'll just revert the damn thing. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3006#issuecomment-2036326288 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Ensure rpmbuild's cleanup doesn't fail due to permissions (PR #3006)
Merged #3006 into master. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3006#event-12352647299 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Ensure %clean always succeeds (Issue #2519)
Closed #2519 as completed via #3006. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2519#event-12352647496 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Stop populating os and arch in the lead structure (Issue #2368)
Closed #2368 as completed. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2368#event-12355469187 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Stop populating os and arch in the lead structure (Issue #2368)
Done in #3017 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2368#issuecomment-2036746689 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Ensure unique tags in signature header (#1570)
The tag conflicts between signature and header are gone as of #3017, what remains is to error out if tags >= 1000 are found in v6 signature header. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1570#issuecomment-2036760091 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Random failure on dependency generation 3 test (Issue #2470)
Reopened #2470. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2470#event-12354300211 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Random failure on dependency generation 3 test (Issue #2470)
Not so fast it seems, I just got this: ``` +++ /srv/rpmtests.dir/at-groups/353/stderr 2024-04-04 08:40:58.419002150 + @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -error: Illegal char '*' (0x2a) in: * +error: failed to write all data to /tmp/bad.req: Broken pipe ``` But at least it's now hinting at the problem. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2470#issuecomment-2036561135 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] First batch of v6 package format (PR #3017)
Here we go. Details in commits, and this is obviously nowhere near complete, the v6 work will be on-going throughout the year. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3017 -- Commit Summary -- * Start a v6 format draft doc * Add tests for v6 package structure and digests, equal to v4 just now * First commit of rpm v6: add version switch, drop obsolete signature tags * Introduce new payloadsize + alt tags in the v6 main header * Always use long filesizes and the new non-cpio payload format on v6 * Add a new unique v6-only reserved signature tag below header base * Add rpm package format version as a tag to = v6 packages. * Dont populate os and arch in the lead structure * Bump the rpm version in the lead to 4 for v6 packages -- File Changes -- M build/files.c (7) M build/pack.c (49) M build/rpmbuild_internal.h (1) M build/spec.c (1) A docs/manual/format_v6.md (132) M docs/manual/index.md (1) M include/rpm/rpmtag.h (6) M lib/rpmlead.c (10) M lib/signature.c (15) M lib/signature.h (4) M macros.in (6) M sign/rpmgensig.c (7) M tests/data/misc/rpmdump4.txt (4) A tests/data/misc/rpmdump6.txt (394) M tests/pinned/common/buildrepr.sh (1) M tests/pinned/common/rpmsigdig.sh (2) M tests/pinned/rpmsigdig.txt (2) A tests/pinned/rpmsigdig6.sh (5) A tests/pinned/rpmsigdig6.txt (11) M tests/rpmgeneral.at (3) M tests/rpmpkgfmt.at (17) M tests/rpmsigdig.at (3) M tools/rpmdump.c (1) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3017.patch https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3017.diff -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3017 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3...@github.com ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Default to 64bit size tags in headers (#864)
Done in #3017 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/864#issuecomment-2036747341 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Default to 64bit size tags in headers (#864)
Closed #864 as completed. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/864#event-12355475047 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Phasing out obsolete crypto in rpm (#1292)
Obsolete crypto tags are gone from v6 packages in #3017 , what remains to be done is disabling validation on those by default. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1292#issuecomment-2036758478 You are receiving this because you commented. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Bump version to 5.99.90 to begin a new devel cycle (PR #3016)
Merged #3016 into master. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3016#event-12354439990 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Start a v6 format draft doc (PR #2988)
Closed #2988. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2988#event-12355359872 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Pass arg3 to regular and file trigger scripts (PR #3018)
Details in the commit messages (GH didnt populate the description automatically for some reason). You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3018 -- Commit Summary -- * Rename script-args to script-prog * Replace hacky hge-style array with ARGV_t * Pass scriptlet args via a new function internally * Pass arg2 (albeit -1) to transaction triggers too * Pass arg3 to regular and file trigger scripts -- File Changes -- M docs/manual/file_triggers.md (2) M docs/manual/triggers.md (9) M include/rpm/argv.h (9) M lib/psm.c (11) M lib/rpmscript.c (63) M lib/rpmscript.h (7) M lib/rpmtriggers.c (10) M lib/rpmts_internal.h (2) M lib/transaction.c (5) M rpmio/argv.c (27) M tests/data/SPECS/filetriggers.spec (2) M tests/rpmscript.at (74) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3018.patch https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3018.diff -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3018 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3...@github.com ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] %transfiletriggerin doesn't share what's in transaction (#386)
As mentioned above, this is indeed expected behavior; when the trigger source is part of the transaction, the trigger is also activated, and is fed *all* the matching prefixes. It's analogous to *all* the packages shipping files in the `/` prefix being part of the transaction. That said, I can see how this would be useful to distinguish in the trigger so I've submitted #3018. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/386#issuecomment-2037045744 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
